12:42:37 RRSAgent has joined #rqtf 12:42:37 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/06/23-rqtf-irc 12:42:39 RRSAgent, make logs public 12:42:39 Zakim has joined #rqtf 12:42:41 Meeting: Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group Teleconference 12:42:41 Date: 23 June 2021 12:43:05 agenda+ XR Accessibility User Requirements - open issues. 12:44:02 agenda+ Updates and coordination regarding other work (Media Synchronization, audio transformation, Web of Things use cases, etc.). 12:44:08 chair: jasonjgw 12:44:15 present+ 12:50:24 janina has joined #rqtf 12:57:42 jpaton has joined #rqtf 12:57:51 scott_h has joined #rqtf 12:58:02 present+ 12:58:39 present+ 12:59:12 Judy has joined #rqtf 12:59:55 present+ 13:00:00 becky has joined #rqtf 13:00:18 scribe: janina 13:02:06 zakim, next item 13:02:06 agendum 1 -- XR Accessibility User Requirements - open issues. -- taken up [from jasonjgw] 13:02:19 SteveNoble has joined #rqtf 13:02:30 present+ 13:03:02 https://github.com/w3c/apa/issues/180 13:03:10 [New User Need] 4.20 Wayfinding - Review of XR Accessibility User Requirements COGA 13:03:54 Joshue108: Offers an overview ... 13:04:16 Joshue108: A new suggested addition ... 13:04:41 Joshue108: Did discuss on 12 May, esp use case for "mono" and low vision 13:04:57 Joshue108: Visual issues for people with brain injury 13:05:32 Joshue108: some COGA users disoriented by stereo sound 13:06:09 This is David Fazio comment https://github.com/w3c/apa/issues/180#issuecomment-862019107 13:07:16 JS: I have no complaint with supporting these needs 13:07:31 But are we feeding requirements to a spec or a user agent? 13:07:40 Should we make that distinction? 13:07:40 q+ 13:07:56 If you look at configuration options in FF - they make everything searchable 13:07:58 ack Judy 13:07:59 Janina: it's unclear whether the requirements pertain to an application or a user agent. Making configuration options searchable is a ptential solution. 13:08:14 JB: This could feed to spec, browser and content dev 13:08:33 There are dependencies 13:08:46 Multilayered 13:08:57 JS: I think the landmark is the strongest case for the spec 13:09:15 you may need to use standard kinds of markers for 360 space 13:09:19 ack j 13:09:25 q+ 13:09:28 The sound stereo/mono is more user agent 13:09:33 ack Judy 13:09:35 Janina: having standard/consistent landmarks is an issue that could be addressed through standardization; mono options are user-agent. 13:10:01 JB: The ref point is more 3D than 360^0 13:10:53 JB: David Fazios comments have been really interesting/useful - as they are often representative of other a11y related user needs 13:11:27 jasonjgw: suggests two pieces here: orientation/nav; and audio option and its discoverability 13:11:31 JW: There are two pieces, orientation and landmark request and then the audio option and its discoverability 13:11:35 jasonjgw: suggests discussing in turn 13:11:43 Joshue108: relates to 184 13:11:45 https://github.com/w3c/apa/issues/184 13:12:14 josh: wrong thing ... 13:12:19 jasonjgw: somewhat related ... 13:12:24 Joshue108: agrees with jgw 13:12:45 q+ 13:13:18 q+ to suggest drafting something 13:13:20 ack jan 13:13:37 JS: We have two issues here and should maybe talk individually 13:13:59 On landmarks - do we have standard markations etc? Co-ords and directionality? 13:14:08 JB: Good question 13:14:15 Janina: notes the relevance of 3d directional navigation and notations for it. 13:14:19 JS: This is maybe more global 13:14:34 JB: Who is doing this stuff in VR? 13:15:14 rajakushalnagar has joined #rqtf 13:15:15 JW: Are they asking for a reference system? 13:15:29 Or some kind of mapping capability? 13:16:18 JW: Its not clear what kind of affordances are wanted here? 13:16:30 JW: Or is it design guidance? 13:16:31 q? 13:16:51 JS: There may be a need for communities to share meta data. 13:16:57 Janina: notes needs expressed elsewhere to be able to share metadata for navigational purposes. 13:17:14 You want to enable this kind of collection and sharing 13:17:32 RK: There has been research on what is the preferred system for VR.. 13:17:56 Either personal or absolute, or like with regards to plains, north south etc 13:18:12 In the end, its down to personal experience etc 13:18:25 Some maps have only North only orientation.. 13:18:38 The map can also move with you - the important thing is both 13:18:52 What you see and how you provide that orientation. 13:19:28 JS: In G maps if data is stored in standard notion then presentation aspects can be generated 13:19:48 JB: Wonders if this is relative or customised? 13:20:01 RJ: Absolute is in VR and shows itself in VR 13:20:12 Personal shows how you see it in VR.. 13:20:31 We have similar problems with captioning.. 13:20:39 you can follow the user or set them in space 13:21:08 Its better to have one ground truth, and adjust that to match perspectives 13:21:22 Within VR games you will know everything 13:21:28 JB: Finite space 13:21:39 JS: Quick number crunching 13:22:18 Joshue108: Where are we? 13:22:23 Joshue108: is this a useful addition? 13:22:31 q+ 13:22:43 brewBelieve it's a nec addition to user reqs 13:22:46 JB: This is a necessary addition IMO 13:24:00 josh: are there COGA affordances we need to accomodate? 