IRC log of dxwgdcat on 2021-09-15

Timestamps are in UTC.

19:54:26 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #dxwgdcat
19:54:26 [RRSAgent]
logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/09/15-dxwgdcat-irc
19:55:48 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
RRSAgent, make logs public
19:55:55 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
RRSAgent, draft minutes
19:55:55 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/15-dxwgdcat-minutes.html RiccardoAlbertoni
19:58:58 [DaveBrowning]
DaveBrowning has joined #dxwgdcat
20:00:28 [AndreaPerego]
AndreaPerego has joined #dxwgdcat
20:00:39 [AndreaPerego]
present*
20:00:49 [AndreaPerego]
s/present*//
20:00:53 [AndreaPerego]
present+
20:00:58 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
present+
20:01:24 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
meeting: DCAT subgroup
20:01:36 [AndreaPerego]
RRSAgent, draft minutes
20:01:36 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/15-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego
20:01:49 [AndreaPerego]
agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2021.09.15
20:01:50 [AndreaPerego]
RRSAgent, draft minutes
20:01:50 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/15-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego
20:01:51 [PWinstanley]
PWinstanley has joined #dxwgdcat
20:02:20 [DaveBrowning]
present+
20:03:12 [PWinstanley]
present+
20:04:48 [AndreaPerego]
RRSAgent, draft minutes
20:04:48 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/15-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego
20:05:16 [alejandra]
alejandra has joined #dxwgdcat
20:05:31 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
RRSAgent, make logs public
20:05:38 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
RRSAgent, draft minutes
20:05:38 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/15-dxwgdcat-minutes.html RiccardoAlbertoni
20:09:02 [AndreaPerego]
gaia-x: https://www.data-infrastructure.eu/GAIAX/Navigation/EN/Home/home.html
20:15:00 [alejandra]
present+
20:15:16 [AndreaPerego]
scribenick: AndreaPerego
20:15:25 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
PROPOSED: approve last meeting minutes https://www.w3.org/2021/09/01-dxwgdcat-minutes
20:15:30 [AndreaPerego]
topic: approve last week meeting agenda
20:15:31 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
+1
20:15:32 [AndreaPerego]
+1
20:15:35 [DaveBrowning]
+1
20:15:38 [alejandra]
0 (was absent)
20:15:45 [PWinstanley]
+1
20:15:49 [PWinstanley]
+1
20:15:55 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
RESOLVED: approve last meeting minutes https://www.w3.org/2021/09/01-dxwgdcat-minutes
20:16:02 [AndreaPerego]
topic: approve agenda
20:16:10 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2021.09.15
20:16:25 [AndreaPerego]
+1
20:16:29 [alejandra]
+1
20:16:34 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
+1
20:16:46 [AndreaPerego]
topic: Pending PRs
20:17:07 [AndreaPerego]
RiccardoAlbertoni: About https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1401
20:17:49 [AndreaPerego]
... This is trying to implement the proposal from Bert to remove the axioms in the DCAT RDF not included in the spec.
20:18:40 [AndreaPerego]
... IMO the proposal makes sense. But we need to check whether some of the axioms make sense in DCAT3.
20:19:21 [alejandra]
+1 to creating issues for the axioms in DCAT3
20:19:26 [AndreaPerego]
... Should we create specific issues on them? Other options.
20:19:27 [AndreaPerego]
1+
20:19:42 [AndreaPerego]
s/1+//
20:19:45 [AndreaPerego]
q+
20:19:54 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
ack AndreaPerego
20:20:18 [alejandra]
AndreaPerego: how many axioms are there that are in the RDF but not in the specification?
20:20:24 [AndreaPerego]
AndreaPerego: How many axioms are to be deleted?
20:20:35 [AndreaPerego]
RiccardoAlbertoni: They are three.
20:21:45 [AndreaPerego]
PWinstanley: The first one doesn't seem to be right. So, maybe we can remove them.
20:22:56 [alejandra]
q+
20:23:07 [AndreaPerego]
q+
20:23:17 [AndreaPerego]
ack alejandra
20:23:36 [AndreaPerego]
alejandra: Do you know where these axioms are coming from?
20:23:48 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
ack alejandra
20:24:15 [AndreaPerego]
... Maybe we can add an errata.
20:25:30 [AndreaPerego]
RiccardoAlbertoni: Adding an errata may affect the REC.
20:25:53 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
q?
20:26:05 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
ack AndreaPerego
20:26:16 [AndreaPerego]
alejandra: In any case we should verify where these axioms were discussed in GitHub before taking a decision.
20:29:10 [AndreaPerego]
AndreaPerego: Tentatively, I would support dropping them, as they may have an impact on re-usability.
20:29:44 [alejandra]
should we first vote on dropping the axioms from the RDF in DCAT2?
