17:49:00 RRSAgent has joined #silver 17:49:00 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/05/07-silver-irc 17:49:02 RRSAgent, make logs Public 17:49:03 Meeting: Silver Task Force & Community Group 17:49:27 present: 17:49:27 chair: jeanne 17:49:27 present+ 17:49:27 zakim, clear agenda 17:49:27 agenda cleared 17:49:28 rrsagent, make minutes 17:49:28 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/05/07-silver-minutes.html jeanne 17:49:28 q? 17:49:55 agenda+ Reminder of 14 May meeting with ACT and preparation 17:49:55 agenda+ Debrief of joint meetings 17:49:55 agenda+ Acknowledgements proposal 17:49:55 agenda+ Subgroup checkins including progress on comments and content for 17:49:56 May Heartbeat 17:50:07 agenda+ Introduce Explainer 17:53:39 jennifer_strickland has joined #silver 17:56:19 sajkaj has joined #silver 17:56:22 present+ 17:57:03 Azlan has joined #silver 17:57:45 present+ 18:01:11 Francis_Storr has joined #silver 18:01:16 present+ 18:01:18 present+ 18:02:02 scribe: jennifer_strickland 18:02:31 zakim, take up next 18:02:31 agendum 1 -- Reminder of 14 May meeting with ACT and preparation -- taken up [from jeanne] 18:02:56 sarahhorton has joined #silver 18:03:08 https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/ACT_-_Silver_Joint_Meeting_May_2021 18:03:10 present+ 18:04:12 SuzanneTaylor has joined #silver 18:04:18 SuzanneTaylor has joined #silver 18:04:22 Suzanne_Taylor has joined #silver 18:04:37 The link above has links to the prep material, zoom link, and survey. 18:04:39 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/94845/2021-05-ACT-Joint-Meeting-Prep/ survey 18:04:47 Fazio has joined #silver 18:04:52 present+ 18:04:59 zakim, take up next 18:04:59 agendum 2 -- Debrief of joint meetings -- taken up [from jeanne] 18:05:47 q+ 18:05:51 more AG involvement is critical 18:06:09 +1 Janina 18:06:40 sajkaj is glad we're doing the joint mtgs. wcag2 is getting to the end, 3 is getting closer to technical recommendation. the wider conversation adds something we've been missing. 18:06:42 JF has joined #silver 18:06:54 Present+ 18:06:55 present+ 18:06:58 agenda? 18:07:49 sajkaj recommends keeping expectations low for the meetings, as we likely need to circle back, and it'sas useful. going to take some time. sees it 18:07:59 ack sa 18:08:28 nothing to add 18:08:55 AngelaAccessForAll has joined #silver 18:09:03 present+ 18:09:03 eliminating an hour's worth of W3C meetings from my calendar is a Good Thing (TM) 18:09:14 the marathon day long approach is difficult to accommodate 18:09:24 Jeanne asks if this is a change we'd like to see longterm. 18:09:58 Tuesdays: AG, Fridays (now): Silver? +1 18:10:30 zakim, take up next 18:10:30 agendum 3 -- Acknowledgements proposal -- taken up [from jeanne] 18:10:50 Jeanne moving on to acknowledgements proposal, background. 18:11:24 when we wanted to publish the first public working draft of 3, there were objections that we didn't give proper acknowledgements. 18:11:56 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WUm57EqqghUL8LObKG8VSwKTj83-DLuNZlFaAkZQpbA/ 18:12:01 so we published in january, with agreement the next would include extended acknowledgements, and in march discussed what it might look like. categories. this past week started filling in names. 18:12:22 keep in mind, there are categories. 18:12:43 I emailed you 18:14:00 If you notice anyone missing, please let Jeanne know -- comment or email. 18:14:15 SuzanneT has joined #silver 18:14:23 this will be updated every draft. 18:14:27 zakim, take up next 18:14:27 agendum 4 -- Subgroup checkins including progress on comments and content for -- taken up [from jeanne] 18:15:04 Visual Contrast of Text was supposed to meet but could not this week, we will update next week. 18:15:09 Sarah Horton: update for errors 18:15:26 Maturity Model hoped to be in the next draaft. We have content ready 18:15:37 Worked through a method, shared a few calls ago; moving content from Google doc to Github, hope to get into May working draft. 18:16:06 Sarah isn't sure if Jeanne has everything needed. Jeanne will check. 18:16:23 Sarah: errors group isn't sure what heartbeat publication is. 18:16:54 Jeanne: heartbeat pub is w3c slang for any working draft being published on a regular basis, showing that the group is publishing regularly. 18:17:13 the heartbeat pub is essentially the current working draft being published. 18:17:27 hopefully our august draft will get wide review. 18:17:46 sajkaj asks if it is the expectation we would frequently go for wide review? 18:18:05 Q+ to mention GitHub 18:18:40 jeanne: we have a request from Bruce (Bailey), certain groups need a longer comment period. 30 days is too short. 18:19:03 We agreed to do a 60 day review period for substantive changes. The May draft doesn't seem like one to do that with. 18:19:32 John Foliot: when we do the heartbeat, we can let folk know if they see issues, they can file a Github issue. 18:19:45 With publishing, remind people to file a Github issue. 18:19:54 Jeanne: good suggestion, that's our plan to do that. 18:20:37 Angela: style guide update: incorporating comments 18:21:50 Visual Contrast of Text was supposed to meet but could not this week, we will update next week. 18:21:56 jennifer: structured content subgroup: had jeanne join us, get us on the right track, and marked many comment replies as ready for survey. 18:22:49 francis: conformance validation, still reviewing john's lengthy document; useful to share with other subgroups; in process of doing that; meeting with jeanne on monday morning; hope to pass feedback on to subgroups in the next week or so. 18:23:29 jeanne: setting time to meet with chris 18:23:57 david fazio: sheri gave presentation on maturity model; seeking feedback 18:24:23 hoping to get into one of the next publications; met with conformance options, might be synergy with 18:25:43 suzanne: re xr, still working async; michael is working on github issues; suzanne is working on outcome related captions; logan is interested 18:26:04 laura has joined #silver 18:26:29 we could use more participation, if you know anyone 18:26:36 present+ Laura_Carlson 18:26:42 present+ 18:27:29 Q+ 18:27:45 francis, on clear words: with global accessibility awareness day coming up, there's a bit of slowness, but progress underway 18:28:23 John Foliot: I can't attend every subgroup call, but I have questions / concerns about… i thought the requirement was that we were using plain language. 18:29:03 in the current draft we talk about "clear words" then we have "common words". i understand how they are tangentially related. 18:29:17 francis: at the moment, it's proof of concept to see if it could be used to score this 18:29:56 as you and others have noticed sometimes terms are used differently. whether clear words / plain language / common words… it'll sort itself out. we need something scorable. 18:30:13 q+ 18:30:25 john foliot: my concern is, is it solving the right problem? common words use, will it make the content clearer? 18:30:39 in the process of using common words, the content may be less clear. 18:31:13 ack me 18:31:13 JF, you wanted to mention GitHub and to 18:31:49 https://www.plainlanguage.gov/guidelines/ 18:31:52 francis storr: still feels like early days; everyone seems to be of the opinion this is tricky to do, and strongly believes it could help. i'm trying to help. i'm sure something will shake out in the future. 18:32:32 q+ 18:32:53 Q+ 18:33:03 david fazio: to john's pt, the thing with clear words, it's not about the words… it's about not using metaphors, … changing sense, that's the issue with cognition; not so much the complexity or reading level. 18:33:31 sajkaj: have we reached out to publishing wg to see if they have any tooling. 18:34:03 francis: someone suggested reaching out to grammarly and other 18:35:01 sajkaj: we have an active publishing community… i think we could use w3c resources. 