IRC log of rqtf on 2021-07-21
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 12:49:16 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #rqtf
- 12:49:16 [RRSAgent]
- logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/07/21-rqtf-irc
- 12:49:18 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 12:49:18 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #rqtf
- 12:49:20 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group Teleconference
- 12:49:20 [trackbot]
- Date: 21 July 2021
- 12:49:28 [jasonjgw]
- agenda+ XR Accessibility User Requirements: issues and publication request.
- 12:49:29 [jasonjgw]
- agenda+ Joint working group meetings at TPAC 2021.
- 12:49:29 [jasonjgw]
- agenda+ WebXR Layers API level 1 review: continuation of discussion.
- 12:49:29 [jasonjgw]
- agenda+ Automotive accessibility: scope of work, requirement analysis, and potential deliverables.
- 12:49:31 [jasonjgw]
- agenda+ Documents in progress: Natural Language Accessibility and Synchronization Accessibility.
- 12:49:34 [jasonjgw]
- agenda+ Miscellaneous topics.
- 12:49:38 [jasonjgw]
- present+
- 12:49:40 [jasonjgw]
- chair: jasonjgw
- 12:56:49 [JPaton]
- JPaton has joined #rqtf
- 12:57:40 [JPaton]
- present+ John_Paton
- 12:58:23 [janina]
- present+
- 12:58:41 [Judy]
- Judy has joined #rqtf
- 13:01:45 [Joshue108]
- present+
- 13:01:55 [jasonjgw]
- zakim, next item
- 13:01:55 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 -- XR Accessibility User Requirements: issues and publication request. -- taken up [from jasonjgw]
- 13:02:00 [SteveNoble]
- SteveNoble has joined #rqtf
- 13:02:07 [SteveNoble]
- present+
- 13:02:14 [scott_h]
- scott_h has joined #rqtf
- 13:02:38 [Judy]
- [Judy regrets for first part of meeting, will join as soon as gets out of another meeting]
- 13:02:51 [scott_h]
- present+
- 13:03:09 [SteveNoble]
- Joshue108: Getting close to finished
- 13:04:03 [SteveNoble]
- Thanks to Josh for all the work!
- 13:05:01 [Joshue108]
- JOC: I'll mint a CFC ready commit, likely tomorrow and we can get ready for creating a publication branch.
- 13:05:33 [SteveNoble]
- jasonjgw: Suggest we look at draft next week to make sure we are ready for CFC
- 13:05:56 [SteveNoble]
- +1
- 13:06:03 [jasonjgw]
- zakim, next item
- 13:06:03 [Zakim]
- agendum 2 -- Joint working group meetings at TPAC 2021. -- taken up [from jasonjgw]
- 13:07:11 [SteveNoble]
- janina: Several meeting will be of interest to RQTF
- 13:07:24 [becky]
- becky has joined #rqtf
- 13:08:14 [SteveNoble]
- janina: We want to meet with timed text (and perhaps second screen) for the synchronization discussion
- 13:10:55 [SteveNoble]
- janina: another might be looking at a glossary for consistent language among specifications
- 13:12:41 [SteveNoble]
- janina: We will know more after Friday, so by next week we will have begun with outreach to other committee chairs
- 13:13:04 [SteveNoble]
- jasonjgw: Can bring back on the agenda in a few weeks
- 13:13:09 [jasonjgw]
- zakim, next item
- 13:13:09 [Zakim]
- agendum 3 -- WebXR Layers API level 1 review: continuation of discussion. -- taken up [from jasonjgw]
- 13:13:57 [SteveNoble]
- jasonjgw: Have been having some discussion on this by email
- 13:15:14 [SteveNoble]
- jasonjgw: Let's see what further comments we receive
- 13:15:51 [SteveNoble]
- jasonjgw: Have had good discussions around captions
- 13:16:34 [SteveNoble]
- jasonjgw: Question. Do we want to express a strong preference for closed captions over burned in?
- 13:16:55 [janina]
- xraccess.org
- 13:17:51 [SteveNoble]
- janina: Question: Do we know who xraccess.org is?
- 13:19:50 [SteveNoble]
- Frances: may know a contact for this
- 13:21:08 [SteveNoble]
- Joshue108: They did suggest the desire for coordination
- 13:23:17 [SteveNoble]
- jasonjgw: Bact to the captions question...any thoughts on closed vs burned in?
