13:20:49 RRSAgent has joined #i18n 13:20:49 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/04/22-i18n-irc 13:20:53 Zakim has joined #i18n 13:20:59 trackbot, prepare teleconference 13:21:02 RRSAgent, make logs public 13:21:05 Meeting: Internationalization Working Group Teleconference 13:21:05 Date: 22 April 2021 13:21:17 Sorry, I did not find an agenda. 13:21:24 Chair: Addison Phillips 13:21:48 Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2021Apr/0009.html 13:21:48 addison, sorry, could not get https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2021Apr/0009.html (code 400). 13:22:32 @Bert: see above 13:22:38 agenda+ Agenda 13:22:43 agenda+ Action Items 13:22:46 agenda+ Info Share 13:22:58 agenda+ RADAR and Active Work Review 13:23:14 agenda+ Scribing 13:23:29 agenda+ Web Payments 13:23:36 agenda+ Shadow DOM 13:23:41 agenda+ Page Numbering 13:23:45 agenda+ AOB? 13:23:54 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/04/22-i18n-minutes.html addison 13:24:49 regrets+ JcK 13:48:00 agenda+ Specdev error message text 13:55:00 xfq has joined #i18n 13:56:54 fsasaki has joined #i18n 13:59:46 scribe: fsasaki 13:59:50 present+ Felix, Fuqiao, Addison 13:59:59 r12a-again has joined #i18n 14:00:05 present+ Atsushi, Richard 14:01:25 agenda? 14:01:32 regrets+ john 14:01:39 zakim, take up agendum 1 14:01:39 agendum 1 -- Agenda -- taken up [from addison] 14:02:09 addison: added page numbering and pull request about spec dev 14:02:21 xfq: encoding in epub 14:02:21 agenda+ epub encoding 14:02:35 zakim, take up agendum 2 14:02:35 agendum 2 -- Action Items -- taken up [from addison] 14:02:44 https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open 14:03:21 r12a: bidi keywords not yet 14:03:23 action-989? 14:03:23 action-989 -- Addison Phillips to Check tus and if necessary ping unicode folks about d145 normalization case fold ordering questions -- due 2021-01-21 -- OPEN 14:03:23 https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/989 14:04:06 addison: next utc meeting is coming up, hope to discuss the topic via that channel 14:04:18 action-996? 14:04:18 action-996 -- Addison Phillips to Follow up with mark davis on liaison status and google participation -- due 2021-02-25 -- OPEN 14:04:18 https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/996 14:04:22 close action-996 14:04:22 Closed action-996. 14:04:33 addison: 996 is stale 14:04:39 action-1015? 14:04:39 action-1015 -- Addison Phillips to Harvest useful text from geolocation 50 for specdev -- due 2021-04-15 -- OPEN 14:04:39 https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/1015 14:04:49 addison: done 14:04:52 close action-1015 14:04:52 Closed action-1015. 14:05:08 action-1016? 14:05:08 action-1016 -- Richard Ishida to Fix stylesheets using logical properties etc. -- due 2021-04-22 -- OPEN 14:05:08 https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/1016 14:05:10 r12a: done 14:05:10 close action-1016 14:05:11 Closed action-1016. 14:05:31 r12a: one thing I did not change: "margin" and "for" values 14:06:16 r12a: detailed logical properties work 14:06:25 ... what does not work: margin with two or four values 14:06:46 ... changing that in the stylesheet would mean: create four lines instead of one 14:07:16 ... it would not break anything, but in our stylesheets we would have four lines 14:07:28 addison: changing the shorthand from physical to logical 14:07:41 r12a: that is the problem, still being discussed in CSS 14:07:53 ... that is the outstanding item about logical properties 14:08:05 https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1282 14:08:34 r12a: apart from shorthands and float and clear, all has been changed 14:08:47 ... looked also at the way we handle language and fonts 14:09:05 ... you will see a big difference of how we handle fonts now in our articles 14:10:02 ... I went through all fonts we are using in our articles 14:10:11 ... made a checklist what languages they support 14:10:20 ... then developed fallback strategies 14:10:45 ... stylesheets now say: use railway for ..., then for language ... another font 14:11:04 ... if you have some ideas how to improve this, let me know 14:11:16 action-1017? 14:11:16 action-1017 -- Addison Phillips to Send wpwg list of specs that implement lang/dir -- due 2021-04-22 -- OPEN 14:11:16 https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/1017 14:11:22 addison: pending 14:11:29 action-1018? 14:11:29 action-1018 -- Addison Phillips to Establish rotating scribe list and add it to the agenda -- due 2021-04-22 -- OPEN 14:11:29 https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/1018 14:11:36 addison: done 14:11:43 close action-1018 14:11:44 Closed action-1018. 14:11:51 zakim, take up agendum 3 14:11:51 agendum 3 -- Info Share -- taken up [from addison] 14:12:05 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/04/22-i18n-minutes.html addison 14:12:24 https://w3c.github.io/i18n-drafts/questions/qa-html-dir.en 14:12:52 r12a: rewrite of article on structural markup and rtl text 14:13:12 ... previous version had a lot of stuff saying "there is this new stuff ..." 14:13:22 ... now many of these things just work 14:13:41 ... new article does not mention things like "problem with IE" etc. anymore 14:13:59 ... added section on how to work with forms 14:14:41 ... still work in progress, if you have feeback, let me know 14:14:54 ... article also implements the new look and feel 14:15:15 ... article has a related article about inline markp and bidi text 14:15:16 https://w3c.github.io/i18n-drafts/questions/qa-html-dir.en 14:15:26 https://w3c.github.io/i18n-drafts/articles/inline-bidi-markup/index.en.html 14:16:06 r12a: this is a quite long article, have shortened it a lot 14:16:35 ... many parts are worked examples, put the stuff into a separate document 14:17:03 ... no uploaded version yet, will show that in due course 14:17:25 ... hopening that we have a much more concise explanation how to work with bidi 14:18:47 felix: great timing for me to use this in my i18n lecture 14:18:59 r12a: will upload the inline doc soon and let you know 14:19:10 zakim, take up agendum 4 14:19:10 agendum 4 -- RADAR and Active Work Review -- taken up [from addison] 14:19:23 https://github.com/w3c/i18n-request/projects/1 14:19:51 addison: no new requests, it seems 14:20:38 r12a to work on logical properties 14:21:31 agenda? 14:21:45 zakim, take up agendum 5 14:21:45 agendum 5 -- Scribing -- taken up [from addison] 14:21:58 addison: established rotation in agenda 14:22:36 ... any objection in being included in rotation? John already did 14:22:55 r12a: objecting too, for various reasons 14:23:35 ... but I understand that this makes the scribe list much smaller 14:25:12 ... doing recording and then editing minutes would be too time consuming 14:26:45 addison: so we do a rotation, or is there anybody who would do this more regular? 14:27:17 ... so I will reduce rotation to people who are willing to scribe 14:27:59 agenda? 14:28:54 addison: anything people want to discuss on webpayments this week? 14:29:04 nothing it seems 14:29:12 zakim, take up agendum 10 14:29:12 agendum 10 -- Specdev error message text -- taken up [from addison] 14:29:30 https://github.com/w3c/bp-i18n-specdev/pull/55 14:30:15 addison: included stuff I got from geolocation 14:30:26 ... moved existing text round a bit, comments welcome 14:30:45 https://aphillips.github.io/bp-i18n-specdev/#localization 14:31:02 xfq_ has joined #i18n 14:31:15 agenda? 14:31:25 addison: please provide comments now or to the PR 14:31:49 r12a: still not sure about our term "natural language" 14:31:59 ... should change it to "human readable text" or "user directed text" 14:32:09 ... or "@@@ oriented" 14:32:31 addison: you are talking about use of "natural language" in sec. 9.6 and 9.6.1? 14:32:34 r12a: yes 14:32:43 addison: didn't we have a defintion in charmod? 14:33:16 r12a: yes, but now we have a clearer understanding about the topic 14:33:24 http://aphillips.github.io/charmod-norm/#terminology 14:34:10 r12a: the label "natural language" does not quite describe the aspect we mean 14:34:35 addison: do we need to revise terminology in charmod? 14:34:38 r12a: I think so 14:34:47 addison: do we pull that into spec dev? 14:35:36 r12a: could do 14:35:45 felix: ltli also has a definition of "natural language" 14:35:55 https://w3c.github.io/ltli/#language-terminology 14:35:59 addison: that definition is much closer to what richard is talking about 14:36:12 .. that is the BCP 47 definition 14:36:51 r12a: another reason for changing charmod, because it conflicts with the definition in LTLI 14:37:27 addison: todos: fix terminology in spec dev, examine charmod & do edits, ensure that specdev itself is consistent, and look at string meta 14:37:52 action: addison to fix terminology on natural language in spec dev 14:37:53 Created ACTION-1019 - Fix terminology on natural language in spec dev [on Addison Phillips - due 2021-04-29]. 14:38:09 action: addison to examine charmod related to natural language & do edits 14:38:10 Created ACTION-1020 - Examine charmod related to natural language & do edits [on Addison Phillips - due 2021-04-29]. 