14:55:34 RRSAgent has joined #rdf-star 14:55:34 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/06/04-rdf-star-irc 14:55:37 RRSAgent, make logs Public 14:55:38 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), pchampin 14:56:10 meeting: RDF-star 14:58:07 TallTed has joined #rdf-star 15:00:04 chair: pchampin 15:00:15 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 15:00:18 date: 4 June 2021 15:00:35 ora has joined #rdf-star 15:00:53 Previous meeting: https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/Minutes/2021-05-28.html 15:01:04 agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star/2021Jun/0002.html 15:01:04 clear agenda 15:01:04 agenda+ Announcements and newcomers 15:01:04 agenda+ Open actions 15:01:04 agenda+ Outstanding pull-requests 15:01:04 agenda+ Publishing a new report 15:01:06 agenda+ Admin 15:01:09 agenda+ Open-ended discussions 15:01:13 present+ 15:02:00 thomas has joined #rdf-star 15:02:01 present+ 15:02:13 thomas+ 15:02:35 present+ 15:02:41 present+ 15:02:47 present 15:02:54 present+ 15:04:07 present+ 15:04:09 gatemezing has joined #rdf-star 15:04:49 I'll scribe 15:04:54 scribe: AndyS 15:05:01 zakim, next agendum 15:05:01 agendum 1 -- Announcements and newcomers -- taken up [from agendabot] 15:05:13 q? 15:05:47 q+ 15:05:48 q+ 15:05:49 pchampin: rust implementation in progress 15:05:52 ack gkellogg 15:06:25 gkellogg: Regenerate EARL tests? 15:06:32 q+ 15:06:37 ack ora 15:06:51 pchampin: wait until next publication 15:07:09 ora: Any C++ implementation? 15:07:30 ... and state of Redland? 15:07:45 I'm not aware of any implementation in C++ nor Redland 15:08:16 ack AndyS 15:08:27 scribe+ 15:08:50 present+ 15:08:57 AndyS: when we publish next time, maybe we should have a vote saying the test suite is complete 15:09:18 scribe- 15:09:19 q? 15:09:34 zakim, next agendum 15:09:34 agendum 2 -- Open actions -- taken up [from agendabot] 15:09:44 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Aaction 15:10:25 pchampin: chart action open. 15:10:51 q? 15:10:54 s/chart/charter/ 15:11:00 ... SPARQl function/operators action merged 15:11:05 zakim, next agendabot 15:11:05 I don't understand 'next agendabot', pchampin 15:11:07 zakim, next agendum 15:11:07 agendum 3 -- Outstanding pull-requests -- taken up [from agendabot] 15:11:11 s/SPARQl/SPARQL/ 15:11:34 subtopic: Discussion on referential opacity 15:12:22 i commented today 15:12:34 sorry, i was late 15:13:34 thomas: suggestion to add section 2.2 that covers transparent vs opaque. 15:14:46 pchampin: section is focused on the abstract syntax. 15:15:19 ... so discussion is with "semantics". 15:16:59 thomas: not visible enough 15:17:45 q+ 15:18:16 pchampin: This PR is about "transparent vs opaque" in dedicated sections. 15:19:12 ... can we merge this PR? 15:20:27 q? 15:20:33 ack gkellogg 15:21:44 gkellogg: this is an abstract issue and may, in a WG, be rolled into RDF semantics and entailments. 15:22:16 ... so maybe guidance to a future WG on updating RDF. 15:23:14 q. 15:23:15 q? 15:23:31 PROPOSAL: merge PR173 15:23:34 +1 15:23:35 +1 15:23:35 pchampin: propose to merge #173. 15:23:40 +1 15:23:40 +1 15:23:41 +1 15:23:53 +1 15:23:59 +1 15:24:14 RESOLVED: merge PR173 15:24:42 Subtopic: Section on RDF-star vocabulary 15:25:19 pchampin: some placeholders for discussion. 15:25:23 q+ 15:25:29 ack thomas 15:25:59 thomas: misses transparency vocabulary - there is an issue. 15:26:13 170 15:26:22 ... issue #170 15:26:29 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/170 15:27:19 ACTION pchampin to add issue 170 in the section of PR173 15:27:34 ACTION: pchampin to add issue 170 in the section of PR173 15:27:37 q+ 15:28:32 thomas: add syntax for transparency? 15:28:40 q? 15:28:45 pchampin: does not define vocabulary. 