14:16:38 RRSAgent has joined #epub 14:16:38 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/01/29-epub-irc 14:16:40 RRSAgent, make logs Public 14:16:41 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), ivan 14:16:42 ivan has changed the topic to: Meeting Agenda 2021-01-29: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-epub-wg/2021Jan/0045.html 14:16:43 Chair: wendy 14:16:43 Date: 2021-01-29 14:16:43 Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-epub-wg/2021Jan/0045.html 14:16:43 Meeting: EPUB 3 Working Group Telco 14:44:30 AramZS has joined #epub 14:45:53 tzviya has joined #epub 14:48:40 wendyreid has joined #epub 14:57:40 MattChan has joined #epub 14:57:44 avneeshsingh has joined #epub 14:57:51 LauraB7 has joined #epub 14:58:06 gpellegrino has joined #epub 14:58:16 MasakazuKitahara has joined #epub 14:58:19 present+ 14:58:36 present+ 14:58:46 present+ avneeshsingh 14:58:46 present+ MattChan 14:58:47 present+ 14:58:56 present+ 14:58:59 present+ MasakazuKitahara 14:59:14 present+ 14:59:18 toshiakikoike has joined #epub 14:59:36 present+ 14:59:41 present+ 14:59:49 present+ tzviya 14:59:54 regrets+ dauwhe 15:01:17 present+ charles 15:01:23 BenSchroeter has joined #epub 15:01:26 CharlesL has joined #epub 15:01:48 present+ BenSchroeter 15:01:52 present+ 15:01:58 present+ george 15:02:14 mgarrish has joined #epub 15:02:20 present+ billk 15:02:54 Bill_Kasdorf has joined #epub 15:02:58 present+ mgarrish 15:03:06 present+ 15:04:08 George has joined #epub 15:04:12 scribe+ 15:04:25 present+ 15:05:19 wendyreid: welcome everyone, today i want to get updates on a couple things. First is the a11y TF 15:05:23 topic: a11y taskforce report 15:05:26 TOPIC: Update on Accessibility TF 15:05:34 Jan 14: https://www.w3.org/publishing/groups/epub-wg/Meetings/Minutes/2021-01-14-epub-a11y 15:05:42 Jan 28: https://www.w3.org/publishing/groups/epub-wg/Meetings/Minutes/2021-01-28-epub-a11y 15:05:55 avneeshsingh: these are minutes of 2 meetings in which we made some important decisions 15:06:14 ... decision for referring to latest version of WCAG 15:06:33 ... we will always point to latest version of WCAG, with provision of referring to 2.0 for backwards compatibility 15:06:41 duga has joined #epub 15:06:44 present+ 15:06:44 present+ brady 15:06:47 present+ 15:07:05 ... also, US and Canada are quite aggressive with keeping up with a11y spec 15:07:10 ... other regions not quite so much 15:07:20 ... don't want to discourage them from keeping up with a11y spec 15:07:35 ... similarly, strongly rec AA, but allow A 15:07:56 ... adapting or improving spec to keep in line with EUAA 15:08:14 ... gpellegrino, luc, and cristina have done a mapping between EUAA and spec 15:08:41 ... main differences are in requiring MO, and in adding a statement that DRM should not interfere with a11y 15:08:56 ... we are in a good position to relese FPWD in Feb 15:09:07 ... will discuss with Matt re exact date 15:09:07 q+ 15:09:32 q+ 15:09:41 ... would also highlight one Q (not for discussion now): Should we rename epub a11y to something more generic? 15:10:09 ... a more generic name way garner more attention, but some things, like MO, are specific to epub 15:10:22 present+ hadrien 15:10:32 Hadrien has joined #epub 15:10:33 ack ivan 15:10:37 present+ 15:10:57 ivan: does it mean that you want the WG to vote on publishing FPWG now? 15:11:05 avneeshsingh: not yet, still need to discuss with Matt 15:11:11 ... will get back to the WG after 15:11:11 ack tzviya 15:11:17 s/FPWG/FPWD/ 15:11:34 tzviya: whether this document needs approval by APA 15:12:04 ... not really concern about our handing of a11y, but more about how this spec touches upon areas that affect publishing in general (e.g. EUAA) 15:12:17 George: APA normally does a review of the FPWD 15:12:38 ... because of the importance of this (owing to the EUAA), maybe we can send them a version before the FPWD 15:13:01 ... but we probably want to wait for Matt and avneeshsingh to make some of the changes we discussed recently 15:13:14 q+ 15:13:23 avneeshsingh: to clarify, the horizontal reviews kick in on publication of the FPWD 15:13:28 ... no need to do it before then 15:13:38 q- 15:13:41 ... don't want to delay the timing by going to APA first 15:13:47 +1 to avneeshsingh 15:13:56 ... the FPWD is just a stake in the ground, still a lot of work to do after until CR 15:14:12 q+ 15:14:23 ... just a note, changing the name has strategic considerations as it make it harder to defend the epub specific parts 15:14:51 ... last time we gave APA a request, we were delayed by a month before moving forward 15:15:21 George: so this FPWD will probably be unchanged for a while, and june is an important date for EUAA, so FPWD would be the version reviewed by Europe 15:15:44 avneeshsingh: once the FPWD is release, continuous changes will be published by the automated publishing system? 15:15:49 wendyreid: no, we don't have that turned on 15:16:08 ... but we can republish as soon as the WG approves it 15:16:24 ... so changes could be live, within, say, a week of the WG deciding it? 15:16:34 ack ivan 15:16:45 ivan: the last thing about the publication 15:17:09 ... automatic publication means that there is a specific branch for each doc, and if there is a merge to this branch, then auto publishing will kick in 15:17:21 ... its not instant in terms of merging PR 15:17:41 ... but if matt makes a merge into that special branch, then auto publishing will kick in 15:17:57 ... if we ask APA for review, they will review not only a11y, but the whole spec (2 other docs as well) 15:18:14 ... APA may decide to delete review of the 2 other docs back to a11y TF, but formally they review the whole thing 15:18:53 ... also, there are procedures in the sense that we have to flag issues after publishing FPWD 15:19:02 q+ 15:19:21 wendyreid: the plan was that we were going to publishing another draft of the other documents along side a11y FPWD 15:19:34 ack CharlesL 15:19:36 ... we'll use this timing to trigger other horizontal reviews 15:19:45 CharlesL: don't we also have to initiate a tag review? 15:20:06 wendyreid: yes, but we're going to time that with getting everything published, so everything can be reviewed at once 15:20:14 TOPIC: Internationalization 15:20:47 ivan: i started on this piece, i18n guys have a self test which you are supposed to check your spec against 15:20:59 Self test: https://github.com/w3c/epub-specs/wiki/Internationalization-self-test-for-the-EPUB-3.3.-spec 15:21:18 ... here it is, with my markup and comment 15:21:37 ... i also added background that is mostly for i18n moreso than for us 15:21:49 ... if you see anything that needs to be changed, go ahead 15:22:11 ... there are places where i didn't know the answer, or points of contention that will need to be discussed 15:22:30 ... if we agree with this as is, we can mark for i18n and get them involved 15:22:50 ... don't want to go into all details now, but the biggest issue is probably the bidirectional text 15:23:03 ... i think we are more or less alright, because we have the dir attribute... 15:23:35 ... to clarify, the only thing we have to check is the package document, everything else is under the XML, CSS, etc. specs 15:23:43 ... but we have to check our own metadata document 15:23:48 ... there are 2 things to mention 15:24:23 ... one, in the RS doc, there is sec 3.2, which talks about the package document 15:24:44 https://w3c.github.io/epub-specs/epub33/rs/#package-doc 15:24:48 ... it does pick some items like what to do with identifier, etc. 15:24:59 ... i think we should add something about how dir is managed 15:25:33 ... two, there is one point where there is a contradition between what i18n reqires and what I believe we should do according to the spec 15:25:52 ... this is what happens if there is text in which dir is set, and unicode in text has also directional note 15:26:09 ... there is remark in spec that says unicode inherent directionality takes precedent over dir 15:26:19 ... but this exact opposite of what i18n asks for 15:26:50 ... this is a classic example for bidirectional text, e.g. text that starts with latin character, but the text is hebrew 15:27:02 ... this should be marked dir rtl 15:27:14 ... but spec seems to say that unicode implicit direction takes precedence 15:27:18 ... seems like a bug in the spec 15:27:49 ... also don't know what happens if title text contains unicode marker for rtl, does RS correctly handle that? 15:27:57 ... spec should say that it should be handled 15:28:32 ... these were the areas where i saw we had issues to discuss 15:28:53 ... Dave had also open issues, e.g. reading direction in spine 15:29:04 ... also, do we say that default of dir is ltr in spec? 15:29:17 ... so please look at all of these issues, and consult the wiki above 15:30:09 ... if we arrive at consensus on all these open issues, then I can flag them (and the wiki) for consultation with the i18n folks 15:30:25 wendyreid: i don't think we say that we have a default directionality 15:30:32 ... we probably use the HTML default 15:30:42 duga: presumably the default has to be auto? 15:30:54 ivan: that was the other thing, dir doesn't have an auto setting 15:31:00 ... not sure what auto would mean 15:31:32 ... another issue, in HTML if you have a there is hreflang attribute 15:31:42 ... (i.e. lang of the linked resource) 15:31:58 ... we don't have that in the package document 15:33:06 wendyreid: any questions about i18n? 15:33:17 ... so we haven't submitted this to them yet 15:33:38 ivan: i would love it if people would review the wiki i prepared above 15:33:47 I will look it over 15:34:05 ... other possibility is that i could raise them as separate issues without involving i18n for now, and we can discuss issue by issue 15:34:32 duga: separate issues are nice, easy to keep track of things 15:34:57 ivan: okay, i'll create the separate issues 15:35:24 wendyreid: we have to do the other checklists for the other horizontal reviews (incl. security) 15:35:32 Topic: AOB? 15:36:14 wendyreid: okay, there are open issues in github right now 15:36:18 ... would be good to get input 15:36:30 ... particularly page progression direction, and conformance re. MO 15:36:39 ... have a great weekend, see you all next week! 15:36:50 CharlesL has left #epub 15:37:00 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:37:00 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/01/29-epub-minutes.html ivan 15:37:15 zakim, end meeting 15:37:15 As of this point the attendees have been ivan, gpellegrino, avneeshsingh, MattChan, LauraB, MasakazuKitahara, toshiakikoike, wendyreid, tzviya, charles, BenSchroeter, CharlesL, 15:37:18 ... george, billk, mgarrish, Bill_Kasdorf, brady, duga, hadrien 15:37:18 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 15:37:18 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/01/29-epub-minutes.html Zakim 15:37:20 I am happy to have been of service, ivan; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 15:37:24 Zakim has left #epub 15:38:01 rrsagent, bye 15:38:01 I see no action items