IRC log of rqtf on 2021-08-18
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 12:47:59 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #rqtf
- 12:47:59 [RRSAgent]
- logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/08/18-rqtf-irc
- 12:48:01 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 12:48:04 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group Teleconference
- 12:48:04 [trackbot]
- Date: 18 August 2021
- 12:48:09 [jasonjgw]
- chair: jasonjgw
- 12:48:12 [jasonjgw]
- present+
- 12:48:14 [jasonjgw]
- agenda+ Joint working group meetings and break-out sessions planned for TPAC 2021.
- 12:48:14 [jasonjgw]
- agenda+ Synchronization accessibility User Requirements.
- 12:48:14 [jasonjgw]
- agenda+ Updates, issues or questions concerning other publication efforts of the Task Force (Natural Language, Remote Meetings, XR).
- 12:48:18 [jasonjgw]
- agenda+ Miscellaneous topics.
- 12:48:25 [jasonjgw]
- zakim, list agenda
- 12:48:25 [Zakim]
- I see 6 items remaining on the agenda:
- 12:48:26 [Zakim]
- 4. Natural Language Interface Accessibility User Requirements. [from jasonjgw]
- 12:48:26 [Zakim]
- 5. Miscellaneous topics. [from jasonjgw]
- 12:48:26 [Zakim]
- 6. Joint working group meetings and break-out sessions planned for TPAC 2021. [from jasonjgw]
- 12:48:26 [Zakim]
- 7. Synchronization accessibility User Requirements. [from jasonjgw]
- 12:48:26 [Zakim]
- 8. Updates, issues or questions concerning other publication efforts of the Task Force (Natural Language, Remote Meetings, XR). [from jasonjgw]
- 12:48:28 [Zakim]
- 9. Miscellaneous topics. [from jasonjgw]
- 12:48:45 [jasonjgw]
- zakim, clear agenda
- 12:48:45 [Zakim]
- agenda cleared
- 12:48:50 [jasonjgw]
- agenda+ Joint working group meetings and break-out sessions planned for TPAC 2021.
- 12:48:50 [jasonjgw]
- agenda+ Synchronization accessibility User Requirements.
- 12:48:50 [jasonjgw]
- agenda+ Updates, issues or questions concerning other publication efforts of the Task Force (Natural Language, Remote Meetings, XR).
- 12:48:53 [jasonjgw]
- agenda+ Miscellaneous topics.
- 12:49:04 [jasonjgw]
- zakim, list agenda
- 12:49:04 [Zakim]
- I see 4 items remaining on the agenda:
- 12:49:06 [Zakim]
- 1. Joint working group meetings and break-out sessions planned for TPAC 2021. [from jasonjgw]
- 12:49:06 [Zakim]
- 2. Synchronization accessibility User Requirements. [from jasonjgw]
- 12:49:06 [Zakim]
- 3. Updates, issues or questions concerning other publication efforts of the Task Force (Natural Language, Remote Meetings, XR). [from jasonjgw]
- 12:49:07 [Zakim]
- 4. Miscellaneous topics. [from jasonjgw]
- 12:55:59 [janina]
- janina has joined #rqtf
- 12:56:40 [janina]
- agenda?
- 12:56:44 [janina]
- present+
- 12:59:27 [JPaton]
- JPaton has joined #rqtf
- 13:00:29 [Joshue108]
- present+
- 13:00:54 [Joshue108]
- scribe: Joshue108
- 13:06:04 [Joshue108]
- <Troubleshooting issues with captions>
- 13:06:24 [jasonjgw]
- zakim, next item
- 13:06:24 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 -- Joint working group meetings and break-out sessions planned for TPAC 2021. -- taken up [from jasonjgw]
- 13:07:09 [Joshue108]
- JW: When we last discussed this APA was planning and co-ordinating
- 13:07:28 [janina]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2021
- 13:07:29 [Joshue108]
- We were to work those out - update from Janina.
- 13:07:40 [Joshue108]
- JS: This will be the ongoing meeting link
- 13:08:08 [Joshue108]
- It will be updated during TPAC, contain meeting info etc - please do bookmark.
- 13:08:18 [Joshue108]
- <Janina gives overview of doc>
- 13:08:49 [Joshue108]
- We will add Google calendar links etc
- 13:09:04 [Joshue108]
- There are proposed sessions in this doc.
