15:01:49 RRSAgent has joined #rdf-star 15:01:49 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/09/03-rdf-star-irc 15:01:51 RRSAgent, make logs Public 15:01:51 Zakim, who is here? 15:01:53 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), pchampin 15:01:53 Present: (no one) 15:01:53 On IRC I see RRSAgent, Zakim, ora, olaf, gatemezing, gkellogg, TallTed, AndyS, pchampin, driib, agendabot, rhiaro 15:02:02 rivettp has joined #rdf-star 15:02:03 meeting: RDF-star 15:02:04 (Too long of a break to again remember all the chat commands...) 15:02:06 present+ 15:02:08 chair: pchampin 15:02:12 present+ 15:02:12 present+ 15:02:15 agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star/2021Sep/0000.html 15:02:15 clear agenda 15:02:15 agenda+ Announcements and newcomers 15:02:15 agenda+ Open actions 15:02:15 agenda+ PR #198: Suggest metadata in manifest turtle file 15:02:15 agenda+ Issue #200: RDF-star and reasoning 15:02:18 agenda+ WG draft charter 15:02:19 present+ 15:02:20 agenda+ Open-ended discussions 15:02:27 present+ 15:03:00 thomas has joined #rdf-star 15:03:21 present+ 15:03:58 present+ 15:04:18 scribe: gatemezing 15:04:28 present+ 15:04:34 zakim, next agendum 15:04:34 agendum 1 -- Announcements and newcomers -- taken up [from agendabot] 15:05:00 Introduction of the new comer fabio 15:05:41 ...Prof in Italy and working a lot on semantic technologies 15:06:25 ...He was also involved in many W3C, like anything around markup 15:06:36 pchampin: thanks for the introduction 15:06:48 Topic: Announcement 15:07:53 ora: Should write a comparison for next week. They write a paper for SCG workshop 15:08:23 Doerthe_ has joined #rdf-star 15:08:23 ... and they realize there are somethings that are not taken into account by this rdf-star work 15:09:11 ...thinking to write a use case on that aspect, and apologize before if this is late 15:09:46 https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/cg-spec/editors_draft.html#occurrences 15:09:48 pchampin: Maybe it is related to some discussions we had before @ora joined the group 15:10:07 ora: do you have a link to the paper? 15:10:20 https://mosaicrown.github.io/scg2021/ 15:10:46 Paper is not public yet, I will provide a link soon. 15:11:18 ora, thanks! looking forward to it 15:11:26 pchampin: explain the venue of SCG workshop at SemantiCs2021 15:11:34 q? 15:11:43 zakim, next agendum 15:11:43 agendum 2 -- Open actions -- taken up [from agendabot] 15:11:52 Topic: Open actions 15:11:55 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/196 15:12:45 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/195 15:12:51 Issue #196 is still pending 15:13:11 s/Issue #196 is still pending / pchampin: Issue #196 is still pending 15:13:32 https://github.com/w3c/EasierRDF/issues/88 15:14:43 pchampin: the process for a "living standard" is possible 15:15:57 ...check what could be a new feature in the W3C process 15:16:52 q? 15:16:56 q+ 15:17:02 q+ 15:17:02 ...and sent an email to a boss at W3C awaiting for the response 15:17:03 q+ 15:17:15 ack thomas 15:17:24 q? 15:17:34 q+ thomas 15:17:42 ack ora 15:18:25 ora: I was wondering the impact on product delivery processes 15:18:33 q+ caniuse 15:18:36 ack AndyS 15:19:28 Doerthe has joined #rdf-star 15:19:47 scribe+ 15:19:48 A d 15:19:52 A dh 15:19:55 AndyS: There's must be a public discussion on new features 15:20:02 s/ A d / 15:20:07 s/ A dh / 15:20:31 AndyS: my gut feeling is that RDF-star would be to big to be considered a "new feature" 15:20:40 scribe- 15:20:42 q+ 15:20:47 ...It would set a high expectation 15:20:50 ack thomas 15:21:03 