18:59:43 RRSAgent has joined #webauthn 18:59:43 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/04/21-webauthn-irc 18:59:45 RRSAgent, make logs Public 18:59:47 Meeting: Web Authentication WG 19:00:15 Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webauthn/2021Apr/0089.html 19:02:05 present+ 19:03:17 present+ 19:03:48 elundberg has joined #webauthn 19:03:52 present+ 19:03:52 Tony: TPAC 2021 set. Virtual. 19:04:03 wendy: breakout and cross group meetings. 19:04:33 ...oct. 19:05:32 present+ agl, akshay, nadalin, elundberg, jeffh, johnbradley, matthewmiller, sbweeden, nsteele 19:05:47 present+ 19:06:06 matthewmill has joined #webauthn 19:06:43 tony: wendy, are we set for first proposed working draft. we are set to go. 19:07:30 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1594 19:07:34 jeffH: signed off on this 19:07:54 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1593 19:08:00 tony: wendy merge 19:10:03 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1595 19:11:19 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1595 19:11:32 nsteele has joined #webauthn 19:11:39 present+ 19:11:48 jeffH: think what they want is not good for FIDO, Web Authn 19:12:03 agl: what about PR extension 19:12:35 jeffH: depends on all the use cases, do they snowball out of control 19:12:54 aksay: there are some use cases. we want raw signature. 19:13:16 ...I don't have a complete use case in my mind 19:13:23 jbradley: not directly related. 19:13:48 mmiller: want to use a key like for a lock box. 19:13:50 q+ 19:14:23 jeffH: we have cred blob to link this. 19:15:50 agl: cred blob in in CTAP spec 19:16:03 q- 19:16:25 wseltzer: WebAppSec is considering putting webcrypto updates into charter scope 19:19:29 jbradley: prf extension or some derivation seems like thing to do 19:22:49 jeffH: do we want to go in the web crypto direction? 19:24:06 akshay: CTAP 2 and 2.1 will have this extension. 19:24:27 ...I don't see web crypto being changed 19:25:11 agl: i offer to write something on this bug 19:25:28 tony: thank you. 19:25:38 mmiller_ has joined #webauthn 19:25:45 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1598 19:27:47 elundberg: need to consider the output value 19:28:10 present+ Yuriy, Martin, Bill 19:28:11 agl: this working says you can specify using null. might be a chrome bug 19:28:55 jeffH: think this is webIDL funky-ness 19:29:32 elundberg: to make it null the definition should be followed by question mark 19:29:46 jeffH; yes. 19:29:55 agl: the wording in the spec is wrong. 19:30:07 elundberg: my understanding. 19:31:22 agl: next week we can decide what the change is - web authn or chrome 19:33:40 agl: this comes from 1536 was issues, 1537 was PR 19:43:22 elundberg: clarify it may be null in response but not in the request 19:43:28 ...I can summarize in an Issue 19:44:53 tony: reminder two weeks until next meeting - May 5 19:46:03 rrsagent, draft minutes 19:46:03 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/04/21-webauthn-minutes.html wseltzer 21:25:58 dlongley has joined #webauthn