12:51:51 RRSAgent has joined #rqtf 12:51:51 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/07/28-rqtf-irc 12:51:53 RRSAgent, make logs public 12:51:53 Zakim has joined #rqtf 12:51:55 Meeting: Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group Teleconference 12:51:55 Date: 28 July 2021 12:51:57 agenda+ XR Accessibility User Requirements: issues and publication request. 12:51:57 agenda+ Accessibility of Remote Meetings. 12:51:57 agenda+ Synchronization accessibility User Requirements. 12:51:57 agenda+ Miscellaneous topics. 12:52:07 present+ 12:52:10 chair: jasonjgw 13:03:00 present+ 13:04:17 scott_h has joined #rqtf 13:04:42 Judy has joined #rqtf 13:04:43 SteveNoble has joined #rqtf 13:04:55 present+ 13:05:03 present+ 13:05:09 present+ 13:05:24 agenda+ Planning on User Requirements documents 13:05:54 Scribe: Joshue108 13:06:20 present+ Raja 13:06:32 present+ Ted 13:07:03 Raja has joined #rqtf 13:08:38 present+ 13:08:40 zakim, next item 13:08:40 agendum 1 -- XR Accessibility User Requirements: issues and publication request. -- taken up [from jasonjgw] 13:09:12 JW: Josh has published a commit URI to consider for publication by APA 13:09:13 http://raw.githack.com/w3c/apa/458e82b2ce737120d774dc3f2f1d26fec070415f/xaur/index.html 13:09:36 JW: APA will produce a Call For Consensus 13:09:49 The question is if there are reasons to not publish. 13:10:02 JS: To clarify, the request would be to publish this as a W3C note. 13:10:22 13:10:27 JW: Any concerns? 13:10:39 No concerns 13:10:51 SH: I saw the email - had a look - 2 years in the making and good to go. 13:11:04 JW: Thanks for that 13:11:32 JB: Checks the acknowedgements. 13:11:55 13:12:22 JOC: Yes, I updated contributors list 13:12:29 JS: Anyone need more time? 13:12:38 JW: I've bee through it in detail. 13:12:48 s/bee/been 13:13:07 JS: We can still accept editorial comments. 13:13:19 These are not substantive. 13:13:43 If we are confident then this group should log a formal resolution 13:14:18 JS: Everyone here can vote on the CFC on the APA admin list 13:14:33 The CFC will go out today and last ~ a week 13:15:03 JW: Have heard no requests for review etc 13:16:00 RESOLUTION: RQTF requests APA issues a CFC to publish XAUR http://raw.githack.com/w3c/apa/458e82b2ce737120d774dc3f2f1d26fec070415f/xaur/index.html as a W3C NOTE 13:16:33 JS: Now please vote! 13:16:50 When you get the email from APA admin, give it a plus one and send. 13:17:03 Ok 13:17:15 JW: Janina will write the CFC today 13:17:42 JW: This is ready for APA review and consideration after much work. 13:17:55 Thanks to all who contributed in various ways. 13:18:02 All the better and stronger for it. 13:18:13 As XR has a growing role. 13:18:24 JS: Regarding messaging Josh? 13:18:32 JOC: Yes, happy to say it is. 13:19:14 TOPIC: Planning on forthcoming publications 13:19:28 scribe: janina 13:19:51 jgw: Asks Josh to provide us an overview ... 13:20:22 Joshue108: So, XAUR is now moving to CfC 13:20:30 Joshue108: remaining is NAUR and MAUR 13:20:31 q+ 13:20:53 Joshue108: Want's some sense of our expectations for the remainder of the calendar year 13:21:13 Joshue108: In part it's important for my funding to get NAUR finished 13:21:32 Joshue108: acknowledges the emergent SAUR 13:27:17 JW: March for the NAUR sounds good 13:27:22 I can contribute 13:27:32 The current version reflects most of the requirements I'm aware of. 13:27:36 Solid draft 13:27:44 jgw: Can devote my employer's time, ETS is interested in this moving forward 13:27:52 That could be taken to FPWD after issues. 13:28:34 JS: I've looked at the SAUR in detail this morning, I'm happy with it. 13:28:52 Some nits, and one substantive thing around synchronising verbiage on glossary 13:29:08 This may be an issue - audio vs video description 13:29:15 I think this could go out in August 13:29:17 q? 13:29:19 ack jan 13:29:21 q+ 13:29:31 So we could be done with comments via TPAC 13:29:41 Steve had some placeholders that were to be filled in. 13:29:54 Not a barrier but should be addressed 13:30:01 JS: I didn't see that. 13:30:27 SN: The only place left where there was a section to add, was at the end in the XR section 13:30:46 Needs some review to see research on XR synchonisation 13:30:59 JS: We can do to FPWD without that. 13:31:22 Hot topic, useful to have an editors draft requesting community comment 13:31:30 Thats ok in a FPWD 13:31:34 SN: Ok 13:31:51 We could take place holder out either. 13:32:19 Or if the requirements would be different because its XR 13:32:27 SN: Would need to look to make sure 13:33:05 JW: We could introduce note - there are some style issues regarding the bibliography etc 13:33:39 JOC: I can help with formatting etc for FPWD 13:33:51 JS: Publishing in September would be good 13:34:00 Could even be up to TPAC. 13:34:31 JW: Timed text group are expecting the SAUR. 13:35:21 JOC: Can we publish both? 13:35:43 JS: I hear the need to finish NAUR, but its important we have a FPWD before TPAC. 13:35:53 Would be great to get NAUR also published. 13:36:05 SAUR has an impact on WCAG 3 also. 13:36:15 We are helping by getting this out. 13:36:32 q? 13:36:35 ack me 13:36:50 JW: Would like to get SAUR done first. 13:37:08 Want to agree that NAUR can follow 13:37:31 JW: Not far away - larger issues can be put in as notes. 