12:45:08 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #rqtf
12:45:08 <RRSAgent> logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/09/08-rqtf-irc
12:45:10 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs public
12:45:10 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #rqtf
12:45:12 <trackbot> Meeting: Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group Teleconference
12:45:12 <trackbot> Date: 08 September 2021
12:45:17 <jasonjgw> chair: jasonjgw
12:45:28 <jasonjgw> agenda+ Joint working group meetings and break-out sessions planned for TPAC 2021.
12:45:28 <jasonjgw> agenda+ Synchronization Accessibility User Requirements: state of the Call for Consensus.
12:45:31 <jasonjgw> agenda+ Accessibility of Remote Meetings.
12:45:33 <jasonjgw> agenda+ WAI-CooP symposium.
12:45:36 <jasonjgw> agenda+ Natural Language Interface Accessibility User Requirements.
12:45:38 <jasonjgw> agenda+ Miscellaneous topics.
12:46:16 <jasonjgw> present+
12:56:53 <janina> janina has joined #rqtf
12:57:03 <janina> present+
12:57:45 <Judy> Judy has joined #rqtf
13:02:01 <jasonjgw> zakim, next item
13:02:01 <Zakim> agendum 1 -- Joint working group meetings and break-out sessions planned for TPAC 2021. -- taken up [from jasonjgw]
13:02:34 <Judy> trackbot, start meeting
13:02:37 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs public
13:02:38 <scott_h> scott_h has joined #rqtf
13:02:40 <trackbot> Meeting: Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group Teleconference
13:02:40 <trackbot> Date: 08 September 2021
13:02:54 <Joshue108> Scribe: Joshue108
13:03:01 <Joshue108> Present+
13:03:09 <janina> zakim, who's here?
13:03:09 <Zakim> Present: jasonjgw, janina, Joshue
13:03:11 <Zakim> On IRC I see scott_h, Judy, janina, Zakim, RRSAgent, MichaelC_, jasonjgw, Joshue108, trackbot
13:03:18 <scott_h> present+
13:03:23 <Joshue108> Agenda?
13:03:37 <Joshue108> Zakim, take up item 1
13:03:37 <Zakim> agendum 1 -- Joint working group meetings and break-out sessions planned for TPAC 2021. -- taken up [from jasonjgw]
13:03:43 <Raja> Raja has joined #rqtf
13:03:46 <Joshue108> JW: Notes changes in meetings
13:03:57 <Joshue108> COGA TF requested joint meeting
13:04:28 <Joshue108> JW: Janina updates?
13:05:17 <SteveNoble> SteveNoble has joined #rqtf
13:05:25 <SteveNoble> present+
13:06:00 <Joshue108> https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2021
13:06:11 <Joshue108> JS: We have two RQTF meetings on the 20th
13:06:15 <Joshue108> Near the top
13:06:45 <Joshue108> In the first week of TPAC on the 20th at this time, we will meet with COGA
13:06:54 <Joshue108> They will drive the agenda
13:07:10 <Joshue108> Then straight into Timed text
13:07:22 <Joshue108> And the SAUR - Media Synchronization
13:07:32 <Joshue108> These are the key items that are scheduled
13:07:37 <Joshue108> These times are confirmed.
13:07:41 <Joshue108> Q?
13:08:01 <Joshue108> JS: Thanks Janina and to other for organisation
13:08:32 <Joshue108> JS: Comments?
13:09:25 <jasonjgw> zakim, next item
13:09:25 <Zakim> agendum 2 -- Synchronization Accessibility User Requirements: state of the Call for Consensus. -- taken up [from jasonjgw]
13:09:29 <Joshue108> JS: Expect things that develop to go there
13:09:40 <Joshue108> JW: This is the SAUR document
13:09:42 <janina> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa-admin/2021Sep/0000.html
13:10:02 <Joshue108> There is an active CFC, that has been issued - it ends midnight next week (Weds)
13:10:20 <Joshue108> JS: Any formal member of APA is invited to review and comment
13:10:32 <Joshue108> [Boston time]
13:11:12 <Joshue108> JW: It is progressing
13:11:32 <Joshue108> JS: The reason for the longer timeframe is that there are a number of holidays at the moment
13:11:53 <Joshue108> We want to cover 5 business days - we are doing that, exactly.
13:12:10 <Joshue108> JW: Thanks all round
13:12:41 <Joshue108> We have also responded to the FCC related comments.
13:13:30 <Joshue108> JOC: When will I get the FPWD branch going?
13:13:51 <Joshue108> JS: Yes, you should - not expecting objections and there have been been positive responses.
13:14:00 <Joshue108> JOC: OK, I can do that.
13:15:48 <Joshue108> JOC: Asks about SAUR blog post with Steve?
13:15:55 <Joshue108> JW: We can do that.