q+ 15:21:35 Fabio_Vitali has joined #rdf-star 15:21:41 thomas: could it be better to send to the public semantic Web W3C list? 15:22:00 action: pchampin to notify semantic.web@w3.org about https://github.com/w3c/EasierRDF/issues/88 15:22:54 ack caniuse 15:23:42 Gregg: A balance should be reach between the limitations and the features 15:25:11 ...the charter should limit the types of the group can do or not 15:26:13 +1 for a feature-annoucement mechanism of some kind 15:26:47 ...RDF-star should consider annoucemenent features like MDN with HTML 15:26:59 q? 15:27:04 ack ora 15:27:41 ack olaf 15:27:50 ora: a risk to choose what to implement in a living document could be also a risk 15:28:45 q+ 15:29:20 ack rivettp 15:29:22 olaf: The concern is to better seperate and consider it 15:30:43 rivettp: How the ecosystem would evolve with somehow different implementations of the specs 15:31:32 scribe+ 15:31:51 rivettp: OWL and other standards have not caught up with RDF 1.1 15:32:03 ... How would that go with RDF being a living standard? 15:32:49 my concern generally was the challenge of managing the ecosystem as a whole if one standard is "living" 15:33:05 AndyS: migrations are hard. People will wait until something is a standard to implement it 15:33:10 q? 15:33:29 +1 with AndyS's point 15:34:06 maybe you try for synchronized configurations or releases of multiple projects - which is what Eclipse tries to do 15:34:11 zakim, next agendum 15:34:11 agendum 3 -- PR #198: Suggest metadata in manifest turtle file -- taken up [from agendabot] 15:34:16 pchampin: This discussion should be push forward in the public mailing list 15:34:59 gatemezing: this PR aims to add more metadata in the manifest files. 15:35:19 ... AndyS, gatemezing, TallTed commented on it. 15:35:40 ... There's general agreement that it should be done, more discussion on what to add exactly. 15:37:07 [discussion on the representation of licenses in RDF] 15:37:29 q? 15:38:31 zakim, next agendum 15:38:31 agendum 4 -- Issue #200: RDF-star and reasoning -- taken up [from agendabot] 15:38:40 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/200 15:38:54 scribe- 15:39:23 q+ 15:40:22 +1 15:40:34 AndyS: We have to choose which types of discussions and maybe add labels 15:40:42 ack thomas 15:41:28 ugh. Github discussion "threads" are one-level deep, and don't do well with shifting active conversation in either direction (issue->disc or disc->issue) 15:42:10 q+ 15:42:11 thomas: how to settle some other discussions in our document 15:42:57 ...can someone put where to write it up so that it's part of the community report 15:43:06 q+ 15:43:21 ...so that that everyone can easily find it 15:43:25 ack olaf 15:43:53 olaf: I can do it, but I can't do it by next week 15:44:44 action: olaf to write a part on "per-property semantics" in the report -- pchampin to help 15:44:53 ack TallTed 15:45:37 TallTed: I'm against using Github discussion since it's not mature for this purpose 15:45:47 q+ 15:46:12 ...Use mailing list for other type of discussion 15:46:18 ack pchampin 15:47:26 pchampin: Not also fan with discussions on Github. There are different special "kind" of issues ... 15:47:44 Probably for next time, it can be good to review issues (with whatever label) based on oldest last activity -- e.g., https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-asc 15:47:50 q? 15:47:56 ... The mailing list has an archive but still difficult to follow 15:48:22 Zakim, who is here? 15:48:22 Present: TallTed, rivettp, ora, gatemezing, olaf, AndyS, gkellogg, thomas 15:48:24 On IRC I see Fabio_Vitali, Doerthe, thomas, rivettp, RRSAgent, Zakim, ora, olaf, gatemezing, gkellogg, TallTed, AndyS, pchampin, driib, agendabot, rhiaro 15:49:02 STRAWPOLL: use github 'discussions' to replace de 'discussion' label on actions 15:49:05 AndyS: When do we know we've finished 15:49:24 trivial question by newcomer: how do I let Zakim know I am present? 