18:35:13 francis: that's useful 18:35:16 ack me 18:35:18 q+ 18:35:22 sajkaj: jeanne and i can make introductions 18:35:25 ack faz 18:35:26 francis: thank you 18:35:28 ack saj 18:35:31 https://w3c.github.io/publishing/ 18:35:44 Q+ 18:35:55 jeanne: coincidentally, i'm giving a presentation to that org on Monday. 18:36:03 so i'll make a note to ask them. 18:36:10 ack jea 18:36:13 ack jf 18:36:55 john foliot: just wanted to say, david, i'm fairly familiar with this topic, i understand for many in the cog community, reading level isn't the end all, but it is some measure (lists a few), to put a stake in the ground. 18:37:12 i'm suggesting it has some utility than scanning for common or unusual words. 18:37:42 I agree 18:37:47 using the plainlanguage paragraph in the tool, it calls out actually simple words as not simple. 18:38:04 voicing concern 18:38:11 david fazio: also voicing concern 18:38:44 jeanne: premature to say the list of common words is ready; they're setting up rules part of it, using a list from Google trillion words that was convenient. 18:39:00 not useful to start criticizing the work as it is just a stake in the ground at this time. 18:40:32 sajkaj: wondering if conformance options can get something into August release, as they are making progress 18:41:15 michael cooper: functional needs: met today, plans to release a survey to silver & APA next week; about the list of needs collected and a couple of definitions 18:41:24 jeanne: expecting anything for may heartbeat? 18:41:38 michael: no discussion for may or silver at this time. 18:41:50 zakim, take up next 18:41:50 agendum 5 -- Introduce Explainer -- taken up [from jeanne] 18:42:07 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-silver/2021May/0020.html 18:42:26 jeanne: one of the other groups of comments received on the FPWD, we had too much intro material, too hard to find the guidelines. 18:43:13 jeanne tried moving things around to respond to comments, started new document, with a w3c category "explainers" 18:44:06 the "tag" w3c architectural group – put content into explainer, then moved guidelines up 18:44:14 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-silver/2021May/0020.html 18:44:43 in wcag 3, there's no intro, normative, then guidelines, then testing, scoring, conformance. 18:45:00 https://raw.githack.com/w3c/silver/explainer/guidelines/#toc 18:45:57 https://raw.githack.com/w3c/silver/explainer/explainer/ 18:46:07 if the group agrees, this may make it easier to find info in wcag 3. the explainer has a few coding errors which makes the toc display incorrectly… will fix. 18:46:31 this explainer would just be a note, not normative or required. 18:48:18 This will be going out for survey. Michael will move into main branch. If people agree, then we will continue for the may heartbeat. 18:49:06 sarah horton: i'm concerned about the updates stacy made recently to the files. i trust michael will make it all right in the end, just noting there've been updates and changes. 18:49:50 q+ to say that the proposed TOC for the main WCAG 3 doc looks much more straightforward 18:50:18 suzanne: i think it looks much more straightforward. 18:50:34 michael: i think we will move some things over to the explainer, and things will get sorted. 18:50:52 jeanne: i have typos in there 18:50:59 michael: or wrap section elements 18:51:17 it's on my to do list to look at the explainer, and i'll probably fix those as i go 18:51:26 jeanne: i'll try to fix this weekend, too 18:51:38 agenda? 18:52:09 bye all! 18:52:14 No Tuesday morning call. working with the other at 11 am eastern 18:52:15 bye 18:52:39 present+ 18:52:39 Azlan has left #silver 19:14:02 johnkirkwood has joined #silver 19:23:31 kirkwood has joined #silver 20:12:10 jeanne has joined #silver 20:29:21 SuzanneTaylor has joined #silver 21:12:10 jeanne has joined #silver 21:56:41 johnkirkwood has joined #silver 22:05:44 jeanne has joined #silver 22:33:26 jeanne has joined #silver 22:33:35 rrsagent, make minutes 22:33:35 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/05/07-silver-minutes.html jeanne