06:44:43 RRSAgent has joined #smart-cities 06:44:43 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/10/18-smart-cities-irc 06:44:45 RRSAgent, stay 06:44:49 RRSAgent, make log public 12:20:13 Karen has joined #smart-cities 13:21:43 jeff_ has joined #smart-cities 13:22:42 Karen has joined #smart-cities 13:50:22 kaz has joined #smart-cities 13:51:09 rrsagent, bye 13:51:09 I see no action items 13:51:21 RRSAgent has joined #smart-cities 13:51:21 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/10/18-smart-cities-irc 14:03:35 Karen has joined #smart-cities 14:56:30 takio has joined #smart-cities 14:56:55 Hirata has joined #smart-cities 14:58:00 meeting: Smart Cities Breakout - Day 1 14:59:14 Karen has joined #smart-cities 14:59:45 Alan has joined #smart-cities 14:59:53 present+ Alan 14:59:59 xueyuan has joined #smart-cities 15:00:05 Tomoaki_Mizushima has joined #smart-cities 15:00:07 ktoumura has joined #smart-cities 15:01:31 ota has joined #smart-cities 15:01:46 Rainer_Lang has joined #smart-cities 15:02:19 present+ Kaz_Ashimura_W3C, Rainer_Lang, Fatima_Bana__Glocal_QS, Hiroshi_Ota_Yahoo_Japan, Alan_Bird__W3C, Jeff_Jaffe__W3C, Lisa_Seeman, Ralph_Swick, Takio_Yamaoka__Yahoo_Japan, Tetsuhiko_Hirata__Hitachi, Tomoaki_Mizushima__IRI 15:03:13 present+ Walter_Daves, WendySeltzer__W3C, Xiaoqian_Wu__W3C, Xueyuan_Jia__W3C, Yu_Wei_Chang__Yanni 15:03:32 wseltzer has joined #smart-cities 15:05:05 cwilso has joined #smart-cities 15:05:10 present+ 15:05:47 Kim_Patch has joined #smart-cities 15:05:52 present+ 15:06:39 scribe+ 15:06:56 ryuichi has joined #smart-cities 15:06:58 Kaz: Here is the Workshop page. Here is the summary report. 15:07:03 McCool has joined #smart-cities 15:07:08 -> https://www.w3.org/2021/06/smartcities-workshop/report.html workshop report 15:07:15 ...There is an IG Charter that is in draft status. 15:07:21 -> https://w3c.github.io/wot/charters/smart-cities/diff.html draft IG Charter 15:07:44 ...The yellow parts are update from the Workshop Report. 15:08:01 xueyuan_ has joined #smart-cities 15:08:20 ...The main purpose of this breakout is to review this charter to see if it's OK. 15:08:28 ...Any questions or comments. 15:08:51 Mike McCool: One thing I'm wondering is relationship to Smart Buildings. 15:09:05 ...Tied to geolocation things like location of pipes. 15:09:11 ...So this is a subset. 15:09:25 Kaz: I think Smart Buildings is one use case. 15:09:45 MikeMc: I think we want to make sure we're not excluding Smart Buildings. 15:10:17 Kaz: A lot of this is copied from the Wkshp report. 15:10:38 ...The main part is based on feedback from the Workshop and the many stakeholders. 15:11:02 ...How do we improve this Charter is the question. 15:11:22 [Kaz reviews Scope section] 15:13:17 [Kaz discusses dependencies / relationships] 15:13:19 q+ 15:13:58 LisaSeemanKest has joined #smart-cities 15:14:11 qq+ eric, lisa 15:14:22 ack eric 15:14:22 eric, you wanted to react to a previous speaker 15:14:23 qq+ lisa 15:14:52 EricS: I've shared my input with you, we need the support of implementers, the cities or authorities, to get them involved to help set prioritization. 15:15:04 ...My fear is we're defining the scope before we get that. 15:15:18 ...It's highly regulated which works to our advantage. 15:15:40 ...If we can get Singapore, Japan and China on board we'll get momementum. 15:15:56 ...The authority tends to be more centralized there which would help. 15:16:12 ...Let's make sure this IG enrolls the support of the Authorities and Cities. 15:16:25 ...Otherwise we'll be adding more confusion vs. clarity. 15:16:36 Kaz: Good point. This is very important. 15:16:47 +1 Eric 15:16:57 [discuss emphasis on this] 15:17:18 Kaz: For example the Japanese gov't has just started this work. 15:17:37 Eric: I know Murai-sensi would be supportive of this approach. 15:18:10 Kaz: that is important and somewhat imcremental but needs to be major. 15:18:15 During the group discussion, we'll continue to work on outreach to clarify the primary stakeholders from the industries, countries/cities and communities to involve in the group's work. 15:18:23 ack lisa 15:18:23 lisa, you wanted to react to eric 15:18:44 LisaS: I see that you have a bullet point re: accessibility which is good. 15:19:09 ...On the last bullet point there are many different groups, we need to work with a more broader set of them. 15:19:27 ...People could become invisible if we don't look for who isn't there in our datasets. 15:20:00 ...We need to be making decisions so it's more important that we pay attention to what's missing. 15:20:36 ...Looking at a subgroup level is potentially ignoring this. 15:20:59 ...Let's not increase the problem, let's work to make it better and easier. 15:21:18 q? 15:21:43 Kaz: During the Workshop accessibility was important so I added things about inclusive design, etc. 15:22:36 LisaS: The applications are really accessible for screen readers but they are very wordy with instructions, but the search for the missing people is important. 15:23:03 Kaz: Regarding this we should tried to make the points but we should work on it more. 15:23:23 ...For the Charter text itself, should we expand on the text? 15:23:54 Wendy: What I hear is Lisa mentioning is explicitly who's missing from our datasets so that would be the point to make. 15:24:20 q? 15:24:24 LisaS: Specifically those with cognative and learning issues. 15:24:25 ack ws 15:24:43 Wendy: I noted you jumped right into analysis of the draft Charter. 15:25:09 ...Since this is a breakout session where folks may not of seen the previous work I'd encourage folks to look at the links. 15:25:22 ...Perhaps we want to hear from people who are newer to this work. 15:25:45 ...Scanning the proposed work, where are the areas W3C and Web Standards can help. 15:26:10 -> https://w3c.github.io/webcomponents-cg/#constructable-stylesheets-adoptedstylesheets 4. Constructable Stylesheets & adoptedStyleSheets 15:26:55 Kaz: There are so many concepts and implementations, they have different scopes and challenges. 15:27:07 ...So we want to see where Web Technologies can help. 15:28:05 scrive+ 15:28:08 scribe+ 15:28:21 Kaz: Also listed expected participants 15:28:28 [enumerates list] 15:29:10 Kaz: Three separate sessions to accommodate time zones 15:29:17 ... feedback and great suggestions 15:29:22 ... identify stakeholders 15:29:37 ... feedback for IG as well 15:29:52 ... liaison with other standards orgs 15:30:07 ... related groups in W3C 15:30:27 ... global organizations (e.g. WEF) 15:30:44 .. updated proposed charter 15:30:48 ... that's the history 15:31:08 ... ask all for opinions and suggestions 15:31:16 q+ 15:31:21 q? 15:32:02 ack je 15:32:21 Jeff: Does anyone have concrete ideas on Eric's comments to grow the set of stakeholders? 15:32:29 Kaz: Yes, let's discuss that 15:33:11 ... supercity should be included as well 15:33:17 ... wondering about other countries 15:33:33 Eric: We have relationship with Singapore 15:33:38 ... some say they are leading 15:33:50 ... should add Japan and Chinese colleagues 15:34:02 ... maybe schedule a smaller group meetng 15:34:09 ... strategize; create a plan 15:34:30 ... if you have China, Japan, and Singapore - the rest of the Asian countries will follow 15:34:41 ... "fear of missing out" 15:35:13 Kaz: Thank you very much. 15:35:27 ... need to add China focus 15:35:50 ... other thoughts? 15:36:12 ... US or Europe? 15:37:13 Hirata-san: Korea has some examples 15:37:35 ... Busan Smart City project; some others 15:37:41 ... national project 15:37:57 q+ 15:38:03 Kaz: Good suggestion 15:38:11 Eric: Good suggestion Hirata-san 15:38:27 ack x 15:38:48 Xueyuan: Agree with Eric to have smaller meeting; including stakeholders from China, Singapore, Japan 15:39:03 ... I'll forward the invitation to stakeholders in China 15:39:51 Kaz: Should we ask Medea(?) about their impressions? 15:40:08 Xueyuan: Does Hualiang want to talk? 15:40:10 s/Medea(?)/Midea/ 15:40:24 Hualiang: I will check the link 15:40:33 q+ Rob 15:40:38 Kaz: You are interested in this topic? 15:40:43 Hualiang: Yes 15:40:51 ack r 15:40:55 Kaz: We will involve you; definitely. 15:41:04 Rob: OGC has some activity 15:41:11 ... did you make contact with them? 15:41:22 Kaz: They already participated well in workshop 15:41:25 ... great input 15:41:39 Rob: Thanks 15:42:26 Kaz: Let's revisit Michael's point about Smart Buildings 15:42:30 q+ Michael 15:42:44 Michael: Business information systems is a big thing. 15:43:06 ... e.g. library is both a Smart-City item, but also a Smart building standard 15:43:15 ... not sure what to include, but we need a placeholder. 15:43:35 Kaz: We should add it to the list of tasks 15:43:39 Michael: Agreed. 15:43:57 Kaz: such as in Singapore 15:44:18 ... also W3C's WoT is already being used for building management in Japan 15:45:03 Michael: Also Geospatial standards are important. But requirements are different: VR, land management, 15:45:10 ... need to ferret out different standards 15:45:30 ... need latitude and longitude before we enter; room number after we entire. 15:46:02 ... OGC is already looking at coordinate systems v layout 15:46:09 ... what about energy management? 15:46:16 ... so we need a placeholder 15:46:25 ... can be done in the IG 15:46:39 Kaz: We should list application areas 15:46:52 Michael: Can coordinate with building data CG 15:47:25 ... for distributed energy there are known use cases 15:47:33 ... sustainability is a key issue 15:48:03 Eric: If we don't get the right regulators to hear where they care 15:48:14 ... we can wander into all sorts of areas 15:48:21 ... Smart Cities is wide and diverse 15:48:31 ... so we need input and support 15:48:39 Michael: I support that 15:48:52 ... we can speculate about many topics 15:48:59 ... but what is key? 15:49:04 ... what fits with W3C? 15:49:21 ... we need to bootstrap by working with some cities. 15:49:34 ... Japan organization will prioritize for Japan 15:50:01 Kaz: Specifically the Ministry for (?) Technologies 15:50:12 Eric: which Murai-sensei set up 15:50:20 Kaz: been discussing with Jun 15:50:23 s/(?)/Digital/ 15:50:40 ... should clarify our starting point 15:51:26 ... Ota-san - any ideas? 15:51:33 Ota-san: Smart Cities is very big 15:51:40 ... contains many domains 15:51:47 ... need overview document 15:51:50 ... what is included 15:51:54 ... what is in scope 15:52:07 ... many people can work on it 15:52:17 Kaz: Really important 15:53:19 Topic: Wrap-up 15:53:28 Kaz: We reviewed the workshop 15:53:36 ... great advice about next steps 15:53:47 ... look at important stakeholders 15:54:04 ... small team of Asian stakeholders 15:54:11 ... involve more countries later 15:54:22 ... need to update IG charter based on feedback. 15:54:30 ... Second session later this week 15:54:38 ... (Thursday) 15:55:27 [adjourned] 15:55:33 rrsagent, make minutes 15:55:33 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/10/18-smart-cities-minutes.html jeff_ 15:58:29 takio has left #smart-cities 16:02:31 wseltzer has left #smart-cities 16:26:14 rrsagent, make log public 16:27:07 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:27:07 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/10/18-smart-cities-minutes.html kaz 16:57:25 Karen has joined #smart-cities 17:04:56 LisaSeemanKest has left #smart-cities 17:47:07 Zakim has left #smart-cities 18:11:46 Karen has joined #smart-cities 19:29:10 jeff_ has joined #smart-cities 20:55:58 Karen has joined #smart-cities 22:05:02 jeff__ has joined #smart-cities 23:13:59 Karen has joined #smart-cities 23:50:12 jeff__ has joined #smart-cities