15:41:11 RRSAgent has joined #apa 15:41:11 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/11/17-apa-irc 15:41:13 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:41:16 Meeting: Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group Teleconference 15:41:16 Date: 17 November 2021 15:41:16 agenda? 15:41:22 zakim, clear agenda 15:41:22 agenda cleared 15:41:26 Chair: Janina 15:41:26 agenda+ Agenda Review & Announcements 15:41:26 agenda+ CfC on CAPTCHA https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa-admin/2021Nov/0000.html 15:41:29 agenda+ Task Force Updates 15:41:32 agenda+ FAST Update 15:41:34 agenda+ New Charters Review https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Horizontal+review+requested%22 15:41:37 agenda+ A11y Review Comment Tracker https://w3c.github.io/horizontal-issue-tracker/?repo=w3c/a11y-review 15:41:40 agenda+ CSS Update https://github.com/w3c/css-a11y/issues 15:41:43 agenda+ new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html 15:41:45 agenda+ Actions Checkin (Specs) https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/open 15:41:48 agenda+ Dangling Spec Review Cleanup: https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Category:Spec_Review_Assigned 15:41:51 agenda+ Other Business 15:41:53 agenda+ be done 15:48:00 regrets: Becky_Gibson, John_Foliot, Gottfried_Zimmerman, David_Fazio 16:58:09 IrfanA has joined #apa 16:58:17 present+ 16:59:50 anevins has joined #apa 17:01:58 anevins_ has joined #apa 17:03:16 Lionel_Wolberger has joined #apa 17:03:20 present+ 17:03:23 Fredrik has joined #apa 17:03:27 present? 17:03:30 present+ 17:03:31 q? 17:03:35 agenda? 17:03:38 present+ 17:03:48 scribe: Fredrik 17:03:49 present+ 17:03:57 scribe: Lionel_Wolberger 17:04:20 zakim, next item 17:04:20 agendum 1 -- Agenda Review & Announcements -- taken up [from janina] 17:05:35 janina: Happy Thanksgiving to our American participants, no meeting next week Nov 24th 17:05:44 zakim, next item 17:05:44 agendum 2 -- CfC on CAPTCHA https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa-admin/2021Nov/0000.html -- taken up [from janina] 17:06:17 janina: Reminder to APA members, cfc open for the Captcha note 17:06:29 ... updating the note with some work from Cloudflare 17:07:01 ... Our consensus is, we need a good Turing test (bots are bad), but the current Captcha fails accessibility and fails for other reasons 17:07:23 ... We can go beyond the 'note' which is only our opinion 17:07:24 q+ 17:07:32 ... and turn this into a statement by the W3C 17:07:58 ... this new process to elevate the NOTE to a STATEMENT, as well wanting to add more info regarding the CLoudflare updates 17:08:19 q+ 17:08:57 mike_beganyi has joined #apa 17:09:08 ... process: (1) publish fpwd of this note, then (2,3...) you can read in the cfc in email 17:09:09 q? 17:09:13 ack fr 17:09:35 Fredrik: Is cloudflare interested in being included in our process, and if so, how? 17:09:40 present+ 17:10:50 janina: Cloudflare did show interest in being involved. Let's complete our cfc then reach out (if we decide we want to reach out) 17:11:12 ... let's go one step at a time. First complete the cfc, then get consensus 17:11:24 ... likely will also push to have them become W3C members 17:11:35 Fredrik: What are they proposing? 17:12:02 janina: Research Questions has pulled together the technical process they are suggesting, using the W3C API for validating the person, 17:12:23 q- 17:12:32 ... we will likely also involve Lionel to evaluate the authorization and authentication process as he has experience in identity issues 17:12:49 ... cloudflare has data on how captcha failures are hurting e-commerce 17:12:57 ... these facts will be super useful to add to the paper 17:13:05 ... good captcha is another "curb-cut" 17:13:07 q? 17:13:41 ack and 17:14:08 anevins_: We recently audited Captcha against 2.1 17:16:33 MichaelC: We will add Andrew to Research Questions 17:17:03 http://github/w3c/captcha-accessibility/ 17:17:08 kirkwood has joined #APA 17:17:08 anevins_: Please put a link to the git for this Captcha/a11y repo, and the preview 17:17:30 