13:24:32 ack me 13:24:32 Joshue, you wanted to suggest drafting something 13:24:34 ack jan 13:24:35 ack ja 13:24:46 JS: I think there is a global need for this 13:24:53 Janina notes a common need for positioning for all users. 13:25:03 Not just an a11y angle - there are things that already exist that are useful 13:25:21 Janina: there are specific affordances for specific groups of users that we haven't discussed in detail yet. 13:25:21 There are also affordances for specific groups with disabilitie 13:25:37 These things already exist - a kinds 13:25:49 s/a kinds/all kinds 13:26:02 JS: Also they should be separate or address diff user needs 13:26:25 Janina notes there is existing experience of the needs of different users. Janina suggests data processing to provide for the different needs. 13:27:54 JS: American printing house for the blind are doing reference points 13:28:53 JOC: The menu system point about mono is important - we should also add that. 13:29:05 https://github.com/w3c/apa/issues/181 13:29:13 [New User Need] 4.21 Understanding Actionable Targets - Review of XR Accessibility User Requirements COGA 13:29:33 Joshue108: About actionable targets for COGA 13:29:55 Joshue108: COGA people need to know what targets are actionable and how to interact with them 13:31:07 Joshue108: understand many objects are directly responsive to interaction 13:31:53 Joshue108: Unclear how one makes that conspicuous 13:31:54 q+ to reply to Janina on global affordances 13:32:07 jasonjgw: what can we generically say? 13:32:11 ack me 13:32:12 Joshue, you wanted to reply to Janina on global affordances 13:32:57 josh:Thinking about the unique equestion, are there particular affordances we need to call out? 13:33:01 q+ 13:33:25 Joshue108: If there cross refs to Content Usable, phps that would help understanding 13:34:12 zakim, who's here? 13:34:12 Present: jasonjgw, Joshue, scott_h, janina, SteveNoble 13:34:14 On IRC I see rajakushalnagar, SteveNoble, becky, Judy, scott_h, jpaton, janina, Zakim, RRSAgent, trackbot, Joshue108, jasonjgw 13:36:00 jasonjgw: we need to make objects interactable via api 13:36:56 q+ 13:37:27 ack jan 13:37:35 JS: We are making this harder than needed 13:37:46 We've had this problem for years.. 13:38:06 How certain controls are used are depended on evironment and previous knowledge etc 13:38:16 Is this around the need for COGA AT? 13:38:20 Janina: notes this is a well understood problem in other domains (e.g., how to interact with a slider depending on assistive technology and operating system/hardware). 13:38:33 What we need from the spec, is that you can map these things, and that they are not locked into code. 13:38:41 So things are mappable via APIs 13:38:44 +1 to Janina 13:38:51 Janina: we provide APIs to map user interface actions to control types. 13:39:49 Judy: recalls essential for some, useful for all applies here 13:39:51 q+ to suggest we reference content usable etc as a note 13:39:58 ack judy 13:40:14 ack me 13:40:14 Joshue, you wanted to suggest we reference content usable etc as a note 13:40:39 Joshue108: believe one of the best things we can do here is highlight need for apis 13:41:14 Joshue108: we might gather these as global implementation details we can call out 13:41:24 Joshue108: it's down to implementations to serve particular pwd needs 13:42:16 topic: Logistics for RQTF 13:42:53 13:45:01 on mac Textual is an option 13:46:43 present+ John_Paton 13:48:07 present+ 13:48:15 zakim, who's here? 13:48:15 Present: jasonjgw, Joshue, scott_h, janina, SteveNoble, John_Paton, Judy 13:48:17 On IRC I see rajakushalnagar, SteveNoble, becky, Judy, scott_h, jpaton, janina, Zakim, RRSAgent, trackbot, Joshue108, jasonjgw 13:48:26 Janina notes that W3C's IRC server is always available; one can join a channel at any time for testing purposes. 13:48:39 Janina notes you don't need to wait for a meeting to experiment and test. 13:49:37 present+ rajakushalnagar 13:50:55 q+ to ask around next steps with some XR issues 13:51:02 present+ frances 13:52:06 ack me 13:52:06 Joshue, you wanted to ask around next steps with some XR issues 13:52:27 jasonjgw: pauses to ask any updates on other areas of work ... 13:52:32 scott_h: nothing that can't wait 13:53:30 janina: wanted to flag ongoing remote meetings work 13:53:35 Raja has joined #rqtf 13:53:48 Judy: yes, but not everything is organized and integrated; som items just captured as ideas 13:54:03 Judy: so, please don't be put off we don't have it articulated well yet! 13:54:11 Judy: but feedback is certainly most welcome 13:54:24 Judy: notes bottom of doc; we need help getting it properly integrated 13:54:37 scott_h: will circulate the link on list 13:54:45 Test 13:54:53 q+ 13:55:21 ack Raja 13:55:30 raja: irc seems to be working! 13:55:34 jasonjgw: Excewllent news! 13:55:54 Judy: will resend joining page 13:56:41 jasonjgw: think we'll need to do remainder XR next week? 13:56:58 Joshue108: one quick ... 13:59:17 Judy has joined #rqtf 13:59:45 zakim, bye 13:59:45 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been jasonjgw, Joshue, scott_h, janina, SteveNoble, John_Paton, Judy, rajakushalnagar, frances 13:59:45 Zakim has left #rqtf 13:59:49 rrsagent, make minutes 13:59:49 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/06/23-rqtf-minutes.html jasonjgw 14:03:18 janina has left #rqtf 14:35:19 Judy_ has joined #rqtf 14:37:22 Judy_ has joined #rqtf 14:49:25 Judy has joined #rqtf 16:02:41 becky has joined #rqtf