13:01:19 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #wot-uc
13:01:19 <RRSAgent> logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/04/13-wot-uc-irc
13:01:28 <kaz> Meeting: WoT Use Cases
13:01:59 <kaz> present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Gyu_Myoung_Lee, Michael_Lagally, Michael_McCool, Tomoaki_Mizushima
13:02:51 <mlagally> mlagally has joined #wot-uc
13:02:56 <McCool> McCool has joined #wot-uc
13:04:17 <kaz> -> https://www.w3.org/2021/03/15-25-wot-minutes.html#d4-t03 vF2F Day 4 discussion as the starting point
13:04:27 <gmlee> gmlee has joined #wot-uc
13:08:03 <kaz> scribenick: Mcool
13:08:06 <kaz> scribenick: McCool
13:08:12 <kaz> s/scribenick: Mcool//
13:08:21 <McCool> note there was a review document discussed in the last meeting
13:08:43 <McCool> ml: what we would like to do today is discuss our goals for collaboration
13:09:03 <McCool> ... for example, when looking at your documents, we noticed some gaps in our own terminology
13:09:14 <kaz> i|what|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-usecases/blob/main/CONTRIBUTIONS/ITU-T-Use-case-summary.md McCool's summary on ITU-T use cases analysis|
13:09:32 <McCool> ... and we don't know about your future plans, and whether there is an opportunity to align ITU-T and W3C standards
13:09:58 <McCool> ... at the very least we want to look for synergies, gaps, and collaboration opportunities
13:10:38 <McCool> ... willingness on WoT side to define some new work items, as long as we can justify them
13:10:59 <McCool> ... in the new charter, starting next year
13:12:10 <McCool> mm: so we'd also like to understand the willingness of ITU-T to publish updates, collaborate, etc.
13:12:43 <McCool> mm: as for a new WoT charter, we would write/submit it in the fall, then start it in Jan 2022 (probably)
13:13:05 <McCool> ml: I understand there is an upcoming ITU-T meeting coming?
13:13:16 <McCool> gm: 17 May and 27 May plenary meetings
13:13:33 <McCool> ... other days will have several other individual meetings on different topics
13:13:45 <McCool> ... these are only for ITU-T members
13:13:58 <McCool> ml: we have been sketching out some ideas for working together
13:14:14 <McCool> ... for example, would there be a willingness to adopt TDs?
13:15:51 <McCool> mm: note there would technically be no problem with supporting both, and deprecating the less-used one over time
13:16:15 <McCool> ml: some technical questions; are these equivalent, can we express the same things?  Can they be automatically translated?
13:17:11 <McCool> ... is anyone in ITU-T interested in moving to more modern metadata description
13:17:20 <McCool> mm: and also, how many implementations are there?
13:17:50 <kaz> s/description/description?/
13:17:54 <McCool> gm: as far as I know, now specific activities
13:18:31 <McCool> ... there is something going on with metadata; but as for WoT, although we have developed recommendations, and have an ongoing work item in health care
13:19:16 <McCool> ... ITU-T also does not intend to develop any protocols
13:19:41 <McCool> ... want to focus on architectural modelling and use cases; high-level concepts