13:32:54 RRSAgent has joined #coga 13:32:54 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/08/12-coga-irc 13:32:56 LisaSeemanKest has joined #coga 13:32:56 RRSAgent, make logs public 13:32:56 Zakim has joined #coga 13:32:58 Meeting: Cognitive and Learning Disabilities Accessibility Task Force Teleconference 13:32:58 Date: 12 August 2021 13:33:11 publish minets 13:33:30 Agenda+ Check in with all sub-groups and action requests https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/coga/wiki/PlanningPage 13:33:31 Agenda+ Reminder, next two weeks are off and present+ yourself before the meeting ends 13:33:32 Agenda+ Continue working on WCAG 2.2 actions including common objects 13:33:32 Agenda+ outreach email to get people to join the community group 13:33:33 Agenda+ add groups to the spread sheet https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RPD4pRLngZslj-KsRBlxknECCe0q1cDIx1eo0XyFGks/edit#gid=1127865154spreadsheet for outreach and recuriting for coga 13:33:34 Agenda+ Do we want every 6 months a “get to know you” sesion? 13:33:35 Regrets: Rain 13:34:15 rrsagent, make minutes 13:34:15 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/08/12-coga-minutes.html LisaSeemanKest 13:34:21 agenda? 13:39:45 agenda+ can we each do a mental health reasech paper? 13:42:13 kirkwood has joined #COGA 13:58:40 present+ 14:01:23 cweidner has joined #COGA 14:01:27 present+ 14:01:30 present+ 14:01:40 present+ 14:01:48 Fazio has joined #coga 14:01:51 present+ 14:01:56 scribe: cweidner 14:02:07 present+ 14:02:21 zakim, next item 14:02:21 agendum 1 -- Check in with all sub-groups and action requests https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/coga/wiki/PlanningPage -- taken up [from LisaSeemanKest] 14:02:40 EA has joined #coga 14:03:26 JohnK: Update on Guardianship policy. Working on drafting a doc for companies to share. 14:05:28 Lisa: Working with Jan to input additional patterns into Clear Words. Would you (Chris) want to help with that? 14:05:43 Chris W: Sure. I have a colleague working on this as well and I'll share. 14:06:25 JohnRochford has joined #coga 14:06:26 Lisa: If anyone is interested doing lit reviews reviewing research papers or user needs please reach out. 14:06:43 present+ 14:06:52 John K: Is there a central lit review hub? 14:06:53 form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeGrqJKV7RluoYrKHJN8cBJH3w9sDx7lAlAhcV0BeBTUVybkw/viewform 14:07:00 Lit review form 14:07:09 and tracking ov papers: 14:07:19 tracking what pepers are done https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XWmikm5Ein5CQ02knEJ5iGzO1YJMilTMBJ_aLVCTzs0/edit?usp=sharing 14:09:03 Lisa: Have we completed adding emails to the participant page? 14:09:09 Roy: Yes, that's complete. 14:09:31 Lisa: Progress on anonymous participation? 14:09:57 Rachel: Taking it to management. 14:10:47 Rachel: Draft process in development, will be sharing with this group when more final. 14:11:41 zakim, next item 14:11:41 agendum 2 -- Reminder, next two weeks are off and present+ yourself before the meeting ends -- taken up [from LisaSeemanKest] 14:11:52 present+ 14:12:00 present+ 14:12:04 zakim, next item 14:12:04 agendum 2 was just opened, LisaSeemanKest 14:12:10 close item 2 14:12:18 zakim, next item 14:12:18 agendum 3 -- Continue working on WCAG 2.2 actions including common objects -- taken up [from LisaSeemanKest] 14:12:29 https://github.com/w3c/wcag/labels/COGA 14:13:29 q+ 14:13:37 Lisa: A few open issues, but the only one that immediately needs our feedback is common objects. 14:14:01 Defining common objs has gone back and forth a bit. 14:14:26 ack r 14:14:38 defining common objects issue being discussed 14:14:41 https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/1902 14:15:37 is there a way to summarize where we are at? 14:16:58 q+ 14:17:31 current text: If the test is based on something the website has set such as remembering or transcribing a word, or recognising a picture the website provided, that would be a cognitive functional test. Recognising common objects, or a picture the user has provided, would not be a cognitive functional test. 14:17:33 Lisa: COGA perspective on what is considered to be a functional test was challenging for Silver group to accept 14:17:56 *cognitive functional test 14:19:41 Concern that there needs to be a block for internet spam, bots, etc. Banks and other legal entities are looking for another check. Would be difficult to move forward if forbidding CAPTCHA-type solutions. 14:19:51 q? 14:19:57 ack john 14:20:29 Rachael: Conflict is between balancing security vs accessibility 14:20:37 potentially alternative method(?) 14:21:07 John: Common objs is not just an accessibility problem. It is wider than just an accessibility issue. 14:21:09 ack ea 14:21:30 EA: Agree. Objects aren't necessarily common across international audiences. 14:21:54 q+ 14:22:09 +1 to EA on all points 14:22:35 I hate the bridges! 14:22:51 David: Often there is a lack of clarity between similar objects 14:23:09 q+ 14:23:22 ack LisaSeemanKest 14:24:24 John K: Agree with all. From the perspective of limited FoV, clicking on the boxes is also a challenge. 14:25:02 Lisa: I've also failed these as well. 14:25:51 John K: The WORD test Captcha is also a challenge. I have difficulty recognizing the characters. 14:26:35 +1 to appreciating the security problem and the need to reduce spam, but we still need to improve the systems offered 14:27:18 Google reCAPTCHA v3: https://developers.google.com/recaptcha/ 14:27:30 No cognitive function test. 14:28:22 Lisa to Rachael: Suggestion as to how we move forward? 14:28:28 +1 that works JR 14:28:46 the tick here if you are not a robort seems to work for all of us 14:29:23 Rachael: I will take it back, and provide some alternatives like the latest version of reCaptcha. However, as I understand it as written if they want to use images and provide an alternative without a cognitive function test, we should be ok. 14:30:58 Lisa: How hard of a stand do we want to take on this issue? 14:33:21 John R: I've been identifying this as an issue since 2014. I strongly believe that we should take a hard stand. If we are presented with an ultimatum that success criteria won't go through without this, then I think we should stand firm. 14:33:25 agreement that this is realy important 14:33:29 +1 we cannot say it works for people if it doesn't 14:33:49 +1 14:33:58 +1 this important 14:34:05 +1 14:35:01 zakim, next item 14:35:01 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, LisaSeemanKest 14:35:07 q? 14:35:11 ack r 14:35:15 zakim, next item 14:35:15 agendum 4 -- outreach email to get people to join the community group -- taken up [from LisaSeemanKest] 14:35:44 https://www.w3.org/community/coga-community/ 14:36:48 https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/1890 14:37:28 https://www.w3.org/community/coga-community/ 14:38:14 Lisa: I will be sending out an email to people who join the community group welcoming them and ask them what they want to be getting out of it. 14:38:39 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DoohB2-tREjXx7PF6sCi3jLt6OrjE1ciAb0Dcb7FgyU/edit# 14:38:44 LIsa: We want to recruit users. We're not limiting who can join. 14:40:19 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RPD4pRLngZslj-KsRBlxknECCe0q1cDIx1eo0XyFGks/edit#gid=1127865154 14:40:58 Lisa: We're also keeping the above spreadsheet to keep track of who we're inviting. 14:41:24 Lisa: Biggest priority group to recruit is mental health experts. 14:41:28 q? 14:42:15 q+ 14:42:28 ack r 14:42:44 Rachael: Do we have a plan for setting groups up and getting conversation going? 14:44:11 Lisa: I would like to send a welcome email to the list and invite folks to introduce themselves. Once we get that dialogue going, we can consider an open Town Hall. 14:44:32 q? 14:44:41 zakim, next item 14:44:41 agendum 5 -- add groups to the spread sheet https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RPD4pRLngZslj-KsRBlxknECCe0q1cDIx1eo0XyFGks/edit#gid=1127865154spreadsheet for outreach and 14:44:44 ... recuriting for coga -- taken up [from LisaSeemanKest] 14:44:59 close item 5 14:45:03 zakim, next item 14:45:03 agendum 6 -- Do we want every 6 months a “get to know you” sesion? -- taken up [from LisaSeemanKest] 14:45:50 +1 14:45:52 q+ 14:46:01 +1 14:46:04 id prefer the beer 14:46:47 Rachael: From a facilitator standpoint in AG, we had success with picking a light topic to chat around. We've had success with that. 14:46:58 agreed 14:47:00 +1 14:47:03 +1 14:47:20 +1 14:47:24 +1 14:48:19 EA: I'm looking at forms for Mental Health orgs in the UK. I am wondering if we are allowed to use your email to get in touch with them? 14:51:04 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DoohB2-tREjXx7PF6sCi3jLt6OrjE1ciAb0Dcb7FgyU/edit# 14:53:09 public-coga-community@w3.org 14:54:25 zakim, next item 14:54:25 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, LisaSeemanKest 14:54:30 q? 14:54:32 Lisa: They can get in touch with Rain or myself if they want someone to speak to. 14:55:15 q- 14:55:18 ack Rachael 14:55:22 zakim, next item 14:55:22 agendum 7 -- can we each do a mental health reasech paper? -- taken up [from LisaSeemanKest] 14:56:21 form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeGrqJKV7RluoYrKHJN8cBJH3w9sDx7lAlAhcV0BeBTUVybkw/viewform 14:56:29 tracking what pepers are done https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XWmikm5Ein5CQ02knEJ5iGzO1YJMilTMBJ_aLVCTzs0/edit?usp=sharing 14:56:46 q? 14:57:24 EA: I'm a bit snowed under at the moment unfortunately, so I'm unavailable for review. 14:57:43 https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/coga/wiki/Scribe_list 14:58:05 Enjoy everyone! 14:58:27 rrsagent, generate minutes 14:58:27 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/08/12-coga-minutes.html cweidner 16:44:14 kirkwood has joined #coga 16:54:22 LisaSeemanKest has joined #coga 18:09:50 stevelee has joined #coga