s|http://github/w3c/captcha-accessibility/|https://github.com/w3c/captcha-accessibility/| 17:18:09 https://w3c.github.io/captcha-accessibility/ 17:19:08 anevins_: Regarding the audit. Google Recaptcha version _ against WCAG 2.1 AA 17:19:34 q? 17:19:38 ack anevins_ 17:20:24 janina: This note on captcha was reviewed by a Google engineer and they did not find issues with it 17:20:58 zakim, next item 17:20:58 agendum 3 -- Task Force Updates -- taken up [from janina] 17:23:00 janina: Research Questions has a lot of documents in the air 17:23:09 ... is ready to take the Captcha note onto their 'plate' 17:23:29 ... in addition to the XAUR, remote meetings, nat'l language, (and janina listed five others) 17:23:52 janina: Personalization is doing well with its i18n issue 17:25:40 Lionel_Wolberger: Yes, we got the symbols thanks to Steve Lee 17:26:32 janina: P11n (pronunciation) is doing a panel presentation on the specification 17:26:38 ... TPAC gave feedback as well 17:27:16 q? 17:27:52 janina: COGA working on providing feedback on RQTF documents and are working to meet the timeline 17:28:32 ... COGA's desire to work on mental health issues likely requires an update to their work statement 17:28:50 ... they are gathering potential issues that may be useful to address 17:28:55 Regarding the audit. Google Recaptcha version 3 against WCAG 2.1 AA 17:29:03 q? 17:29:11 zakim, next item 17:29:11 agendum 4 -- FAST Update -- taken up [from janina] 17:29:44 MichaelC: Framework for Accessible Specification of Technologies (FAST) is a bit stalled 17:29:51 ... not much to report in the last week 17:30:04 zakim, next item 17:30:04 agendum 4 was just opened, Lionel_Wolberger 17:30:12 zakim, close this item 17:30:12 agendum 4 closed 17:30:13 I see 8 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:30:13 5. New Charters Review https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Horizontal+review+requested%22 [from janina] 17:30:23 zakim, next item 17:30:23 agendum 5 -- New Charters Review https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Horizontal+review+requested%22 -- taken up [from janina] 17:30:52 https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues/291 17:31:00 https://w3c.github.io/secondscreen-charter/ 17:31:34 MichaelC: Second Screen Working Group 17:31:46 janina: That group has high turnover 17:32:13 MichaelC: Adding "define APIs to query windows positions and position windows on multiple screens" and more... 17:32:31 q+ 17:33:22 janina: We want this spec to speak about "discovering devices" and not just displays 17:34:10 ... "second screen" does not mean a second SCREEN, it means multiple devices 17:34:38 ... "second screen" is a shorthand idiom to speed discussion, such as "watching a movie" 17:34:50 ... we know it's not a movie, it's an idiom to simplify discussion 17:35:17 ... second screen refers to many different devices 17:35:43 Lionel_Wolberger: The spec says " e-book readers, phones, tablets, laptops, auto displays, and electronic signs." 17:36:01 ... allow these devices to use secondary audio and video presentation devices available in the local environment, attached by wired connections or remotely with wireless, peer-to-peer media. 17:37:07 ... can you tell us more about these multiple screens 17:37:53 janina: In the Media Accessibility User Requirements we spoke about how the alternative representations (such as captions, or audio descriptions) 17:38:01 ... will often be available on other devices 17:38:30 ... in a Broadway theater the audio descriptions can be made available by wifi to people's personal android devices 17:38:39 ... these secondary devices are critical 17:39:18 ... refreshable braille displays, bluetooth headphones, chromecast devices, any technology that will participate in consuming a media resource 17:39:35 ... the primary display carries the primary, and the secondary can carry the secondary 17:39:57 Lionel_Wolberger: The name "second screen" obfuscates 17:40:11 janina: But the alternative name was really long, awkward and hard to remember 17:40:46 ... like blind people 'watch TV' using the proximate meaning 17:41:25 ... using an even tempered scale metaphor--losing the perfect fifth enabled us to integrate more notes and melodies 17:41:44 ... A good moment to remind people about the MAUR (Media Accessibility User Requirements) 17:41:52 ... this was the first *AUR 17:42:05 ... HTML5 brought the media support that APA asked for 17:42:14 ... with the exception of one item 17:42:34 ... we accomplished this with use cases, user scenarios, a markup technology that could support an extensible list of these support version 17:43:23 ... we invented a term which we called the PRIMARY video resource and then the ALTERNATIVE 17:43:33 ... the video provided as video and the video provided as text 17:43:48 ... we are still developing what we have developed for HTML 5 17:43:56 q? 17:44:04 ack li 17:44:06 ack Lionel_Wolberger 17:44:10 zakim, next item 17:44:10 agendum 6 -- A11y Review Comment Tracker https://w3c.github.io/horizontal-issue-tracker/?repo=w3c/a11y-review -- taken up [from janina] 17:45:32 MichaelC: Nothing new this week 17:45:40 zakim, close this item 17:45:40 agendum 6 closed 17:45:41 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:45:41 7. CSS Update https://github.com/w3c/css-a11y/issues [from janina] 17:45:42 zakim, next item 17:45:42 agendum 7 -- CSS Update https://github.com/w3c/css-a11y/issues -- taken up [from janina] 17:46:48 janina: Need a new representative from CSS. Amy has moved on, thanks to Amy for the splendid job she did keeping us synchronized 17:47:26 ... We have spoken with the CSS chairs and will follow-up after Thanksgiving 17:47:29 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2021Nov/0016.html 17:48:33 CCSS highligh API 17:48:34 An example: In data analysis, highlights are used to indicate any number of things - errors, outliers, or like the example in my comment in the issue: user sentiments. Highlights are also used in data analysis for medical literature to highligh medical conditions or symptom keywords. 17:50:27 Issue 6498 on how the CSS highlight API is exposed to the accessibility tree ( https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6498). 17:51:04 q? 17:51:26 janina: Do we agree to track this? 17:51:33 ... No one disagrees. 17:52:15 ... If a site associates certain color highlights with certain semantic meanings, that is something that APA would be interested in 17:52:34 Fredrik: Personalization would seem to be in scope of semantics like this 17:53:20 janina: Maybe we can write an accessibility section that points to Personalization, where we could specify how a highlight color is associated with a color 17:54:00 Lionel_Wolberger: ARIA-labelled_by could handle this 17:54:15 janina: But this is wider than just assistive technology, it would be helpful to keep it in Personalization scope 17:55:24 ... colorization is becoming more sophisticated and deserves to be associated with semantics 17:58:13 MichaelC: "Figure out how highlights are exposed to the accessibility tree" is in our tracker 17:58:17 ... shall I block? 17:58:22 janina: Let's block 17:58:42 https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6498 17:58:57 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/17-apa-minutes.html MichaelC 18:00:16 zakim, next item 18:00:16 agendum 8 -- new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html -- taken up [from janina] 18:00:50 janina: Thanks everyone for a productive meeting, see you in two weeks. 18:01:30 r symptom keywords. [19:50] Issue 6498 on how the CSS highlight API is exposed to the accessibility tree ( https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6498). [19:50] * trackbot doesn't understand that ISSUE command. [19:51] q? [19:51] * Zakim sees no one on the speaker queue [19:51] janina: Do we agree to track this? [19:51] ... No one disagrees. [19:52] rrsagent, make minutes 18:01:40 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/17-apa-minutes.html Lionel_Wolberger 18:06:50 MichaelC_ has joined #apa 18:12:11 janina has changed the topic to: APA Weekly Teleconference; Wednesday 1 December at 1700Z 18:24:50 micro__ has joined #apa 18:30:10 MichaelC has joined #apa