13:37:57 [judy rejoins, and apologizes for the logistical glitch when I had to step off this call to take another, earlier] 13:38:30 JS: We could probably do it, and publish soon 13:38:46 Janinas ordering sounds good and could be done within weeks of each other. 13:38:55 JS: Great chance to solialise 13:39:32 JOC: I can dedicate time to this when back from hols and we can get SAUR and NAUR ready 13:40:03 RESOLUTION: RQTF to prioritise a FPWD of SAUR followed by NAUR 13:40:26 q+ to comment on remote meetings after Scott's comments 13:40:40 JOC: Apologies to Scott as I know you wanted to talk about Remote meetings a11y 13:40:51 SH: All good 13:41:26 The structured draft has received work since we discussed it. 13:41:41 All the comments etc have been incorporated, the appendix has been worked through etc 13:41:50 Lots of things have clicked into place 13:42:07 Have updated the caption requirements, window resizing and more are updated 13:42:40 Still things to do, but the question is things around hybrid meetings, presentation etc 13:42:45 Some items to be done. 13:43:06 My question is to look at where the space is to look at it and what we want to do. 13:43:25 There is also the tips section - please do have a look. 13:43:30 So how to progress? 13:43:34 JB: Thanks Scott 13:43:52 Its great to see the notes etc integrated into the doc 13:44:24 I want to highlight two things, hybrid meetings first... 13:44:46 There is more granularity needed - you need someone in the room and there are social and technical tips. 13:45:15 We need some placeholder text at the top of the section - so we dont create an impression that this is comprehensive 13:45:29 We need to change label on refs, link incorrect. 13:46:18 JB: Now it is cleaned up RQTF should review 13:46:45 JW: A question - we have two publication efforts in progress, SAUR and NAUR 13:47:03 This doc is in a wiki, so its not subject to note track doc review process 13:47:26 q+ 13:47:44 where do you see this being published? 13:47:49 Not clear 13:48:08 JB: We don't know yet. 13:48:14 For sure more than a wiki. 13:48:36 we want to evolve it - not sure if it is NOTE track but could be. 13:48:49 Could be a WAI resource, happy to hear views. 13:49:06 SH: I'm happy for it to be more easily edited. 13:49:28 I think it could be a NOTE 13:49:48 It does speak to different audience. Could be an education piece. 13:49:53 There is a demand for this info 13:50:30 If I want to disseminate to education or research, what are the steps? 13:51:08 JW: To ask if it was to be a resource or NOTE, that would engage wide review etc. When do you think you would have it in an appropriate spot. 13:51:15 like -- presentation, poster, or publication 13:51:17 q+ 13:51:19 q+ 13:51:31 ack raja 13:52:44 JB: 13:52:58 ack Judy 13:52:58 Judy, you wanted to comment on remote meetings after Scott's comments and to and to 13:53:17 JB: I'm thinking this is as a working group NOTE- takes time to do that. 13:53:38 Grabbing comments on wiki stuff can be tricky. 13:53:55 Rajas comment is good as we needed this over a year ago. 13:54:10 If we do a formal group NOTE we should have a PR version 13:54:13 ack jan 13:54:18 q+ 13:54:29 JS: I wanted to speak in favour of NOTE as it is a well known process 13:54:32 Q+ 13:54:39 This idea is well socialised 13:55:08 If we invent something new, we have issues with getting feedback, as well as moving from a wiki to a HTML document 13:55:26 JS: Not so hard, style sheets are simple. @@Pandoc? 13:55:37 s/a year ago/a year ago, and particularly we need to promote awareness of this/ 13:55:50 JW: Not e'one can change a controlled doc 13:56:11 JW: I can take care of format conversion and work with Scott to make sure its an accessible editing process. 13:56:16 SH: I can do HTML 13:56:38 JW: I can get a branch into a repo. 13:56:50 q? 13:56:54 ack sc 13:57:17 SH: The resource was useful to have a year ago etc, but there is also guidance here that has not been implemented 13:57:22 q+ 13:57:35 It also provides guidance on things that need to be added 13:57:52 ack Raja 13:58:05 RK: I was thinking we could share it with the community... 13:58:20 In research access community, there are user experience reports etc 13:58:36 that would be good for the wiki. How can we get community feedback in? 13:58:49 When it comes to education we should include that. 13:59:05 q+ 13:59:14 To cover feedback like automatic captioning and show all our collective efforts. 13:59:42 JW: If we had a FPWD on this, that would help as it is designed to get broad public review etc 13:59:47 ack jan 14:00:06 JS: On the messaging we try to get the widest response we can - create that list 14:00:21 Get comment on what is good and bad 14:00:36 It would have been good to have it, but we would be versioning it now. 14:00:54 We've learned a lot - we can put this out and put editors notes where we have questions. 14:01:07 SH: +1 14:01:39 JB: Will withhold comment - getting this into education and beyond it important 14:02:11 trackbot, end meeting 14:02:11 Zakim, list attendees 14:02:11 As of this point the attendees have been jasonjgw, Joshue, SteveNoble, Judy, scott_h, Raja, Ted, janina 14:02:19 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 14:02:19 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/07/28-rqtf-minutes.html trackbot 14:02:20 RRSAgent, bye 14:02:20 I see no action items 14:02:21 present+ Frances