IRC log of rdf-star on 2021-09-17
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:55:33 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #rdf-star
- 14:55:33 [RRSAgent]
- logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/09/17-rdf-star-irc
- 14:55:35 [Zakim]
- RRSAgent, make logs Public
- 14:55:36 [Zakim]
- please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), pchampin
- 14:55:40 [pchampin]
- meeting: RDF-star
- 14:56:09 [pchampin]
- chair: pchampin
- 14:56:13 [pchampin]
- regrets: james
- 14:56:28 [pchampin]
- date: 17 September 2021
- 14:56:36 [pchampin]
- agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star/2021Sep/0006.html
- 14:56:36 [agendabot]
- clear agenda
- 14:56:36 [agendabot]
- agenda+ Announcements and newcomers
- 14:56:36 [agendabot]
- agenda+ Open actions
- 14:56:36 [agendabot]
- agenda+ PR #204: Classes for RDF-star terminology
- 14:56:36 [agendabot]
- agenda+ Defining our path
- 14:56:38 [agendabot]
- agenda+ Open-ended discussions
- 14:56:59 [pchampin]
- Previous meeting: https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/Minutes/2021-09-03.html
- 14:57:15 [pchampin]
- Next meeting: https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/Minutes/2021-10-01.html
- 15:00:00 [ora]
- ora has joined #rdf-star
- 15:00:21 [thomas]
- thomas has joined #rdf-star
- 15:00:25 [Fabio_Vitali]
- Fabio_Vitali has joined #rdf-star
- 15:00:33 [ora]
- present+
- 15:01:10 [gatemezing]
- gatemezing has joined #rdf-star
- 15:01:31 [olaf]
- olaf has joined #rdf-star
- 15:01:32 [rivettp]
- rivettp has joined #rdf-star
- 15:01:37 [rivettp]
- present+
- 15:01:40 [olaf]
- present+
- 15:01:43 [gatemezing]
- present+
- 15:01:45 [pchampin]
- present+
- 15:01:59 [thomas]
- present+
- 15:03:05 [Fabio_Vitali]
- +present
- 15:03:11 [Fabio_Vitali]
- present+
- 15:03:54 [pchampin]
- zakim, pick a scribe
- 15:03:54 [Zakim]
- Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose ora
- 15:04:21 [AndyS]
- present+
- 15:04:41 [AndyS]
- We must be approaching 5 sigma on this by now.
- 15:04:43 [thomas]
- if Ora in room -> scribe Ora
- 15:04:46 [pchampin]
- scribe: ora
- 15:04:55 [pchampin]
- zakim, next agendum
- 15:04:55 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 -- Announcements and newcomers -- taken up [from agendabot]
- 15:05:12 [pchampin]
- q?
- 15:05:36 [pchampin]
- https://mosaicrown.github.io/scg2021/
- 15:05:43 [ora]
- pchampin: Last week's workshop...
- 15:06:08 [olaf]
- Thanks ;-)
- 15:06:10 [ora]
- pchampin: It went well, lively discussion, interesting things, papers will be on-line soon.
- 15:06:22 [ora]
- pchampin: Presentations were recorded.
- 15:06:50 [ora]
- pchampin: It was a hybrid conference, it was great to see people.
- 15:07:03 [ora]
- pchampin: There is a lot of interest for RDF-star.
- 15:07:07 [pchampin]
- q?
- 15:07:07 [olaf]
- +1
- 15:08:27 [ora]
- olaf: Announcing that I have been selected to be an Amazon Scholar, I will work with the Amazon Neptune team. Still associate professor in Linköping too.
- 15:08:27 [TallTed]
- present+
- 15:08:52 [ora]
- olaf: RDF-star is one of the topics.
- 15:08:53 [pchampin]
- q?
- 15:09:06 [pchampin]
- zakim, next agendum
- 15:09:06 [Zakim]
- agendum 2 -- Open actions -- taken up [from agendabot]
- 15:09:16 [pchampin]
- https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Aaction
- 15:09:31 [pchampin]
- https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/195
- 15:10:32 [ora]
- pchampin: Confirmed that process does not limit what a new feature can be. It can be limited by the charter.
