20:00:02 RRSAgent has joined #webauthn 20:00:02 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/11/17-webauthn-irc 20:00:04 RRSAgent, make logs Public 20:00:06 Meeting: Web Authentication WG 20:00:49 wseltzer has changed the topic to: 17 November https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webauthn/2021Nov/0071.html 20:00:52 Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webauthn/2021Nov/0071.html 20:00:58 chair: Nadalin, Fontana 20:01:03 John_Bradley has joined #webauthn 20:03:52 matthewmiller has joined #webauthn 20:05:20 nina has joined #webauthn 20:07:02 present+ davidturner, elundberg, jpascoe, jeffh, johnbradley, matthewmiller, nina, ranjivaprasad, sbweeden, timcappalli 20:07:14 present+ jfontana, nadalin, wseltzer 20:07:40 nadalin: 1663 20:07:53 jeffh: I believe I've addressed elundberg's comments 20:08:15 jfontana_ has joined #webauthn 20:08:24 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1663 20:09:02 nadalin: 1621 20:09:02 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1621 20:10:02 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1576 20:10:18 nina: still some comments to be added. 20:10:43 jeffH: other discussion in git-hub 20:10:55 ...please review 20:11:24 jeffH: also in credential management PR 155 20:11:38 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1425 20:12:02 tony: no resoluitioin 20:12:10 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1680 20:12:37 tony: jeffH looked at this? 20:12:55 jeffH: agl is out, he will look when he comes back. 20:14:08 tony: a few untriaged issues 20:18:02 nsteele has joined #webauthn 20:18:35 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1683 20:18:55 mattM: people wondering how to work with these 20:19:05 ...we need the libraries 20:19:22 ...native API functionality perhaps 20:19:38 NSteele: others asking about this 20:20:18 mattM: could we tackle this as either bytes or strings 20:20:26 ...would it be a ctap thing? 20:24:46 jbradley: don't think we want to touch this with CTAP 20:25:39 mattM: not proposing we touch CTAP 20:27:07 JeffH: higher priority things to do, we would have to see what people come up with 20:27:59 nina: might be better things to work on . But we want a good experience for developers. 20:28:17 tony: leave this one in the un-triaged spot 20:28:25 ? 20:28:37 s/work on/work on, because there are JS libraries/ 20:28:40 ...I will put this in futures. 20:30:46 nsteele: agree we should bet this slated for level 3. better to have it sooner 20:30:58 ...put it in milestone objective 20:31:07 ...we can start a discussion in the community group. 20:32:16 tony: someone will have to support this before we close out level 3 20:32:33 jeffH: if there is a solid proposal, we can look at it. 20:33:37 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1681 20:33:49 jeffH: do we know where caBLE stands now 20:33:56 ...work in progress 20:34:09 present+ 20:34:18 ...further work in FIDO Alliance 20:34:39 present+ 20:34:52 tony: may impact FIDO but maybe not webauthn 20:34:58 ...triage or futures 20:35:08 ...will leave it here for now. 20:35:38 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1667 20:35:55 The community group will discuss writing a proposal for https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1683 at the next meeting 20:35:57 jeffh: forked into a separate issue? 20:36:36 jbradley: desire for cross origin get assertion without iFrame in non-payment context? 20:36:56 jeffH: presently , can do it, so it should be good enough for this point in time 20:37:18 jbradley: this may only be in payments context re: SPC 20:39:58 shane: if can do in iFrame, it might be good enough 20:44:04 jbradely: we need some decision around this. 20:48:31 tony: any other issues to talk about? 20:49:14 nsteele: on #1683, community group will work on it and get back to you 20:49:42 rrsagent, draft minutes 20:49:42 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/17-webauthn-minutes.html wseltzer