12:24:19 RRSAgent has joined #eo 12:24:19 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/08/27-eo-irc 12:24:21 RRSAgent, make logs public 12:24:21 Zakim has joined #eo 12:24:23 Meeting: Accessibility Education and Outreach Working Group (EOWG) Teleconference 12:24:23 Date: 27 August 2021 12:28:18 Laura has joined #eo 12:28:36 present+ 12:28:41 eoncins has joined #eo 12:28:50 CarlosD has joined #eo 12:29:12 Chair: Sharron 12:29:21 Scribe: eoncins 12:29:42 Jade has joined #eo 12:30:34 present+ 12:30:37 zakim, who is on the call? 12:30:37 Present: brent, CarlosD 12:30:44 present+ Laura 12:31:28 Present+ Estella, Donna, Hidde, Mark, Daniel, Michele, Leticia, Jade 12:32:02 Leticia has joined #eo 12:32:10 present+ 12:32:14 Michele has joined #eo 12:33:21 krisannekinney has joined #eo 12:33:28 present+ Kris Anne, Billie 12:33:34 Sharron: Hidde will comment on topics arround WCAG report tool 12:34:10 Topic: WCAG Em report tool 12:34:10 MarkPalmer has joined #eo 12:35:03 Changes and fixes since last review: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Group/group-eo-chairs/2021JulSep/0098.html 12:35:10 Hidde: There are some last minutes comments. There were 2 specific things I wanted to highlight... 12:35:23 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Group/group-eo-chairs/2021JulSep/0098.html 12:35:47 on the first page you can select HTML, CSS under others. A request was made to add also pdf... 12:36:16 do you agree to add .pdf or own technology? 12:37:00 Sharron: According to the low vision Task Force pdf should not be included... 12:37:27 ...pdf is absolutely a non accessible technology and should not be in the default list... 12:37:33 Donna has joined #eo 12:38:02 ...this is the other bit of context. 12:38:29 Hidde: Thanks Sharron. 12:38:46 Sharron: Any comments about adding pdf as technology? 12:39:01 Laura: I agree that it is unappropiate to add it. 12:39:12 q+ to support proposal 12:39:25 +1 to support pdf 12:39:36 +1 to support including pdf 12:39:43 ack dmo 12:39:43 dmontalvo, you wanted to support proposal 12:39:44 +1 12:39:47 +1 to support including PDF 12:39:48 +1 12:39:54 Daniel: I agree that it is easier to acknowledge that. 12:39:56 +1 12:40:14 Sharron: Any other items on WCAG-EM report tool? 12:41:25 Hidde: The new tool will replace the old tool. A comment has been included with a warning a box in yellow... 12:41:43 also in the footer there is an indication to the previous version... 12:42:02 ...maybe the yellow box at the top can be removed? 12:42:12 q+ 12:42:31 ...do we want the banner at the top? 12:42:33 ack Laura 12:43:01 Laura: I agree that the yellow banner can be removed. With the footer is ok. 12:43:04 q+ 12:43:08 q+ 12:43:12 q+ 12:43:15 Laura: feels like you are not confident about the tool 12:43:34 -1 to the banner 12:43:42 +1 not showing the banner - the only reason to have that would be if they are to have a huge problem w the new one. 12:43:47 q? 12:44:08 ack dmontalvo 12:44:27 ack dmontalvo 12:44:37 Krisanne: Somebody may want to know were is the old version. 12:44:51 ack krisannekinney 12:44:54 Hidde: With a link would be enough? 12:45:49 Krisanne: It is important that people submitting with the old version can finish the submission. 12:46:45 Hidde: Someone that is submitting can export on jason file and finish the submission. 12:47:17 The export/import of reports: is that well documented? 12:47:33 Sharron: If I save a jason file with the old tool. I can import it with the new version and finish the submission? 12:47:42 Hidde: yes it should work. 12:48:05 q+ 12:48:06 Sharron: Maybe this can be announced to the audience? 12:48:09 q? 12:48:11 Hidde: yes 12:48:18 ack Michele 12:48:18 ack Michele 12:49:13 Michelle: I think that it is important to let people know that this is a new version and indicate a deadline. 12:49:24 Sharron: That's a good suggestion. 12:49:24 q? 12:49:31 ack Laura 12:50:13 Laura: I agree with Michelle with the deadline for the old version and indicate it. A soft transition to the new version. 12:51:14 Sharron: This is true. 12:52:22 Sharron: As a group we would like to have the message on the top but the message should be more friendly. Is that correct? 12:52:26 Billie has joined #eo 12:52:38 +1 to what Sharron proposes 12:52:48 +1 12:53:25 Laura: Yes, it is important to indicate that the old version will move away but people will have time to still use it. 12:53:58 Hidde: We really need to get the wording right. 12:54:55 ...we have a lot of things going on at the bottom of the tool. For accessible reasons we need to have it right. 12:56:24 Micheles in chat: Welcome to the new WCAG-EM Tool. You can access the old version (linked) until Sept 21, 2021. 12:56:52 Somebody needs to remember to take that off on Sept 21st btw 12:57:00 Sharron: That's good because it addressed the concern of not having confidence to the new version. 