- 13:09:44 [Joshue108]
- We've asked Timed-text group if they want a session on the Synchronization Accessibility User Requirements
- 13:10:09 [Joshue108]
- We hope to be at FPWD or beyond at TPAC
- 13:10:09 [Joshue108]
- https://raw.githack.com/w3c/apa/main/saur/
- 13:10:42 [Judy]
- q+
- 13:10:42 [Joshue108]
- JS: We also have proposed longer meetings - one on the future of a11y APIs - there are some concerns over their potential end of life
- 13:11:00 [Judy]
- q+ to suggest a re-framing of the time context, and to update on AOM
- 13:11:09 [Joshue108]
- Discussions on how frameworks would handle this - or what next gen A11y APIs need to look like
- 13:11:25 [becky]
- becky has joined #rqtf
- 13:11:32 [Joshue108]
- There are also near term requirements out of our pronunciation task force that we need to bridge
- 13:11:41 [Joshue108]
- Relating to TTS specs etc
- 13:12:09 [Joshue108]
- We also have breakouts - an introduction to APA publications
- 13:12:35 [Joshue108]
- We may need more time to discuss various specs and our extensive user requirement documents
- 13:12:52 [Joshue108]
- Should that be two sessions? Need more time?
- 13:13:01 [Joshue108]
- COGA, will talk about content usable
- 13:13:14 [Joshue108]
- Remote meetings with Judy and Scott to present work
- 13:13:45 [Joshue108]
- Our main interest it scheduling so there is no clash
- 13:14:42 [Joshue108]
- Also we have mechanisms for live captioning etc that we need to plan
- 13:15:05 [Joshue108]
- A question is do we want to join with personalisation and pronunciation or is that too much?
- 13:15:13 [Joshue108]
- ack judy
- 13:15:13 [Zakim]
- Judy, you wanted to suggest a re-framing of the time context, and to update on AOM
- 13:15:40 [Joshue108]
- JB: Regarding the future of APIs discussion..
- 13:15:52 [Joshue108]
- there are other discussions relating..
- 13:16:27 [Joshue108]
- There is an issue around how to frame the A11y API -we need to be careful about what we imply about the timing of that.
- 13:16:47 [Joshue108]
- They may need to transition in the next 5 years but we dont want to scare people out of using them
- 13:16:57 [Joshue108]
- Should be framed in the future tense.
- 13:17:20 [Joshue108]
- JB: There are discussion at W3C Management and team about the AOM
- 13:17:40 [Joshue108]
- These conversations should also happen in APA before TPAC
- 13:17:53 [Joshue108]
- JB: Sounds good
- 13:18:22 [Joshue108]
- JS: Fine to all the above - the issue of coming to end of life - is about exploring the future before we get there to avoid trouble.
- 13:18:40 [Joshue108]
- That meeting needs to have the right people there.
- 13:18:59 [Joshue108]
- We aim to invite some key people. Then if so we can chat, otherwise won't schedule.
- 13:19:20 [Joshue108]
- JS: I did raise this on a WAI co-ordination call.
- 13:19:32 [Joshue108]
- James Craig was positive about doing this
- 13:19:44 [Joshue108]
- At TPAC, as a good forum
- 13:20:16 [Joshue108]
- Cc'ing Joanie Diggs also - and Alice Boxhall , Aaron etc
- 13:20:36 [Joshue108]
- We can also learn from their input.
- 13:20:41 [Joshue108]
- q?
- 13:21:03 [Joshue108]
- JW: The closest connection is with the XR A11y work
- 13:21:08 [Joshue108]
- But there are others.
- 13:21:36 [Joshue108]
- If you are interested in how these all connect then that is a good conversation to be a part of.
- 13:22:17 [Joshue108]
- JW: Regarding diagrams and charts - that is one area that ARIA is interested in, as well as limitations in current approaches
- 13:22:37 [Joshue108]
- JS: If we can frame these an engineering problems, I'd be happy to list them
- 13:22:46 [Judy]
- q+
- 13:23:02 [Joshue108]
- JS: Near term challenges are important conversations
- 13:23:57 [Joshue108]
- JB: I'm looking at this from the perspective of how others who are new to the group - so want to give some background
- 13:24:03 [Joshue108]
- <Judy gives background>
- 13:24:21 [Joshue108]
- <on TPAC and how it works>
- 13:25:40 [Joshue108]
- ack judy
- 13:25:46 [Joshue108]
- JW: Any questions?
- 13:26:16 [Joshue108]
- q?
- 13:26:32 [Joshue108]
- JS: Can I return to the time issue a la breakouts?
- 13:26:56 [Joshue108]
- Single session or presentation of individual sessions on each user requirements document.
- 13:27:22 [Joshue108]
- JW: First reaction, is if covering all of them - that session could be tricky.
- 13:27:36 [Joshue108]
- Brevity vs sufficiency
- 13:27:43 [Joshue108]
- In one hour
- 13:28:02 [Joshue108]
- Recent publications also will entail more exposition as well as questions.
- 13:28:13 [Joshue108]
- Seems crowded to me
- 13:28:20 [Joshue108]
- JS: Will we split it?
- 13:28:29 [Judy]
- s/Judy gives background/Judy describes Technical Plenary and Advisory Committee meeting as (currently) a two-week virtual opportunity for the W3C accessibility area to sync up with other W3C working groups, with a lot of pre-arranged joint meetings/
- 13:28:36 [Joshue108]
- JW: Yes, are they in hour long blocks
- 13:28:37 [Joshue108]
- q+
- 13:29:06 [Joshue108]
- JW: some prep and advance notice would be needed
- 13:29:35 [Joshue108]
- JW: Other points of view
- 13:29:37 [Joshue108]
- ack me
- 13:30:23 [jasonjgw]
- Josh: suggests organizing the sessions to group related documents together.
- 13:30:52 [Joshue108]
- JS: Wants to know what to do.
- 13:31:10 [Joshue108]
- JS: If slots are at a premium, you could tend towards one over two.
- 13:31:39 [Joshue108]
- If you could get two sessions set up - that may be better approach - time needed for questions etc
- 13:31:51 [Joshue108]
- JS: I'm looking at Jason and Josh as presenters.
- 13:32:19 [Joshue108]
- Thinking of the docs we have - and some new items for TPAC - such as the Natural Language A11y User Requirements.
- 13:32:24 [Joshue108]
- What do you want to do?
- 13:32:40 [Joshue108]
- Can they be combined? What should the wider W3C need to know.
- 13:32:58 [Joshue108]
- Add up the time - 25 mins max each?
- 13:33:44 [Joshue108]
- JW: 5 min summaries of each - Media Syn, Natural Language, XR, WebRTC etc
- 13:33:57 [Joshue108]
- Remote meetings - looking at 2-25 minutes.
- 13:34:22 [Joshue108]
- JOC: Are we looking at divided sessions?
- 13:35:57 [Joshue108]
- JS: We can look at this and I can be a good referee.
- 13:36:04 [Joshue108]
- JS: We can set up a page etc
- 13:36:14 [Joshue108]
- JW: Should we revisit this next week?
- 13:36:34 [Judy]
- Judy has joined #rqtf
- 13:36:43 [Joshue108]
- JS: Coming to a decision soon would be good
- 13:36:49 [Joshue108]
- JW: Next weeks agenda
- 13:37:12 [Joshue108]
- JS: There is a link also to the Silver / Accessibility Guidelines Working Group also
- 13:37:26 [Joshue108]
- Some of our user requirements doc are relevant here also
- 13:37:58 [Joshue108]
- JS: Looks to Judy for tech solution, CSS? To prevent flashing.
- 13:38:08 [Joshue108]
- JB: Gives overview on MIT research
- 13:38:50 [Joshue108]
- Flash mitigation in streaming video using micro second sandboxing techniques that scans luminosity variance.
- 13:39:17 [Joshue108]
- Can reduce seizure triggers - we need to work out how to deploy that
- 13:40:01 [Joshue108]
- JB: Lets follow up on that
- 13:40:13 [Joshue108]
- JS: Want to discuss how to deploy solutions
- 13:40:48 [Joshue108]
- In browsers or media platforms.
- 13:41:02 [Joshue108]
- JS: Questions license
- 13:41:08 [Joshue108]
- JB: Answers question
- 13:41:37 [Joshue108]
- JS: Will add an agendum to following week
- 13:41:46 [Joshue108]
- <chat on schedule>
- 13:42:31 [Joshue108]
- JW: Other questions?
- 13:42:38 [jasonjgw]
- zakim, next item
- 13:42:38 [Zakim]
- agendum 2 -- Synchronization accessibility User Requirements. -- taken up [from jasonjgw]
- 13:43:09 [Raja]
- Raja has joined #rqtf
- 13:43:12 [Joshue108]
- JW: This is the first of our new docs that we want to bring to first public working draft (FPWD)
- 13:43:14 [Joshue108]
- https://raw.githack.com/w3c/apa/main/saur/
- 13:43:34 [Joshue108]
- JW: It is pretty stable.
- 13:43:56 [Joshue108]
- What more do we want to do before we publish?
- 13:44:08 [Raja]
- q+
- 13:44:08 [Joshue108]
- JS: I want to take an editors pass.