- 15:10:49 [pchampin]
- https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/196
- 15:11:15 [pchampin]
- scribe+
- 15:11:49 [pchampin]
- ora: proposed a text explaining the distinction btw asserted and quoted
- 15:12:02 [pchampin]
- ... made a parallel with evaluated/quoted in LISP
- 15:12:06 [AndyS]
- q+
- 15:12:53 [pchampin]
- ack AndyS
- 15:13:45 [william]
- william has joined #rdf-star
- 15:13:55 [pchampin]
- AndyS: disagreeing with what ora is saying
- 15:14:17 [TallTed]
- s/disagreeing/agreeing/
- 15:14:49 [pchampin]
- ... going back to the spec: a triple is a 3-tuple, that's all
- 15:15:00 [pchampin]
- ... there is an infinite set of it, "floating around"
- 15:15:05 [william]
- william has joined #rdf-star
- 15:15:11 [pchampin]
- ... they are asserted once added to a graph
- 15:15:53 [pchampin]
- s/added to/put into/
- 15:16:11 [pchampin]
- q+
- 15:16:53 [pchampin]
- in a given graph, a triple maybe both asserted and quoted
- 15:16:55 [pchampin]
- ack pchampin
- 15:17:01 [pchampin]
- scribe-
- 15:17:07 [AndyS]
- not disagreeing with ora
- 15:17:11 [ora]
- scribe: ora
- 15:17:40 [ora]
- pchampin: I do not agree that the chevrons are a quoting operator, they are an embedding operator.
- 15:17:53 [AndyS]
- q+ to bring in some current spec text
- 15:18:04 [ora]
- pchampin: In Lisp, you can simply remove the quote. Not so in RDF-star.
- 15:18:18 [ora]
- pchampin: Context of use makes a triple quoted or asserted.
- 15:18:28 [pchampin]
- q?
- 15:18:33 [ora]
- pchampin: I do not disagree with the analogy, but it could be confusing.
- 15:18:36 [TallTed]
- Nitpick: Chevrons are the `«»` glyphs, which are distinct from double angle brackets `<< >>`.
- 15:18:39 [AndyS]
- "A quoted triple is a triple used as the subject or object of another triple."
- 15:18:40 [pchampin]
- ack AndyS
- 15:18:40 [Zakim]
- AndyS, you wanted to bring in some current spec text
- 15:19:10 [ora]
- AndyS: This line from the spec... change it to "...can be used...".
- 15:19:24 [ora]
- AndyS: Chevrons are doing the quoting.
- 15:19:37 [thomas]
- q+
- 15:19:52 [pchampin]
- ack thomas
- 15:20:02 [ora]
- thomas: Aren't we making things too complicated?
- 15:20:35 [ora]
- pchampin: I am not making a distinction between quoted and embedded triples.
- 15:21:05 [ora]
- pchampin: The main role of the chevrons are to "embed" a triple. You can only do this in a certain context.
- 15:21:17 [ora]
- thomas: Also you can only quote in a certain context.
- 15:21:50 [ora]
- q+
- 15:22:14 [pchampin]
- ack ora
- 15:22:19 [pchampin]
- scribe+
- 15:22:27 [ora]
- pchampin: Reluctant to see chevrons as a quoting operator.
- 15:24:33 [AndyS]
- Writing a triple as (:s :p :o) then ( (:s :p :o) :q "abc" )
- 15:24:38 [ora]
- scribe+
- 15:24:38 [pchampin]
- scribe-
- 15:25:02 [TallTed]
- Zakim, who is scribe?
- 15:25:02 [Zakim]
- I don't understand your question, TallTed.
- 15:25:15 [TallTed]
- RRSAgent, who is scribe?
- 15:25:15 [RRSAgent]
- I'm logging. Sorry, nothing found for 'who is scribe'
- 15:25:23 [pchampin]
- q?
- 15:25:25 [TallTed]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes
- 15:25:25 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/17-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed
- 15:25:41 [TallTed]
- RRSAgent, make minutes public
- 15:25:41 [RRSAgent]
- I'm logging. I don't understand 'make minutes public', TallTed. Try /msg RRSAgent help
- 15:25:47 [TallTed]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 15:26:03 [ora]
- AndyS: Everyone has a different background, everyone's viewpoint is different.
- 15:26:20 [ora]
- AndyS: Is there anything wrong in the spec?
- 15:26:39 [ora]
- AndyS: What do we have to do, to change in the spec?
- 15:26:56 [ora]
- pchampin: Thinking was that something might be missing.
- 15:27:09 [ora]
- pchampin: I am not against adding Ora's paragraph.
- 15:27:24 [ora]
- pchampin: Details can confuse...
- 15:27:43 [ora]
- pchampin: If we think this adds to folks' understanding, then why not.
- 15:28:01 [pchampin]
- PROPOSED: include Ora's text in the spec
- 15:28:04 [pchampin]
- +0
- 15:28:16 [ora]
- ora: +1
- 15:28:40 [ora]
- pchampin: Defer the decision as not everyone has read it.
- 15:28:47 [Fabio_Vitali]
- I can't understand where is the text going to end up...
- 15:29:13 [TallTed]
- is that text in a PR or Issue? (should be linked in PROPOSED & RESOLVED...)
- 15:29:57 [ora]
- pchampin: Ora please make this into a pull request.
- 15:30:07 [ora]
- pchampin: Mark as non-normative.
- 15:30:21 [ora]
- ora: OK
- 15:30:37 [ora]
- AndyS: I particularly like the last sentence.
- 15:31:01 [pchampin]
- action: ora to turn his proposal in #196 into a PR
- 15:31:08 [thomas]
- q+
- 15:31:39 [thomas]
- q-
- 15:31:44 [pchampin]
- https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/201
- 15:32:05 [ora]
- pchampin: I did this.
- 15:32:34 [ora]
- pchampin: Nice side effect was creating some publicity for an easier RDF repo.
- 15:32:54 [pchampin]
- q?
- 15:33:01 [ora]
- pchampin: My feeling is the consensus is "why not, but let's be careful".
- 15:33:08 [AndyS]
- +1
- 15:33:23 [ora]
- pchampin: Next two actions are mine...
- 15:33:37 [ora]
- pchampin: Not everyone has reviewed the PRs.
- 15:33:49 [ora]
- pchampin: Still have to push the other one.
- 15:34:04 [TallTed]
- s/an easier RDF repo/the Easier RDF repo, https:\/\/github.com\/w3c\/EasierRDF/
- 15:34:22 [pchampin]
- q?
- 15:34:34 [pchampin]
- zakim, next agendum
- 15:34:34 [Zakim]
- agendum 3 -- PR #204: Classes for RDF-star terminology -- taken up [from agendabot]
- 15:34:48 [pchampin]
- https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/pull/204
- 15:35:03 [ora]
- pchampin: Fleshing out the vocabulary section.
- 15:35:37 [ora]
- AndyS: I took existing material, refined a bit.
- 15:35:53 [ora]
- AndyS: Discuss classes first, before discussing properties.
- 15:36:15 [thomas]
- q+
- 15:36:19 [pchampin]
- ack thomas
- 15:36:34 [ora]
- thomas: What is the source?
- 15:36:54 [ora]
- pchampin: <scribe missed the answer...>
- 15:37:36 [ora]
- thomas: Is that another term for graph?
- 15:37:47 [ora]
- pchampin: No, because of mutability.
- 15:38:00 [ora]
- thomas: I read it but meaning was not obvious.
- 15:38:11 [pchampin]
- q?
- 15:38:48 [ora]
- pchampin: This is still bare, just trying to define terms not yet defined (RDF-star source).
- 15:39:27 [TallTed]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes
- 15:39:27 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/17-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed
- 15:39:33 [ora]
- thomas: It is difficult to discuss terms that are a mathematical abstraction but also very concrete.
- 15:40:00 [pchampin]
- q?
- 15:40:03 [ora]
- thomas: No sense discussing this yet.
- 15:40:22 [pchampin]
- PROPOSED: merge #204
- 15:40:25 [pchampin]
- +1
- 15:40:30 [olaf]
- +1
- 15:40:31 [AndyS]
- +1
- 15:40:32 [ora]
- ora: +1
- 15:40:34 [gatemezing]
- +1
- 15:40:47 [TallTed]
- s|https:\/\/github.com\/w3c\/EasierRDF|https://github.com/w3c/EasierRDF|
- 15:40:48 [TallTed]
- +1
- 15:40:58 [thomas]
- -1
- 15:40:58 [TallTed]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes
- 15:40:58 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/17-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed
- 15:41:21 [rivettp]
- +1
- 15:41:27 [Fabio_Vitali]
- My list of issues goes up to #203. Where do I find 204?
- 15:41:29 [gatemezing]
- AndyS: I guess we don't need to add axioms like disjointness between some clases?
- 15:41:29 [Fabio_Vitali]
- anyway +1
- 15:41:56 [pchampin]
- RESOLVED: merge #204
- 15:42:35 [TallTed]
- s|/EasierRDF.|/EasierRDF|
- 15:42:36 [pchampin]
- q?
- 15:42:47 [pchampin]
- zakim, next agendabot
- 15:42:47 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'next agendabot', pchampin
- 15:42:52 [pchampin]
- zakim, next agendum
- 15:42:52 [Zakim]
- agendum 4 -- Defining our path -- taken up [from agendabot]
- 15:42:54 [TallTed]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes
- 15:42:54 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/17-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed
- 15:43:43 [ora]
- pchampin: From AndyS' email: we should give ourselves some milestones, we are soon one year old, we have achieved a lot.
- 15:43:58 [ora]
- pchampin: Also the next step: chartering a WG.
- 15:44:28 [pchampin]
- q?