15:49:47 +1 to ted 15:49:49 Are we not talking about GH Discussions as opposed to GH Issues - they are distinct things? 15:49:50 Present 15:49:53 Present+ 15:49:59 STRAWPOLL: use github 'discussions' to replace de 'discussion' label on actions 15:50:06 Zakim, who is here? 15:50:06 Present: TallTed, rivettp, ora, gatemezing, olaf, AndyS, gkellogg, thomas, Fabio_Vitali 15:50:08 On IRC I see Fabio_Vitali, Doerthe, thomas, rivettp, RRSAgent, Zakim, ora, olaf, gatemezing, gkellogg, TallTed, AndyS, pchampin, driib, agendabot, rhiaro 15:50:18 +0.5 15:50:21 +0.5 15:50:24 +0 15:50:27 @gatemezing: thanks 15:50:28 -0.9 15:50:34 +0 15:50:42 -1 15:50:42 -0 15:50:46 0 (no experience with the github discussion feature) 15:50:51 +0 15:50:51 +0.56 15:50:58 there was a standard sentence to agree with majority 15:51:17 +0 15:51:40 present+ 15:52:20 Zakim, who is here? 15:52:20 Present: TallTed, rivettp, ora, gatemezing, olaf, AndyS, gkellogg, thomas, Fabio_Vitali, Doerthe 15:52:20 q+ 15:52:22 On IRC I see Fabio_Vitali, Doerthe, thomas, rivettp, RRSAgent, Zakim, ora, olaf, gatemezing, gkellogg, TallTed, AndyS, pchampin, driib, agendabot, rhiaro 15:52:27 ack thomas 15:53:02 thomas: how do we go on this problem? Do we wait for the creator to join? 15:54:00 pchampin: Once we have the vocabulary added, then we could move forward with that point 15:54:56 topic: roadmap 15:55:53 q+ 15:56:25 pchampin: few things regarding the vocab section, do think that all can be done before we send out a "final community report" 15:56:27 qN 15:56:29 q? 15:56:35 ack thomas 15:56:50 s/qN/q? 15:57:56 thomas: I proposed to review the sections in the document before the summer.. 15:59:10 s/review/reordoring 15:59:26 q? 16:00:27 q? 16:02:47 AndyS: I'm concerned about the PR on restructuring before having a consensus on it is desirable 16:04:22 action: pchampin to draft an introduction paragraph to show the interconnection between the section 16:04:31 I need to drop 16:04:34 Zakim, who is here? 16:04:34 Present: TallTed, rivettp, ora, gatemezing, olaf, AndyS, gkellogg, thomas, Fabio_Vitali, Doerthe 16:04:37 On IRC I see Fabio_Vitali, Doerthe, thomas, rivettp, RRSAgent, Zakim, ora, olaf, gatemezing, gkellogg, TallTed, AndyS, pchampin, driib, agendabot, rhiaro 16:05:06 pchampin: Thanks everyone and see you! 16:05:16 Regrets for the next meeting. 16:05:24 Previous meeting: https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/Minutes/2021-07-16.html 16:05:24 Next meeting: https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/Minutes/2021-09-17.html 16:06:18 gatemezing, no I'll take care of the rest 16:06:21 thanks 16:07:19 RRSAgent, pointer 16:07:19 See https://www.w3.org/2021/09/03-rdf-star-irc#T16-07-19 17:41:13 zakim, end the meeting 17:41:13 As of this point the attendees have been TallTed, rivettp, ora, gatemezing, olaf, AndyS, gkellogg, thomas, Fabio_Vitali, Doerthe 17:41:15 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 17:41:15 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/09/03-rdf-star-minutes.html Zakim 17:41:18 I am happy to have been of service, gkellogg; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 17:41:22 Zakim has left #rdf-star 17:41:37 rssagent, bye 17:42:10 rssagent, please leave