- 13:23:40 [SteveNoble]
- jasonjgw: Closed captions seem to be the norm
- 13:24:28 [SteveNoble]
- janina: Seems that closed captions allow for more user setup
- 13:25:17 [SteveNoble]
- Frances: Burned in may sometimes have benefits, but in most cases closed captions work best
- 13:27:30 [SteveNoble]
- jasonjgw: Josh will continue to respond to comments received
- 13:28:01 [SteveNoble]
- Joshue108: Have asked immersive captions group for comments
- 13:28:11 [jasonjgw]
- zakim, next item
- 13:28:11 [Zakim]
- agendum 4 -- Automotive accessibility: scope of work, requirement analysis, and potential deliverables. -- taken up [from jasonjgw]
- 13:29:36 [SteveNoble]
- jasonjgw: We want to start defining and clairifying the issues and what work we may want to take up
- 13:30:15 [SteveNoble]
- Ted: would like to hear from others on their thoughts
- 13:31:31 [SteveNoble]
- Ted: have had a contact from Eric
- 13:32:04 [SteveNoble]
- Ted: Wanted to know if there was interest in collaboration
- 13:32:48 [SteveNoble]
- jasonjgw: Potential scope of work?
- 13:33:13 [SteveNoble]
- jasonjgw: Perhaps opening a wiki page to start collecting information
- 13:34:14 [SteveNoble]
- Ted: Best practices document at https://www.w3.org/community/autowebplatform/wiki/Best_Practices#Accessibility_.28A11y.29
- 13:34:55 [SteveNoble]
- janina: Media related systems - out of scope?
- 13:37:44 [SteveNoble]
- Ted: Eric is from Melbourne University
- 13:38:24 [SteveNoble]
- jasonjgw: Sounds like we have a few avenues of work
- 13:38:43 [Joshue108]
- q+ to say some term to explore this space more is welcome
- 13:39:17 [Joshue108]
- ack me]
- 13:39:22 [Joshue108]
- ack me
- 13:39:22 [Zakim]
- Joshue, you wanted to say some term to explore this space more is welcome
- 13:40:02 [SteveNoble]
- Joshue108: Further exploration with others who are doing work
- 13:40:59 [SteveNoble]
- jasonjgw: Natural language interaction is one example of where automotive accessibility might have a connection
- 13:41:35 [SteveNoble]
- janina: Will there be any TPAC activity on this?
- 13:41:47 [Joshue108]
- +1 to break out session on automotive a11y
- 13:42:26 [SteveNoble]
- Ted: At least a breakout session
- 13:43:59 [SteveNoble]
- Ted: many of these people are in Europe, so meeting times will need to be cognizant of that
- 13:44:52 [SteveNoble]
- Ted: suggest seeing who is interested first so we can keep meeting time in mind
- 13:46:27 [SteveNoble]
- Ted: will write up a breakout overrview
- 13:46:41 [jasonjgw]
- zakim, next item
- 13:46:41 [Zakim]
- agendum 5 -- Documents in progress: Natural Language Accessibility and Synchronization Accessibility. -- taken up [from jasonjgw]
- 13:48:05 [SteveNoble]
- janina: Can we go ever the TOC, and figure out where some research may exist?
- 13:49:01 [SteveNoble]
- Raja: In regard to captions, there is some research in delay and size requirements
- 13:50:09 [SteveNoble]
- Raja: there was some discussion on minimal resolution and size
- 13:51:38 [SteveNoble]
- Jason: Any further comments?
- 13:53:06 [SteveNoble]
- judy: Suggest we do some of this discussion by email and then do follow-up discussion in the next meeting
- 13:53:15 [SteveNoble]
- jasonjgw: +1
- 13:53:36 [Judy]
- q+
- 13:53:55 [SteveNoble]
- jasonjgw: Not much work has been done lately on natural language
- 13:54:53 [SteveNoble]
- Judy: Would like to suggest accessibility of remote meetings may have priority
- 13:55:33 [SteveNoble]
- Joshue108: OK with me; XAUR is my current priority at the moment
- 13:57:28 [SteveNoble]
- scott_h: Working through feedback on remote meetings
- 13:58:23 [SteveNoble]
- jasonjgw: XR, Remote meetings and synchronization for next meeting
- 13:58:30 [jasonjgw]
- zakim, bye
- 13:58:31 [Zakim]
- leaving. As of this point the attendees have been jasonjgw, John_Paton, janina, Joshue, SteveNoble, scott_h
- 13:58:31 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #rqtf
- 13:58:34 [jasonjgw]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 13:58:34 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/07/21-rqtf-minutes.html jasonjgw
- 14:04:23 [janina]
- janina has left #rqtf
- 14:53:56 [Judy]
- Judy has joined #rqtf