11:03:45 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #wot-marketing
11:03:45 <RRSAgent> logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/09/14-wot-marketing-irc
11:05:26 <kaz> meeting: WoT Marketing
11:05:53 <kaz> present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Daniel_Peintner, Fady_Salama, Philipp_Blum, Sebastian_Kaebisch
11:06:05 <sebastian> sebastian has joined #wot-marketing
11:06:11 <kaz> chair: Sebastian
11:07:01 <fadyS> fadyS has joined #wot-marketing
11:07:14 <kaz> present+ Jan_Roman
11:07:26 <kaz> present- Jan_Roman
11:07:28 <kaz> present+ Jan_Romann
11:08:03 <kaz> agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Marketing_WebConf#Sept_14.2C_2021
11:08:05 <jkrhb> jkrhb has joined #wot-marketing
11:08:09 <kaz> present+ Toamoaki_Mizushima
11:08:19 <jkrhb> present+ Jan_Romann
11:08:23 <citrullin> topic: Minute review
11:08:48 <kaz> -> https://www.w3.org/2021/09/07-wot-marketing-minutes.html Sep-7
11:11:33 <citrullin> sk: We should discuss, if we can bring the logos on the website. There are some rules from the W3C regarding that.
11:11:49 <citrullin> ... any objections?
11:12:01 <citrullin> Minutes are getting published.
11:12:24 <citrullin> topic: New moderation
11:13:26 <citrullin> sk: The new year at Siemens starts and since I also work in the other tasks forces, I will not have enough time for the marketing taskforce anymore.
11:14:04 <citrullin> ... I asked Fady, if he has time for this. Fady is kind of the successor of Ege.
11:14:33 <kaz> rrsagent, make log public
11:14:37 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
11:14:37 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/14-wot-marketing-minutes.html kaz
11:15:09 <citrullin> ... Fady would be fine doing it. Even though, this is open. So, if anyone is interested, please go ahead.
11:15:10 <sebastian> q?
11:15:29 <kaz> i/We should discuss/scribenick: citrullin/
11:15:31 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
11:15:31 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/14-wot-marketing-minutes.html kaz
11:16:04 <citrullin> dp: Maybe we should ask in the whole group, not only in the task force.
11:16:19 <Mizushima> +1
11:16:23 <citrullin> sk: Maybe we should make this announcement in the main call.
11:16:24 <citrullin> +1
11:16:46 <dape> +1
11:16:55 <citrullin> topic: Web of Things webpage
11:16:59 <dape> q+
11:18:00 <dape> ack dape
11:18:05 <citrullin> add text and link to events -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/pull/200
11:18:46 <citrullin> sk: Any objections to merge the PR?
11:18:56 <citrullin> no objections, PR gets merged.
11:19:08 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
11:19:08 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/14-wot-marketing-minutes.html kaz
11:19:48 <citrullin> sk: Anything else we should update on the website?
11:20:52 <citrullin> sk: The F2F dates are wrong.
11:21:00 <citrullin> dp: I can fix that right away.
11:22:06 <kaz> -> https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/F2F_meeting,_October_2021 vF2F wiki
11:24:09 <citrullin> dp: Updated the dates. It takes some minutes to update on the website.
11:24:44 <citrullin> sk: Ege is not here, but I can write him to make one
11:25:29 <citrullin> dp: I updated the video section.
11:25:53 <citrullin> s/make one/create one tweet/
11:26:53 <citrullin> sk: I haven't seen the introduction title first. Is it just me? Is there another way we can make it more clear that this is a category?
11:27:00 <citrullin> dp: We could use tabs for it.
11:27:22 <citrullin> ... what might help is to have a little more space in between.
11:28:27 <citrullin> sk: The resolution of this preview image (TPAC 2020) is not great. Maybe can change that.
11:29:16 <citrullin> dp: I can change this. Maybe I can also add a gray border to make it clearer.
11:29:51 <citrullin> sk: I will ping Ege regarding the tweet of the plugfest.
11:29:54 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
11:29:54 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/14-wot-marketing-minutes.html kaz
11:30:05 <citrullin> topic: TUM explainer videos
11:30:26 <citrullin> sk: Fady, do you have an update on it?
11:31:12 <citrullin> fs: We are working on this and can give you an update on it this month.
11:31:22 <citrullin> sk: Philipp, do you have an update?
11:31:32 <citrullin> pb: No, I am working on the documentation.
11:34:35 <citrullin> sk: I would like to have the introduction video by TUM on the website.
11:34:41 <citrullin> TUM introduction video -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lt_P2BU8e3I
11:36:41 <citrullin> pb: Is it important to have Jeff Jeffe at the first place at all?
11:36:57 <citrullin> kaz: We can sort the videos by year instead.
11:38:21 <kaz> s/pb: Is it important to have Jeff Jeffe at the first place at all?/wondering about the order of our videos.../
11:39:00 <kaz> i|Fady, do|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/194 Issue 194 - Adding simple WoT introduction video (and reorganize video ordering)|
11:39:08 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
11:39:08 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/14-wot-marketing-minutes.html kaz
11:40:37 <citrullin> sk: We can put up the tutorials first and have the interview in another section below it.
11:40:47 <citrullin> pb: I agree on this. The tutorials are way more important.
11:41:17 <citrullin> dp: I still  suggest to have them orderd by date.
11:41:22 <citrullin> sk: Yes, that makes sense.
11:41:34 <kaz> s/We can sort/We can put them into some categories. Also we can simply sort/
11:41:59 <citrullin> sk adds a comment to issue 194.
11:42:07 <citrullin> issue 194 in wot-marketing -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/194
11:42:41 <citrullin> kaz: I agree with daniel to sort it by date.
11:45:12 <citrullin> kaz: We could add the tutorials to the developer section.
11:45:40 <citrullin> sk: Let's revisit this topic when fady and ege have their tutorial series ready.
11:46:44 <kaz> kaz: ok. there are 3 possible pages at the moment, Developers, Documentation and Videos.
11:47:42 <kaz> i/ok/scribenick: kaz/
11:47:47 <kaz> scribenick: citrullin
11:48:18 <citrullin> dp: The intro text in the developer section is a bit weird.
11:48:30 <citrullin> sk: You are right. I am also not happy with it.
11:48:34 <citrullin> dp: I can just remove it.
11:48:38 <citrullin> sk: Okay.
11:50:24 <citrullin>  topic: Contact information.
11:50:42 <citrullin> dp: We have pointer to the spec, but no contact information.
11:51:39 <citrullin> dp: We had a long discussion about matrix, github, discord etc.
11:51:57 <citrullin> pb: As I remember the conclusion was, for now, to just use Github.
11:52:13 <citrullin> sk: Github has this new feature for discussions.
11:53:36 <citrullin> dp: If we would activate it, I would only activate it on one page.
11:53:57 <citrullin> ... this looks very similar to github issues.
11:54:27 <citrullin> +1 on only have one discussion page.
11:57:11 <citrullin> pb: I am with daniel on this. Only one discussion page. For now, github discussion is probably fine.
11:57:25 <citrullin> sk: We also have Stackoverflow. Should we link it as well?
11:58:00 <citrullin> pb: Since most of our activities are already on github, github is probably the better way to go, for now.
11:58:14 <citrullin> dp: That is a topic for the main call.
11:58:54 <citrullin> sk adds a comment to issue 192
11:59:00 <citrullin> issue 192 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/192
11:59:56 <kaz> [adjourned]
12:00:00 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
12:00:00 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/14-wot-marketing-minutes.html kaz
12:46:51 <Mizushima> Mizushima has left #wot-marketing
13:37:40 <Zakim> Zakim has left #wot-marketing