16:57:46 RRSAgent has joined #apa 16:57:46 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/01/27-apa-irc 16:57:48 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:57:48 Zakim has joined #apa 16:57:50 Meeting: Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group Teleconference 16:57:50 Date: 27 January 2021 16:57:52 agenda? 16:57:55 Chair: Janina 16:57:55 agenda+ Agenda Review & Announcements 16:57:55 agenda+ Task Force Updates 16:57:55 agenda+ FAST Progress 16:57:55 agenda+ New Charters Review https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Horizontal+review+requested%22 16:57:58 agenda+ new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html 16:58:01 agenda+ CSS Update (Amy) https://github.com/w3c/css-a11y/issues 16:58:03 agenda+ Actions Checkin (Specs) https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/open 16:58:06 agenda+ Horizontal Review Issues Tracker https://w3c.github.io/horizontal-issue-tracker/?repo=w3c/a11y-review 16:58:09 agenda+ APA Rechartering https://raw.githack.com/w3c/apa/charter-2021/charter.html 16:58:11 agenda+ Other Business 16:58:14 agenda+ be done 16:59:07 /me I'm on my way. Another minute or so 16:59:14 Matthew_Atkinson has joined #apa 16:59:44 amy_c has joined #apa 16:59:54 becky has joined #apa 17:00:24 present+ 17:00:28 JPaton has joined #APA 17:00:39 paul_grenier has joined #apa 17:00:44 present+ 17:00:47 present+ 17:01:09 IanPouncey has joined #apa 17:01:21 present+ 17:01:46 present+ 17:01:47 Ela has joined #apa 17:01:50 Irfan has joined #apa 17:01:59 present+ 17:02:00 present+ 17:02:02 present+ 17:02:16 scribe: paul_grenier 17:02:34 present+ 17:02:38 zakim, next item 17:02:38 agendum 1 -- Agenda Review & Announcements -- taken up [from janina] 17:03:03 janina: I trimmed a few items from the agenda to get to our draft charter 17:03:30 janina: any additions or changes or items of news? 17:03:57 becky: I've accepted another position outside of Knowbility. Hopefully, I'll stay as co-chair. 17:05:15 Matthew_Atkinson: quick update, I had a look at the personalization repo and I'll get in touch with Joshua as needed 17:05:22 topic: Open CfC 17:05:30 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa-admin/2021Jan/0000.html 17:06:14 janina: we send to apa-admin so it's readable by everyone but only writable by apa members 17:06:54 janina: we only use it for things like voting 17:07:21 janina: I have a question about the first item 17:07:55 Jonny_James has joined #apa 17:08:25 present+ 17:08:49 JF has joined #apa 17:08:55 Present+ 17:09:27 paul_grenier: the goal was to not allow for people to be excluded by their differences, I can take a compromise to not require only 1 biometric facet 17:10:07 janina: there's emerging wcag guidance we should sync with that 17:10:50 MichaelC: their guidance is generic 17:11:14 JF: (reading 3.3.7 strictly about coga) 17:12:07 Q+ to ask about WAI resources regarding biometrics 17:12:09 janina: since this is a point release and it's not new major features, I propose we recast this and turn the biometrics into "must support multiple" and note that additional requirements are emerging 17:12:29 janina: they should plan on supporting any new guidance 17:12:58 JF: i don't think there's anything specific about biometrics 17:13:04 janina: CAPTCHA does 17:13:09 JF: we should point to that then 17:14:41 JF: "should not" instead of "must not" makes this a recommendation and doesn't sound normative 17:15:07 ack me 17:15:07 JF, you wanted to ask about WAI resources regarding biometrics 17:15:09 becky: so it needs reworded as "single biometric factor" 17:15:18 janina: note the 2019 CAPTCHA note 17:15:28 becky: do we include COGA notes or not? 17:15:42 janina: I think we give them a heads up, John can you drop the pointer? 17:16:28 Link to emergent WCAG 2.2 SC: https://w3c.github.io/wcag/guidelines/22/#accessible-authentication 17:16:29 WCAG 2.2 SC 3.3.7: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/#accessible-authentication 17:16:31 janina: when we send out the decision we cc the main list and we track it in the wiki 17:17:13 JF: becky and I pointed to different versions, I wouldn't point to the TR yet (use the editors draft) 17:17:57 JF: since there's nothing in wcag speaking to biometrics now can we pass that suggestion along to agwag? 