17:02:09 RRSAgent has joined #aria 17:02:09 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/08/19-aria-irc 17:02:09 Jory has joined #aria 17:02:11 RRSAgent, make logs Public 17:02:13 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), jamesn 17:02:52 pkra has joined #aria 17:03:06 present+ 17:04:18 present+ Joanmarie_Diggs 17:04:28 present+ 17:04:29 scribe Jory 17:04:41 agenda+ [New Issue Triage](https://bit.ly/aria-issues-aug19) 17:04:41 agenda+ [New PR Triage](https://bit.ly/aria-pr-aug19) 17:04:41 agenda+ [Meaty Topic Meeting Reminders](https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/aria/calendar) 17:04:41 agenda+ [Meaty topics for future weeks](https://bit.ly/aria-meaty-topic-candidates) 17:04:42 agenda+ [Updating ARIA 1.2 due to IDL implementations (exit and re-enter CR?)](https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/1598) 17:04:42 agenda+ Validator Tests: [open issues](https://bit.ly/aira-validator-test-issues) and [status](https://github.com/w3c/aria/tree/main/validator-tests#test-files-and-results) 17:04:42 agenda+ [Prohibit presentation / none on where it causes conflict resolution](https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/1494) 17:04:44 scribe: Jory 17:04:54 present+ 17:05:00 sarah_higley has joined #aria 17:05:01 present+ 17:05:43 Matt_King has joined #aria 17:05:48 zakim, next item 17:05:48 agendum 1 -- [New Issue Triage](https://bit.ly/aria-issues-aug19) -- taken up [from jamesn] 17:06:08 present+ 17:06:52 audio fail 17:07:02 James: for issue 1 we need to pull aria-dsecription out of CR for 1.2... agreed? 17:07:41 issue: 1598 nater in agenda 17:07:41 Created ISSUE-1056 - 1598 nater in agenda. Please complete additional details at . 17:10:33 reflecting element references should be a 1.3 milestone, assigned to CYNS 17:10:34 MarkMcCarthy has joined #aria 17:10:46 present+ 17:11:41 siri has joined #aria 17:11:57 zakim, next item 17:11:57 agendum 2 -- [New PR Triage](https://bit.ly/aria-pr-aug19) -- taken up [from jamesn] 17:13:01 PR 140 in AccName, needs Brain and Matt will review together 17:13:11 PR 1595 James will review 17:13:17 zakim, next item 17:13:17 agendum 3 -- [Meaty Topic Meeting Reminders](https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/aria/calendar) -- taken up [from jamesn] 17:13:57 Layout Grids is Meaty next week, then alertdialog the following week 17:14:07 zakim, close item 17:14:07 I don't understand 'close item', Jory 17:14:46 zakim, close this item 17:14:46 agendum 3 closed 17:14:47 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:14:47 4. [Meaty topics for future weeks](https://bit.ly/aria-meaty-topic-candidates) [from jamesn] 17:14:51 zakim, next item 17:14:51 agendum 4 -- [Meaty topics for future weeks](https://bit.ly/aria-meaty-topic-candidates) -- taken up [from jamesn] 17:15:36 zakim, next item 17:15:36 agendum 4 was just opened, Jory 17:15:43 zakim, close this item 17:15:43 agendum 4 closed 17:15:44 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:15:44 5. [Updating ARIA 1.2 due to IDL implementations (exit and re-enter CR?)](https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/1598) [from jamesn] 17:15:46 zakim, next item 17:15:46 agendum 5 -- [Updating ARIA 1.2 due to IDL implementations (exit and re-enter CR?)](https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/1598) -- taken up [from jamesn] 17:17:48 joanie: if we can put the spec BACK TO nullable DOMstring we have 3 implementations, if not we are back to 0 17:18:08 joanie: whould we pull the 1.2 CR, fix it, then put it back up? 17:18:18 james: why was it changed in the first place? 17:19:18 cyns: here was feedback that in #1058 17:20:17 correction: there was feedback in 1058 that prompted the change. AOM working group noted that there have been IDL changes that need to taken into account 17:20:54 james: let's make sure we understand the reason for the change before we revert it 17:21:18 cyns: let's get feedback from jamesc 17:21:36 james: let's do a draft PR for this change 17:21:51 cyns: will do a PR for next week 17:23:13 joanie: we also need to change the narrative and normative text explaining the validation and handling of an absent value 17:25:24 joanie: there may be role-by-role differences for what the default value should be 17:27:33 jamesn: please set implementers as reviewers of the draft PR 17:27:40 cyns: do we have tests for this yet? 17:28:07 joanie and syn will try to find those tests 17:28:23 correction: syn = cyns 17:29:41 jamesn: will need a CFC if we want to enter a new CR 17:29:51 zakim, next item 17:29:51 agendum 6 -- Validator Tests: [open issues](https://bit.ly/aira-validator-test-issues) and [status](https://github.com/w3c/aria/tree/main/validator-tests#test-files-and-results) -- 17:29:54 ... taken up [from jamesn] 17:31:33 valerie: I think all the tests are written but there may be open PRs to be review 17:31:44 jamesn: happy to help with reviews 17:33:04 joanie: a good next step would be to test the new w3c validator 17:33:21 jamesn: IBM has one too (that may be OSS) 17:36:08 jamesn:does anyone know of another agent we can file issues against? It would be good to have a second one. W3 validator? 17:36:27 valerie: not sure if that one does aria 1.2 validation 17:38:08 jamesn: not every Author MUST statement is going to be machine checkable, but we should do the best we can. 17:38:24 jamesn: maybe the W3C one is not the best candidate 17:39:38 https://github.com/validator/validator/issues/ 17:40:33 jamesn: (looking at the repo) they do have some ARIA validation in here 17:40:56 validator repo: https://github.com/validator/validator/issues/ 17:41:17 zakim, next item 17:41:17 agendum 7 -- [Prohibit presentation / none on where it causes conflict resolution](https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/1494) -- taken up [from jamesn] 17:42:15 jamesn: this PR needs some improvement, anyone want to take this? 17:43:56 zakim, next item 17:43:56 I do not see any more non-closed or non-skipped agenda items, Jory 17:44:57 RRSagent, make minutes 17:44:57 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/08/19-aria-minutes.html Jory 18:46:43 Jory has joined #aria 18:58:52 Jory has joined #aria 19:44:57 Zakim has left #aria 20:41:05 Jory_ has joined #aria