13:16:02 <Joshue108> SN: I can work with Jason.
13:16:36 <Joshue108> JS: Can be done in email?
13:16:52 <Joshue108> JOC: I will forward sample blog posts and related things.
13:16:58 <Joshue108> Q?
13:17:08 <Joshue108> JW: We will discuss again next week.
13:17:39 <jasonjgw> zakim, next item
13:17:39 <Zakim> agendum 3 -- Accessibility of Remote Meetings. -- taken up [from jasonjgw]
13:18:13 <Joshue108> JW: Last time we discussed it, we were thinking of next stages.
13:18:28 <Joshue108> There have been some changes - I proposed some revisions
13:18:40 <Joshue108> These have been discussed and are included
13:18:55 <Joshue108> So what process do we want for public review and status?
13:19:21 <Joshue108> Open for comments
13:19:36 <Joshue108> SH: Thanks for all the input, v helpful
13:19:42 <janina> q+
13:20:08 <Joshue108> SH: It’s in a good place - q to Judy around plan?
13:20:14 <Joshue108> Any update?
13:20:49 <Joshue108> JB: Josh and I spoke about this.
13:21:31 <Joshue108> JB: Shawn had concerns around how the remote meetings doc fits in.
13:21:38 <Joshue108> JOC: Can you do that?
13:21:42 <Joshue108> JB: Yup.
13:22:14 <Joshue108> JB: We need to work out where this fits.
13:22:50 <Joshue108> I’ll follow up with Shawn
13:23:03 <Joshue108> JS: Sounds good. EO is the main intersection point here.
13:23:36 <Joshue108> JW: Let’s make progress here, and see that that looks like.
13:23:45 <Joshue108> Ack jan
13:24:12 <Joshue108> JS: I want to promote the notion of W3C note - either APA only or EO only or joint
13:24:23 <Judy> q+
13:24:56 <Joshue108> For two reasons - getting the widest public review on the way to note status, and also around the process regarding statements
13:25:14 <Joshue108> JB: Thanks for the clarification
13:25:22 <Joshue108> JB: EO does not do notes
13:25:47 <Joshue108> I don’t think they would co-sponsor etc - they are busy
13:26:13 <Joshue108> regarding the note track, Michael has concerns around how this intersects with other notes from APA
13:26:37 <scott_h> q+
13:26:39 <Joshue108> JB: Do others support what Janina is saying?
13:26:42 <Joshue108> Ack Judy
13:26:57 <Joshue108> FYI Statements are a new W3C process option
13:27:31 <Joshue108> JW: I’ve read the draft - gives overview
13:27:33 <Joshue108> Ack sc
13:27:43 <Joshue108> SH: I do support Janina
13:27:59 <Judy> q+ to describe the W3C Process Statement option
13:28:07 <Joshue108> It’s also useful as a supporting document for the RAUR
13:28:27 <Joshue108> SH: Are there reasons why it shouldn’t be a note?
13:29:16 <Joshue108> JB: <gives overview of W3C publications>
13:29:38 <janina> https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/Drafts/#note-track
13:30:11 <Joshue108> Ack judy
13:30:11 <Zakim> Judy, you wanted to describe the W3C Process Statement option
13:30:21 <Joshue108> JB: Janina is right that we could send this on a path
13:30:28 <Joshue108> JB: There are pros and cons
13:30:46 <Joshue108> Q?
13:31:04 <Joshue108> JB: We could do that outside the meeting and include a W3C statement in the options
13:31:16 <Joshue108> SH: That would be helpful
13:32:17 <Joshue108> JW: Let’s see what pros and cons look like after EO have engaged with the question.
13:32:47 <Joshue108> JB: Shawn has many roles
13:33:08 <Joshue108> JW: When will we bring it back?
13:33:14 <Joshue108> JB: Next week please
13:34:26 <jasonjgw> zakim, next item
13:34:26 <Zakim> agendum 4 -- WAI-CooP symposium. -- taken up [from jasonjgw]
13:35:03 <Judy> [JB clarifies that the discussion will be with Shawn, not directly with EOWG]
13:35:09 <Joshue108> JW: This is the Community of Practice project
13:35:34 <Joshue108> An important element is that this will explore issues with Emerging technology and practices.
13:35:51 <Joshue108> The organisers are arranging a symposium
13:36:07 <Joshue108> APA and Research Questions are participating.
13:36:14 <Joshue108> JW: Josh?
13:37:23 <Judy> q+
13:37:24 <jasonjgw> Josh: notes that APA will essentially be co-organizing the symposium. Several APA/RQTF participants have contributed to preliminary discussions of the Symposium.
13:37:57 <Joshue108> JS: I also contributed
13:38:11 <Joshue108> JB: There is a timing issue they want to announce today.
13:38:17 <Joshue108> Ack judy
13:38:34 <Joshue108> JB: We hope to get this through the announcement cycle today.
13:38:51 <Joshue108> So there were questions around APA and RQTF role.
13:39:04 <Joshue108> JS: My additions are given in the last hour.
13:39:52 <Joshue108> Q+
13:40:15 <Joshue108> JW: They are canvassing for research topics that would be of interest.
13:40:46 <Joshue108> All here are welcome to participate.
13:42:29 <Joshue108> Ack me
13:43:46 <Joshue108> JOC: Acks seeing Janina proposal
13:43:58 <Joshue108> JB: Carlos’s proposal seemed to be lighter.
13:44:15 <Joshue108> JW: Some tweaking is needed to what Carlos is saying.
13:44:37 <Joshue108> He lists Pronunciation but it isn’t clear that it refers to TTS.
13:45:09 <Joshue108> JB: Research Questions may not all have seen this either, can you resend?
13:45:14 <Joshue108> JS: Happy to do that.
13:45:33 <Joshue108> Agenda?
13:45:53 <Joshue108> JW: There will be opportunities for engagement with the symposium
13:45:59 <Joshue108> Anything else to note?
13:47:37 <Joshue108> JOC: We just need to work out what the term is that we are.
13:49:26 <Joshue108> JOC: <gives overview of latest draft symposium draft from Carlos>
13:49:31 <Joshue108> Q?
13:49:55 <Joshue108> JW: The call is broad - and there are a list of topics that should engage people
13:50:18 <Joshue108> JW: Comments?
13:50:18 <Raja> If there is no active link to the symposium , is there a link to previous symposium?
13:51:28 <Joshue108> JB: Any objections to ‘RQTF invites..’ wording?
13:51:36 <Raja> No objection
13:51:48 <Joshue108> JS: Can we say APA - Research Questions invites? Keep link?
13:51:57 <Raja> Yes, I like that
13:52:47 <Joshue108> JW: There is a broad audience here
13:52:59 <Joshue108> Q?
13:53:02 <Joshue108> Agenda?
13:53:57 <jasonjgw> zakim, take up item 5
13:53:57 <Zakim> agendum 5 -- Natural Language Interface Accessibility User Requirements. -- taken up [from jasonjgw]
13:54:33 <Joshue108> JW: This is an early editors draft and once the SAUR is ready we would start working in this
13:54:41 <Joshue108> And getting it over the line.
13:54:59 <Joshue108> Josh is busy now on getting SAUR ready for publishing
13:55:20 <Joshue108> Please do re-familiarise yourself with the NAUR
13:55:48 <Joshue108> What is in main will reflect the work done so far - there is some work in a branch, that I will review with Josh
13:56:02 <Joshue108> But proposed material is in main
13:56:35 <Joshue108> JW: Let’s do that over the next couple of weeks, and as soon as SAUR is ready we can look at the Natural Language Interface document (NAUR)
13:56:52 <Joshue108> <crickets>
13:57:29 <Joshue108> JW: There is a good window to review and get ready for public review
13:57:43 <Joshue108> Q?
13:57:56 <Joshue108> JW: Let’s bring this back next week.
13:58:27 <jasonjgw> zakim, next item
13:58:27 <Zakim> agendum 4 -- WAI-CooP symposium. -- taken up [from jasonjgw]
13:58:38 <jasonjgw> zakim, take up item 6
13:58:38 <Zakim> agendum 6 -- Miscellaneous topics. -- taken up [from jasonjgw]
13:59:09 <Joshue108> JW: There is the topic of Flash mitigation
13:59:16 <Joshue108> Anything else from APA?
13:59:28 <Joshue108> JS: Nothing we’ve not touched on.
13:59:42 <Joshue108> We are hoping to progress
14:00:46 <Joshue108> JS: We have good stuff in the pipeline, the SAUR, Flash mitigation - exciting when we can do stuff that fixes problems
14:01:41 <Joshue108> Rrsagent, draft minutes
14:01:41 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/08-rqtf-minutes.html Joshue108
14:01:50 <Joshue108> Trackbot, end meeting
14:01:50 <trackbot> Zakim, list attendees
14:01:50 <Zakim> As of this point the attendees have been jasonjgw, janina, Joshue, scott_h, SteveNoble
14:01:58 <trackbot> RRSAgent, please draft minutes
14:01:58 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/08-rqtf-minutes.html trackbot
14:01:59 <trackbot> RRSAgent, bye
14:01:59 <RRSAgent> I see no action items
14:02:01 <jasonjgw> zakim, bye
14:02:01 <Zakim> leaving.  As of this point the attendees have been jasonjgw, janina, Joshue, scott_h, SteveNoble
14:02:01 <Zakim> Zakim has left #rqtf