12:01:34 RRSAgent has joined #wot-script 12:01:34 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/02/22-wot-script-irc 12:02:01 cris has joined #wot-script 12:02:02 meeting: WoT Scripting API 12:02:18 present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Cristiano_Aguzzi, Philipp_Blum, Zoltan_Kis 12:02:22 dape has joined #wot-script 12:02:36 present+ Daniel_Peintner 12:02:43 chair: Daniel 12:03:40 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Scripting_API_WebConf#22_February_2021 12:05:08 TOPIC: Previous minutes 12:05:19 --> https://www.w3.org/2021/02/15-wot-script-minutes.html 12:07:06 Mizushima has joined #wot-script 12:07:32 s/-->/->/ 12:07:35 --> no objections --> minutes approved 12:07:58 s/html/html Feb-15/ 12:08:05 TOPIC: Quick Updates 12:08:12 DP: F2F March 2021 - Scripting Topics 12:08:21 -> https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/F2F_meeting,_March_2021#Scripting%7CVirtual 12:09:11 s/Virtual/Virtual March F2F wiki/ 12:11:24 ZK: Shared doc? 12:11:25 DP: +1 12:12:13 ZK: Will do 12:12:17 +1 12:13:12 present+ Tomoaki_Mizushima 12:13:22 ZK: 60-70 minutes 12:14:42 TOPIC: PR Add definitions for partialTD 12:14:48 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/pull/289 12:15:07 CA: incorporated comments 12:15:15 ... updated examples 12:15:43 ... took into account ZK comment 12:15:53 ... plan to add more examples 12:16:20 ... with security 12:16:42 s/PR Add/PR 289 - Add/ 12:16:55 s/289/289 PR 289/ 12:17:07 DP: maybe split example in one view 12:17:15 ZK: Make sense 12:18:03 ... approved PR 12:18:12 CA: Can work on split screen 12:18:24 ... should talk to TD folks as well 12:18:30 ... to be consistent 12:19:39 DP: PR ready? 12:19:48 ZK/CA: Yes. Add examples latger 12:19:54 ZK: Small PRs 12:20:55 q+ 12:22:12 ack zkis 12:22:14 ZK: section in TD about generate TDs 12:23:17 DP: related discussion, see https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/1047#issuecomment-781383187 12:23:31 i/section/discuss during the F2F about a 12:24:18 CA: proposed in TD call to merge ourt work 12:24:30 .. 1. create partial TD 12:24:39 ... 2. Create TD 12:25:15 ZK: issue needs owner 12:25:43 CA: I am reviewing it... PR from Sebastian 12:26:33 ... I opened related issue in scripting API, https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/304 12:28:52 TOPIC: Issue ActionHandler returning InteractionInput always 12:28:53 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/302 12:30:52 ZK: don't think it is necessary.. object can be null 12:30:55 CA: beneficial to state null 12:31:05 ... clearer to implementor 12:31:34 ZK: WebIDL choose to do it that way 12:32:05 CA: use of nullable objects? 12:32:37 https://heycam.github.io/webidl/#idl-nullable-type 12:35:58 Mizushima_ has joined #wot-script 12:36:48 ... see discussion here, https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/302#issuecomment-783342412 12:37:10 TOPIC: Does PropertyMap need to be different for reading and writing a value? 12:37:11 -> see https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/293 12:38:36 CA: I would expect PropertyMapOutput and PropertyMapInput 12:38:48 ... algorithmn is fine also 12:38:48 s/302/302 Issue 302/ 12:39:06 s/Issue ActionHandler/Issue 302 - ActionHandler/ 12:39:45 ZK: tag review might not like PropertyMap 12:40:56 ... interface map like 12:40:58 https://heycam.github.io/webidl/#dfn-maplike-declaration 12:47:49 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/293#issuecomment-783349553 12:48:34 TOPIC: Should title be mandatory in ExposedThingInit? 12:48:35 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/300 12:49:31 DP: I can see pros and cons 12:49:41 CA: No strong opinion either 12:49:49 ... can see McCools points also 12:50:37 s|-> see https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/293|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/293 See issue 293| 12:51:08 s|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/293#issuecomment-783349553|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/293#issuecomment-783349553 Comments on issue 293| 12:51:24 s/Should title/Issue 300 - Should/ 12:51:34 s/- Should/- Should title/ 12:51:47 s/300/300 Issue 300// 12:51:56 rrsagent, make log public 12:52:02 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:52:02 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/02/22-wot-script-minutes.html kaz 12:52:32 ZK: Since title is required we might want to require it 12:52:46 .... or we keep issue open since we have good use-case 12:52:56 CA: Yes/no decision 12:53:57 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:53:57 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/02/22-wot-script-minutes.html kaz 12:54:47 s|Issue 300/|Issue 300| 12:54:49 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:54:49 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/02/22-wot-script-minutes.html kaz 12:56:56 DP: i think title should be optional, up to the runtime 12:57:12 ZK: I don't like up to the runtime, should be standardized 12:58:31 ... implementation can reject 13:01:07 [adjourned] 13:01:11 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:01:11 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/02/22-wot-script-minutes.html kaz 14:34:50 Zakim has left #wot-script 14:44:53 zkis2 has joined #wot-script