11:01:41 RRSAgent has joined #wot-marketing 11:01:41 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/04/20-wot-marketing-irc 11:01:47 Meeting: WoT Marketing 11:02:06 present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Daniel_Peintner, Kunihiko_Toumura, Philipp_Blum 11:02:13 citrullin has joined #wot-marketing 11:03:08 sebastian has joined #wot-marketing 11:03:08 present+ Sebastian_Kaebisch 11:03:44 Mizushima has joined #wot-marketing 11:06:01 present+ Tomoaki_Mizuhima, Michael_McCool 11:06:07 zakim, who is on the call? 11:06:07 Present: Kaz_Ashimura, Daniel_Peintner, Kunihiko_Toumura, Philipp_Blum, Sebastian_Kaebisch, Tomoaki_Mizuhima, Michael_McCool 11:06:20 McCool has joined #wot-marketing 11:06:24 zakim, pick a scribe 11:06:24 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Kunihiko_Toumura 11:06:50 zakim, pick a scribe 11:06:50 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Michael_McCool 11:07:29 scribenick: McCool 11:08:42 topic: minutes review 11:08:58 for vF2F and minutes from last meeting before F2F 11:10:40 i|vF2F|-> https://www.w3.org/2021/04/13-wot-marketing-minutes.html Apr-13| 11:11:22 note that regarding "task force", I recall the decision was to always use two words, but it's not recorded in the minutes 11:12:41 kaz: I will add a note to the minutes to record the decision 11:14:19 mm: also liaison is misspelled in several places 11:14:32 present+ Ege_Korkan 11:14:44 rrsagent, make log public 11:14:54 [note added and typos fixed] 11:15:01 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:15:01 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/04/20-wot-marketing-minutes.html kaz 11:15:10 Ege has joined #wot-marketing 11:15:12 mm: regarding tutorials, we did discuss in plugfest call, and can do that again this week 11:15:26 seb: any objection to publishing the minutes? 11:16:02 (none; approved) 11:16:07 topic: Blog post 11:16:23 seb: hearing no objections, these minutes will be published 11:16:33 s/topic: Blog post// 11:16:39 s/topic: Blog post// 11:16:41 topic: Blog post 11:17:12 sk: just one comment on the size of the thumbnail picture 11:18:06 mm: can look into it 11:18:07 mm: I'll have to figure out how to do it, wordpress is a little weird 11:18:14 s/mm: can look into it// 11:18:25 i/just/scribenick: kaz/ 11:18:34 i/I'll/scribenick: McCool/ 11:18:38 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:18:38 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/04/20-wot-marketing-minutes.html kaz 11:18:44 ... also looks like the alt tag might be missing 11:18:49 ... it was in the HTML but... 11:20:06 ... also "alt" might be expanded to "if youtube does not work for you, click here" 11:24:42 seb: 50% looks ok 11:25:13 mm: will have to update formatting, then will click on post when I'm done 11:30:29 resolution: when W3C provides a tweet which is relevant to WoT, @W3C_WoT is allowed to re-tweet directly 11:30:31 @w3c is the account name to be precise :) 11:30:49 mm: I'll also update the policy, and we should mention in the main call tomorrow 11:31:12 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Marketing_WebConf#Apr_20.2C_2021 11:31:22 topic: web page updates 11:31:30 seb: daniel has provided some PRs 11:31:51 ... issue 161 11:32:25 dape: there were a number of broken links on the liaison page 11:32:38 ... and also strange ones, like a link pointing to a french wikipedia site 11:32:52 ... also logos would be nicers, but formatting is tricky 11:33:03 ... for now do without logos 11:33:30 q+ 11:34:15 i|there were|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/161 Issue 161 - Add WoT Liaisons to IG page| 11:34:16 kaz: let's start with text names, can work on logos later 11:34:34 dape: I also listed three issues regarding links, please take a look 11:34:47 ... hypercat is broken, etc. 11:35:00 ... when you look on the official liaison page 11:35:58 mm: and if we find broken links on the official page, those should be fixed 11:36:24 kaz: regarding broken links on the official page, can send an email to the systeam 11:36:38 s/can/we can/ 11:36:38 seb: feel that we *should* include logos 11:36:45 s/systeam/liaison team/ 11:36:56 ... logos will look more professional and easier to read 11:37:37 mm: just a question of timing; do we do text first, and then add logos, or wait until we have logos? 11:37:44 seb: ok to do it incrementally 11:39:40 ack k 11:41:01 ege: issue with logos not being consistent sizes, etc 11:41:16 mm: also logos typically come with rules about white space, etc. 11:41:38 ... let's get the logos first, then figure out how to design the page to display them 11:42:31 ... logo capture will be tracked in issue 164 11:43:21 dape: new pr 164, addresses issue to move icons before text, and also fixes "task force" spelling 11:43:39 ... fixes issue 153 11:44:55 dape: note also some decisions made about text alignment 11:45:41 ege: note binding templates are a tf in the charter 11:46:45 ... not necessarily useful any more 11:48:07 ... and it does not have its own meeting 11:48:15 ... instead it is part of the TD call 11:48:33 ... if someone goes looking for the binding template call they won't find it 11:50:04 seb: the description of the TD TF does say that binding templates are handled by the TD TF 11:50:24 kaz: note there is no official list of TFs managed by the W3C 11:51:05 ... it is up to each group to manage 11:51:30 seb: ege, maybe you can do some research to see if we have to fix anything 11:51:40 ege: ok, but for now the web page looks ok 11:51:56 seb: back to this PR, I think it looks good 11:52:09 ... shall we merge it? 11:52:24 seb: hearing no objections, will merge 11:52:34 https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/pull/160 11:52:47 seb: merged 11:53:12 seb: another pr 161, still in progress 11:53:22 topic: conferences 11:53:43 ege: issue 163, API Specification Conference 11:53:55 q? 11:54:25 https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/pull/154 11:54:51 seb: this PR just provides sources for the images used in the web page 11:54:56 ... as a PPTX 11:57:06 ... note it is under docs/material/wot-figures.pptx 11:57:15 topic: conferences 11:57:25 ege: API Specification Conference 11:57:29 q+ 11:57:47 ege: would like to discuss what kind of content we want 11:58:06 ... we can't do exactly the same as last year as it will get rejected 11:58:34 ... so maybe this year we can focus on a different aspect 11:59:16 ... we could also focus on new things, but need to know previous work 11:59:35 ... then there is scripting, maybe look at specific examples 12:02:40 mm: I personally would like to see a deep dive into a specific use case and use in products 12:02:45 q+ to note we're out of time... 12:02:54 seb: will have some mention in June 12:03:11 +1 on what Seb said 12:03:55 mm: and I think we should avoid emphasizing "maker" scene, etc. 12:04:02 i|ege: API Spe|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/163 Issue 163 - API Specification Conference 2021| 12:04:06 ... rather should look at commercial applications 12:04:20 rrsagent, make log public 12:04:20 ege: participants are commercial vendors 12:04:32 seb: have to close, let's follow up on this next week 12:04:35 [adjourned] 12:04:42 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:04:42 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/04/20-wot-marketing-minutes.html kaz