15:04:15 RRSAgent has joined #rdf-star 15:04:15 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/10/01-rdf-star-irc 15:04:16 RRSAgent, make logs Public 15:04:17 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), pchampin 15:04:19 meeting: RDF-star 15:04:24 chair: pchampin 15:04:33 present+ 15:04:33 agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star/2021Sep/0046.html 15:04:33 clear agenda 15:04:33 agenda+ Announcements and newcomers 15:04:33 agenda+ Open actions 15:04:33 agenda+ PR #206 Paragraph and figure in the intro 15:04:33 agenda+ PR #209: New section about selective referential transparency 15:04:36 agenda+ Issue #3: 'conformance' section 15:04:38 agenda+ Issues we may defer to the future WG 15:04:40 present+ 15:04:41 agenda+ Open-ended discussions 15:04:41 Previous meeting: https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/Minutes/2021-09-17.html 15:04:41 Next meeting: https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/Minutes/2021-10-15.html 15:04:53 not me 15:05:05 scribe: AndyS 15:05:18 Fabio has joined #rdf-star 15:05:20 zakim, next agendum 15:05:20 agendum 1 -- Announcements and newcomers -- taken up [from agendabot] 15:06:51 rivettp has joined #rdf-star 15:06:58 present+ 15:07:01 New headsets for everyone! 15:07:09 present+ 15:07:19 Hello everybody 15:08:02 use case - security labels for publishing attribute-based security of data 15:08:33 q? 15:08:40 zakim, next agendum 15:08:40 agendum 2 -- Open actions -- taken up [from agendabot] 15:08:45 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Aaction 15:09:01 thomas has joined #rdf-star 15:09:09 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/196 15:09:39 present+ 15:10:55 ora: work for 196 done; will submit a PR. 15:11:04 https://docs.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-pull-requests/proposing-changes-to-your-work-with-pull-requests/creating-a-pull-request 15:11:42 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/202 15:12:15 I have problems in understanding the whole concept of "quoted". Is this the right moment in time to express it or did I just loose the magic moment? 15:12:17 solved by PR https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/pull/209 15:12:21 pchampin: per-property semantics -- PR in progress 15:12:46 ... and in the agenda today 15:12:51 Ok sure no problem 15:13:16 q? 15:13:36 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/203 15:14:00 q? 15:14:02 pchampin: intro paragraph - in this meeting 15:14:19 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/207 15:14:43 Fabio, in the meantime, you can find the definition at: https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/cg-spec/editors_draft.html#dfn-quoted 15:14:55 pchampin: tag long-term items. Some done, more to do. 15:14:56 q? 15:15:17 zakim, next agendum 15:15:17 agendum 3 -- PR #206 Paragraph and figure in the intro -- taken up [from agendabot] 15:15:35 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/pull/206 15:15:53 https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/rdf-star/pull/206.html#structure 15:16:31 pchampin: guide for reader - doc is not necessarily linear 15:16:33 q? 15:16:51 q+ 15:17:06 olaf, andy, ok, I have a very clear idea of what are quoted triples and how they came into being. They used to be called "embedded" up until July. I simply fear the concept of "quoting" can be misleading and imprecise and not totally useful. 15:17:16 ack TallTed 15:17:33 TallTed: accessibility for the picture 15:17:40 q+ 15:18:03 ... literal description for each box 15:18:10 q+ 15:18:21 question: a name or verb for grouping section 2 - ? 15:18:35 ack AndyS 15:20:03 AndyS: highlight "section 2" box in some way as the entry point section 15:20:57 (someone is typing a lot which makes listening to other audio quite hard) 15:21:08 pchampin: may do SVG - need manual maintenance 15:22:00 (okay, then never mind) 15:22:45 Pull request for Issue #196 created: https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/pull/210 15:23:13 q? 15:23:17 ack g 15:24:25 I have a blind PhD, if that may help 15:24:44 gkellogg: Diagram adequate - extra text can be added 15:25:11 ... odd that "section 2" box does not have a title 15:26:35 +1 to add a title for "section 2" 15:26:43 pchampin: will merge, and continue to refine diagram. 15:26:44 action: pchampin to make the center bubble more salient and the bold keywords less salient 15:27:11 PROPOSAL: merge PR #206 15:27:17 +1 15:27:18 +1 15:27:19 +1 15:27:20 +1 15:27:22 +1 15:27:22 +1 15:27:25 +1 15:27:27 +1 15:27:38 +1 15:27:41 +1 15:27:48 +1 15:27:50 +1 15:27:59 RESOLVED: merge PR #206 15:28:06 q? 15:28:22 zakim, next agendum 15:28:22 agendum 4 -- PR #209: New section about selective referential transparency -- taken up [from agendabot] 15:29:28 olaf: context - quoted triples are referentially opaque - they are like literals. 15:30:08 ... vocabulary for declaring that a quoted triple can be treated as referentially transparent 15:30:49 ... if using an entitlement regime, can derive other nested triples 15:30:51 q+ 15:32:37 pchampin: another way to look at it is if a property holds, that property holds for all ref transparent nest triples from the original quoted triple 15:33:09 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/pull/209 15:33:28 https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/rdf-star/pull/209.html#selective-ref-transparency 15:33:28 https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/rdf-star/pull/209.html#selective-ref-transparency 15:33:50 ... PR#209 adds a non-normative section. 15:33:59 q+ 15:34:02 ack p 15:34:07 ack thomas 15:34:21 thomas: why is it not normative? 15:34:49 q+ 15:34:49 pchampin: not sure it is mature enough yet. May be getting there. 15:35:48 ... now comfortable to make it normative. 15:36:00 ... (personal opinion) 15:36:36 olaf: I am happy to make it normative. 15:36:47 q- 15:37:01 s/not sure it is mature enough yet/not sure when starting that it would be mature enough/ 15:37:30 q+ 15:37:35 ack olaf 15:37:39 pchampin: to go between 6.3 and 6.4 15:37:54 olaf: can go in section 7 15:38:45 pchampin: so sec 7 introduces an entailment regime 15:39:01 q? 15:39:35 olaf: 6.4.6 can continue to exist for example then refer to sec 7. 15:39:44 pchampin: makes sense 15:41:00 ... needs some work for this semantic extension 15:42:21 thomas_ has joined #rdf-star 15:42:22 ... does not need all vocab in this section, only certain items of the proposed vocabulary 15:43:12 ... easier to merge as is and keep working in new PR 15:43:41 q? 15:43:43 PROPOSAL: merge #209, then make a new PR to move the format parts in §7 15:43:51 +1 15:43:51 +/-0 15:43:52 +1 15:43:56 +1 15:44:02 +1 15:44:06 +1 15:44:07 +1 15:44:09 +1 15:44:15 +1 15:44:31 +1 15:44:49 +1 15:44:53 sorry! 15:45:01 +1 15:45:10 RESOLVED: merge #209, then make a new PR to move the format parts in §7 15:46:07 action: pchampin to move the TEP entailment regime to §7 and extend it to the rest of the vocabulary 15:46:14 q? 15:46:38 zakim, next agendum 15:46:38 agendum 5 -- Issue #3: 'conformance' section -- taken up [from agendabot] 15:46:43 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/3 15:47:14 pchampin: some standard boilerplate 15:47:28 ... test suite 15:47:37 q+ 15:47:45 ack AndyS 15:47:53 scribe+ 15:48:18 AndyS: the Conformance section is the place that says "this is RDF-star" 15:48:29 ... if anyone claims to support RDF-star, this is where they should look 15:49:00 ... currently, system claiming to support RDF-star have very different notions of RDF-star 15:49:33 ... following the normative text may still lead to different implementations 15:50:52 q+ 15:51:16 ... This is not to say that all implementations must pass the whole test suite. 15:51:33 ack gkellogg 15:52:15 gkellogg: specification makes normative statement and test suite tests the normative statements. 15:52:24 "Implementers can partially check their level of conformance to this specification by successfully passing the test cases of the JSON-LD test suite. Note, however, that passing all the tests in the test suite does not imply complete conformance to this specification. It only implies that the implementation conforms to aspects tested by the test suite." 15:52:26 ... some normative statements are hard to test 15:52:32 .. JSON-LD example 15:52:34 scribe- 15:52:42 ... JSON-LD example 15:53:34 ... conformance to a CG note and a proper WG will provide conformance to changes it makes e.g. to Turtle 15:54:05 ... we have tests for TTL, NT (etc), SPARQL (syntax and eval) and semantics 15:54:12 +1 to gkellogg 15:54:31 ... may be highlight semantics in the conformance section. 15:55:40 q+ 15:56:01 pchampin: semantics is the entailment 15:56:06 ack AndyS 15:56:09 scribe+ 15:56:42 AndyS: if you implemented the syntax for Turtle, 15:56:48 ... would there be any more work to be compliant? 15:57:25 ... that would be the practical approach of many implementers 15:58:16 pchampin: have a python script to test implementation using SPARQL-star to test 15:58:44 ... approximation to investigate what system did 15:59:08 q+ 15:59:25 q- 15:59:33 ... support inference in a consistent way 15:59:56 q+ 16:00:00 ack olaf 16:00:07 ... e.g. don't some "leak" triples not others 16:00:10 gotta drop 16:00:13 present- 16:01:24 olaf: what consequences of semantics does this have? 16:02:02 pchampin: e.g. rdflib - has D-entailment on literals. Triple stores != exactly the triple retrieved 16:02:19 (rdflib is not the only system to do that) 16:03:00 q? 16:03:09 ... tests are tagged with an entailment regime. Some are OWL (uses owl:sameAs), some D-entailment. 16:03:52 ... conclusion: we need something though still unclear what. 16:03:59 q? 16:04:17 no no go ahead. 16:04:19 you can close now,. 16:04:40 gotta go 16:04:41 present- 16:05:48 bye all! 16:05:50 present- 16:05:50 thanks all! 16:05:50 thx bye 16:05:51 bye 16:05:52 bye 16:05:54 Thanks for today! Bye 16:05:56 bye 16:05:57 zakim, end meeting 16:05:57 As of this point the attendees have been ora, rivettp, olaf, gatemezing, pchampin, thomas, present, Fabio_Vitali, AndyS, TallTed, gkellogg, Doerthe, william, Fabio, /-0 16:06:00 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:06:00 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/10/01-rdf-star-minutes.html Zakim 16:06:02 I am happy to have been of service, AndyS; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 16:06:06 Zakim has left #rdf-star 16:06:11 present- 16:06:12 bye 16:06:13 rrsagent, please excuse us 16:06:13 I see 2 open action items saved in https://www.w3.org/2021/10/01-rdf-star-actions.rdf : 16:06:13 ACTION: pchampin to make the center bubble more salient and the bold keywords less salient [1] 16:06:13 recorded in https://www.w3.org/2021/10/01-rdf-star-irc#T15-26-44 16:06:13 ACTION: pchampin to move the TEP entailment regime to §7 and extend it to the rest of the vocabulary [2] 16:06:13 recorded in https://www.w3.org/2021/10/01-rdf-star-irc#T15-46-07 16:06:13 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:06:14 olaf has left #rdf-star