- 15:44:35 [ora]
- pchampin: If all goes well, a future WG will take this up.
- 15:44:41 [thomas]
- q+
- 15:44:48 [ora]
- AndyS: I predict the WG will revisit a lot of things.
- 15:45:09 [ora]
- AndyS: Limited value in getting into really fine details.
- 15:45:29 [ora]
- AndyS: REC-grade doc not needed now.
- 15:45:54 [ora]
- AndyS: Early on in the WG there will be discussion by new people about what RDF-star really is.
- 15:45:56 [pchampin]
- q+
- 15:46:10 [pchampin]
- ack thomas
- 15:46:11 [TallTed]
- and what RDF-star is NOW, vs original and other earlier papers...
- 15:46:15 [ora]
- AndyS: We cannot possibly have considered everything.
- 15:46:36 [ora]
- thomas: Issue #117, referential opacity, is crucial.
- 15:46:55 [ora]
- thomas: Makes a difference in many use cases, such as provenance.
- 15:47:05 [pchampin]
- https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/117
- 15:47:05 [ora]
- pchampin: A solution or a discussion?
- 15:47:12 [ora]
- thomas: A proposal, a solution.
- 15:47:14 [AndyS]
- 170 --> https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/170
- 15:47:41 [ora]
- thomas: We should evaluate how much effort this is.
- 15:48:27 [ora]
- AndyS: Another source of validation exists.
- 15:48:38 [ora]
- thomas: The proposed semantics does not cover usage.
- 15:48:51 [ora]
- pchampin: Evidence?
- 15:48:58 [ora]
- thomas: Look on the Web.
- 15:49:12 [ora]
- thomas: I do not have to provide evidence.
- 15:49:31 [ora]
- thomas: Want a proof of how referential opacity is easy.
- 15:50:07 [ora]
- thomas: Something that is worked out.
- 15:50:24 [olaf]
- https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/202 is still an open action on me
- 15:50:32 [pchampin]
- q?
- 15:50:35 [pchampin]
- ack pchampin
- 15:50:45 [pchampin]
- https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/202
- 15:51:18 [ora]
- thomas: I need an answer, then I can comment.
- 15:51:42 [pchampin]
- https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/cg-spec/2021-07-01.html#alternatives-to-referential-opacity
- 15:52:39 [ora]
- pchampin: I did some prototyping in N3. I understand it is not a standard.
- 15:52:54 [ora]
- thomas: This is not how it would look in RDF.
- 15:53:09 [ora]
- pchampin: I do not share thomas' feeling on this.
- 15:53:34 [ora]
- pchampin: Please wait until that section is complete enough.
- 15:53:51 [ora]
- pchampin: PR not ready yet.
- 15:54:16 [ora]
- thomas: I am waiting, but I want to check how this works with use cases.
- 15:54:52 [ora]
- AndyS: We can change how often we have meetings if that helps.
- 15:55:41 [ora]
- pchampin: Let's use the tag "later" for some.
- 15:56:07 [pchampin]
- q?
- 15:56:08 [ora]
- pchampin: Other than those, we can declare we are done.
- 15:56:11 [ora]
- q+
- 15:56:40 [pchampin]
- action: pchampin to review issues and propose to tag 'later' all but those necessary to finalize report
- 15:57:05 [TallTed]
- confirming -- current meeting schedule is every 2 weeks, so next is Oct 1?
- 15:57:47 [pchampin]
- zakim, next agendum
- 15:57:47 [Zakim]
- I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, pchampin
- 15:57:49 [pchampin]
- q?
- 15:59:38 [pchampin]
- https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/cg-spec/2021-07-01.html#occurrences
- 15:59:56 [pchampin]
- ack ora
- 16:00:11 [pchampin]
- ora: would like to discuss the problem raised in our workshop paper
- 16:00:26 [Fabio_Vitali]
- can we have a link to the paper?
- 16:00:39 [pchampin]
- ... the uniqueness of triples in RDF-star makes it impossible to model some common PG patterns
- 16:01:16 [pchampin]
- it will be linked from https://mosaicrown.github.io/scg2021/
- 16:01:26 [ora]
- Paper: https://www.lassila.org/publications/2021/scg2021-lassila+etal.pdf
- 16:02:22 [ora]
- bye!
- 16:02:22 [Fabio_Vitali]
- @ora thanks
- 16:02:25 [Fabio_Vitali]
- bye
- 16:02:25 [thomas]
- good bye
- 16:02:27 [TallTed]
- ciao
- 16:02:29 [olaf]
- bye
- 16:02:34 [gatemezing]
- bye
- 16:03:23 [TallTed]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes
- 16:03:23 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/17-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed