15:56:09 RRSAgent has joined #wai-curricula 15:56:09 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/03/09-wai-curricula-irc 15:56:11 RRSAgent, make logs Public 15:56:12 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), Daniel 15:57:02 Meeting: WAI Curricula Task Force Teleconference 15:59:59 estella has joined #wai-curricula 16:01:06 CarlosD has joined #wai-curricula 16:01:34 Gerhard has joined #wai-curricula 16:01:56 Zakim, take up next 16:01:56 agendum 1 -- Setting up meeting, choosing scribe https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/WAI_Curricula/WAI_Curricula_Task_Force_Meetings#Scribe_Rotation_List -- taken up [from Daniel] 16:02:17 Present+ 16:02:34 Present+ 16:02:48 present+ 16:03:56 present+ 16:04:01 scribe: shadi 16:04:18 zakim, take up agendum 1 16:04:18 agendum 1 -- Setting up meeting, choosing scribe https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/WAI_Curricula/WAI_Curricula_Task_Force_Meetings#Scribe_Rotation_List -- taken up [from Daniel] 16:05:07 zakim, take up agendum 2 16:05:07 agendum 2 -- Sequence for first module "User research and requirements" 16:05:09 ... https://deploy-preview-340--wai-curricula.netlify.app/curricula/designer-modules/user-research-and-requirements/ -- taken up [from Daniel] 16:05:27 Howard has joined #wai-curricula 16:05:38 present+ Howard 16:06:55 DM: collected different tasks in this area 16:07:12 ...just concerned that working with people with disabilities comes at the end 16:07:24 ...how can we address this issue? 16:08:30 HK: concerned about last bullet point? 16:09:12 DM: last topic 16:09:29 ...does it convey involving in testing only? 16:10:02 CD: not seeing this concern 16:10:39 EO: agree with Carlos 16:12:30 SAZ: does first bullet need to be limited to "usability testing"? 16:12:44 ...could also be involvement in the co-design process 16:13:01 ...but just generally, are these designer tasks? 16:13:25 CD: agree with Shadi on expanding beyond just "usability testing" 16:13:39 ...maybe also not put as first bullet point 16:14:06 ...looks like module for UX designers 16:15:35 EO: miss terms like "user requirements" and "requirements gathering" 16:18:39 SAZ: other topics should also include aspects of involving people with disabilities 16:18:52 ...for example for gathering requirements and researching users 16:19:03 ...not just create personas and scenarios of them 16:19:18 ...also need to include aspects of considering standards 16:19:39 ...not everything needs to be researched from scratched 16:20:00 ...standards provide a starting point 16:20:05 CD: agree with Shadi 16:20:24 GN: the latter bullets seem very general 16:20:32 ...also apply to people without disabilities 16:20:55 ...basic principles of usability and ethics 16:21:15 EO: agree, this is part of any research 16:21:34 ...data protection laws also apply, confidentiality, ... 16:22:03 ...protective of people with disabilities 16:22:16 ...may have counter-effect of excluding them 16:23:08 DM: agree but some situations require particular attention 16:23:18 ...including informed consent 16:23:35 EO: you have adapt to their communication 16:23:42 ...for example, sign-language 16:24:00 ...or easy-to-read instructions 16:24:37 CD: agree with Estella and Gerhard 16:24:52 ...maybe focus just on these specifically relevant aspects 16:25:06 ...also location, for example 16:25:24 ...sometimes need to go to their homes/work environment 16:25:31 ...rather than them coming to the lab 16:25:56 DM: so maybe integrate this last topic into the prior topics 16:26:10 ...and in doing that reduce to the most essential parts 16:26:42 zakim, take up agendum 3 16:26:42 agendum 3 -- Is "Colors, Styles, and Animations" the best place to discuss 2.3.3 animation from interactions? 16:26:44 ... https://deploy-preview-340--wai-curricula.netlify.app/curricula/designer-modules/colors-styles-and-animations/#topic-seizures-and-physical-reactions -- taken up [from Daniel] 16:28:21 DM: is this the right place to talk about animations? 16:28:36 ...seizures and physical reactions 16:29:05 CD: what about motion and animation not from interaction? 16:29:50 ...everything else in this module is not interaction-driven 16:31:15 GN: I'm ok with this as-is 16:31:25 ...these requirements are together in WCAG 16:31:57 EO: agree with both, not sure 16:34:28 SAZ: feel Animations is misplaced here but not sure where else 16:34:40 ...there are other animations, such as carousels 16:34:53 ...also the concept of "change of context" 16:35:11 ...these all kind of relate to user interaction and animations 16:35:25 ...but not necessarily seizures 16:35:32 CD: not sure misplaced here 16:35:51 ...but agree with Shadi 16:36:04 ...many more criteria from guideline 2.2 16:36:26 ...kind of fall under Animations umbrella 16:36:53 DM: so need to broaden the scope for sure 16:37:01 ...then can decide where it goes 16:37:41 EO: agree with Carlos and Shadi 16:37:51 ...is Animations the correct term? 16:40:12 SAZ: where do we deal with the other types of animations, auto-playing audio, change of context, etc? 16:40:27 HK: moving content, like carousels, ads, etc. 16:40:54 ...maybe focus on distractions? content that is distracting 16:42:44 zakim, take up agendum 4 16:42:44 agendum 4 -- Missing Examples of Visual Patterns -- taken up [from Daniel] 16:43:43 DM: refer to "distinguishable styles" but don't provide examples 16:44:15 ...should we provide examples? 16:44:32 ...or enough to say distinguishable styles 16:46:29 SAZ: don't think we should provide examples 16:46:40 ...also didn't in the developer modules 16:47:09 CD: agree, out of scope 16:47:21 ...courses should provide these specific examples 16:47:28 ...not the curricula 16:47:47 EO: agree with Carlos and Shadi 16:47:58 ...same approach like previous modules 16:49:14 SAZ: maybe make more specific but not as far as examples 16:49:36 ...for example, that links should be distinguishable from the text around it 16:49:46 ...or heading levels to be each distinctive 16:50:04 DM: so not provided the specific patterns but being more specific 16:50:29 ...also the sign-posting to the coding aspects associated with this 16:51:07 HK: programmatic aspects seems out of scope of design 16:51:28 s/design/this part 16:51:37 ...more about organization or structure 16:52:43 ...for example, for "ensure headings are nested" 16:54:09 SAZ: agree, these seem more navigation and orientation 16:54:18 ...rather than layout and spacing 16:54:47 HK: also should focus on the visuals 16:55:25 CD: partially agree 16:55:46 ...layout may have particular meaning for designers 16:55:58 ...yet they also need to mark-up the content 16:56:25 ...not sure it needs to be moved 16:57:05 SAZ: maybe split? 16:57:28 ...visual aspects of headings and hierarchy is one 16:57:39 ...and working with developers to ensure coding is another 16:58:25 DM: good input but might not fully address concern from Howard 16:58:53 HK: maybe "Layout, Spacing, and Structure" 17:00:24 ...visual cues, lists, headings, are for me layout 17:01:06 DM: will look into it 17:01:21 ...but previously we wanted to move away from terms such as "structure" 17:01:30 ...because too developer-oriented 17:02:07 EO: need to mention terms such as "responsive design" 17:02:22 ...designers look for these types of terminology 17:02:47 DM: Gerhard mentioned that last time 17:02:53 ...will look into it 17:03:00 Topic: Wrap-Up 17:03:12 DM: will integrate your feedback 17:03:19 ...and work on other modules 17:03:28 ...might not neet next week 17:03:36 ...but might have a survey soon 17:03:47 ...with all 7 modules proposed 17:03:56 ...with just the learning outcomes 17:04:08 ...to move things around etc. 17:05:10 Rrsagent, draft minutes 17:05:10 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/03/09-wai-curricula-minutes.html Daniel 17:10:21 S/ neet / meet / 17:10:30 Rrsagent, draft minutes 17:10:30 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/03/09-wai-curricula-minutes.html Daniel