19:54:26 RRSAgent has joined #dxwgdcat 19:54:26 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/09/15-dxwgdcat-irc 19:55:48 RRSAgent, make logs public 19:55:55 RRSAgent, draft minutes 19:55:55 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/15-dxwgdcat-minutes.html RiccardoAlbertoni 19:58:58 DaveBrowning has joined #dxwgdcat 20:00:28 AndreaPerego has joined #dxwgdcat 20:00:39 present* 20:00:49 s/present*// 20:00:53 present+ 20:00:58 present+ 20:01:24 meeting: DCAT subgroup 20:01:36 RRSAgent, draft minutes 20:01:36 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/15-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 20:01:49 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2021.09.15 20:01:50 RRSAgent, draft minutes 20:01:50 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/15-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 20:01:51 PWinstanley has joined #dxwgdcat 20:02:20 present+ 20:03:12 present+ 20:04:48 RRSAgent, draft minutes 20:04:48 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/15-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 20:05:16 alejandra has joined #dxwgdcat 20:05:31 RRSAgent, make logs public 20:05:38 RRSAgent, draft minutes 20:05:38 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/15-dxwgdcat-minutes.html RiccardoAlbertoni 20:09:02 gaia-x: https://www.data-infrastructure.eu/GAIAX/Navigation/EN/Home/home.html 20:15:00 present+ 20:15:16 scribenick: AndreaPerego 20:15:25 PROPOSED: approve last meeting minutes https://www.w3.org/2021/09/01-dxwgdcat-minutes 20:15:30 topic: approve last week meeting agenda 20:15:31 +1 20:15:32 +1 20:15:35 +1 20:15:38 0 (was absent) 20:15:45 +1 20:15:49 +1 20:15:55 RESOLVED: approve last meeting minutes https://www.w3.org/2021/09/01-dxwgdcat-minutes 20:16:02 topic: approve agenda 20:16:10 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2021.09.15 20:16:25 +1 20:16:29 +1 20:16:34 +1 20:16:46 topic: Pending PRs 20:17:07 RiccardoAlbertoni: About https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1401 20:17:49 ... This is trying to implement the proposal from Bert to remove the axioms in the DCAT RDF not included in the spec. 20:18:40 ... IMO the proposal makes sense. But we need to check whether some of the axioms make sense in DCAT3. 20:19:21 +1 to creating issues for the axioms in DCAT3 20:19:26 ... Should we create specific issues on them? Other options. 20:19:27 1+ 20:19:42 s/1+// 20:19:45 q+ 20:19:54 ack AndreaPerego 20:20:18 AndreaPerego: how many axioms are there that are in the RDF but not in the specification? 20:20:24 AndreaPerego: How many axioms are to be deleted? 20:20:35 RiccardoAlbertoni: They are three. 20:21:45 PWinstanley: The first one doesn't seem to be right. So, maybe we can remove them. 20:22:56 q+ 20:23:07 q+ 20:23:17 ack alejandra 20:23:36 alejandra: Do you know where these axioms are coming from? 20:23:48 ack alejandra 20:24:15 ... Maybe we can add an errata. 20:25:30 RiccardoAlbertoni: Adding an errata may affect the REC. 20:25:53 q? 20:26:05 ack AndreaPerego 20:26:16 alejandra: In any case we should verify where these axioms were discussed in GitHub before taking a decision. 20:29:10 AndreaPerego: Tentatively, I would support dropping them, as they may have an impact on re-usability. 20:29:44 should we first vote on dropping the axioms from the RDF in DCAT2? 20:30:21 proposed: we are going to drop the axioms from the RDF of DCAT2 20:30:27 +1 20:30:33 +1 20:30:36 +1 20:30:36 +1 20:30:55 +1 20:31:00 resolved: we are going to drop the axioms from the RDF of DCAT2 20:31:11 RRSAgent, draft minutes 20:31:11 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/15-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 20:32:13 proposed: we create an issue to discuss all the axioms, and then, if need be, we create separate ones 20:32:19 +1 20:32:28 +1 20:32:38 +1 20:32:42 +1 20:33:00 +1 20:33:10 resolved: we create an issue to discuss all the axioms, and then, if need be, we create separate ones 20:33:35 https://github.com/SEMICeu/DCAT-AP/issues/166 20:33:47 RiccardoAlbertoni: The last aspect is the discussion in DCAT-AP ^^ 20:34:00 ... The question is what is normative and what is not. 20:34:53 ... The fact that only the HTML is normative is explicitly mentioned in the RDF. 20:35:11 ... What said in the HTML colophon is probably not so visible / clear. 20:35:14 q+ 20:35:53 q+ 20:36:04 ack AndreaPerego 20:37:43 ack alejandra 20:38:16 https://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#Normative 20:38:40 q+ 20:38:49 AndreaPerego: The fact that the HTML is the normative part is a general rule at W3C, so I don't think we should have anything - especially because we have already this clarification in the RDF. 20:38:50 ack DaveBrowning 20:39:23 alejandra: Agree, but it may be worth making this clear for people who are not familiar with this W3C rule. 20:41:43 q+ 20:41:55 DaveBrowning: Providing a pointer to something non normative may sound pointing to something not reliable. At least this how the message can be understood. 20:41:58 q+ 20:42:41 RRSAgent, draft minutes 20:42:41 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/15-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 20:42:44 q+ 20:42:53 ack alejandra 20:43:05 https://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#N-I-sections 20:43:13 alejandra: A suggestion: I you look at ^^ 20:43:36 https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#RDF-representation 20:43:52 ... it explains the reason behind the normative / non-normative issue 20:44:38 ... Based on that, we can just say that the RDF is provided as an informative complement to the REC. 20:44:50 q? 20:44:54 ack AndreaPerego 20:48:11 ack PWinstanley 20:48:18 AndreaPerego: I wonder whether this clarification may be confusing, as we are saying something different from what was in DCAT2. 20:48:48 +q 20:49:17 alejandra: I don't agree. We had already to add or revise to clarify issues. And there are also parts of the document when we use "normative" (as for the mappings) that may be confusing. 20:49:53 q+ 20:50:03 RRSAgent, draft minutes 20:50:03 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/15-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 20:50:09 ack alejandra 20:50:21 https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#RDF-representation 20:51:11 e.g. https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-ssn/ 20:52:06 q? 20:53:29 suggest that we need to have within the Primer area a 'getting started' section that includes desciption of the artifacts and describes what 'normative' means and which parts of the artifacts are normative 20:53:35 DaveBrowning: There's also the issue about the translation of the label names. 20:53:53 q+ 20:53:58 ack DaveBrowning 20:54:01 ack DaveBrowning 20:54:07 ack AndreaPerego 20:54:13 q? 20:55:03 AndreaPerego: How many issues were reporting the misunderstanding about the fact that the RDF in non-normative? 20:55:52 RiccardoAlbertoni: This one explicitly, but others may be related. 20:56:44 +q 20:57:01 q? 20:57:32 https://github.com/SEMICeu/DCAT-AP/issues/166#issuecomment-917912937 20:58:35 alejandra: I think that clarifying is not a problem. But I think that from Bert's comment ^^ is clear that they are aware about the normative / non-normative part. 20:59:36 q+ 20:59:46 ack alejandra 20:59:59 ack AndreaPerego 21:02:39 alejandra: Anyway, I don't see issues in adding a clarification. 21:02:50 RRSAgent, draft minutes 21:02:50 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/15-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:09:27 [meeting adjourned] 21:09:29 RRSAgent, draft minutes 21:09:29 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/15-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:10:33 chair: RiccardoAlbertoni 21:10:35 RRSAgent, draft minutes 21:10:35 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/15-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego