15:57:30 RRSAgent has joined #webfonts 15:57:30 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/06/08-webfonts-irc 15:57:32 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:57:32 Zakim has joined #webfonts 15:57:34 Meeting: Web Fonts Working Group Teleconference 15:57:34 Date: 08 June 2021 16:02:36 Garret has joined #webfonts 16:02:50 present+ 16:03:02 present+ 16:03:26 chris has joined #webfonts 16:04:19 present+ 16:04:40 rrsagent, here 16:04:40 See https://www.w3.org/2021/06/08-webfonts-irc#T16-04-40 16:04:51 present+ 16:04:59 scribenick: Garret 16:06:32 Vlad: main topic is proposed woff2 recommendation update. 16:06:56 Vlad: background on woff2 overlaps flags. 16:07:34 Vlad: when we made the preprocessing steps that flag was lost due to optimizations. 16:08:00 Vlad: works for most, but not all rasterizers. 16:08:20 Vlad: first reported in 2018 16:08:32 Vlad: now we've found a relatively easy fix to resolve it. 16:08:49 Vlad: fix is in email with specific edits. 16:09:13 Vlad: one action item was for Garret to do a test run and see if modified font would remain backwards compatible. 16:09:27 Vlad: that looks to be true. 16:09:44 Vlad: so old decoders will ignore the data. New ones will see it. 16:09:57 Vlad: only further changes is naming of the bit array field. 16:10:46 Vlad: any objections? 16:10:52 changes look good to me 16:11:22 no objections 16:11:28 where is the test? 16:11:49 Vlad: chris can elaborate further on candidate recommendations. 16:12:23 Chris: previous process when you publish recommendation there's a link to a errata document. Eventually those can be patched in. Then proposed req, ac review. 16:12:32 Chris: this is confusing to some. 16:12:52 Previously issued errata: https://www.w3.org/Fonts/REC-WOFF2-20180301-errata.html 16:13:03 Chris: so there's now a new option. You republish a recommendation, you can see the old text and new text. 16:13:14 Chris: since errata are difficult to read. 16:13:27 Chris: only one or two specifications that have done this. 16:13:38 Chris: you need to add insert/delete elements in the mark to show the changes. 16:14:11 Chris: you have candidate corrections with minimum 60 day reviews. After that you can actually make the changes and make them normative. 16:14:38 Chris: this is a good way forward as the spec remains also a recommendation. 16:15:05 Vlad: the review period, can it be longer? is there any benefit? 16:15:13 Chris: depends on the scope and size of the change. 16:15:28 https://www.w3.org/Fonts/REC-WOFF2-20180301-errata.html 16:15:28 Chris: I think 60 days for this small change is fine. 16:15:46 Chris: we already have one errata, so we should include that as. well. 16:16:16 Chris: we need a specific resolution to publish recomendation. 16:16:50 Vlad: we decided that a 60 day review period is acceptable and the group has agreed to publish the recommendation. 16:17:37 Resolved: publish updated Recommendation of WOFF2 wth candidate corrections 16:18:57 Vlad: ask that everyone review the proposed changes. 16:19:13 Vlad: two additional paragraphs will following existing bounding box paragraphs. 16:20:10 I'm planning to make the proposed code changes to the woff2 decoder/encoder. 16:21:15 Chris: Vlad should have access to make the changes. 16:22:14 Vlad: next call on 22nd of June. 16:22:37 rrsagent, make minutes 16:22:37 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/06/08-webfonts-minutes.html chris 16:23:06 rrsagent, make logs public 16:23:10 rrsagent, make minutes 16:23:10 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/06/08-webfonts-minutes.html chris