20:30:21 [AndreaPerego]
proposed: we are going to drop the axioms from the RDF of DCAT2
20:30:27 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
+1
20:30:33 [alejandra]
+1
20:30:36 [DaveBrowning]
+1
20:30:36 [AndreaPerego]
+1
20:30:55 [PWinstanley]
+1
20:31:00 [AndreaPerego]
resolved: we are going to drop the axioms from the RDF of DCAT2
20:31:11 [AndreaPerego]
RRSAgent, draft minutes
20:31:11 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/15-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego
20:32:13 [AndreaPerego]
proposed: we create an issue to discuss all the axioms, and then, if need be, we create separate ones
20:32:19 [AndreaPerego]
+1
20:32:28 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
+1
20:32:38 [PWinstanley]
+1
20:32:42 [DaveBrowning]
+1
20:33:00 [alejandra]
+1
20:33:10 [AndreaPerego]
resolved: we create an issue to discuss all the axioms, and then, if need be, we create separate ones
20:33:35 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
https://github.com/SEMICeu/DCAT-AP/issues/166
20:33:47 [AndreaPerego]
RiccardoAlbertoni: The last aspect is the discussion in DCAT-AP ^^
20:34:00 [AndreaPerego]
... The question is what is normative and what is not.
20:34:53 [AndreaPerego]
... The fact that only the HTML is normative is explicitly mentioned in the RDF.
20:35:11 [AndreaPerego]
... What said in the HTML colophon is probably not so visible / clear.
20:35:14 [AndreaPerego]
q+
20:35:53 [alejandra]
q+
20:36:04 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
ack AndreaPerego
20:37:43 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
ack alejandra
20:38:16 [alejandra]
https://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#Normative
20:38:40 [DaveBrowning]
q+
20:38:49 [AndreaPerego]
AndreaPerego: The fact that the HTML is the normative part is a general rule at W3C, so I don't think we should have anything - especially because we have already this clarification in the RDF.
20:38:50 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
ack DaveBrowning
20:39:23 [AndreaPerego]
alejandra: Agree, but it may be worth making this clear for people who are not familiar with this W3C rule.
20:41:43 [alejandra]
q+
20:41:55 [AndreaPerego]
DaveBrowning: Providing a pointer to something non normative may sound pointing to something not reliable. At least this how the message can be understood.
20:41:58 [AndreaPerego]
q+
20:42:41 [AndreaPerego]
RRSAgent, draft minutes
20:42:41 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/15-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego
20:42:44 [PWinstanley]
q+
20:42:53 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
ack alejandra
20:43:05 [alejandra]
https://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#N-I-sections
20:43:13 [AndreaPerego]
alejandra: A suggestion: I you look at ^^
20:43:36 [alejandra]
https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#RDF-representation
20:43:52 [AndreaPerego]
... it explains the reason behind the normative / non-normative issue
20:44:38 [AndreaPerego]
... Based on that, we can just say that the RDF is provided as an informative complement to the REC.
20:44:50 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
q?
20:44:54 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
ack AndreaPerego
20:48:11 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
ack PWinstanley
20:48:18 [AndreaPerego]
AndreaPerego: I wonder whether this clarification may be confusing, as we are saying something different from what was in DCAT2.
20:48:48 [alejandra]
+q
20:49:17 [AndreaPerego]
alejandra: I don't agree. We had already to add or revise to clarify issues. And there are also parts of the document when we use "normative" (as for the mappings) that may be confusing.
20:49:53 [DaveBrowning]
q+
20:50:03 [AndreaPerego]
RRSAgent, draft minutes
20:50:03 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/15-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego
20:50:09 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
ack alejandra
20:50:21 [alejandra]
https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#RDF-representation
20:51:11 [alejandra]
e.g. https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-ssn/
20:52:06 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
q?
20:53:29 [PWinstanley]
suggest that we need to have within the Primer area a 'getting started' section that includes desciption of the artifacts and describes what 'normative' means and which parts of the artifacts are normative
20:53:35 [AndreaPerego]
DaveBrowning: There's also the issue about the translation of the label names.
20:53:53 [AndreaPerego]
q+
20:53:58 [AndreaPerego]
ack DaveBrowning
20:54:01 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
ack DaveBrowning
20:54:07 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
ack AndreaPerego
20:54:13 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
q?
20:55:03 [AndreaPerego]
AndreaPerego: How many issues were reporting the misunderstanding about the fact that the RDF in non-normative?
20:55:52 [AndreaPerego]
RiccardoAlbertoni: This one explicitly, but others may be related.
20:56:44 [alejandra]
+q
20:57:01 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
q?
20:57:32 [alejandra]
https://github.com/SEMICeu/DCAT-AP/issues/166#issuecomment-917912937
20:58:35 [AndreaPerego]
alejandra: I think that clarifying is not a problem. But I think that from Bert's comment ^^ is clear that they are aware about the normative / non-normative part.
20:59:36 [AndreaPerego]
q+
20:59:46 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
ack alejandra
20:59:59 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
ack AndreaPerego
21:02:39 [AndreaPerego]
alejandra: Anyway, I don't see issues in adding a clarification.
21:02:50 [AndreaPerego]
RRSAgent, draft minutes
21:02:50 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/15-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego
21:09:27 [AndreaPerego]
[meeting adjourned]
21:09:29 [AndreaPerego]
RRSAgent, draft minutes
21:09:29 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/15-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego
21:10:33 [AndreaPerego]
chair: RiccardoAlbertoni
21:10:35 [AndreaPerego]
RRSAgent, draft minutes
21:10:35 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/15-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego