20:46:18 RRSAgent has joined #dxwgdcat 20:46:18 logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/01/20-dxwgdcat-irc 20:46:34 present+ 20:46:45 RRSAgent, make logs public 20:46:52 RRSAgent, draft minutes 20:46:52 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/01/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html riccardoAlbertoni 20:47:13 zakim, start meeting 20:47:13 RRSAgent, make logs Public 20:47:14 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), riccardoAlbertoni 20:47:40 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:47:40 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/01/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html riccardoAlbertoni 20:48:20 meeting: DXWG DCAT subgroup teleconference 20:48:33 trackbot, start meeting 20:48:36 RRSAgent, make logs public 20:48:39 Meeting: Dataset Exchange Working Group Teleconference 20:48:39 Date: 20 January 2021 20:49:11 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:49:11 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/01/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html riccardoAlbertoni 20:59:07 PWinstanley has joined #dxwgdcat 20:59:16 present+ 21:01:58 AndreaPerego has joined #dxwgdcat 21:02:27 Makx_ has joined #dxwgdcat 21:02:54 present+ Makx 21:07:51 trackbot, start meeting 21:07:54 RRSAgent, make logs public 21:07:57 Meeting: Dataset Exchange Working Group Teleconference 21:07:57 Date: 20 January 2021 21:08:04 Chair: RiccardoAlbertoni 21:08:07 present+ 21:08:10 meeting: DXWG DCAT subgroup call 21:08:30 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2021.01.20 21:08:33 present+ 21:08:45 topic: approve last meeting minutes 21:08:46 PROPOSED: approve last meeting minutes https://www.w3.org/2020/11/11-dxwgdcat-minutes 21:08:54 0 21:09:07 +1 21:09:18 RRSAgent, make logs world 21:09:22 +1 21:09:40 RESOLVED: approve last meeting minutes https://www.w3.org/2020/11/11-dxwgdcat-minutes 21:09:43 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:09:43 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/01/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:09:57 topic: approving agenda 21:09:59 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2021.01.20 21:10:07 Fine with me 21:10:41 s/Fine with me/AndreaPerego: Fine with me/ 21:10:43 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/projects/17 21:10:54 topic: open issue on gh 21:11:00 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:11:00 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/01/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:11:40 riccardoAlbertoni: Issues have been grouped for being reviewed by topic. 21:11:51 ... We have a lot of stale issues. 21:12:37 ... Anyway, when closing issues, especially those concerning requirements, we should make a statement there. 21:13:10 ... Should we start with them? 21:13:22 [silence] 21:13:34 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/82 Reference system [RRS] 21:13:38 riccardoAlbertoni: Let's stat then with them. 21:13:54 https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-2/#ex-dataset-crs 21:14:19 riccardoAlbertoni: For #82, the requirements should have been addressed in DCAT2 by providing an example of how to specify a CRS. 21:14:30 PROPOSED: close https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/82 21:14:34 +1 21:14:36 +1 21:14:45 +1 21:14:59 +1 21:14:59 resolved: close https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/82 21:15:17 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/70 Publication control [RPC] 21:15:21 riccardoAlbertoni: Let's look at #70. 21:16:07 https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#license-rights 21:16:19 ... We do have in DCAT2 a section on licenses and rights. 21:17:25 ... Either we keep things as they are, or we state that the same rules apply to dcat:CatalogRecord's 21:18:24 Makx_: I don't see in that section about the type of resources a license applies to. 21:19:08 riccardoAlbertoni: It is implictly related to subclasses of dcat:Resource, which a dcat:CatalogRecord is not. 21:20:17 ... It is however true that we have not specified the properties for all classes, and since we are in OWA one can use rights on any resource. 21:20:27 q+ 21:20:39 ack AndreaPerego 21:23:06 +q 21:23:07 +1 to keep things as they are 21:24:00 AndreaPerego: I would keep things as they are. It was a requirement about IPR on metadata produced by private companies, and we didn't have any additional input along those lines. 21:24:19 riccardoAlbertoni: So we can just repeat what we said here. 21:24:25 ... Any objections. 21:24:35 no objection 21:24:40 none from me 21:24:57 s/Any objections./Any objections?/ 21:25:25 propose: Reply to the issue explaining the open word assumpion and how to address the specific requirement without changing the document 21:25:37 + 21:25:38 +1 21:25:39 +1 21:26:04 s/propose/proposed 21:26:11 +1 21:26:22 resolved: Reply to the issue explaining the open word assumpion and how to address the specific requirement without changing the document 21:26:34 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:26:34 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/01/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:26:40 q? 21:26:47 ack riccardoAlbertoni 21:27:01 riccardoAlbertoni: Next one... 21:27:01 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1287 digest for DCAT distribution 21:27:15 riccardoAlbertoni: This is quite recent. 21:27:45 ... There is a solution in DCAT-AP using spdx:checksum. 21:28:53 ... My question is whether SPDX is stable enough to be included into a W3C Recommendation. 21:28:58 ... WDYT? 21:29:11 Makx_: Not sure on how much is stable. 21:29:41 ... One of the issues raised is that there's only one way of expressing it. 21:30:28 ... I think we should first check whether this solution is flexible enough. 21:30:29 q+ 21:30:45 ack AndreaPerego 21:31:08 Look at https://spdx.org/rdf/terms/#d4e1968 21:33:00 Makx_: There was an issue about the support of only one hash algorithm, but the current version of SPDX supports more. 21:35:18 AndreaPerego: We need anyway to add some notes of use to make it clear when and for which use cases it can be used. 21:37:04 riccardoAlbertoni: Maybe we can start with a PR, and then work on that. Or we go on discussing on GH. 21:37:12 ... WDYT? 21:37:36 AndreaPerego: I would propose to go on working on GH. 21:37:37 ok 21:37:45 riccardoAlbertoni: Any other comments? 21:37:56 riccardoAlbertoni: Next one... 21:38:14 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/87 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/88 21:38:17 s/Next one/Next ones/ 21:38:28 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:38:28 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/01/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:38:59 riccardoAlbertoni: About relationships with other vocs, not sure mapping with VoID is necessary. 21:39:17 ... But in GH people are raising some questions on this. 21:39:39 ... Should we elaborate more on this? 21:40:40 ... We said that DCAT, VoID, QB can be used in a complementary way, we have DataID as an example. 21:40:49 Makx_: I would just close it. 21:40:54 PWinstanley: Agreed. 21:40:59 No further elaboration 21:41:28 riccardoAlbertoni: My concern is that in #88 there was quite a long discussion on this. 21:41:57 ... Some people were asking clarifications. 21:42:22 ... After all, I agree we can close, at least the part about the mapping. 21:42:48 ... On the other side, the comments were coming from people actually using DCAT. 21:42:54 q+ 21:43:36 ack AndreaPerego 21:45:34 AndreaPerego: I don't think we have enough evidence and use cases to understand how to link DCAT with VoID and QB. 21:47:02 riccardoAlbertoni: I actually don't think it is possible to standardise this link. 21:48:06 Makx_: This is also what Bert was saying. And you also may need link DCAT from VoID. 21:48:27 ... And not having use cases, we cannot provide a safe solution. 21:48:38 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:48:38 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/01/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:48:47 proposed: Closing the issues as we do not have enough use cases grouding a solution 21:49:35 roposed: Closing the issues as we do not have enough use cases for grouding a solution 21:50:14 +1 21:50:17 +1 21:50:25 +1 21:50:28 +1 21:50:35 s/roposed: Closing the issues as we do not have enough use cases for grouding a solution// 21:50:42 s/grouding/grounding/ 21:51:00 +1 21:51:18 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:51:18 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/01/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:51:41 resolution: Closing the issues as we do not have enough use cases grounding a solution 21:51:43 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:51:43 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/01/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:52:08 s/resolution/resolved/ 21:52:16 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:52:16 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/01/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:53:13 topic: outstanding actions 21:53:19 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:53:19 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/01/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:53:28 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/open 21:54:43 riccardoAlbertoni: About https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/417 , do you have anything, PWinstanley? 21:55:35 PWinstanley: I suggest we keep it, and collect the presentations we made to start a draft for the primer. 21:55:52 Makx_: Should we have then a document linking to training material? 21:56:03 PWinstanley: Yes, plus some narrative. 21:56:35 riccardoAlbertoni: There is also a collection of resources I created, but I don't remember where it is. 21:56:41 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/wiki/DCAT-presentations-and-external-materials 21:56:52 ... Here ^^ ! 21:57:22 ... Anyone can add links to their presentations etc. 21:57:50 PWinstanley: Let's start this in April, when we have finished with the dissemination activities. 21:58:48 riccardoAlbertoni: About https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/434 , do you have anything AndreaPerego? 21:59:08 AndreaPerego: It's a work item for the next drafts. 21:59:30 riccardoAlbertoni: This maybe relates to some feedback on versioning etc. 22:03:48 q+ 22:04:34 ack PWinstanley 22:05:19 AndreaPerego: The action is about 2 aspects: providing more example and provide the mappings between unqualified and qualified relationships. 22:05:43 ... About the examples, we need to decide the use cases we would like to use as a basis for the examples. 22:06:41 ... About the mapping, we need to present them properly, as qualified relationships may rely on community-specific vocabularies (e.g., for roles) that would not ensure interoperability across communities and domains. 22:07:12 PWinstanley: Why not considering the use of RDF*, or property graphs, instead of PROV? 22:07:46 riccardoAlbertoni: So, should we keep the action, or make it an issue? 22:07:47 q+ 22:08:38 +1 to consider later 22:08:52 AndreaPerego: I think this maps to more that one issue, so I would keep it as an action, and decide which issues we should create in future meetings. 22:08:59 q+ 22:09:02 ack 22:09:05 nothing from me 22:10:20 AndreaPerego: Maybe, it would be worth knowing how much effort each of us can put in DCAT in the next few months, and decide what we can actually do for the next drafts. 22:13:54 Makx_: An option is to set a date, and see what we can do. 22:14:09 PWinstanley: There is also the DCAT paper to be finalised and submitted. 22:17:28 riccardoAlbertoni: Let's meet in 2 weeks. 22:17:30 meeting adjourned 22:17:51 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 22:17:51 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/01/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html riccardoAlbertoni 22:19:55 s/meeting adjourned// 22:20:01 [meeting adjourned] 22:20:14 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 22:20:14 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/01/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 22:24:49 s/Makx_/Makx/g 22:24:50 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 22:24:50 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/01/20-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego