IRC log of silver on 2021-04-13
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 13:09:48 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #silver
- 13:09:48 [RRSAgent]
- logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/04/13-silver-irc
- 13:09:51 [Zakim]
- RRSAgent, make logs Public
- 13:09:51 [Zakim]
- Meeting: Silver Task Force & Community Group
- 13:10:18 [jeanne]
- present:
- 13:10:18 [jeanne]
- chair: Shawn, jeanne
- 13:10:18 [jeanne]
- present+
- 13:10:18 [jeanne]
- zakim, clear agenda
- 13:10:18 [Zakim]
- agenda cleared
- 13:10:19 [jeanne]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 13:10:19 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/04/13-silver-minutes.html jeanne
- 13:10:19 [jeanne]
- q?
- 13:12:10 [mgarrish]
- mgarrish has joined #silver
- 13:16:39 [jeanne]
- agenda+ calendar reminders and announcements: AGWG All-day, survey for joint ACT meeting, 30 min AGWG issues meeting
- 13:16:42 [jeanne]
- agenda+ Issue handling training
- 13:17:38 [Fazio]
- Fazio has joined #Silver
- 13:21:41 [Lauriat]
- Lauriat has joined #silver
- 13:21:48 [Lauriat]
- agenda?
- 13:21:55 [Lauriat]
- Present+
- 13:28:40 [Chuck]
- Chuck has joined #silver
- 13:28:47 [Chuck]
- present+
- 13:30:01 [ChrisLoiselle]
- ChrisLoiselle has joined #silver
- 13:30:02 [alastairc]
- present+
- 13:30:19 [sajkaj]
- sajkaj has joined #silver
- 13:30:23 [sajkaj]
- present+
- 13:30:32 [Fazio]
- present+
- 13:30:34 [alastairc]
- agenda?
- 13:30:48 [Makoto]
- Makoto has joined #silver
- 13:30:48 [JF]
- JF has joined #silver
- 13:30:52 [JF]
- Present+
- 13:30:59 [Makoto]
- present+
- 13:31:03 [JustineP]
- JustineP has joined #silver
- 13:31:08 [JustineP]
- present+
- 13:31:36 [Sheri_B-H]
- Sheri_B-H has joined #silver
- 13:31:38 [Sheri_B-H]
- present+
- 13:31:40 [bruce_bailey]
- bruce_bailey has joined #silver
- 13:31:49 [bruce_bailey]
- present+
- 13:31:51 [jeanne]
- scribe:Sheri_B-H
- 13:31:54 [JakeAbma]
- JakeAbma has joined #silver
- 13:31:57 [JakeAbma]
- present+
- 13:31:57 [Lauriat]
- Zakim, take up item 1
- 13:31:57 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 -- calendar reminders and announcements: AGWG All-day, survey for joint ACT meeting, 30 min AGWG issues meeting -- taken up [from jeanne]
- 13:32:19 [Sheri_B-H]
- Jeanne's announcements: Reminder of all day joint meeting for April 29 with AGWG
- 13:32:44 [jeanne]
- https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-silver/2021Apr/0051.html
- 13:32:59 [Sheri_B-H]
- Jean's second announcement: next All day Joint meeting with ACT, poll in IRC for date
- 13:33:08 [Azlan]
- Azlan has joined #silver
- 13:33:09 [mgarrish]
- present+
- 13:33:13 [sarahhorton]
- sarahhorton has joined #silver
- 13:33:16 [Azlan]
- present+
- 13:33:18 [sarahhorton]
- present+
- 13:33:36 [Sheri_B-H]
- Jeanne's third announcement: 30 minutes after this call, we are invited to the first 30 min of AGWG for live issue processing
- 13:34:02 [mikecrabb]
- mikecrabb has joined #silver
- 13:34:07 [mikecrabb]
- present+
- 13:34:07 [laura]
- laura has joined #silver
- 13:34:23 [jeanne]
- zakim, take up next
- 13:34:23 [Zakim]
- agendum 2 -- Issue handling training -- taken up [from jeanne]
- 13:34:28 [laura]
- present+ Laura_Carlson
- 13:34:32 [ChrisLoiselle]
- present+
- 13:35:04 [Sheri_B-H]
- Alastair to discuss how AGWG processes issues
- 13:35:10 [Francis_Storr]
- Francis_Storr has joined #silver
- 13:35:13 [Francis_Storr]
- present+
- 13:35:44 [alastairc]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.2_Issue_tracking_and_resolution
- 13:35:44 [joconnor]
- present+
- 13:36:34 [Sheri_B-H]
- Alistair: AGWG process might apply to Silver, even though outcomes are different
- 13:37:07 [KimD]
- KimD has joined #silver
- 13:37:16 [KimD]
- Present+
- 13:37:47 [Sheri_B-H]
- alistair: responses need to be created to comments. Could be an update to the documentation, or a response why the comment isn't being adopted
- 13:38:16 [sajkaj]
- q+ to ask whether draft response goes on github?
- 13:38:20 [ToddLibby]
- ToddLibby has joined #silver
- 13:38:25 [ToddLibby]
- present+
- 13:38:37 [Chuck]
- ack sajkaj
- 13:38:37 [Zakim]
- sajkaj, you wanted to ask whether draft response goes on github?
- 13:38:48 [Sheri_B-H]
- Initial discussion on comment decides to adopt response, agree with documentation update, or if there is not agreement then another discussion is required.
- 13:38:51 [Jan]
- Jan has joined #silver
- 13:39:13 [Fazio]
- Responses that disagree with an isssue/comment should be diplomatic thanking the commenter and saying we consider their comment
- 13:39:31 [JustineP]
- +1 David
- 13:40:00 [Sheri_B-H]
- Janina asked - should draft responses go into github directly? Alistairs answer is they can, as long as they are marked as draft. If it is controversial, drafts can be in email.
- 13:40:37 [jeanne]
- +1 David
- 13:41:22 [Wilco]
- Wilco has joined #silver
- 13:41:35 [Chuck]
- q+
- 13:41:43 [Chuck]
- ack Chu
- 13:41:50 [Wilco]
- present+
- 13:42:12 [jeanne]
- q+ to ask at what point you close the issue where there are multiple comments on the same issue
- 13:42:20 [JustineP]
- Should we formally assign ourselves to issues using Github tags?
- 13:42:41 [Sheri_B-H]
- alistair: use email if you aren't confident of your response
- 13:45:50 [Sheri_B-H]
- alistair: you can send a "holding" response that says effectively: "we are going to examain this in the future"
- 13:45:51 [Chuck]
- q?
- 13:46:48 [Sheri_B-H]
- Jeanne: can you update a number of issues simultaneously?
- 13:46:53 [jeanne]
- ack je
- 13:46:53 [Zakim]
- jeanne, you wanted to ask at what point you close the issue where there are multiple comments on the same issue
- 13:47:04 [bruce_bailey]
- q+ to suggest GitHub labels for grouping
- 13:47:05 [Sheri_B-H]
- Alistair: yes, you can close multiple issues with a single updte
- 13:47:13 [Chuck]
- q?
- 13:47:47 [laura_]
- laura_ has joined #silver
- 13:48:04 [Sheri_B-H]
- Jeanne: clarification - you don't update the ticket until the proposed large change is ready? Alister agreed
- 13:48:19 [Chuck]
- ack bru
- 13:48:19 [Zakim]
- bruce_bailey, you wanted to suggest GitHub labels for grouping
- 13:48:26 [jeanne]
- ack br
- 13:48:40 [Sheri_B-H]
- Bruce: should we use labels to group?