12:57:10 q+ 12:57:24 Have to drop - more wacky stuff! Lovely to see your faces and talk soon!! 12:57:37 I totally made up that date! 12:57:48 Sharron: We have to make sure that once the deadline is gone the old version is not available. 12:58:01 ack me 12:58:14 Laura: More than 3 moths might be too much. 12:58:27 +1 to 3 months 12:58:40 Sharron: Let's give a 3 months window. Thanks for the work Hidde. 12:59:07 Topic: Curricula Modules 12:59:32 Sharron: We had quite a lot of work to consider. I will turn it into Daniel. 12:59:46 Daniel: I will past the first issue to deal with. 13:00:58 Daniel: We had a discussion regarding the structure and differentiations between designers and developers... 13:01:36 ...now in the module one we have included the color and also we have switched module 2 and module 3... 13:02:13 ...now information design is module 2 and navigation is module 3... 13:02:25 Draft Curricula Designer Modules: https://deploy-preview-389--wai-curricula.netlify.app/curricula/designer-modules/ 13:03:01 ...in information design we have added forms and controls. Also we will add information on forms... 13:03:37 ...module 3 will remain the same. In terms of images we also added informative images and complex images... 13:04:05 ...we will also add information regarding the role of the image... 13:05:13 ...in the last module we also made some modifications to cover topics related to gestions and motions. A lot of changes in structure and information... 13:05:36 ...we want now to make sure that people agrees with the changes made. 13:05:37 q? 13:06:40 Sharron: Maybe we need a new survey. Daniel you had already several comments with other people, have you addressed all them? 13:06:58 Daniel: yes we are having an exchange with people and addressing them. 13:07:45 ...on the detail side yes. On the structural side I decided to discuss them with the EO. 13:07:58 ...we may wait for a survey. 13:08:23 ...today I was looking for first reactions. 13:08:59 Sharron: It seems that now the curricula focus more on designers. Any reactions from the group? 13:09:39 Michelle: To me forms, interactions and feedback may not work together. But I want to see the survey. 13:10:00 q+ 13:10:03 Daniel: I see that we could split that in two different topics. 13:10:47 Michelle: I maybe could join the next TF and explain the comments. 13:10:54 ack CarlosD 13:11:23 Carlos: Just wanted to ecco that we have this in the back of our minds I also do not feel comfortable in mixing all the terms together... 13:12:37 ...I thinks that module 1 could be called visual desing, module 2 is ok module 3 is navigation desing and module 4 would be interaction design. 13:12:49 Daniel: It sound a good suggestion. 13:12:51 q+ 13:13:10 Daniel: That would be more consistent with the developers curricula. 13:14:30 Estella: ONe of the comments that I made is for the dvelopers a single word described the module, for a designer we have more descriptive titles. That would me more consistent 13:14:49 Daniel: We may have two words in the designers and one word on the developers. 13:15:04 ...for the designers we need to be a bit more descriptive. 13:15:35 Sharron: I am glad that we have Michelle onboard on the TF meetings. 13:15:41 https://github.com/w3c/wai-curricula/issues/378/#issuecomment-905383586 13:16:31 Daniel: There were other comments regarding wording and WCAG specific terminology which have been removed. We are working on those. 13:16:40 ...this is also happening. 13:16:50 Sharron: That's great. 13:17:12 Daniel: Thanks to the TF participants. 13:18:27 Brent: We will have a survey on this. So it is important to add comments of the EO calls in the surveys. 13:19:01 Sharron: Good job and progress on the designers' curricula. 13:19:13 Topic: Wrap up 13:19:37 q+ 13:19:44 Sharron: Follow the progress of the different projects, surveys and work of the EO. 13:19:50 q+ 13:20:42 Michelle: For me it is really helpful that you add the deadline as subject for the surveys. 13:21:18 Sharron: We are happy to do that and if you miss the deadline please do not hesitate to inform us. 13:21:31 ack Michele 13:21:37 ack eon 13:21:54 Estella: We are working on a Universal Design Project. I don't know if you are ocnsidering these principles when writing your materials. Just a comment 13:23:03 trackbot, end meeting 13:23:03 Zakim, list attendees 13:23:03 As of this point the attendees have been brent, CarlosD, Laura, Estella, Donna, Hidde, Mark, Daniel, Michele, Leticia, Jade, Kris, Anne, Billie 13:23:11 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 13:23:11 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/08/27-eo-minutes.html trackbot 13:23:12 RRSAgent, bye 13:23:12 I see no action items