13:42:53 RRSAgent has joined #rqtf 13:42:53 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/11/17-rqtf-irc 13:42:55 RRSAgent, make logs public 13:42:56 Zakim has joined #rqtf 13:42:57 Meeting: Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group Teleconference 13:42:58 Date: 17 November 2021 13:43:23 chair: jasonjgw 13:43:26 present+ 13:43:46 agenda+ Revision of CAPTCHA Note. 13:43:46 agenda+ Accessibility of remote Meetings. 13:43:46 agenda+ Natural Language Interface Accessibility User Requirements. 13:43:46 agenda+ Synchronization Accessibility User Requirements. 13:43:46 agenda+ RQTF and COGA: potential research topics. 13:43:48 agenda+ Miscellaneous issues and TPAC 2021 observations. 13:44:09 zakim, list agenda 13:44:09 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda: 13:44:10 1. Revision of CAPTCHA Note. [from jasonjgw] 13:44:10 2. Accessibility of remote Meetings. [from jasonjgw] 13:44:10 3. Natural Language Interface Accessibility User Requirements. [from jasonjgw] 13:44:10 4. Synchronization Accessibility User Requirements. [from jasonjgw] 13:44:10 5. RQTF and COGA: potential research topics. [from jasonjgw] 13:44:11 6. Miscellaneous issues and TPAC 2021 observations. [from jasonjgw] 13:57:09 Judy has joined #rqtf 13:58:32 janina has joined #rqtf 13:59:51 scott_h has joined #rqtf 14:01:45 Joshue108_ has joined #rqtf 14:02:11 zakim, who is on the phone? 14:02:11 Present: jasonjgw 14:02:16 SteveNoble has joined #rqtf 14:02:20 present+ 14:02:27 present+ 14:03:23 zakim, next item 14:03:23 agendum 1 -- Revision of CAPTCHA Note. -- taken up [from jasonjgw] 14:03:33 Scribe: Joshue108 14:04:31 JW: This is the working group note 14:04:38 There is a CFC at the moment 14:04:39 present+ 14:04:50 Should conclude tonight 14:05:01 We hope to enable republication, then have a review 14:05:10 ~https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa-admin/2021Nov/0000.html 14:05:25 This relates to the new W3C process doc etc 14:05:36 JS: E'one here should have voted. 14:05:41 Please do if not. 14:05:58 JW: No dissent 14:06:37 JW: On the substance - there is a proposal that Janina referred to, from Cloudflare to use the Web Authenticaltion API 14:06:55 To assert the user is a person 14:07:23 Then they can proceed. The second part strengthens privacy a la zero knowledge proofs etc 14:07:58 2 part proposal from Cloudflare - interesting as it looks like it will do e'vthing that CAPTCHA does, and could be a comple CAPTCHA replacement 14:08:19 Interesting solution, potentially better than others. 14:08:30 JW: I've drafted changes that describe the proposal 14:08:36 q+ 14:08:58 ack jan 14:09:25 JS: I agree that is a strong proposal that we should give serious consideration too.. 14:09:40 s/too../to. 14:09:46 JS: We will have some edits 14:10:22 There is also economic advise that should make it into the intro 14:10:38 It is costly to use CAPTCHA, in terms of frustration and wasted time 14:10:56 We need to publish this note as a FPWD 14:11:06 And signal to the community we are working on this document 14:12:02 SH: +1 on the really good data on the cost of using CAPTHCA from Cloudflare 14:12:15 JW: I've a branch, with these changes - not merged 14:12:34 JW: Is that reasonable? 14:12:49 How long do we want to wait for comments? Xmas etc 14:13:01 At least until the end of Jan or Feb for comments. 14:13:10 SH: I'd support that. 14:13:36 RK: Regarding timeline, the holidays are coming soon and I'm not familiar with the process, so can we include that info in email? 14:13:51 And have more knowledge - I'm listening and learning 14:14:13 JW: We want to propose late Jan. 14:14:27 JW: Publication will for sure not happen before Dec. 14:14:36 14:15:11 q? 14:16:39 JS: This becomes another kerbcut - not just an a11y issue but of benefit for all 14:16:56 JW: I will look for editing opportunitites 14:17:06 q+ to ack Judys request 14:17:54 JS: 14:18:28 ack me 14:18:29 Joshue108_, you wanted to ack Judys request 14:19:05 JW: We are not meeting next week 14:19:19 we can schedule in Dec or Jan 14:19:34 JS: Beginning in Jan? 14:19:42 JW: We can look at their availability. 14:19:58 JOC: No meeting on the 24th 14:20:14 nor the 22nd or 29th 14:21:45 RESOLUTION: RQTF would very much like to meet the Flash mitigation folks in either Dec 1, 8 or 15 or Jan 5th, 12, 19 or 26 14:22:26 @judy - check resolution for possible dates 14:22:48 JS: Anything else on CAPTHCA? 14:23:01 JS: Confirming our bibliography errors? 14:23:07 JW: No issues 14:23:45 zakim, agenda? 