14:38:29 action: addison to ensupre that specdev itself is consistent with regards to natural language 14:38:30 Created ACTION-1021 - Ensupre that specdev itself is consistent with regards to natural language [on Addison Phillips - due 2021-04-29]. 14:38:37 action: richard to look at string meta 14:38:38 Created ACTION-1022 - Look at string meta [on Richard Ishida - due 2021-04-29]. 14:39:39 agenda? 14:39:56 zakim, take up agendum 11 14:39:56 agendum 11 -- epub encoding -- taken up [from addison] 14:40:09 https://github.com/w3c/epub-specs/issues/1628 14:40:36 xfq: they mention css files and also xml files and media type that must be utf-8 or utf-16 14:40:46 ... I asked "why do you mention utf-16?" 14:41:04 .. they did not find the reason, has been in the spec for a long time 14:41:18 ... they are concerned now about compatibility 14:41:40 .. I proposed to add that utf-16 is deprecated, but still allowed for CSS and XML 14:41:56 ... for the media type, it is still utf-8 / utf-16 14:42:17 addison: that can be resolved with MUST and SHOULD 14:42:40 xfq: eBook publishers are very concerned if their book is valid 14:43:10 addison: sure. we could say: it MUST be in one of the two, and it SHOULD be utf-8 14:43:48 discussion of what is stronger: "deprecated" or "SHOULD" 14:44:08 addison: OK with "deprecated" 14:44:17 xfq: fine by me too 14:44:18 +1 14:44:22 +1 14:44:25 r12a: ok 14:44:36 agenda? 14:44:45 ... xfq, will you let them know that we are ok with their resolution? 14:44:47 xfq: sure 14:45:15 zakim, take up agendum 8 14:45:15 agendum 8 -- Page Numbering -- taken up [from addison] 14:45:30 https://github.com/w3c/epub-specs/issues/1505 14:46:29 addison: made comments, r12a was involved in discussion too 14:47:01 r12a: do they need an ID for each page, so that they can point to it? 14:47:03 addison: yes 14:47:44 r12a: problem is how to point to a page if there are e.g. "two page 3"? Which digit you used? 14:48:20 addison: real page number in physical manifestation opposed to pages changing based on screen size etc. 14:48:52 r12a: look at page xyz means = you need to use the same type of digits 14:49:08 addison: yes, and there are various schemes to number pages 14:49:20 ... you cannot use them together in the same book 14:49:34 ... question is: does that include native digits? yes 14:50:10 stpeter has joined #i18n 14:53:14 addison: can the numbers be non ascii digits? sure 14:53:29 ... there are many other schemes you can use for numbering 14:54:01 r12a: need to read this in more detail 14:54:19 ... I worry that they do not take into account section based numbering 14:54:30 ... and that the same number is used several times in the document 14:54:40 ... because the fragment IDs need to be unique 14:54:59 addison: they need to figure out a scheme to make the strings unique 14:55:57 r12a: they have a fragment id and the content of the element, which they would show the user 14:56:16 ... question is how to generate a fragment id from what they show to the user, if that is what they are doing? 14:56:54 addison: on some level the tokens do not matter, they are just IDs 14:57:14 ... they will be case sensitve, because upper and lower case page numbering schemes exist 14:57:35 ... charmod norm provides guidance on how to make the tokens unique 14:58:59 suggestion to carry on the discussion in the issue 14:59:02 agenda? 14:59:31 zakim, take up agendum 7 14:59:31 agendum 7 -- Shadow DOM -- taken up [from addison] 15:00:35 action: addison: ping fantasai about shadow dom 15:00:37 Created ACTION-1023 - Ping fantasai about shadow dom [on Addison Phillips - due 2021-04-29]. 15:00:53 zakim, take up agendum 9 15:00:53 agendum 9 -- AOB? -- taken up [from addison] 15:01:25 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/04/22-i18n-minutes.html addison 15:01:34 rrsagent, bye 15:01:34 I see 5 open action items saved in https://www.w3.org/2021/04/22-i18n-actions.rdf : 15:01:34 ACTION: addison to fix terminology on natural language in spec dev [1] 15:01:34 recorded in https://www.w3.org/2021/04/22-i18n-irc#T14-37-52 15:01:34 ACTION: addison to examine charmod related to natural language & do edits [2] 15:01:34 recorded in https://www.w3.org/2021/04/22-i18n-irc#T14-38-09 15:01:34 ACTION: addison to ensupre that specdev itself is consistent with regards to natural language [3] 15:01:34 recorded in https://www.w3.org/2021/04/22-i18n-irc#T14-38-29 15:01:34 ACTION: richard to look at string meta [4] 15:01:34 recorded in https://www.w3.org/2021/04/22-i18n-irc#T14-38-37 15:01:34 ACTION: addison: ping fantasai about shadow dom [5] 15:01:34 recorded in https://www.w3.org/2021/04/22-i18n-irc#T15-00-35