13:37:45 RRSAgent has joined #coga 13:37:45 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/11/04-coga-irc 13:37:47 RRSAgent, make logs public 13:37:47 Zakim has joined #coga 13:37:49 Meeting: Cognitive and Learning Disabilities Accessibility Task Force Teleconference 13:37:49 Date: 04 November 2021 13:38:33 agenda+ TPAC highlights and followups 13:38:53 Check in with all sub-groups and action requests 13:39:11 agenda+ Check in with all sub-groups and action requests 13:39:38 agenda+ Reminder: no meeting on Thanksgiving (November 25th) 13:40:05 agenda+ new times for subgroups 13:41:23 agenda+ AG process (for WCAG) https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/AG_process 13:47:57 agenda+ personlization module 1 with Matt https://www.w3.org/TR/personalization-semantics-content-1.0/ 13:48:06 Fazio has joined #coga 13:55:54 Matthew_Atkinson has joined #coga 14:00:56 cweidner has joined #Coga 14:01:07 julierawe has joined #coga 14:01:33 present+ 14:01:45 present + 14:01:54 EA has joined #coga 14:02:00 scribe: EA 14:02:03 present+ 14:02:06 Rain has joined #coga 14:02:30 Present+ 14:03:22 next item 14:03:50 present+ 14:04:16 Feedback - 2 people interested in joing the task force 14:04:40 Lisa expressed thanks to all those involved in making the slides etc. 14:05:30 present+ 14:05:38 present+ 14:05:48 Lisa felt that the fact that we offered ourselves as a useful resource was helpful and the workplace group are involved in diversity and they have follow ups for review 14:06:02 q+ 14:06:22 The workforce suggested quick ref card and training - Rain to follow up with what the time frames may be 14:07:18 Mental health group to review research and feedback - if any research groups have question - could ask them to link up 14:07:19 ack j 14:08:01 Julie wanted to remind Lisa and Rain - how to work with Coga - suggested one page sheet as a summary and offered to work on the idea 14:08:15 Lisa felt we needed to find out the time frame 14:08:24 q? 14:08:28 q+ 14:08:34 Julie suggested it was asked in general with no urgency 14:09:14 q- 14:09:35 Lisa mentioned the slides and wondered if there is a need to make the short summary but need time to review it as to what is actually needed 14:10:03 Julie just wanted to make sure everyone was aware there was a request for the one page summary 14:10:46 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cognitive-a11y-tf/2021Nov/0006.html 14:10:58 Lisa mentioned that we need to work with APA in a little bit of a better way - 2 specifications - natural language interface and user requirements was one 14:12:02 Lisa went on to describe what Natural Language meant - speech recognition etc and considered this was an opportunity to engage. JK wrote an issue paper on speech recognition 14:12:37 Lisa mentioned that the second APA spec was on remote meetings - needs to also be reviewed 14:12:38 q? 14:13:01 I will be looking at them this week, as well 14:13:08 Lisa has offered to take a quick look and see if more time is needed 14:13:44 Lisa siad we have an Action item to improve communication between the two groups 14:14:15 q? 14:14:20 Rain and Lisa will deal with the internationalisation item - Silver was also good - Lisa asled if there were any other points 14:14:22 next item 14:14:49 https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/coga/wiki/Actions_Requests 14:15:46 Need to update survey status and review AG's process 14:15:49 next item 14:16:10 next item 14:16:15 https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/AG_process 14:17:02 This has been added more as a reminder and items will be discussed in 2 weeks time. They have made steps for the various stages. 14:17:22 Need to participate in the steps - mature from stable 14:17:27 The chairs will send the PR to the working group through a survey and then discuss the results in the working group meeting. 14:18:04 q? 14:18:29 If this cannot be achieved we will have problems and it will cause issues so please look at the document and provide feedback 14:18:43 https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/AG_process 14:18:43 q+ 14:19:03 btw: the diagram is quite good/helpful 14:19:16 “Workflow diagram” 14:19:31 next item 14:19:31 Rachel will be on the call next week so can have her support on the next call 14:19:39 ack r 14:19:58 John K said the diagram was very helpful 14:20:15 next item 14:21:29 The different subgroups can be a bit overwhelming so possibly have the 2 hours after this call as a chance to discuss items - a block of time to give to coga subgroups each week 14:22:18 +1 sounds better to have them on the same day 14:22:40 Julie asked if this was changing the time to the same day - Thursdays rather than other days in the week 14:23:10 Lisa confirmed that there was a block of time for subgroups - may not be as long as 2 hours but at least have some time 14:23:48 Julie felt this might be a long time - cognitive load - a lot of time at one time 14:23:58 I think it makes coordination a bit easier to have a solid “working time” for the task force but doesn’t necessarily need to be after this meeting. 14:23:58 Is it really going to be 3 hours? 14:24:43 +1 and I can do a poll for the Task Force to find the right time block 14:25:43 +1 14:25:48 Lisa said you do not have to attend to all - just might make it easier than doing it on several days in the week. Does anyone dislike the idea? 14:26:02 next item 14:26:13 close item 5 14:26:24 Here's the link to the slides, video and minutes from our TPAC week 1 breakout session, in which we presented the full set of slides: https://www.w3.org/2021/10/TPAC/breakouts.html#Oct18-01 (the hash part of the URL may change, but it's the first session on this page anyway) 14:26:56 Lisa said the follow up with Matt is to help more users with the personalisation attributes. 14:27:29 Matt joined in the conversation 14:27:48 There is a full recording of the set of slides and meeting. 14:29:02 Isn't that a facebook tag line? 14:31:03 Matt went through the slides in Zoom and talked about the power of the adaptations they can make automatically with the help of authors - introduced 6 ttributes in the first part of the spec. 14:31:20 correct ttributes to attributes 14:31:55 Matt went through the attributes. 14:33:10 The attributes are not yet standard so dashes are being used. 14:34:37 q? 14:37:53 q+ 14:38:01 is this scalable, or compressible to mobile? 14:39:13 present+ 14:39:34 Jennie has joined #coga 14:39:38 present+ 14:40:21 Lisa asked - one to one mapping - can be more and much happens at the user end - codes and qualifiers - one through a browser extension and also adds code to a web apge 14:40:23 Here's a link to part of the latest spec, which covers these attributes: https://w3c.github.io/personalization-semantics/content/#purpose-explanation 14:40:24 web page] 14:40:30 present+ 14:40:48 present+ 14:41:04 Lisa added you can add different symbols - a lot of flexibility 14:41:08 q? 14:41:10 ack d 14:41:25 ack l 14:41:56 q? 14:42:00 q+ 14:43:28 q+ 14:45:21 Users could upload their own symbol sets. 14:45:31 ack ea 14:49:13 +1 to EA, like the word read in its different meanings 14:49:27 q+ 14:49:42 EA: If you have three many to many, choose the most likely based on the context E.g., “spring” could be the weather, a coil, or to jump 14:50:20 Lisa: the symbols are not words, they are concepts, but there are IDs. 1263 is specific 14:50:48 EA: correct, but the problem is that the numbers are different across different symbol sets. So we would need a universal number that the sets map their symbols to 14:51:44 Example: in an online text about another country 14:52:07 EA: at the user end, they may come across a context where something is different. The user can be confounded by the amount available. So the context becomes important. 14:53:21 Lisa: at the user agent level, can choose a symbol set as a default and how you want numbers displayed 14:53:29 ... this will help us choose the symbol set if you don't have one 14:53:41 ... and this will help you choose how you want it rendered 14:53:52 ... all these things can be left to the user agent, not the specification 14:54:34 EA: think we need to look at it really in depth, because there are some issues there even around the user choice. Needs to be carefully debated. Very aware that situations when working on web pages and looking at them, how you choice the symbols has implifications especially around simplification. 14:55:11 EA: simplification alongside the symbols, very intertwined. Must happen together. 14:55:29 Thank you rain 14:55:30 ... text even at a 12 year old level is still very difficult for making very good selections 14:55:31 Raine 14:55:37 sorry spelling!! 14:56:00 Matt will share developments in the future 14:56:23 Matt confirmed user needs will be paramount 14:56:41 Q? 14:56:53 ack l 14:56:54 Matt wants ot get it right and felt it was very near to being complete 14:57:12 Working with Steve Lee to provide examples 14:57:58 Lisa suggested the need to have advice - .svgs, contrast, no clutter, etc best practice for user agent, symbol set and author 14:58:25 Lisa - next step - taking 4 items... Matt? 14:59:02 Matt felt that he could not speak for personalisation but felt review of this part of the spec would help - technical review - feedback would help 14:59:34 Other modules - general issues around user needs - metadata to help 15:00:40 Lisa - Collect more questions - would this help Matt was asked - just the 4 concepts - email thread to Personalisation 15:01:32 +1 and to set up on multiple computers (home, work, mobile...) 15:02:23 q+ 15:02:28 matt mentioned - a proxy server as an option 15:03:13 matt - spectrum of users - a lot of possibilities - wondering if we have a small group together to meet up with personalisation group 15:04:03 Wouldn’t it make sense to bring it to our group meeting? 15:04:24 Matt said need real examples first - then Lisa suggested we review - follow on meetings - Jennie will send email with remote users and firewalls 15:04:59 Lisa asking if we need to set up a google doc or wait for examples. 15:05:56 Lisa - do we need more code examples and/or more demos? 15:05:58 I would need time to think about that 15:06:32 q+ 15:07:31 Matt just working on a procedural idea as a recipe - Steve Lee working on it. 15:07:51 Have to leave for another meeting, thank you, Matt! 15:08:32 Jennie as if there was anyone from the Microsoft team on the subject 15:10:42 ack Jennie 15:11:15 Thank you Matt 15:11:47 Lisa said if there are anymore comments - add to list 15:13:30 rrsagent, make minutes 15:13:30 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/04-coga-minutes.html LisaSeemanKest_ 15:26:18 hdv has joined #coga 16:49:36 kirkwood has joined #COGA 17:15:29 bkardell_ has joined #coga 17:24:41 stevelee_ has joined #coga