- 13:44:52 [Joshue108]
- JS: If we want to publish early Sept, the first week may be bad - but we may have participation problems, hols and labour day etc.
- 13:45:02 [Joshue108]
- ack Raja
- 13:45:27 [Joshue108]
- RK: Please clarify - for the information access, the synchronization was a little bit unclear
- 13:45:41 [Joshue108]
- THere is a subtle difference between the two.
- 13:45:50 [Joshue108]
- The use cases vs information
- 13:46:04 [Joshue108]
- JS: Something in the doc could be better presented?
- 13:46:22 [Joshue108]
- RK: Is it tor both info like video or conferences?
- 13:46:29 [Joshue108]
- s/tor/for
- 13:46:49 [Joshue108]
- JS: One reason to take an editor pass, is to be sure we have made things clear.
- 13:47:00 [Joshue108]
- What real world expectations should be etc.
- 13:47:15 [Joshue108]
- Maybe our RTC doc needs to contain more of this?
- 13:47:54 [Joshue108]
- JS: It starts with people needing speech and audio latency falling within certain tolerances
- 13:48:06 [Joshue108]
- Regular people lip read without knowing it.
- 13:48:52 [Joshue108]
- We need to be clear about distinctions - so movies and live things are covered properly.
- 13:49:17 [Joshue108]
- JW: The doc does discuss tolerances in different media
- 13:49:42 [Joshue108]
- Mostly similar, but what can be realistically be done in various contexts is different.
- 13:50:17 [Joshue108]
- What is reasonable and appropriate may differ
- 13:50:38 [Joshue108]
- JW: Sounds tight, so what is your availability for editors pass?
- 13:51:01 [Joshue108]
- JB: Michael back next week.
- 13:51:07 [Joshue108]
- q+
- 13:51:22 [Joshue108]
- JS: We can give ourselves a week to review?
- 13:51:36 [Joshue108]
- We can say we will publish and that triggers an APA CFC
- 13:51:50 [Joshue108]
- maybe into the second full week of September.
- 13:52:06 [Joshue108]
- We could publish around the 14th and 16th of Sept
- 13:52:23 [Joshue108]
- we could keep the comment period open through TPAC
- 13:52:29 [Joshue108]
- how does that sound?
- 13:53:06 [Joshue108]
- JW: We been discussing live and pre-recorded media - and if there are issues that can be fixed or resolved in a second working draft.
- 13:53:31 [Joshue108]
- JS: An editors note may be sufficient.
- 13:53:58 [Joshue108]
- We are presenting available research etc - vs other guidance that is experiential
- 13:54:30 [Joshue108]
- JS: Asking for comments is not a bad thing to ask.
- 13:54:39 [Raja]
- I agree
- 13:54:53 [Joshue108]
- JW: Summary and guidance - also good. Editors note I can add.
- 13:55:14 [Joshue108]
- JS: Any reply from the Madeline?
- 13:55:18 [Joshue108]
- JW: Yes
- 13:55:29 [Joshue108]
- They are interested.
- 13:55:50 [Joshue108]
- And window to review.
- 13:55:53 [Joshue108]
- ack me
- 13:56:17 [jasonjgw]
- Josh: offers to help with the editorial review as well as the publication preparation.
- 13:57:16 [Joshue108]
- JS: We will be looking for others to review
- 13:57:26 [jasonjgw]
- zakim, next item
- 13:57:26 [Zakim]
- agendum 3 -- Updates, issues or questions concerning other publication efforts of the Task Force (Natural Language, Remote Meetings, XR). -- taken up [from jasonjgw]
- 13:57:40 [Joshue108]
- JS: Regarding our other publication efforts
- 13:57:59 [Joshue108]
- There has work been going on with Natural Language Accessibility from Josh
- 13:58:19 [Joshue108]
- A11y of remote meetings - I've raised an issue on Github, clarity needed
- 13:58:28 [Joshue108]
- Thats it mostly
- 13:59:29 [jasonjgw]
- Josh: XR Accessibility User Requirements is in a publication-ready state; Michael will address the publication process upon his return.
- 13:59:58 [Joshue108]
- trackbot, end meeting
- 13:59:58 [trackbot]
- Zakim, list attendees
- 13:59:58 [Zakim]
- As of this point the attendees have been jasonjgw, scott_h, Joshue, janina, SteveNoble, Judy
- 14:00:06 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, please draft minutes
- 14:00:06 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/08/18-rqtf-minutes.html trackbot
- 14:00:07 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, bye
- 14:00:07 [RRSAgent]
- I see no action items