12:25:49 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #wot-uc
12:25:49 <RRSAgent> logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/05/04-wot-uc-irc
12:26:08 <kaz> meeting: WoT Use Cases - publication status check
12:26:33 <kaz> kaz has changed the topic to: WoT Use Cases
12:27:13 <kaz> topic: Status check
12:27:15 <mlagally__> mlagally__ has joined #wot-uc
12:27:41 <kaz> present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_Lagally, Michael_McCool, Tomoaki_Mizushima
12:28:15 <kaz> Agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/IG_UseCase_WebConf
12:29:30 <kaz> topic: Recent updates
12:29:43 <kaz> s/updates/editorial updates/
12:30:29 <kaz> subtopic: PR 126
12:30:40 <kaz> -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-usecases/pull/126 PR 126 - Editorial fixes for issue 119
12:30:47 <kaz> ml: just fixed typos
12:31:07 <kaz> subtopic: PR 128
12:31:17 <kaz> -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-usecases/pull/128 PR 128 - list contributors and respective companies in acknowledgement section
12:31:42 <kaz> ml: updates for the acknowledgement section
12:32:28 <kaz> mm: maybe should have the list in alphabetical order?
12:32:36 <kaz> ml: yes, it's already so
12:33:36 <kaz> q+
12:34:52 <kaz> ack
12:35:18 <kaz> kaz: as confirmed the other day, we should not include non-Member companies' names for each Use Case entry
12:35:29 <kaz> -> https://w3c.github.io/wot-usecases/index.html#smart-building-things 2.3.3 Automated Smart Building Management
12:36:08 <kaz> mm: or rather we can simply remove all the companies' names from each Use Case description to be consistent
12:36:10 <kaz> ml: right
12:36:59 <kaz> mm: we can list multiple authors concatenated with ", " (=A, B, C)
12:38:10 <kaz> rrsagent, make log public
12:38:16 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
12:38:16 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/05/04-wot-uc-minutes.html kaz
12:39:09 <kaz> subtopic: PR 129
12:39:27 <kaz> -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-usecases/pull/129 PR 129 - cleanup references
12:39:40 <kaz> ml: updated the reference section
12:39:42 <kaz> mm: ok
12:40:05 <kaz> subtopic: Issue 117
12:40:13 <kaz> s/Issue/PR/
12:40:27 <kaz> -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-usecases/pull/117 PR 117 - WIP: Add liaisons
12:40:47 <kaz> ml: let's leave it out at the moment
12:40:49 <kaz> mm: ok
12:41:09 <kaz> topic: Issues
12:41:12 <kaz> -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-usecases/issues
12:41:21 <kaz> s/issues/issues remaining issues/
12:41:44 <kaz> subtopic: Issue 84
12:41:55 <kaz> -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-usecases/issues/84 Issue 84 - Security and requirements questionnaire
12:42:00 <kaz> mm: we did look into it
12:42:17 <kaz> ... may have cross-TF issues
12:42:46 <kaz> ml: asking for a table indicating which concrete implementations (eg OAuth2) satisfy which requirements (eg "scopes").
12:42:51 <kaz> mm: yes
12:42:56 <kaz> ... we talked about this
12:43:17 <kaz> ... most to be included in the Security Best Practice document
12:43:30 <kaz> ... and Use Case document should have more generic description
12:43:45 <kaz> ... and possibly link to the Best Practices document
12:44:36 <kaz> ... would be nice to have detailed description at one place
12:45:00 <kaz> ... question 4 here is more related to Web questionnaire
12:45:29 <kaz> ... probably should look at the long list on security
12:46:29 <kaz> kaz: McCool, could you please respond to this issue 84?
12:46:50 <kaz> mm: (adds comments)
12:47:07 <kaz> ... adding a cross-reference
12:48:04 <kaz> ml: think we need to extend the Use Case template with some more detailed security questions
12:48:07 <kaz> mm: yeah
12:48:37 <kaz> s|security|security and privacy|
12:49:19 <kaz> ... just added a cross-referencing with wot-security issue 168
12:49:42 <kaz> -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/168 wot-security issue 168 - Add "Security and Privacy Considerations" to all use cases (or requirements)
12:50:58 <kaz> ml: (also updates the wot-usecases issue 84)
12:51:20 <kaz> ... McCool will discuss this in the Security TF and come back with a list of candidate questions
12:51:30 <kaz> mm: ok
12:51:58 <kaz> ... 3 sub steps
12:52:21 <kaz> ... starting with brainstorming
12:52:31 <kaz> ... look at the CR questions we got
12:53:49 <kaz> subtopic: Issue 70
12:54:11 <kaz> -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-usecases/issues/70 Issue 70 - Fix reference section
12:54:40 <kaz> ml: PR 129 already available
12:54:42 <kaz> (closed)
12:55:00 <kaz> subtopic: Issue 45
12:55:30 <kaz> -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-usecases/issues/45 Issue 45 - Review EdgeX Architecture
12:55:58 <kaz> mm: what would be the use case description for this proposal?
12:56:25 <kaz> s/mm:/ml:/
12:56:35 <kaz> mm: maybe we need some more generic use case description
12:56:55 <kaz> q+
12:57:26 <kaz> ... also a hub-based architecture proposal for the Architecture document
12:57:51 <kaz> ... we could think about adding a section for hub-based architecture
13:00:11 <kaz> kaz: from our viewpoint, hub-based structure is one the possible connection patters, and we already have a section about that which could include hub-based structure as well
13:00:19 <kaz> ... also we @@@
13:00:22 <kaz> topic: AOB
13:00:50 <kaz> ml: will update the shortname to "wot-usecases"
13:01:16 <kaz> kaz: as I mentioned, we've got transition approval, so let' move forward :)
13:01:19 <kaz> [adjourned]
13:02:12 <kaz> s/@@@/should have some concrete use case scenario for EdgeX architecture if we want to have a use description for it within the Use Cases document./
13:02:18 <kaz> rrsagent, make log public
13:02:24 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
13:02:24 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/05/04-wot-uc-minutes.html kaz
13:02:36 <kaz> chair: Lagally
13:02:37 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
13:02:37 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/05/04-wot-uc-minutes.html kaz
13:03:12 <kaz> s/topic: Status check//
13:03:12 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
13:03:13 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/05/04-wot-uc-minutes.html kaz
15:01:43 <Zakim> Zakim has left #wot-uc