15:52:32 RRSAgent has joined #epub-a11y 15:52:32 logging to https://www.w3.org/2020/11/26-epub-a11y-irc 15:52:40 Zakim has joined #epub-a11y 15:52:49 zakim, this will be epub-a11y 15:52:49 ok, Avneesh 15:53:08 present+ 15:53:23 chair: Avneesh 16:00:29 MattChan has joined #epub-a11y 16:03:11 wendyreid has joined #epub-a11y 16:05:18 scribe+ 16:05:49 Avneesh: Part of the charter is aligning EPUb Accessiblity with the EUAA 16:05:55 George has joined #epub-a11y 16:06:04 Luc: We know the principles of EPUB Accessibility is WCAG 16:06:08 ... we know all this 16:06:18 present+ 16:06:21 ... in the EUAA, we find the same principles and requirements 16:06:28 ... POUR 16:06:47 ... these are spread inside the act in different concerns for products and services 16:06:52 Cristina has joined #epub-a11y 16:06:59 present+ 16:07:33 present+ 16:07:44 ... product is devices (ATMs, websites), and the services are files, like EPUBs 16:08:10 ... services could be ticketing, ecommerce, etc 16:08:24 ... the provision of ebooks for reading is providing a service 16:08:25 EU accessibility act requirements: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/882/oj?eliuri=eli:dir:2019:882:oj 16:08:46 ... services is where POUR comes in 16:09:06 ... the wordings are different between EPUB Accessibility and EUAA 16:09:07 q+ 16:09:12 ... how do we synchronize them 16:09:25 ... do we need to make them align in their wording? 16:09:35 Avneesh: There is a difference here 16:09:41 ... the EUAA has functional requirements 16:09:49 ... EPUB Accessibility has success criteria 16:10:02 ... EPUB Accessiblity has more specific guidelines 16:10:33 ... for example, EUAA says there should be alternatives for text content, based on WCAG 16:10:45 ... we should instead adjust the success criteria 16:10:51 ... instead of rewriting 16:11:34 Luc: Section 3 of EUAA (see link) 16:11:48 Cristina: This is what is existing in the directive 16:11:52 ... it's very high-level 16:11:58 ... as it also covers websites and other services 16:12:15 ... is WCAG is more based on success criteria or functional requirements 16:12:25 ... for the directive, they adopted based on WCAG 16:12:35 ... when you are talking about EPUB Accessibility, it also refers to WCAG 16:12:42 Avneesh: It refers to WCAG 16:12:50 Cristina: This is very high-level 16:13:07 ... I think that mapping the high-level requirements to success criteria in EPUB Accessibility is a good idea 16:13:13 Luc: That's how we need to make it 16:13:45 ... the discussions we had with Inmaculada (EU), for EPUB the requirements of the EUAA are covered 16:13:49 ... in EPUB Accessibility 16:14:04 Avneesh: What is the format of this? Do we want to provide mapping? 16:14:10 ... what is the structure and timeline 16:14:19 Luc: The format should be a document with a mapping 16:14:29 ... where EUAA and EPUB Accessiblity meet 16:14:32 q+ 16:14:46 ... the timing would be good to see in Q1 2021 16:14:50 ... January 16:15:04 ... she has to plan for the method in mid-2021 16:15:07 ... June 16:15:27 ... in June she would have to say "There's something for ebooks", and could point to EPUB 16:15:37 ... and it has been developed openly through consensus 16:15:50 ... she could direct the commission to this 16:16:19 ... otherwise she would have to direct an EU standardization body to develop one of their own 16:16:29 Cristina: I don't think they would choose a format 16:16:40 ... they would choose any format that meets the requirements 16:16:49 ... we need to not only consider EPUB 16:16:58 ... the commission will not only recommend EPUB 16:17:20 ... it would be impossible for the commission to select only one 16:18:03 Avneesh: As far as success criteria, EPUB Accessiblity is format independent 16:18:14 George: Do we need to change the title of the document in revision? 16:18:24 Avneesh: That is a broader discussion 16:18:35 George: It's a possibility though? 16:18:42 Avneesh: There's ways of doing it 16:19:00 ... we start with EPUB Accessibility and change the name 16:19:16 George: Something like digital publication conformance and discoverability 16:19:35 ... we need an introductory statement of how this document meets the requirements of the EUAA 16:19:45 ... link to the places in our specification that meets the functional requirements 16:20:15 ... walk through the document with links and affirmative statements 16:20:23 Luc: I don't think we should change the name 16:20:27 ... it's for EPUB 16:20:42 ... and this will avoid the question of PDF 16:20:53 ... the commission will need technical specifications for ebooks in general 16:21:10 ... we haven't thoroughly discussed this with Inmaculada 16:21:23 ... if we say it is for digital publications, would it cover PDF? 16:21:58 Avneesh: The discussion we had in the past, the takeaway was if the EU is going for a harmonized standard, it needs to work with different technologies 16:22:13 ... if they want a technical standard, then any non-profit org can submit a specification 16:22:24 ... there can be more than one that meets the functional requirements 16:22:33 Luc: It's not for us to explain how PDF meets the requirements 16:22:41 ... what we would try to prove is that EPUB conforms 16:22:56 George: I agree, and if we don't have to change the name that's fine 16:23:01 ... when we think of the services 16:23:21 ... the provision of books by a publisher, once it's delivered to Amazon and changed, would the specification still be applied 16:23:32 ... everyone who ingests changes the book in some way 16:23:39 q+ 16:23:49 ... it doesn't honour the original 16:24:04 Avneesh: EU provides the functional requirements, Amazon has to meet them 16:24:33 Cristina: The requirements are laid out, we need to provide the details, but it won't be format-specific 16:25:02 ... if there's a new format that is accessible and compliant in the future, they can't go back and change things, it needs to be future proof 16:25:03 q- 16:25:35 Luc: If in the case that the commission uses the technical specifications, any format on the market needs to prove conformance 16:25:48 ... it would be Amazon's job to prove that the kindle format is conformant 16:25:58 ... anyone publishing to PDF would have to do the same 16:26:13 ... on our side, we have to so the job for EPUB 16:26:27 ... I don't know if the commission would ask us for PDF 16:27:00 Avneesh: Speaking from a technical perspective, if we make EPUB Accessibility purely technical like WCAG, it would be challenging 16:27:06 ... we would have to move a lot to techniques 16:27:13 Luc: I don't think that is mandatory 16:27:20 Cristina: We might need to add other metadata 16:27:36 ... the requirement is to have metadata distributable in the chain 16:27:46 ... if we discuss schema we might also need ONIX 16:27:53 Avneesh: There is a provision for metadata 16:28:02 ... for this call we should focus on the high-level plan 16:28:26 ... do we need a clarification from the representative to make EPUB Accessibility an abstract specification 16:28:31 ... or can we focus on EPUB 16:28:41 Luc: It might be a good time to discuss with Inmaculada 16:28:46 ... we have a new revision 16:28:56 ... we plan to provide the necessary documents 16:29:04 ... showing the conformance 16:29:18 ... there is a missing link here between the act and the technical specifications 16:29:36 Cristina: I'm not sure we need to go to her 16:29:39 ... we have done many meetings 16:29:47 ... she will not tell us exactly what is needed 16:29:52 ... we should start working 16:30:03 ... then we will have an idea of the challenges 16:30:26 ... if we tell her to accept this, we can seem like we're forcing this 16:30:49 ... we should focus on the mapping 16:31:12 George: One question and one though 16:31:24 s/though/thought 16:31:24 ... is Inmaculada the right person to talk to about this 16:32:27 s/... is Inmaculada the right person to talk to about this// 16:32:37 s/George: One question and one though// 16:34:28 lucaudrain has joined #epub-a11y 16:34:44 present+ 16:36:23 Avneesh: Timeline wise, we will be prepared to have a FPWD in February 16:36:45 ... a draft of what we expect to send could be sent in January 16:37:01 Luc: This timing should work 16:37:32 Avneesh: Short term plan, working on this mapping document 16:37:40 ... it should show the direction by January 16:38:04 ... after which we'll get feedback and carry on based on the feedback 16:38:13 ... Cristina and Luc, you will be working on this? 16:38:30 ... I will help as well, but I want the Europeans to take the lead 16:38:36 Cristina: Gregorio as well 16:38:45 ... I am wondering how to format this 16:38:49 ... perhaps a table 16:39:07 ... with the EUAA requirements in one column, the EPUb Accessibility mapping, and comments 16:39:14 Avneesh: That sounds good 16:39:28 Cristina: We've done it before, but we need to see if we have a 1:1 mapping for the elements 16:39:48 ... it could be that there are empty spaces 16:40:10 wendyreid: That would be a good visualization of any gaps 16:40:47 George: I think the important gaps are if there's a missing requirement for an EUAA requirement 16:41:10 ... have an intro from the EPUB Accessibility doc, then the table, make any issues clear in the comments 16:41:17 lucaudrain: I can start a first draft 16:41:38 ... we can work together to figure this out 16:42:01 ... we can divide the work 16:42:10 ... there's less than 15 requirements 16:42:19 Avneesh: Where would we like to collaborate? 16:42:24 ... wiki on GitHub 16:42:35 lucaudrain: I am ok with that 16:42:43 Cristina: Then we can all access the document 16:43:06 Avneesh: The optimized way is markdown and pull requests, but that is too heavy right now 16:43:18 George: Is it easy to format a table in the wiki? 16:43:22 Avneesh: It's just markdown 16:43:37 Cristina: I've received from ISO the documents that EPUB Accessibility has been approved 16:43:42 ... its official? 16:43:57 Avneesh: We were expecting approval in November, so it is official 16:44:03 George: Did that come in today? 16:44:11 Cristina: I got it this morning 16:46:09 s/is official/might be the notification/ 16:47:04 Avneesh: All of the EPUB specifications in ISO are available for free 16:48:40 ... so we have the action plan, I will create the wiki and we can start collaborating 16:48:45 ... anything else to discuss today? 16:54:19 rrsagent, make logs public 16:54:32 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:54:32 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/11/26-epub-a11y-minutes.html Avneesh 18:48:01 Zakim has left #epub-a11y