14:23:45 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda: 14:23:46 1. Revision of CAPTCHA Note. [from jasonjgw] 14:23:46 2. Accessibility of remote Meetings. [from jasonjgw] 14:23:46 3. Natural Language Interface Accessibility User Requirements. [from jasonjgw] 14:23:46 4. Synchronization Accessibility User Requirements. [from jasonjgw] 14:23:46 5. RQTF and COGA: potential research topics. [from jasonjgw] 14:23:46 zakim, next item 14:23:47 6. Miscellaneous issues and TPAC 2021 observations. [from jasonjgw] 14:23:47 agendum 2 -- Accessibility of remote Meetings. -- taken up [from jasonjgw] 14:24:35 JS: Thank you Scott for going through the outcomes from TPAC - I have worked thru and added to tracker etc 14:24:40 I've commented etc 14:25:10 s/JS: Thank/JW: Thank 14:25:36 JW: Lets do this Async etc on Github etc so we can make progress etc 14:25:49 We can come back in two weeks then. Sound ok? 14:25:56 SH: Sounds good 14:27:20 Lets all look at the issues 14:27:27 There is a label in GH that we can use 14:28:04 We have had not much comment outside of TPAC 14:28:30 If we have issues to discuss, lets do that now? 14:28:50 Good progress 14:28:58 zakim, next item 14:28:58 agendum 3 -- Natural Language Interface Accessibility User Requirements. -- taken up [from jasonjgw] 14:31:44 JW: We had a good discussion at the WAI CooP Symposium 14:32:02 I've circulated the ref to the chatbot a11y paper that was mentioned 14:32:21 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rqtf/2021Nov/0031.html 14:32:40 Chatbot Accessibility Guidance: A Review and Way Forward. 14:32:45 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-16-1781-2_80 14:32:54 JW: Discussion? 14:33:12 JOC: Would this be a useful reference to include? 14:33:38 JW: Not really sure - its more of a lit review - but does highlight issues that we may want to discuss. 14:33:55 JOC: You may give a precis of the issues and we could discuss. 14:34:38 JW: If you have Springer access.. 14:34:43 SN: I may do. 14:35:19 JW: I'll finish parsing it. They are planning to release more material in December. 14:35:47 JS: COGA are actively working on comments 14:38:09 JW: 14:38:42 zakim, next item 14:38:42 agendum 4 -- Synchronization Accessibility User Requirements. -- taken up [from jasonjgw] 14:39:27 JW: We have had comments from the breakout session 14:39:41 Steve N is looking at issues and is starting to comment 14:39:50 JW: Co-ordination? 14:40:09 SN: A few of these appear to be old issues. 14:40:18 Some are process issues and can be closed. 14:40:37 There was a bibliography comment - a la W3C style. 14:41:00 How you reference a standard etc, journal articles/ 14:41:14 JW: We have used that in the past - may need to convert refs. 14:41:38 SN: Specref - I've looked at it - does it apply to journals 14:41:50 14:44:40 JS: Wait a little Steve until we have ported repositories 14:46:07 SN: I'll review 14:46:23 JS: We can get those into a branch - then we migrate that over to a new repo 14:46:28 Like we did with CAPTCHA 14:47:05 JS: We can work through the comments etc 14:47:30 q? 14:47:36 zakim, next item 14:47:36 agendum 5 -- RQTF and COGA: potential research topics. -- taken up [from jasonjgw] 14:49:18 JW: These topics are back on the agenda - we have not had a specific list but we have a general idea - that we got at the joint meeting 14:49:32 Anything to say? 14:50:10 JS: Yeah, I've told them there will be scrutiny in terms of the task force workstatements 14:50:40 Mental health issues were not a part of the original assignment, but that was many years ago. 14:51:05 They are not charters to produce deliverables that relate to mental health 14:51:27 Not currently in scope - there is an early non-vetted draft. 14:51:56 I told them we would get to it, and co-ord with AGWG. Likely Jan. 14:52:16 JS: 14:53:01 JW: Understood 14:53:41 This TF look forward to discussing when the COGA TF approaches us again. 14:55:34 SH: 14:56:24 q? 14:56:39 JW: 14:58:15 SH: 14:59:03 q+ 14:59:35 ack me 15:01:13 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:01:13 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/17-rqtf-minutes.html Joshue108_ 15:01:45 zakim, bye 15:01:45 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been jasonjgw, Joshue108_, SteveNoble, scott_h 15:01:45 Zakim has left #rqtf 15:01:50 rrsagent, make minutes 15:01:50 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/17-rqtf-minutes.html jasonjgw 15:04:32 I hear you, but you don't seem to hear me 15:37:54 janina has left #rqtf