- 13:48:52 [johnkirkwood]
- johnkirkwood has joined #Silver
- 13:49:39 [Sheri_B-H]
- Alistair: there are topic labels and lifecycle labels (surveys were the example he provided of a lifecycle survey)
- 13:49:43 [bruce_bailey]
- very nice, adding key word as first word in labels
- 13:50:31 [Sheri_B-H]
- Alistair: if you aren't sure about a label leave it to your label manager
- 13:50:35 [bruce_bailey]
- i retract my suggestion to look into the GitHub "Project" feature
- 13:51:32 [jeanne]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/Issue_Processing_Report#13_April_2021
- 13:51:34 [Sheri_B-H]
- Jeanne: We have 200 issues that aren't assigned to a subgroup. Those are the ones we need editors to help. Label is "needs proposal"
- 13:52:13 [JustineP]
- q+ to follow up on question about formally assigning ourselves to issues in Github for tracking purposes
- 13:53:04 [Sheri_B-H]
- Jeanne: Create a github account if you don't have one
- 13:53:11 [Chuck]
- ack Just
- 13:53:11 [Zakim]
- JustineP, you wanted to follow up on question about formally assigning ourselves to issues in Github for tracking purposes
- 13:53:49 [Sheri_B-H]
- Alister: once you have created an account, email Michael so he can attach your account to the repository. Then you can assign yourself issues
- 13:56:47 [jeanne]
- I have updated the link to only included issues that Need proposal AND are not assigned.
- 13:56:54 [Sheri_B-H]
- Alistair: survey should only include things that have a clear response so you understand what is being proposed.
- 13:57:20 [jeanne]
- s/ link to only included issues/ link to only include issues
- 13:58:24 [SuzanneTaylor]
- SuzanneTaylor has joined #silver
- 13:58:25 [Sheri_B-H]
- Alistair: survey gives you 4 options: accept as is, accept with mods, leave as is, something else
- 13:58:45 [Sheri_B-H]
- Alistair: AGWG did one survey per SC
- 14:01:52 [Sheri_B-H]
- Alistair then walked through an example with IBM's comment #500 which hd multiple parts
- 14:02:04 [bruce_bailey]
- i wish we had thought to do a video recording of this session!
- 14:03:32 [Sheri_B-H]
- q+
- 14:03:48 [Chuck]
- q?
- 14:04:12 [Jemma]
- Jemma has joined #silver
- 14:04:28 [Sheri_B-H]
- q+ how do we ask the commenter for more information
- 14:05:51 [Sheri_B-H]
- sorry audio problems
- 14:06:03 [Chuck]
- ack Sheri
- 14:06:57 [Chuck]
- q+
- 14:07:41 [Sheri_B-H]
- Alister: it would be best if we could tell from the ticket who generated the comment. If the commenter added their ticket in Github directly, you can comment in the ticket.
- 14:07:47 [Chuck]
- ack Ch
- 14:08:18 [Sheri_B-H]
- Jeanne: Tickets that were emailed in should have a link to the email at the beginning of the ticket
- 14:09:11 [jeanne]
- q+ to ask about summarizing discussions in the thread
- 14:09:17 [Sheri_B-H]
- Alister: if the commenter doesn't respond to the request for more info, you can close the ticket with the proposal and finish with "if you aren't happy with this response, please open a new ticket"
- 14:11:13 [Sheri_B-H]
- Jeanne: sometimes there are lively discussions in the thread. What do we do with those?
- 14:11:37 [Sheri_B-H]
- Alister: focus the discussion on the original comments. Sometimes new issues come up in the discussion, those need to be separated out into their own tickets
- 14:13:12 [JenniferC]
- JenniferC has joined #silver
- 14:13:52 [Sheri_B-H]
- Alister: it is useful in complicated tickets if you write a recap, and then you can search for your name later to find it
- 14:13:59 [Chuck]
- q+
- 14:14:42 [JenniferC_]
- JenniferC_ has joined #silver
- 14:14:56 [Chuck]
- ack Jeanne
- 14:14:56 [Zakim]
- jeanne, you wanted to ask about summarizing discussions in the thread
- 14:15:18 [jeanne]
- q-
- 14:15:22 [jeanne]
- ack chuck
- 14:15:53 [Sheri_B-H]
- Chuck: once you have a resolution, what then?
- 14:16:14 [Fazio]
- The commentor doesn't necessaarily have to agree
- 14:17:40 [Sheri_B-H]
- Alister: If there is an agreed change, someone needs to make the update. The easiest way is to put the PR containing the change in the survey
- 14:18:18 [Sheri_B-H]
- Alister: the PR should state which issue is being closed
- 14:18:45 [Sheri_B-H]
- Alister: Issue gets closed after change gets merged in
- 14:19:16 [Sheri_B-H]
- Alister: use the surveys as the nexus point
- 14:19:36 [Chuck]
- q+
- 14:19:37 [Sheri_B-H]
- Alister: David is right, only the group has to agree, the commenter doesn't have to agree
- 14:19:58 [Wilco]
- q+
- 14:20:18 [alastairc]
- ack ch
- 14:20:58 [JustineP]
- If issue is very simple (e.g., typographical error) should we just implement via pull request and close issue afterwards?
- 14:21:21 [Sheri_B-H]
- Jeanne: All of our surveys are open, otherwise community groups don't have access
- 14:21:26 [Fazio]
- Surveys for issues feels like a lot of inundating emails
- 14:22:18 [Sheri_B-H]
- Alister: simple issues like typos can be fixed and closed without surveys
- 14:22:49 [Sheri_B-H]
- Jeanne: don't let lack of git knowledge stop you. The hard part is the proposals. Other folx can handle the tech bits for you
- 14:23:49 [Fazio]
- I find surveys hard
- 14:24:02 [Fazio]
- the format is hard for me to read cognitively
- 14:24:19 [Sheri_B-H]
- Jeanne: to answer David's comment, it should be two emails per week - one with the survey, one announcing the survey. Please keep your comments IN the survey and not in the email thread
- 14:24:19 [Fazio]
- I like the thread better
- 14:24:24 [Fazio]
- in github
- 14:25:04 [jeanne]
- s/two emails per week - one with the survey, one announcing the survey./one email per week announcing the survey.
- 14:25:21 [alastairc]
- https://github.com/w3c/silver/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3A%22status%3A+needs+proposal%22+created%3A%3E2020-11-01+sort%3Acreated-asc+
- 14:25:33 [bruce_bailey]
- very nice overview !
- 14:25:45 [Lauriat]
- +1, thank you!
- 14:26:03 [jeanne]
- +1, thank you!
- 14:26:05 [alastairc]
- WCAG 2.x, but similar... https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.2_Issue_tracking_and_resolution
- 14:26:44 [Sheri_B-H]
- Chuck: in the AGWG call we can review one where we have a proposed a response. We need to increase confidence on proposed responses.
- 14:27:42 [Sheri_B-H]
- Jeanne: Several comments are about usability. If you are a usability specialist, please look at the label "section: usability issues"
- 14:28:50 [ToddLibby]
- ToddLibby has left #silver
- 14:28:53 [jeanne]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 14:28:53 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/04/13-silver-minutes.html jeanne
- 14:29:38 [alastairc]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.2_Issue_tracking_and_resolution
- 14:54:45 [laura]
- laura has joined #silver
- 14:55:59 [sajkaj]
- sajkaj has left #silver
- 15:00:17 [laura_]
- laura_ has joined #silver
- 15:01:20 [mbgower]
- mbgower has joined #silver
- 15:03:25 [MarcJohlic]
- MarcJohlic has joined #silver
- 15:14:02 [KimD]
- KimD has left #silver
- 15:19:22 [SuzanneTaylor]
- SuzanneTaylor has joined #silver
- 17:59:28 [MarcJohlic]
- MarcJohlic has joined #silver
- 18:17:44 [laura]
- laura has joined #silver
- 20:26:58 [johnkirkwood]
- johnkirkwood has joined #silver