13:55:18 RRSAgent has joined #me 13:55:18 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/07/06-me-irc 13:55:23 Zakim has joined #me 13:56:18 takio has joined #me 13:57:59 igarashi has joined #me 13:58:22 tidoust has joined #me 13:59:16 nigel has joined #me 14:00:00 Meeting: MEIG monthly call 14:00:01 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/acc2edca-73b2-491b-a7d4-ae502e254657 14:00:33 Present+ Chris_Needham, Andreas_Tai, Takio_Yamaoka, Tatsuya_Igarashi, Kazuyuki_Ashimura 14:00:34 atai has joined #me 14:00:45 present+ Francois_Daoust 14:01:10 jholland has joined #me 14:01:33 RobSmith has joined #me 14:02:07 I don't have the link to connect to the meeting, can someone send that to me? 14:02:10 jholland@akamai.com 14:02:11 Present+ Nigel_Megitt 14:02:24 present+ Rob_Smith 14:04:37 present+ Jake_Holland 14:06:07 scribenick: kaz 14:06:18 cpn: TPAC is coming up 14:06:26 i/TPAC/topic: TPAC/ 14:06:40 ... (shows the basic structure) 14:07:20 ... the question is whether we'd like to meet or not 14:07:31 ... a few suggestions here 14:07:51 ... 18-22 Oct: breakouts 14:08:02 ... 25-29 Oct: Group meeting 14:08:42 ... currently planned: WebRTC, Media, WebTransport, WebRTC 14:09:04 -> https://github.com/w3c/media-and-entertainment/issues/25#issuecomment-866684452 Possible topics for WebTransport 14:09:08 ... do we want to have a joint meeting with WebTransport, etc.? 14:09:33 jake: updates on Web Transport? 14:09:43 fd: put info above 14:09:48 https://github.com/w3c/webtransport/blob/main/explainer.md WebTransport explainer 14:09:54 ... there is an ssue (Issue 25) 14:09:59 s/ssue/issue/ 14:10:04 webtransport use cases: https://github.com/w3c/webtransport/blob/main/use-cases.md 14:10:20 cpn: Multicast CG may be considering joint discussion 14:10:37 jh: ok 14:10:46 ... use cases document above 14:11:07 ... do you have other use cases in mind? 14:11:35 fd: basically, low-latency and live streaming 14:12:05 jh: do agree but in terms of media... 14:12:11 cpn: my question was... 14:12:35 ... whether we'd use Web Transport for low-latency distribution or not 14:12:59 ... live streaming scale for large number of viewers 14:13:05 zakim, who is on the call? 14:13:07 Present: Chris_Needham, Andreas_Tai, Takio_Yamaoka, Tatsuya_Igarashi, Kazuyuki_Ashimura, Francois_Daoust, Nigel_Megitt, Rob_Smith, Jake_Holland 14:13:15 ... not really my own expertise 14:13:29 iga: CDN support for low-latency streaming 14:13:45 ... kind of implementation issue on that 14:14:10 present+ Gry_Katsevman 14:14:15 present+ Kazuhiro_Hoya 14:14:27 ... not aware of other requirements myself 14:14:48 cpn: don't want to push multicast topic at the moment 14:15:27 ... but joint discussion on WG's requirements, etc., would make sense 14:15:51 iga: live streaming for low-latency is a good use case for us 14:16:16 jh: would ask if there is any implementation 14:16:39 ... interesting to know 14:17:00 ... Web Transport is already out? 14:17:05 cpn: not sure about the status 14:17:22 ... maybe in Chrome but as experimental feature 14:17:31 https://web.dev/webtransport/ 14:17:33 ... like web-dev 14:17:45 ... status update table there 14:17:57 ... happy to organize a joint meeting 14:18:14 ... need to decide the agenda, though 14:18:24 ... who to present what... 14:18:39 ... anybody who implemented may talk 14:18:50 jh: if there is anybody, would be interested 14:19:17 cpn: Will Law is the co-Chair 14:19:20 jh: can ask him 14:19:23 ... or Ali 14:19:28 cpn: great 14:19:46 iga: we also can ask the Web Transport WG if they think about CDN support 14:19:49 cpn: yes 14:20:13 jh: it's already listed as a use case 14:20:21 iga: usage of CDN? 14:20:33 jh: anybody who provide the service 14:21:11 iga: what about limelight? 14:21:38 ... they already provide CDN for low-latency streaming on WebRTC 14:21:51 ... similar approach to be applied 14:22:00 jh: yeah 14:22:16 ... don't know about the pros and cons, though 14:22:39 cpn: let's organize a joint meeting with the Web Transport WG 14:22:43 jh: ok 14:23:01 ... interested in finding an implementation 14:23:13 cpn: in the early discussion we had 14:23:33 ... people were thinking about sending CMAF message 14:23:50 ... can we make a dedicated secure protocol? 14:24:24 iga: the other benefit of WebRTC is application's having low-latency control 14:24:31 q? 14:24:31 q? 14:24:52 cpn: next 14:24:55 ... MiniApps 14:25:06 ... Chris Lorenzo is interested 14:25:12 s/Apps/Apps for TV devices/ 14:25:20 ... maybe concerns about Web technologies 14:25:37 ... in terms of efficiency of UIs for low-power devices 14:25:47 ...he has been looking at MiniApps approach 14:25:55 ... could be interesting to look into it 14:26:31 ... and gauge interest from other media companies 14:26:39 ... doesn't have to wait until TPAC 14:26:52 ... can have a joint meeting with them earlier 14:27:17 ... would be interesting to see if there is general interest 14:27:31 ... then 14:27:43 ... finally new areas? 14:27:55 ... are we looking at the right things? 14:28:02 q+ 14:28:15 ... and kind of related topic 14:28:25 ... how to increase participation? 14:28:42 ... covering right topics or not? 14:28:48 kazho has joined #me 14:29:01 ... could organize something about that 14:29:14 ... post-TPAC planning 14:30:20 kaz: Could be several levels to joint meetings: invite other groups to our meetings, or MEIG members visiting other groups and reporting back 14:31:11 ... Discussion for expected joint meetings so far, inviting people into MEIG meeting. I'd like to suggest some MEIG members visit the WoT meeting to discuss TV devices and media streaming integration in the IoT context 14:31:35 ... I organised a W3C workshop on smart cities. I'm generating a charter for a Smart Cities IG based on the results 14:32:15 i/Could be/scribenick: cpn/ 14:32:16 ... May not be ready by TPAC, but could have a breakout session. Thinking about media streaming or content in general for smart cities could be another topic for TPAC 14:32:23 scribenick: kaz 14:32:47 cpn: yeah 14:33:24 q+ 14:33:35 ... could be interesting though the detail is not clear yet 14:33:42 ack k 14:34:38 jh: possible use case on vide streaming? 14:34:57 ... e.g. IoT devices (like video cams)? 14:35:07 cpn: IoT aspects and smart cities aspects 14:35:32 ... how to work together interoperably? 14:35:54 ... media context within smart home environment, etc. 14:36:20 kaz: and data governance in general 14:36:35 rs: something I've been thinking about smart cities 14:36:45 ... moving object data from video 14:36:57 ... e.g., school busses to be tracked 14:37:11 ... based on the video image captured by a webcam 14:37:26 ... take a video frame to identify the target 14:37:38 ... calculate the location from that 14:37:46 ... metadata to handle that 14:38:00 ... CCTV and also autonomous cars 14:38:16 ... hoping some breakout sessions during TPAC 14:38:38 cpn: interested in combining multiple data like that 14:38:51 rs: combining multiple cameras as well 14:39:08 ... can be identified from one specific vehicle 14:39:20 ... to track the specific vehicle 14:39:43 kaz: kind of scary :) 14:39:45 rs: yeah 14:39:50 ack r 14:40:00 cpn: image processing and ML 14:40:15 ... if you're organizing something, that would be good 14:40:45 ... so if there is any possible discussion on smart cities, we can join it 14:40:49 kaz: yes, very welcome 14:40:54 +q 14:40:58 cpn: rather than organizing something ourselves 14:41:01 kaz: right 14:41:12 jh: attaching metadata to video? 14:41:38 -q 14:41:38 rs: I'm working on WebVMT 14:41:59 ... location side of geospatial data 14:42:21 ... moving features work by OGC 14:42:43 ... e.g., template at some location 14:42:49 s/template/temperature/ 14:43:45 ... putting some resource on IRC 14:43:58 cpn: we've got a separate activity about that 14:44:08 OGC Testbed-17 MF: https://portal.ogc.org/files/?artifact_id=95726#MovingFeatures 14:44:43 cpn: we should have discussion with TTWG as well 14:44:57 ... should identify when to have it 14:45:00 ... will do that 14:45:10 OGC Moving Features: https://www.ogc.org/standards/movingfeatures 14:45:16 q? 14:45:29 topic: C2PA 14:45:47 cpn: summary of the discussion here 14:45:48 OGC SensorThings: https://www.ogc.org/standards/sensorthings 14:45:51 ... content provenance 14:46:35 WebVMT Editors Draft: https://w3c.github.io/sdw/proposals/geotagging/webvmt/ 14:46:36 ... this is BBC's work 14:46:57 @@@resources on OGC/webvmt to be moved later 14:47:09 WebVMT website: https://webvmt.org/ 14:47:10 topic: Multicast Receiver API 14:47:32 jh: getting the security model reviewed by IETF 14:47:52 ... basics to be covered before too many people to dig in 14:48:10 ... media use cases are important for Multicast Receiver API 14:48:37 ... the basic status is working with Chromium folks 14:48:39 OGC Testbed-16 Motion Video to Moving Features WebVMT results video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9ayV2_gskY 14:49:06 ... anybody interested multicast for media are welcome to join the CG 14:49:46 ... hoping some support by ISP near future 14:50:03 ... would like to work on the Web 14:50:14 ... and work on the security model 14:50:35 ... on the media front, would encourage you all to keep eyes on this work 14:50:51 ... working on the tutorials 14:51:11 q? 14:51:30 cpn: when we're ready about the security model, we can invite more people 14:51:49 ... the CG can host the conversation 14:51:56 ... interesting prototype there 14:52:06 ... might be fun to experiment 14:52:21 jh: would love to see that 14:52:33 s/prototype/if any prototype/ 14:52:47 cpn: great 14:52:53 ... thanks 14:53:01 topic: Media Timed Events 14:53:08 cpn: last datacue meeting 14:53:23 ... trying to work on Timed Text in MSE 14:53:35 ... a bit nervous to expand the scope 14:54:00 s/Timed Text/text tracks/ 14:54:13 ... interesting to hear from media players 14:55:02 ... we can dig it in the data cue meeting 14:55:13 topic: Media Integration Guidelines 14:55:31 cpn: input from developers, Google, Mozilla and Vewd 14:55:37 ... good input so far 14:56:20 ... anybody interested in editing the document? 14:56:32 ... other companies to get input? 14:56:36 ... e.g., Apple 14:56:47 ... potentially others 14:56:53 ... e.g., TV integrators 14:57:10 q? 14:57:11 ... feel free to contact the MEIG Chairs and/or John Riviello 14:57:22 topic: Open issue review 14:57:31 cpn: GitHub issues 14:57:38 ... a number of open topics 14:57:53 ... good to decide whether we'd like to keetp them or not 14:58:11 ... noticing Andreas is on the call 14:58:25 ... question about environment 14:58:38 ... makes me wonder if there is any progress 14:58:47 ... any updates on the issues? 14:58:52 at: there is another CG 14:59:01 ... working on issues about captioning 14:59:15 ... accessibility experts there 14:59:36 ... maybe we could the issue on our side 14:59:44 cpn: we could invite the CG guys 15:00:07 kaz: which CG, btw? 15:00:10 s/we could the issue/we could close the issue/ 15:00:19 cpn: immersive captions, I thought 15:00:38 -> https://www.w3.org/community/immersive-captions/ Immersive Captions CG 15:01:09 at: my impression is there is some discussion held in parallel there 15:01:19 cpn: yeah 15:01:30 ... cross-group coordination is important here 15:01:55 (CG meets regularly, see internal mailing-list archives: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/internal-immersive-captions/2021Jun/) 15:02:13 cpn: my meta question is 15:02:23 ... how to handle the remaining issues 15:02:34 ... let's have some more discussion offline 15:02:39 [I started to add "needs input" and "needs editor" labels. Not sure whether that's the right approach :)] 15:03:08 topic: Media WG updates 15:03:20 cpn: would recommend people look into it 15:03:27 topic: Next meeting 15:03:32 cpn: August 3 15:03:42 ... we'll plan something for the meeting 15:03:54 ... anything else for today? 15:03:56 (none) 15:04:02 [adjourned] 15:04:14 rrsagent, make log public 15:04:18 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:04:18 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/07/06-me-minutes.html kaz 15:05:20 Chair: ChrisN, Igarashi 15:05:22 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:05:22 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/07/06-me-minutes.html kaz 15:07:26 regrets+ ChrisL 15:07:28 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:07:28 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/07/06-me-minutes.html kaz 16:13:23 kaz has joined #me 17:01:18 Zakim has left #me 17:41:36 kaz has joined #me