DM: audio element content is media alternative
<Daniel_> https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/pull/1652
DM: Trevor
TB: pretty much done
... think merged
DM: should we update this now or wait for Wilco?
TB: simple change, think OK to make
SAZ: think there are versions too
... Wilco can see the changes
[TB makes changes]
DM: document has heading for non-repeated content
... was supposed to be discussed with AGWG
AJ: usually Wilco adds an issue when it gets discussed
DM: agree, so assuming not discussed
... element in sequential focus order has visible focus
AJ: need reviewers
<Daniel_> https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/pull/1658
AJ: wording needs to change for focus indicator
... color can be ambiguous
... so removed "color" and replaced with "color value"
... think less ambiguous
DM: need reviewers?
AJ: sometimes get approvals but still can't merge
... not sure why?
TB: think only worked after I got added to the contributors list
DM: will check with Wilco on permissions for Aron
AJ: maybe need to sign license agreement
DM: could be that too, will check with Wilco
... Trevor can you review this Pull Request?
TB: yes
DM: will also ask Wilco to review this
... no keyboard shortcuts uses only printable characters
AJ: made changes, got approvals, but can't merge
... this is one of these problematic rules
DM: see only 2 approvals
... approvals not showing up?
AJ: yes, not always accounted for
... not sure why
TB: it says need 3 approvals from people with *write-access*
DM: maybe that's the issue
AJ: will confirm in a moment
DM: video element visual content has accessible alternative
TB: found some odd formats
... need to run through converter
... not done yet but working on it
... should be done by the end of this week
DM: not the only one in that situation?
TB: correct
DM: video element visual content has transcript
<Daniel_> https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/pull/1647
DM: has 3 approvals
... in final call
... heads up for you Trevor
... you have 2 weeks for that
TB: maybe more Kathy than I
... not sure I have much to comment on this one
DM: video element visual content has strict accessible alternative
... Trevor working on this too
TB: correct
DM: zoomed text node is not clipped with CSS overflow
... issue for that
<Daniel_> https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues/1638
DM: Wilco commented not a problem with the rule but with a particular browser
... no changes to this one
... headins has non-empty accessible
<Daniel_> https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/pull/1640
DM: believe went into call for review 2 weeks ago
... so should be accepted meanwhile?
AJ: can anyone merge this, or just the Pull Request author?
DM: should be anyone with write access
... why don't you try?
... video element visual-only content has accessible alternative
... not sure why this doesn't have liaisons
AJ: seems to relate to the issue Trevor is working on?
TB: maybe but giant caveats on accessibility support
... discussion around that
... potentially meet the rule but not improve accessibility
AJ: the captions one says no accessibility support issues
... but think there may
TB: please put me as owner for related issues
DM: may need to discuss the broader issue on accessibility support
<Daniel_> https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/pulls/
AJ: might be able to merge Kathy's Pull Request
... heading has non-empty accessible name
... will add Trevor's name for related issues
DM: back to open Pull Requests
... 1658, talked about that
AJ: table header cells (1548) and new rule (1590) will not be resolved soon
... think other ones should be done soon
DM: #1555, old one
... we were working on that one during the workshop
... others merged