13:46:55 RRSAgent has joined #i18n 13:46:56 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/10/28-i18n-irc 13:47:18 Meeting: Internationalization WG 2021 TPAC (Thursday, 28 Oct) 13:47:23 Chair: Addison Phillips 13:47:28 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/10/28-i18n-minutes.html addison 13:47:59 Note: we're meeting with COGA on #coga 13:50:00 Agendums: https://www.w3.org/wiki/I18N_2021_TPAC 13:53:38 o Join link: https://mit.zoom.us/j/676992029?pwd=Y21saTN6V1lla2R1NC9xOG9Ub2VDZz09 13:53:50 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/10/28-i18n-minutes.html addison 14:00:01 r12a has joined #i18n 14:00:50 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/10/28-i18n-minutes.html addison 14:01:06 JcK_ has joined #i18n 14:01:31 xfq has joined #i18n 14:05:37 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/10/28-i18n-minutes.html addison 14:07:57 I am apparently not sufficiently important and/or registered to get in on the COGA channel. See you next week 14:10:35 Tried to follow the email instructions and log in via some TPAC channel. Not letting me in. If there is a direct Zoom link, I'm happy to try, but also just noticed that I can't immediately get to the slides (organizers don't know my Google account and I'm reluctant to tie it to general W3c business) 14:13:04 try Join link: https://mit.zoom.us/j/676992029?pwd=Y21saTN6V1lla2R1NC9xOG9Ub2VDZz09 14:16:06 Got it. Thx. 14:37:56 castastrophe_ has joined #i18n 14:46:37 MURATA_ has joined #i18n 14:46:48 present+ 14:47:54 plh has joined #i18n 15:00:47 COGA minutes are at: https://www.w3.org/2021/10/28-coga-minutes.html 15:01:10 Should I join a different Zoom conference? 15:01:19 addison has joined #i18n 15:01:20 i18n's one 15:02:04 xfq has joined #i18n 15:02:13 I am afraid that I cannot find the link for the zoom teleconf 15:04:04 by mail? 15:05:22 Thanks! 15:05:41 Richard, no trouble hearing you... but... 15:07:19 scribe: atsushi 15:07:22 I didn't get the message about this session being shifted and will have to drop off in about 5 minutes 15:08:05 topic: agenda review 15:08:08 fantasai has joined #i18n 15:08:13 present+ 15:08:19 present+ 15:08:21 [no objection from call] 15:08:21 Topic: Ruby 15:08:26 topic: ruby a11y 15:08:38 [self introduction from Murata Makoto] 15:09:15 murata: I gave a talk at APAWG on ruby related roles, and will be explained later here 15:09:21 https://github.com/Japan-Daisy-Consortium/documents/wiki/Text-to-Speech-of-Electronic-Documents-Containing-Ruby:-User-Requirements 15:09:29 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/10/28-i18n-minutes.html addison 15:09:41 murata: hope to create a WG Note based on above wiki page contents 15:09:55 ... and hope to be a joint of A11y and i18n WGs 15:10:12 murata: let me demonstrate insteresting examples on ruby T2S 15:10:23 ... how harmful double reading is 15:10:55 ... double reading means to T2S both base and ruby annotation, sometimes that make reading totally incorrect 15:11:22 present+ 15:11:26 present+ 15:11:45 ... so, double reading is quite dangerous 15:11:56 ... but for some ruby used for non phonetics, but as annotation 15:12:04 ... slide p3 15:12:47 ... for these cases, double reading is the most appropriate 15:13:06 ... on that point, we need to be possible to specify whether phonetics or annotation 15:13:15 ... slide p4 15:13:35 ... another example why reading phonetic ruby can be dangerous 15:15:00 ... these examples are very carefully selected, although 15:15:39 ... ruby is in Kana characters, sometimes will cause additional issue, like Ha and Wa 15:16:19 murata: there are many issues on T2S of ruby, so I would want to publish a WG Note on this point 15:16:23 q+ 15:16:30 ack r 15:16:54 r12a: looking at wiki page, have two things I don't really know 15:17:04 ... one is how to publish as a joint WG Note 15:17:18 q+ 15:17:26 ... you want to wait movement of a11y along with i18n movement 15:18:06 ... if it doesn't provide explicit instructions on handling on ruby T2S, it doesn't work 15:18:19 murata: working on another companion document on this point 15:18:30 ... but not sure how to finish that document 15:18:36 q+ 15:19:05 ... on a11y tools, engines, etc., toolchain is complecated 15:19:16 ack p 15:19:44 plh: Murata is not a part of groups? need to join. 15:19:53 ... it is a Note, not rec-track matter 15:20:25 ... if this document will move to rec-track later, issue need to raise, although 15:21:11 addison: if we are to have a joint publication, one WG should host or? 15:21:36 r12a: a bit more background, this is coming from JL-TF under IG, like simple-ruby, which is published through i18n wG 15:21:40 s/wG/WG/ 15:22:15 plh: owner ship transfer is fine if both groups agree 15:22:35 ... if one group owns the documentation, that group need to issue CfC 15:22:59 ... would not change anything on publication process 15:23:15 q+ 15:23:22 ack r 