15:28:49 ack thomas 15:29:23 PROPOSAL: merge PR173 after issue 170 has been added to it 15:29:25 +1 15:29:27 +1 15:29:28 +1 15:29:28 +1 15:29:29 +1 15:29:31 +1 15:29:51 +1 15:30:03 RESOLVED: merge PR173 after issue 170 has been added to it 15:30:29 Subtopic: Discussion of TR 'Content Negotiation by Profile' 15:32:20 q? 15:33:01 TallTed: "x." not appropriate 15:33:46 q+ 15:34:01 q+ 15:34:05 ack AndyS 15:34:07 scribe+ 15:34:39 AndyS: IANA registration is slow, but updating an existing registration can be quicker 15:36:12 TallTed: there is a combination of facts here, including the fact that text/turtle *currently* does not point to the correct document 15:36:26 scribe- 15:36:29 ack pchampin 15:37:06 pchampin: the correct text is to leave it as "x." 15:37:17 ... "x-" is not a subtree 15:37:21 q+ 15:37:28 s/"x." not appropriate/neither "x." nor "x-" is appropriate/ 15:38:29 pchampin: the point of the section is to note there is not consensus in this group. 15:38:40 +1 of pchampin solution of not explicitly mentioning the x. or x- 15:39:16 pchampin: suggest remove mention of "x?" 15:39:28 STRAWPOLL: do not mention either 'x.' or 'x-' 15:39:31 +1 15:39:32 +1 15:39:35 0 15:39:36 +1 15:39:40 +1 15:39:46 +1 15:40:02 +1 15:40:19 ack gkellogg 15:40:35 https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/application/n-triples 15:41:01 gkellogg: what is necessary for other media type - eg: n-triples: -> TR/n-triples 15:41:25 ... then no IANA involvement needed 15:41:29 Linking from the CGReport to the relevant Issues and/or PRs could keep some of the discussion text out of the report, and make it easier for follow-on work to see how we reached the conclusion(s) in the CGReport 15:43:11 scribe+ 15:43:22 AndyS: Turtle was registered before it was a REC 15:43:28 ... it is a special case 15:44:20 We might suggest to the IANA-listed W3 affiliated maintainers of these media types that their registrations be changed to point to w3id.org URIs which *should* be easier to update going forward, with more maintainers, etc. 15:44:25 pchampin: bring the "one person" contact issue to W3C team. 15:45:05 ACTION: pchampin to raise the IANA issue (specific individual responsible for mediatype) in W3C stategy team 15:45:11 (or that the IANA-listed maintainers be changed to point to role accounts/addresses) 15:45:45 Name: Eric Prud'hommeaux 15:45:45 Email: eric&w3.org 15:45:50 q? 15:46:49 PROPOSED: merge PR 177 once the 'x.'/'x-' mentions have been removed 15:46:53 +1 15:46:55 +1 15:47:09 +1 15:47:10 +1 15:47:48 TallTed: suggestion - link to discussions 15:47:52 0 15:48:45 ... add links to places location for discussions 15:48:48 q+ 15:48:57 ack AndyS 15:50:36 AndyS: discussions tend to be in context 15:50:54 q+ 15:51:05 kellogg: discussions exist on github. 15:51:14 ack pchampin 15:51:20 s/kellogg/gkellogg/ 15:51:59 +0.75 15:52:06 pchampin: The section has a link to issue 43. 15:53:03 ... and telecon discussions noted on issues 15:53:46 +1 15:54:10 +1 on Andy's comment 15:54:15 RESOLVED: merge PR 177 once the 'x.'/'x-' mentions have been removed 15:56:15 zakim, next agendum 15:56:15 agendum 4 -- Publishing a new report -- taken up [from agendabot] 15:56:44 pchampin: ted and thomas wish to make proposals. 15:57:00 TallTed: not a blocker for me. 15:57:10 thomas: not a blocker for me. 15:57:35 s/thomas: not a blocker for me.// 15:58:26 pchampin: only choices in W3C process are "draft" and "final" 15:59:05 ... will add to infro/abstract explaining "final" does not mean no further publication 15:59:19 s/infro/intro/ 16:01:40 pchampin: proposal - we make a decision next week on publication of a "non draft" report. 16:02:37 thomas: my proposal by Wednesday 16:02:39 Bye! 16:03:00 zakim, end meeting 16:03:00 As of this point the attendees have been ora, pchampin, thomas, AndyS, TallTed, gkellogg, gatemezing 16:03:02 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:03:02 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/06/04-rdf-star-minutes.html Zakim 16:03:05 I am happy to have been of service, AndyS; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 16:03:09 Zakim has left #rdf-star 16:03:16 rrsagent, excuse us 16:03:16 I see 2 open action items saved in https://www.w3.org/2021/06/04-rdf-star-actions.rdf : 16:03:16 ACTION: pchampin to add issue 170 in the section of PR173 [1] 16:03:16 recorded in https://www.w3.org/2021/06/04-rdf-star-irc#T15-27-34 16:03:16 ACTION: pchampin to raise the IANA issue (specific individual responsible for mediatype) in W3C stategy team [2] 16:03:16 recorded in https://www.w3.org/2021/06/04-rdf-star-irc#T15-45-05