12:52:08 RRSAgent has joined #wot 12:52:08 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/11/10-wot-irc 12:52:32 meeting: WoT-IG/WG 12:52:40 present+ Kaz_Ashimura 12:53:47 Mizushima_ has joined #wot 13:00:32 stevelee has joined #wot 13:01:10 ktoumura has joined #wot 13:01:57 present+ Kunihiko_Toumura 13:02:19 present+ Ege_Korkan 13:02:55 regrets+ Michael_McCool 13:03:03 present+ Sebastian_Kaebisch 13:05:22 dape has joined #wot 13:05:23 present+ Daniel_Peintner 13:06:50 present+ Tomoaki_Mizushima 13:07:57 scribenick: dape 13:08:49 TOPIC: Minutes approval 13:09:03 -> https://www.w3.org/2021/11/03-wot-minutes.html 13:10:07 ryuichi has joined #wot 13:10:43 present+ Michael_Lagally 13:11:17 SK: Minutes approved 13:11:21 Ege has joined #wot 13:11:55 -> https://www.w3.org/2021/10/27-wot-minutes.html vF2F Day 4 13:12:56 SK: could add link to scripting slides 13:13:00 Kaz: will do 13:13:38 https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/main/PRESENTATIONS/2021-10-online-f2f/2021-10-27-WoT-F2F-Scripting%20API.pdf 13:14:01 SK: Scripting minutes are ok 13:14:21 SK: Next is last day of TPAC 13:14:31 -> https://www.w3.org/2021/10/28-wot-minutes.html 13:14:48 i/are ok/(link for Daniel's slides added)/ 13:15:13 https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/main/PRESENTATIONS/2021-10-online-f2f/2021-10-28-WoT-F2F-OPC-UA.pdf 13:15:43 SK: OPCUA presentation can also be added, see link above 13:16:26 SK: another topic was T2TRG/DID 13:16:52 (link for Sebastian's slides added) 13:17:49 SK: Finally we talked with Manu Sporny about TD versioning 13:17:58 ... outcome was *new* namespace 13:18:19 SK: Next was PF and testing report 13:19:32 No objections to approve minutes -> publish 13:19:46 SK: All other minutes are already approved 13:20:03 TOPIC: Current WG Charter Extension 13:20:11 present+ Ryuichi_Matsukura 13:20:33 SK: Talked in Editors call about 12 month extensions (vs 6 month) 13:20:57 mlagally has joined #wot 13:20:58 q+ 13:21:23 ... Kaz mentioned concerns about longer review phase 13:22:18 ... I prefer having stricter deadlines 13:22:46 ... however having 6 month first and extending later causes issues 13:23:22 ... McCool supports 12 month extension but would like to stick to current roadmap 13:23:44 s/month/months/ 13:23:51 s/month/months/ 13:24:02 SK: I agree with that 13:24:05 s/current/the current/ 13:24:31 SK: other opinions? 13:24:33 q? 13:24:56 Kaz: I agree with SK & McCool 13:25:04 ... 2 more points 13:25:53 ... 1. Official review needed for longer than 6 months anyway 13:26:21 q+ 13:26:25 ack k 13:26:30 ... 2. feature freeze within this year 13:26:57 ML: I think we need specific dates 13:27:13 ... REC in 6 months is desirable 13:27:30 ... most people start implementing once the spec is final 13:28:06 s/feature freeze/basically we're already in "wrapping-up" mode and the extended period (regardless of whether it's 6mo or 12mo) should be used for the wide reviews and test work. Feature freeze should be done/ 13:28:10 ... hence, we should try not to delay 13:28:15 q+ 13:28:26 ack ml 13:28:32 q+ 13:28:50 ... at the moment it is not clear what we do in the second 6 months period 13:28:56 ack mlagally 13:29:07 Kaz: ML, great comment 13:29:20 ... we suggest to keep tight schedule 13:29:30 ... should check schedule weekly 13:29:57 ... in 2nd half we can start thinking about next charter 13:30:14 ... we don't need to wait till end of charter 13:31:31 ... the 2nd half can be used for review comment but we can restart earlier with next charter 13:31:42 s/for review comment/for review comments 13:31:49 ack kaz 13:32:26 Ege: Step 3 (wide review) in plan can take 6 months 13:32:31 q+ 13:32:40 ... the plan does not mention it 13:33:05 ... by mid May we can start incorporating comments 13:33:09 present+ Michael_Koster 13:33:39 ... Q: Can we incorporate things also after CR phase ? 13:33:57 Kaz: We can ask for review earlier 13:34:14 ... after CR we cannot change normative part 13:34:28 ... changes means new CR 13:34:56 ... -> should ask for review early 13:35:12 SK: Yes, we should start with asking for review soon 13:35:27 s/changes means/changing normative parts means/ 13:36:13 -> https://www.w3.org/Guide/documentreview/ wide review guideline 13:36:42 Kaz: The wide review has been improved 13:36:54 ... should be quicker than in the past 13:37:03 ack e 13:37:08 s/has/process has/ 13:37:16 SK: Yes, should start review process in December 13:38:18 q? 13:38:27 ML: 2 comments 13:38:58 ... 1. Group-wide review should not take more than 3 months 13:39:19 q+ 13:39:21 ack ml 13:39:36 ... 2. Not sure what we mean by "relevant features" 13:39:56 SK: Yes, there seems to be some misunderstanding 13:40:20 ... task force should decide what goes into TDv1.1 13:40:40 ... or what should be deferred to 2.0 13:41:16 present+ Cristiano 13:41:21 ML: Normative features, not sure what we mean by that 13:41:52 SK: We just need to clarify 13:42:06 ML: maybe change "covered" to be "included" 13:42:27 ... this seems clearer 13:42:37 q? 13:42:54 Kaz: w.r.t. point 0 in extension plan 13:43:11 ... McCool removed Architecture 13:43:37 ... I would like to see all 4 normative documents (TD, Arch, Profile & Discovery) 13:44:12 q+ 13:44:15 q+ 13:44:17 ... TD and Arch seems stable 13:44:39 ML: For the profile I don't think it is realistic 13:45:31 ... profile freeze cannot be done in some days 13:46:16 Kaz: Clarification for normative sections are different from feature freeze 13:46:31 ... structure should be clarified first 13:46:58 Ege: I don't think this is possible for Profile now 13:47:04 ML: We still have issues 13:47:07 ... we need to decide 13:47:24 ... it is pre-mature to decide at the moment 13:48:05 q? 13:48:07 q+ 13:48:36 Kaz: We need to have a date "when" Profile can be clarified 13:49:01 ML: Structure/features need to be done by end of January 13:49:14 q? 13:49:20 ack kaz 13:49:22 ack mlagally 13:49:26 ack sebastian 13:49:35 q+ 13:50:06 SK: Point 0 (zero) is not about decisions. It is rather about clarifications ... 13:50:15 ... should we remove Point 0 ? 13:50:26 ... it seems to confuse people 13:50:35 q? 13:50:36 ack s 13:51:07 ML: Still don't know about canonical features 13:51:45 SK: TD should be freezed by Dec 15 13:52:49 ... we miss implementation of canonical feature 13:52:55 qq+ 13:52:58 ack k 13:53:02 ... this would mean removing it 13:53:03 ack k 13:53:03 kaz, you wanted to react to s 13:53:23 Kaz: point 0, need to identify structure first 13:53:30 ... details later 13:53:53 ... if we cannot do that, I don't believe in the deadlines 13:54:05 ... TD/Arch stable 13:54:29 ... profile work still ongoing, but we can add "at risk" statements 13:55:00 ML: If we want to make progress, I think we should remove point 0 13:55:03 q? 13:55:28 Ege: Kaz mentioned TD/Arch are stable 13:55:41 qq+ 13:55:46 ack e 13:55:47 ... I think there is still some work needed 13:56:19 q? 13:56:48 https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/625 13:57:08 Kaz: The pending PRs to Arch do not change feature. It is more about restructuring 13:57:20 Ege: Issue 625 is a blocker to me 13:57:50 SK: I guess we should tackle this issue in Arch call 13:58:07 ... what about point 0 13:58:39 Kaz: I suggest to decide on structure 13:58:52 ... we are already in wrapping-up mode 13:59:14 ... we should not add big changes now 14:00:10 ML: Agree that we need to decide on structure 14:00:28 ... removing an entire structure is not what we want 14:00:44 Kaz: Should concentrate on sections that are incomplete 14:01:56 Kaz: Point 0 -> could be rephrased -> look into sections that need improvement 14:02:43 SK: 14:02:58 ML: Okay 14:03:49 Kaz: 12 month extension with 6 months schedule ok by everyone? 14:04:10 SK: About 12 months, should we make decision today? 14:04:40 Kaz: PLH proposed a quick resolution 14:05:28 ML: I think 8 people in the call are not enough 14:06:21 Kaz: Makes sense, but we have all main editors in the call. McCool agreed with 12 m also 14:07:01 ML: I am still concerned? 14:07:23 SK: What about decision in Arch call tomorrow? 14:07:30 Kaz/ML: +1 14:07:59 (preliminary resolution now; and confirmation tomorrow) 14:08:07 s/8 people/10 people/ 14:08:44 DP: suggest to send email about 12 m extension plan 14:09:42 s|Kaz/ML|ML| 14:10:15 s|(preliminary resolution now; and confirmation tomorrow)|kaz: preliminary resolution now; and confirmation tomorrow| 14:10:37 preliminary proposal: the group decide to extend the current WG charter for 12month. A final decision will be made in tomorrow's Architecture call. An email will be send to the WG group as reminder. 14:10:55 s/send/sent/ 14:11:09 preliminary resolution: the group decide to extend the current WG charter for 12month. A final decision will be made in tomorrow's Architecture call. An email will be sent to the WG group as reminder. 14:11:43 TOPIC: Rechartering 14:11:52 SUBTOPIC: IG Charter re-Chartering status 14:12:04 -> https://www.w3.org/2019/10/wot-ig-2019.html 14:12:27 Kaz: Issue#274 -> https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues/274 14:12:57 .. related to wot-marketing Issue 217 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/217 14:13:16 .. related wot-testing Issue 198 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/198 14:14:23 SK: change marketing to CG? 14:14:52 Kaz: we can do so in the future, but should not do that now since we have it in the draft already 14:16:12 Kaz: I suggest we should have a resolution mentioning that we update charter 14:16:13 proposal: the group agrees that the text proposal from https://github.com/w3c/wot/issues/986#issuecomment-951852452 for the PlugFest report and https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/217#issuecomment-964100511 for marketing description. The new IG charter will be updated based on those text. 14:16:38 s(I am still concerned?/I am still concerned because major contributors are not on this call and may not have the bandwidth to continue attending meetings for a year/ 14:16:39 resolution: the group agrees that the text proposal from https://github.com/w3c/wot/issues/986#issuecomment-951852452 for the PlugFest report and https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/217#issuecomment-964100511 for marketing description. The new IG charter will be updated based on those text. 14:16:51 s/I am still concerned?/I am still concerned because major contributors are not on this call and may not have the bandwidth to continue attending meetings for a year/ 14:17:34 rrsagent, make log public 14:17:39 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:17:39 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/10-wot-minutes.html kaz 14:17:47 [adjourned] 14:17:52 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:17:52 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/10-wot-minutes.html kaz 14:18:20 [TD call in 40 mins] 14:18:44 stevelee has joined #wot 14:51:27 stevelee has joined #wot 14:54:43 stevelee_ has joined #wot 16:20:15 Zakim has left #wot