15:23:25 qq+ 15:23:33 fantasai: need to involve a11y groups to get attention 15:24:08 ... it would be difficult to get attention from them, where they don't have an experties on that area 15:24:27 ... but, formal approval need to go through both groups 15:24:28 ack r 15:24:28 r12a, you wanted to react to r12a 15:24:43 i18n has the expertise to support the editor 15:24:55 r12a: document has currently use in i18n area, and having a related document within us 15:25:06 but a11y needs to be involved, because this requires changes to a lot of things, from specs to OS APIs 15:25:13 ack f 15:25:17 having it a joint publication means a11y needs to pay attention 15:25:52 fantasai: need to have a consensus on whether rec-track 15:26:31 ... several items need to be considered on ruby T2S, like how T2S handles ruby or markup 15:26:56 ... also we need update on html 15:27:42 q- 15:27:52 r12a: question in my mind, bidi document is in similar situation 15:27:57 s/need to have a consensus on whether/this document would not ever become/ 15:28:15 ... i18n WG raised issue on that document to external groups 15:28:21 (for reference: https://www.w3.org/TR/html-bidi/) 15:28:34 ... to Makoto, is it ok to publish as i18n WG Note, or still want to involve a11y 15:28:49 murata: no strong opiniton, but want to get attention from a11y colleagues 15:28:51 s/also we need update on html/this document would serves similar role as JLREQ or Aharon's bidi problems in HTML document, explaining the problems but not inventing solutions 15:29:03 ... I've gate a talk about my proposal of two ARIA roles on ruby 15:29:24 ... for first role, it was pointed to be submitted to whatwg 15:29:48 ... for second one, one points to agree with ARIA role, but some points to be as whatwg attribute 15:30:04 i/r12a: question/fantasai: the NOTE would open up the problem space and explain it, and other REC-track documents would be written informed by this NOTE/ 15:30:28 addison: we have a tracking issue for Whatwg repositories, and label your one with that after adding issue 15:30:30 q+ 15:30:40 r12a: should we add, or HTML WG? 15:31:03 fantasai: it is also for ruby element? 15:31:17 plh: WICG is an option 15:31:37 ... they incubate new items in html, and some will be brought 15:32:02 s/it is also for ruby element?/need to resolve question of whether ruby is being specced in WHATWG or W3C first/ 15:32:23 ... advantage over ARIA is a support by browsers and tools 15:32:58 addison: what is next step? 15:33:05 ... currently don't have a document 15:33:14 ... do you have a sense when document will come? 15:33:30 murata: hope to create an html document by respec, once repository is available 15:33:54 r12a: where do we create was in discussion, in jlreq could be easy 15:34:09 ... if we want to have as a joint document, we may need to consider 15:34:33 plh: when creating new repositories, consider who to own 15:34:48 addison: I will create, but also we need to ask a11y to be interaction 15:34:51 murata: ARIA and APA 15:35:05 fantasai: ARIA is not an WG? 15:35:06 s/I will create/If we create/ 15:36:14 s/ARIA is not an WG?/ARIA is more about defining aria roles, right? But this is a use cases document, not defining aria roles/ 15:36:14 [please correct here...] 15:36:52 addison: murata-san, already have discussion with a11y, do they surpirise if we ask them on this? 15:37:05 murata: I've already talked with a11y, and they should know 15:37:12 ... they are not @@1 15:37:24 s/@@1/not yet enthusiastic/ 15:37:24 s/[please correct here...]/What we document is not a solution. Although it may be related to ARIA, it is mainly an a11y use case./ 15:37:26 addison: measn they don't want to work on this or? 15:37:37 action: addison: reach out to APA about potential joint publication of T2S ruby requirements with I18N 15:37:38 Created ACTION-1090 - Reach out to apa about potential joint publication of t2s ruby requirements with i18n [on Addison Phillips - due 2021-11-04]. 15:37:43 murata: seems not understanded yet 15:37:51 s/a solution/a technical solution/ 15:37:53 addison: will start conversation with them 15:38:22 action: atsushi: create repo for ruby t2s doc 15:38:22 Created ACTION-1091 - Create repo for ruby t2s doc [on Atsushi Shimono - due 2021-11-04]. 15:38:27 r12a: will create repo, and review doucment carefully and send feedback to Murata 15:38:29 -san 15:38:58 topic: self introduction from Maud Stiernet 15:39:34 maud: coming from AIRA, florian coming and Richard also, and we discussed on children about writing in EU and US 15:40:13 ... how children literecy problem could be helped, 15:40:44 ... it's very interesting if you really work on the concept 15:41:00 s/EU and US/EU and US, and Florian talked also about ruby use in Japan/ 15:41:15 r12a: is a standalone group or a11y group? 15:41:33 maud: one community, as task force, we are going to present to several task forces 15:41:46 addison: formal community group or group of individuals? 