17:18:40 MichaelC: we're not taking new guidelines for 2.x only for 3 right now. I don't think we need a formal request, someone can just bring it up. 17:19:00 JF: where would one bring it up? 17:20:14 MichaelC: with agwag in context of wcag 3 17:21:20 janina: first working draft released last week 17:21:29 Here's a pointer to WCAG 3 (via W3C's 'blog): https://www.w3.org/blog/2021/01/wcag-3-fpwd/ 17:21:37 zakim, next item 17:21:37 agendum 2 -- Task Force Updates -- taken up [from janina] 17:21:59 janina: RQTF met with internet of things today 17:22:35 janina: it was very productive, was everyone able to attend who wanted to? 17:23:04 janina: any other Tf updates? 17:23:05 zakim, next item 17:23:05 agendum 3 -- FAST Progress -- taken up [from janina] 17:23:55 q? 17:24:28 MichaelC: Josh and I have been working on FAST separately. Josh is working on content for functional requirements and AURs I'm working on a way to store and output this info. I hope I can demo soon (1-2 weeks). 17:24:49 zakim, next item 17:24:49 agendum 4 -- New Charters Review https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Horizontal+review+requested%22 -- taken up [from janina] 17:25:10 MichaelC: only one, from the browser testing and tools WG (recharter) 17:25:17 https://w3c.github.io/charter-drafts/browser-testing-tools.html 17:26:23 MichaelC: I don't personally have any comments 17:26:32 janina: anyone with a concern? 17:26:36 janina: we can pass on it 17:26:38 zakim, next item 17:26:38 agendum 5 -- new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html -- taken up [from janina] 17:27:09 stevelee has joined #apa 17:27:19 MichaelC: two pubs wcag 3.0 and requirements for wcag 3.0 17:27:25 -> https://www.w3.org/TR/wcag-3.0/ W3C Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 3.0 17:27:31 stevelee_ has joined #apa 17:27:44 -> https://www.w3.org/TR/wcag-3.0-requirements/ Requirements for WCAG 3.0 17:29:01 MichaelC: I don't have any comments, do we want apa review? We want a wide review but we don't typically review from accessibility groups. 17:29:17 janina: everyone should read and file comments as individuals (end of Feb deadline) 17:29:30 janina: does APA itself want to review? 17:29:48 everyone: silence 17:30:11 janina: there are some radically different things, so please provide your individual feedback 17:30:27 becky: lots of overlap in membership 17:30:30 zakim, next item 17:30:30 agendum 6 -- CSS Update (Amy) https://github.com/w3c/css-a11y/issues -- taken up [from janina] 17:30:51 zakim, take up item 5 17:30:51 agendum 5 -- new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html -- taken up [from janina] 17:31:15 agenda? 17:32:03 zakim, next item 17:32:03 agendum 6 -- CSS Update (Amy) https://github.com/w3c/css-a11y/issues -- taken up [from janina] 17:32:25 amy_c: I have two I'd like us to look at 17:32:40 https://github.com/w3c/css-a11y/issues/30 17:33:16 amy_c: first is a spec review for css timing function which is out of date now (2018) when you go to it it's called css easing functions which is a candidate recommendation 17:33:30 janina: are there other levels of this coming (level 1) 17:33:41 amy_c: last editor's draft was January, it's still active 17:34:04 JPaton has joined #APA 17:34:21 janina: let's look to see if we have any issues in the latest draft whichever version it's pointing to 17:35:12 amy_c: they may have changed it from timing to easing to convey it's about animations rather than timeouts 17:36:30 IanPouncey: yes it's about mathematics of animation while it has an impact on accessibility it's not specific to this document 17:36:34 janina: so I think we pass on this 17:36:52 IanPouncey: there's no accessibility implications between the different functions 17:37:05 janina: no need to review 17:37:19 https://github.com/w3c/css-a11y/issues/32 17:37:51 amy_c: a suggestion about having a pseudo class for role 17:38:29 amy_c: James closed an ARIA ticket for this so it's moved to CSS WG 17:38:52 JF: we should track it 17:39:47 amy_c: seems like a use case is for EPUB dealing with fallbacks from missing namespace role attributes 17:40:16 amy_c: (reading) there needs to be an api for computed role 17:40:45 Q+ 17:40:56 IanPouncey: computed role selector would apply to implied semantics as well as role attribute 17:41:06 stevelee_ has joined #apa 17:41:53 janina: has CSS agreed to discuss this? 17:42:12 becky: it was sent to us from ARIA 17:42:39 janina: we should open an issue and raise it with CSS 17:43:29 JF: does this blur lines between the classic separation of concerns? 17:44:18 IanPouncey: (example) looking for all headings you'd need to create a selector with role=heading as well as h1-h6 this would allow you to write a selector based on the computed role 17:44:43 IanPouncey: you don't want styles based on arbitrary appearance but on the semantics 17:44:51 stevelee has joined #apa 17:45:30 janina: we should calendar discussion, so let's open the issue 17:47:07 zakim, next item 17:47:07 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, paul_grenier 17:47:11 q? 17:47:14 ack JF 17:47:15 ack jf 17:47:15 ack me 17:47:17 zakim, next item 17:47:17 agendum 7 -- Actions Checkin (Specs) https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/open -- taken up [from janina] 17:47:50 Garth has joined #apa 17:48:10 JF: I had an action to look at the template for the minutes, I'm about 65% complete. I've noted a best-practice there is some content that's not inside a landmark. 17:49:17 JF: the new design does a good job for visual structure and I like it, I still need to review it in a screen reader. 17:49:25 janina: I haven't noticed any difference 17:49:37 JF: we should adopt it and encourage others to do so 17:49:45 janina: is the background a concern 17:50:03 JF: it's not an issue, color contrast was good throughout 17:51:27 JF: we can provide feedback that the background should not zoom but otherwise good to go 17:51:34 w3t-sys@w3.org 17:51:58 MichaelC: the people on that list will either be the maintainers or know who the maintainers are 17:52:12 JF: I'll write up a draft response from APA in the next few days 17:52:51 Example of new minutes design: https://raw.githack.com/w3c/scribe2/master/sample-public.html 17:53:41 ACTION: Draft a response to Bert Boss and w3t-sys@w3.org 17:53:41 Error finding 'Draft'. You can review and register nicknames at . 17:53:44 zakim, next item 17:53:44 agendum 8 -- Horizontal Review Issues Tracker https://w3c.github.io/horizontal-issue-tracker/?repo=w3c/a11y-review -- taken up [from janina] 17:54:02 ACTION: JF to Draft a response to Bert Boss and w3t-sys@w3.org 17:54:03 zakim, close this item 17:54:03 agendum 8 closed 17:54:04 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:54:04 9. APA Rechartering https://raw.githack.com/w3c/apa/charter-2021/charter.html [from janina] 17:54:10 Error creating an ACTION: could not connect to Tracker. Please mail with details about what happened. 17:54:11 zakim, take up 9 17:54:11 I don't understand 'take up 9', paul_grenier 17:54:14 zakim, take up item 9 17:54:14 agendum 9 -- APA Rechartering https://raw.githack.com/w3c/apa/charter-2021/charter.html -- taken up [from janina] 17:54:57 becky: (reading scope) 17:57:34 janina: spoken presentation is a better name than pronunciation maybe we should change it 17:58:20 Q+ 17:59:50 JF: I'm opposed to the change 18:01:34 JF: what about eml emotional markup language 18:01:51 janina: bring it up, if eml can help us all the better 18:02:25 RRSAgent, make logs public 18:02:29 RRSAgent, make minutes 18:02:29 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/01/27-apa-minutes.html paul_grenier 18:02:37 EML: https://www.w3.org/TR/emotionml/ 18:03:34 RRSAgent, make minutes 18:03:34 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/01/27-apa-minutes.html paul_grenier 18:33:20 stevelee has joined #apa 18:35:47 stevelee_ has joined #apa 18:38:50 stevelee__ has joined #apa 19:00:14 stevelee__ has joined #apa 19:08:48 jamesn has joined #apa 19:18:31 becky has joined #apa 21:33:07 stevelee__ has joined #apa 21:47:52 stevelee_ has joined #apa