IRC log of wcag-act on 2021-06-14
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 13:59:17 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #wcag-act
- 13:59:17 [RRSAgent]
- logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/06/14-wcag-act-irc
- 13:59:47 [jeanne]
- meeting: Joint ACT-Silver Testing
- 13:59:58 [jeanne]
- chair: jeanne, Wilco
- 14:00:08 [jeanne]
- present:
- 14:00:11 [jeanne]
- present+
- 14:01:04 [JakeAbma]
- JakeAbma has joined #wcag-act
- 14:01:17 [JakeAbma]
- present+
- 14:01:19 [bruce_bailey]
- bruce_bailey has joined #wcag-act
- 14:01:49 [Wilco]
- Wilco has joined #wcag-act
- 14:01:55 [anne_thyme]
- anne_thyme has joined #wcag-act
- 14:01:58 [anne_thyme]
- present+
- 14:02:15 [shadi]
- present+
- 14:02:17 [Francis_Storr]
- present+
- 14:03:02 [Skotkjerra]
- Skotkjerra has joined #WCAG-ACT
- 14:03:07 [Wilco]
- agenda+ review work done on Outcomes proposal
- 14:03:12 [Wilco]
- agenda+ identifying definitions and volunteers for drafts
- 14:03:16 [Wilco]
- agenda+ moving from tests to Expectations
- 14:03:19 [DavidASx]
- DavidASx has joined #wcag-act
- 14:03:22 [Wilco]
- present+
- 14:03:35 [DavidASx]
- present+
- 14:04:20 [Skotkjerra_]
- Skotkjerra_ has joined #wcag-act
- 14:04:56 [Jennifer]
- Jennifer has joined #wcag-act
- 14:05:12 [Jennifer]
- present+
- 14:08:22 [Francis_Storr]
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vsp1V2hBpU6Y0vNt-AGP-Y6fOxx1-IjoKgBJ_3bPlfg/edit#heading=h.5abhd9pz034w
- 14:08:23 [JennC__]
- JennC__ has joined #wcag-act
- 14:09:01 [jeanne]
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vsp1V2hBpU6Y0vNt-AGP-Y6fOxx1-IjoKgBJ_3bPlfg/edit#heading=h.imejt9fcuvoy
- 14:11:44 [Wilco]
- q+
- 14:11:44 [Jemma]
- Jemma has joined #wcag-act
- 14:11:49 [SusanH]
- SusanH has joined #wcag-act
- 14:12:29 [Jemma]
- present+
- 14:12:53 [SusanH]
- present+
- 14:13:00 [Jemma]
- q+
- 14:13:06 [Jemma]
- ack me
- 14:13:37 [Wilco]
- ack w
- 14:14:02 [Jemma]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 14:14:02 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/06/14-wcag-act-minutes.html Jemma
- 14:15:31 [Jemma]
- rrsagent, make logs public
- 14:16:47 [bruce_bailey]
- q+
- 14:16:51 [shadi]
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vsp1V2hBpU6Y0vNt-AGP-Y6fOxx1-IjoKgBJ_3bPlfg/edit#
- 14:17:07 [Wilco]
- ack br
- 14:17:09 [anne_thyme]
- q+
- 14:18:42 [ChrisLoiselle]
- In reading this, we are conflating outcomes and methods https://www.w3.org/TR/wcag-3.0/#outcomes-structure and https://www.w3.org/TR/wcag-3.0/#methods-structure . The "you should" leads to how one would do something, thus a method to achieve.
- 14:19:25 [Jemma]
- three bullet items are 1)Provide headings for sections of content
- 14:19:25 [Jemma]
- 2)Make headings descriptive of the content that follows
- 14:19:25 [Jemma]
- 3) Organize content so the headings make locating and navigating information easier and faster.
- 14:19:46 [Wilco]
- ack an
- 14:20:47 [Jemma]
- I wonder where the landmark discussion wil be placed in the structured content rule
- 14:21:43 [Wilco]
- q+
- 14:22:41 [shadi]
- q+
- 14:24:04 [Wilco]
- ack sh
- 14:24:07 [Wilco]
- ack wi
- 14:24:11 [Jemma]
- q+ out of scope question re:html sectioning element
- 14:24:12 [shadi]
- q+
- 14:25:46 [shadi]
- ack me
- 14:28:11 [Jennifer]
- q+
- 14:28:22 [Jemma]
- q+ to ask about sectioning element
- 14:29:57 [jeanne]
- ack jemma
- 14:29:57 [Zakim]
- Jemma, you wanted to ask about sectioning element
- 14:31:51 [Jemma]
- yes, it make sense that we think beyond web.
- 14:33:07 [jeanne]
- Should we move to more granular Outcomes? Or stick to presentation, Function, and semantic?
- 14:33:08 [Jemma]
- fyi, sectioning element examples include nav, main, header, footer.
- 14:33:52 [Jennifer]
- The sectioning element examples are HTML -- which is not tech neutral.
- 14:34:50 [jeanne]
- https://www.w3.org/TR/wcag-3.0/#structured-content
- 14:34:59 [bruce_bailey]
- i like keeping the presentation/function/semantic outcome
- 14:35:04 [shadi]
- q+
- 14:35:26 [jeanne]
- ack Jenn
- 14:35:39 [jeanne]
- 1) Headings organize content (outcome for "Structured content")
- 14:35:51 [jeanne]
- 2) Uses visually distinct headings (outcome for "Structured content")
- 14:36:04 [jeanne]
- 3) Conveys hierarchy with semantic structure (outcome for "Structured content")
- 14:36:24 [ToddLibby]
- ToddLibby has joined #wcag-act
- 14:36:29 [ToddLibby]
- present+
- 14:37:48 [Skotkjerra_]
- I am lost too, but then I am a newcomer to this meeting and wor which also doesn't help.
- 14:38:20 [shadi]
- q-
- 14:38:48 [SusanH]
- Yes Jenn, it's not just you :)
- 14:38:50 [Skotkjerra_]
- +1
- 14:40:39 [Skotkjerra_]
- q+
- 14:42:35 [anne_thyme]
- q+
- 14:43:22 [shadi]
- ack Skotkjerra_
- 14:43:47 [Jennifer]
- Wouldn't tests be at the Method level?
- 14:45:50 [shadi]
- q+
- 14:45:55 [bruce_bailey]
- q+ to remind that methods may be many-to-many
- 14:46:03 [shadi]
- ack anne
- 14:48:03 [Skotkjerra_]
- q+
- 14:48:22 [Wilco]
- +100
- 14:48:30 [ToddLibby]
- +1
- 14:48:59 [shadi]
- ack me
- 14:49:51 [Jennifer]
- The explicitness clarifies expectation for developers and designers. Key to remember that this is not exclusively for developers, as it needs be considered earlier than at development. The designers and product folks I worked with literally fought tooth and nail because WCAG isn't explicit and detailed.
- 14:50:25 [Skotkjerra_]
- But try asking a lawyer to phrase legislations in plain language -t heir argument would be that that is by no means precise enough. But that is their profesion, this is ours - they are both requiring skills - we cannot change that, IMHO
- 14:50:42 [Jemma]
- yes, landmark is part of this discussion.
- 14:51:14 [jeanne]
- q?
- 14:51:20 [jeanne]
- ack bruce
- 14:51:20 [Zakim]
- bruce_bailey, you wanted to remind that methods may be many-to-many
- 14:52:12 [Jemma]
- good summary of discusison, Bruce!
- 14:52:21 [shadi]
- +1
- 14:52:41 [ToddLibby]
- +1
- 14:52:42 [Jemma]
- +1
- 14:53:32 [Jemma]
- yes! more outcomes for structured content inclduing landmarks.
- 14:54:26 [Skotkjerra_]
- q-
- 14:54:46 [Jemma]
- q+ to ask about testing rule on visual heading.
- 14:55:54 [Jemma]
- 1) how to integreat ACT rule to wcag 3
- 14:56:42 [Jemma]
- s/integreat/integrate
- 14:56:44 [jeanne]
- Should we move to more granular Outcomes? Or stick to presentation, Function, and semantic?
- 14:56:57 [shadi]
- +1 to more granular outcomes
- 14:57:12 [Jemma]
- +1 what Bruce said.
- 14:57:20 [Jennifer]
- +1 to granular outcomes
- 14:57:27 [ToddLibby]
- +1 to more granular outcomes
- 14:57:37 [SusanH]
- +1 more granular
- 14:57:41 [bruce_bailey]
- +1 to more granular outcomes
- 14:57:41 [anne_thyme]
- +1
- 14:57:41 [Wilco]
- 0
- 14:57:56 [DavidASx]
- +1
- 14:58:11 [Skotkjerra_]
- +1
- 14:58:20 [bruce_bailey]
- just keep them technology neutral
- 14:58:48 [ToddLibby]
- agreed. keep them technology neutral
- 14:59:07 [Jennifer]
- Thank good ness for the transcript we have what Bruce said!
- 14:59:14 [bruce_bailey]
- present+
- 14:59:57 [Skotkjerra_]
- present+
- 15:00:51 [ToddLibby]
- ToddLibby has left #wcag-act
- 15:05:08 [ChrisLoiselle]
- present+
- 15:10:26 [jeanne]
- https://www.w3.org/TR/wcag-3.0/#structured-content
- 15:19:52 [jeanne]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 15:19:52 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/06/14-wcag-act-minutes.html jeanne
- 15:51:00 [Zakim]
- Zakim will reboot in 4 minutes
- 15:54:46 [Zakim]
- Zakim restarting; apologies for the inconvenience
- 16:58:15 [jeanne]
- jeanne has joined #wcag-act
- 17:46:02 [johnkirkwood]
- johnkirkwood has joined #WCAG-ACT