15:42:09 maud: in wiki page, there is agenda, notes, but still as a community of individuals 15:42:20 ... as CG 15:43:02 https://www.w3.org/community/accessibility4children/ 15:43:08 murata: children rely on ruby 15:43:26 maud: there is one another item to add 15:44:05 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/10/28-i18n-minutes.html addison 15:44:31 ... whether there is questions on children, and who/how to contact people. if any information is available 15:44:47 [discussion on adding to self-review checklist] 15:44:51 r12a: for horizontal review, adding an issue is the best way 15:46:00 https://github.com/w3c/bp-i18n-specdev 15:46:13 r12a: there are more than one checklist 15:46:31 ... there is different sort of things, like for html or css 15:46:48 maud: list for developers 15:46:51 https://www.w3.org/TR/international-specs/ 15:47:24 Maud_ has joined #i18n 15:47:31 https://github.com/w3c/bp-i18n-specdev/issues 15:49:08 r12a: like for arabic, children is a bit difficult to read them 15:50:00 maud: we are working for other various areas, including visual queues 15:50:15 r12a: if you have writting things down, we can review the documentation 15:50:39 maud: we have some list of requirements for now 15:50:56 addision: one suggestion to bring us before you finish ones 15:51:02 ... during a development phase 15:52:04 topic: AOB? 15:52:24 xfq: if no, I would like to discuss of character restriction in EPUB 15:52:25 https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/1430 15:52:35 topic: character restriction in EPUB 15:52:56 xfq: we discussed this few days ago, and files draft here 15:53:16 ... EPUB is restricting filenames to reject emojis etc. 15:53:25 ... ok to send this issue to EPUB? 15:53:26 +q 15:53:36 q- 15:53:42 addison: seems good to me 15:53:48 ack MURATA_ 15:53:59 murata: is there any use case? 15:54:19 addison: if author use it in title, tag could contain 15:54:33 ... people could do anything 15:54:51 ... question is that is this artificial restriction or just don't want to use these characters? 15:55:00 q+ 15:55:21 q+ 15:55:29 xfq: if filesystem allows these characters, there is no reason to restrict these 15:55:51 addison: if there is any restriction on some filesystem, but I think no 15:56:13 r12a: it seems to be placed ago, and kept left there 15:56:36 murata: apple applies normalization, and see different result due to normalization 15:56:44 ... this could avoid some problem 15:57:20 addison: not case for this? some could work differently for non characters etc. 15:58:05 murata: long time ago, Martin wrote a document of interactions between html and unicode codepoint, still valid document? 15:58:09 r12a: no 15:59:11 [agreed to send as review issue] 15:59:28 topic: from CSS MTG 15:59:36 r12a: two things 15:59:57 ... emoji properties, discussion held and some progrees there 16:00:13 ... generic font name, seems some progress after call 16:00:25 ... for third point, no time yesterday, and would join sometime later 16:01:23 addison: maybe we can close some issues 16:01:43 rrsagent, make minutes 16:01:43 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/10/28-i18n-minutes.html xfq 16:18:01 s/emoji properties,/logical properties,/ 16:29:18 s/AIRA/ARIA/ 16:30:02 s/florian coming and Richard also/Florian and Richard attended a session with us last week/ 16:31:54 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:31:54 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/10/28-i18n-minutes.html r12a 16:33:43 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:33:43 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/10/28-i18n-minutes.html r12a 23:59:59 s/Note: we're meeting with COGA on #coga// 23:59:59 s|o Join link: https://mit.zoom.us/j/676992029?pwd=Y21saTN6V1lla2R1NC9xOG9Ub2VDZz09|| 23:59:59 s/Agendums: /agenda: / 23:59:59 s|I am apparently not sufficiently important and/or registered to get in on the COGA channel. See you next week|| 23:59:59 s/Tried to follow the email instructions and log in via some TPAC channel. Not letting me in. If there is a direct Zoom link, I'm happy to try, but also just noticed that I can't immediately get to the slides (organizers don't know my Google account and I'm reluctant to tie it to general W3c business)// 23:59:59 present+ addison, maud, plh, r12a 23:59:59 s|try Join link: https://mit.zoom.us/j/676992029?pwd=Y21saTN6V1lla2R1NC9xOG9Ub2VDZz09|| 23:59:59 s/Got it. Thx.// 23:59:59 s/Should I join a different Zoom conference?// 23:59:59 s/i18n's one// 23:59:59 s/I am afraid that I cannot find the link for the zoom teleconf// 23:59:59 s/by mail?// 23:59:59 s/Thanks!// 23:59:59 s/Richard, no trouble hearing you... but...// 23:59:59 s/I didn't get the message about this session being shifted and will have to drop off in about 5 minutes// 23:59:59 s/Topic: Ruby// 23:59:59 s/addision/addison/