20:52:16 RRSAgent has joined #dxwgdcat 20:52:16 logging to https://www.w3.org/2020/10/28-dxwgdcat-irc 20:52:18 RRSAgent, make logs Public 20:52:19 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), riccardoAlbertoni_ 20:53:22 meeting: DXWG DCAT Subgroup 20:54:09 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2020.10.28 20:54:31 RRSAgent, make logs public 20:54:40 present+ 20:54:43 RRSAgent, make logs public 20:54:49 RRSAgent, draft minutes 20:54:49 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/28-dxwgdcat-minutes.html riccardoAlbertoni_ 20:56:10 RRSAgent, make logs public 20:56:18 RRSAgent, draft minutes 20:56:18 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/28-dxwgdcat-minutes.html riccardoAlbertoni_ 20:57:29 rrsagent, create minutes v2 20:57:29 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/28-dxwgdcat-minutes.html riccardoAlbertoni_ 21:01:21 alejandra has joined #dxwgdcat 21:01:36 AndreaPerego has joined #dxwgdcat 21:01:57 present+ 21:02:27 present+ 21:05:21 present+ 21:05:36 RRSAgent, draft minutes 21:05:36 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/28-dxwgdcat-minutes.html riccardoAlbertoni_ 21:10:57 scribenick: alejandra 21:11:07 chair: riccardoAlbertoni_ 21:11:13 PROPOSED: approve last meeting minutes https://www.w3.org/2020/10/14-dxwgdcat-minutes 21:11:33 topic: approve last meeting's minutes 21:11:43 +1 21:12:20 +0 (was not present) 21:12:22 +1 21:12:35 RESOLVED: approve last meeting minutes https://www.w3.org/2020/10/14-dxwgdcat-minutes 21:12:48 PWinstanley has joined #dxwgdcat 21:13:20 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2020.10.28 21:13:31 topic: approve agenda 21:13:40 +1 21:13:44 +1 21:13:50 +1 21:13:57 topic: Dataset Series 21:14:14 riccardoAlbertoni_: we prepared some material about dataset series 21:14:54 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/wiki/Examples-on-dataset-series, 21:14:58 Draft section in ED: https://raw.githack.com/w3c/dxwg/dcat-dataset-series/dcat/index.html#dataset-series 21:15:30 riccardoAlbertoni_: I'd like to start discussing the PR prepared by Andrea 21:16:15 AndreaPerego: put together what it was discussed so far, trying to structure some consistent ideas on how to specify dataset series 21:16:25 ... I organised the section in introductory and two subsections 21:16:41 ... notion of dataset series, same issue as with versions 21:16:54 ... it is community specific, and the term is not used consistent 21:17:25 ... in stats domain it is formally define in a very strict way 21:17:33 ... set of dimensions where the values are always the same 21:17:51 s/consistent/consistently 21:18:05 .. in other cases it is not so strict 21:18:30 ... group according to space or temporal dimensions and you may need to include some additional information as part of the dataset that is part of the series 21:18:54 ... it is a very heterogenous situation so we are not trying to define dataset series but to explain how to represent them using DCAT 21:19:04 ... considered use cases that we got from people 21:19:19 ... consesus of using dct:isPartOf dct:hasPart 21:19:28 s/consesus/consensus 21:19:51 ... datasets released on a yearly version, using what we did for versioning section 21:20:51 ... last section on some discussion not developed completely 21:21:16 ... dataset with some characteristics, spatial / temporal coverage, spatial / temporal resolution 21:21:27 ... how this should be reflected in the metadata describing the series 21:21:37 ... discussion about this topic and idea of inheritance principle 21:21:48 ... child dataset should inherit what it was defined at the series level 21:22:17 ... upstream inheritance might make more sense 21:22:59 ... reason is that dataset series with data from different years, the temporal coverage for each dataset is a specific year, but the series year is all the years of the series 21:23:10 ... similarly with spatial coverage 21:23:17 ... also temporal / spatial resolution 21:23:48 ... how to deal with annotation properties related to the publication process 21:23:54 q+ 21:23:58 ... what should be the last update date, update frequency 21:24:12 ... these aspects are addressed on the last part of the proposal 21:25:05 ... the idea is that the creation date of the series should be when the first child dataset has been created, earliest date 21:25:38 ... when talking about last update, the series will have the date of the last child 21:26:16 AndreaPerego: final point is about update frequency, the proposal is that it should correspond to the most frequently updated child dataset 21:26:28 ... the proposal was a way to raise these issues for discussion 21:26:39 q? 21:27:26 ack PWinstanley 21:27:38 PWinstanley: all of what you said makes sense 21:28:00 ... when using dcat:Distribution, can we have distribution of distributions 21:28:20 q+ 21:28:23 ... I wonder if we should have somethingt hat specifically characterises datasets that are series 21:28:54 ack AndreaPerego 21:28:59 ... we've included hasPart but there might be a situation when we created a dataset and the hasPart has not been minted yet but we know it is going to be a series 21:29:13 +q 21:29:23 AndreaPerego: about the last point, I forgot to mention that we are discussing if we should create a new type or use a soft type approach 21:29:42 ... for the time being, while we discuss it, I used the soft typing approach 21:30:58 AndreaPerego: for the distribution, practical issues 21:31:02 ... the way people are using it 21:31:16 ... most frequently catalogue patterns are not supporting the notion of dataset series 21:31:49 PWinstanley: if I have a budget dataset and I have distributions (csv, and other format), those are distributions 21:32:18 ... having it in there, acknowledges them 21:32:56 AndreaPerego: we have an example by Jakub about many datasets 21:33:10 ... other examples for geospatial data from the INSPIRE infrastructure 21:33:18 ... each satellite image as a dataset 21:33:26 ... many datasets for one series 21:33:42 ... in the geospatial domain, people are creating series and not creating the children dataset records 21:33:49 PWinstanley: use data cube for this 21:33:58 AndreaPerego: yes, but this is on the data management side of things 21:34:07 PWinstanley: as a cube, it could be slices of information 21:34:30 AndreaPerego: for me, the uses cases that were contributed shouldn't be dealt with at the catalogue level 21:34:44 ... postal information, one of the post complex data models in INSPIRE 21:34:51 ... complex in terms of representation 21:35:06 ... have a landing page where you can filter based on the criteria the slice that you want on the dataset 21:35:19 ... in these cases, I don't see how it can be managed effectively 21:35:34 PWinstanley: service that delivers the distribution, but its metadata is going to be fairly generic 21:35:51 AndreaPerego: something else - the section is focusing on the approach that a series is itself a dataset 21:36:16 ... paragraph mentioning that people are using distributions, but we propose as a default approach creating a dataset for child dataset 21:36:36 .. in case where the distribution approach is more suited, we don't restrict it 21:36:55 q? 21:36:58 ... this is the request that we got, consistent way of doing this if people want to do it 21:37:05 ack riccardoAlbertoni_ 21:37:25 riccardoAlbertoni_: as far as I am concern, this is a set forward, some issues that need to be discussed still 21:37:36 .. we can try to highlight the open issues in the document 21:37:36 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/wiki/Examples-on-dataset-series 21:37:50 ... some of Peter's observations are mentioned as aspects in the wiki page 21:38:04 ... at the end, there are different examples in the spirit that Andrea explained 21:38:16 ... at the end there is a discussion section, where different aspects are listed 21:38:39 ... one aspect about using dataset or distribution, already expressed my concerns about using distribution 21:38:49 ... but at the moment, mentioning both is the best approach 21:38:58 ... what can we do next? 21:39:09 ... one question for Andrea - what is missing to accept the draft PR? 21:40:22 q+ 21:40:32 riccardoAlbertoni_: we are expecting to have the first PWD at the end of November 21:40:43 ... there will be issues we won't be able to resolve 21:40:49 ... but important to show the discussions 21:41:10 ... for example, the note about the upstream inheritance could deserve an issue 21:41:15 +1 for creating an issue on that 21:41:30 riccardoAlbertoni_: we have time to do some refinements on this proposal 21:41:39 ... if we include what we have already is a good start 21:41:39 q? 21:41:47 ack AndreaPerego 21:42:09 AndreaPerego: fine with that, final version on this section and the versioning section by the end of the Month 21:42:21 ... worth including in the PWD 21:42:33 ... having a draft version is not so dangerous 21:42:41 +q 21:43:00 ... based on what has happened so far, it is the only way to have it in a PWD 21:43:16 ack alejandra 21:43:29 scribenick: AndreaPerego 21:43:36 ... fixing all the points, trying to get an agreement and get it out 21:44:10 alejandra: It would be good to have it in the FPWD. 21:44:22 ... I also agree to create issues for specific aspects. 21:44:58 ... My question is about the not so many meetings we have before FPWD. 21:46:28 PROPOSED: draft on dataset series should be included in the FPWD for DCAT 3 21:46:36 scribenick: alejandra 21:46:49 +1 21:46:51 +1 21:46:55 +1 21:46:56 +1 21:47:09 RESOLVED: draft on dataset series should be included in the FPWD for DCAT 3 21:47:19 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:47:19 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/28-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:47:56 present+ PWinstanley 21:47:57 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:47:57 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/28-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:48:07 topic: Versioning 21:48:15 riccardoAlbertoni_: have we received any feedback? 21:48:20 AndreaPerego: no new feedback 21:48:20 Nope 21:48:25 s/Nope// 21:48:42 topic: FPWD is due by 24th November 21:48:47 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:48:47 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/28-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:48:52 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/milestone/27 21:49:31 riccardoAlbertoni_: how to speed up? 21:49:32 q+ 21:49:46 +q 21:50:05 AndreaPerego: most of the issues are going to be addressed by the two new sections that we have (versioning and dataset series) 21:50:14 ... and I would close them once we have them in the spec 21:50:22 ... we can create new issues if necessary 21:50:42 ... left other issues not related to versioning or series, and they could be removed if they are not going to be addressed 21:50:56 ... last two can be easily merged 21:51:38 ... no intention for our side on putting restrictions on domain and range 21:51:49 issue: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1260 21:51:49 Created ISSUE-1 - Https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1260. Please complete additional details at . 21:52:23 ... second one is the use of inconsistent use of IANA uris 21:52:38 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1261 21:53:40 AndreaPerego: two new sections - versioning and dataset series 21:53:53 ... they mention some properties that are not explicitly included in the class descriptions 21:54:00 q? 21:54:10 ack AndreaPerego 21:54:17 ... two options: either we include them in the class descriptions or we wait for some feedback 21:54:46 +1 to postpone the change in the normative part 21:54:47 ... about modifying the class descriptions, we haven't received any feedback, so it might not be worth in getting modifications of the normative part of the document 21:55:43 ... we leave the changes of the normative part for later 21:55:54 ack alejandra 21:57:26 q+ 21:57:34 ack AndreaPerego 22:00:10 alejandra: I agree with the milestone, and how to address the issues 22:00:23 ... question about use of emojis in the comments in github 22:01:31 s/... question about use of emojis in the comments in github/ 22:01:39 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 22:01:39 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/28-dxwgdcat-minutes.html alejandra 22:05:35 topic: outstanding actions 22:05:46 scribenick: AndreaPerego 22:06:09 riccardoAlbertoni_: I think we can close alejandra 's action. 22:06:24 close action-391 22:06:24 Closed action-391. 22:06:41 ... and also AndreaPerego 's one. 22:06:45 close action-433 22:06:46 Closed action-433. 22:07:02 close ACTION-394 22:07:02 Closed ACTION-394. 22:07:24 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 22:07:24 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/28-dxwgdcat-minutes.html alejandra 22:07:53 +q 22:08:15 ack alejandra 22:11:00 q+ 22:11:04 AndreaPerego: question about what to do with issues that we cannot cover by end of Nov 22:11:30 alejandra: I think we can move them to the next milestone, as it is better to have shorter cycles for PWD 22:11:38 scribenick: alejandra 22:11:42 AndreaPerego: revision of deadlines 22:12:13 riccardoAlbertoni_: deadline to share with the group 22:12:28 PWinstanley: is there a concept of issues at risk? 22:12:43 riccardoAlbertoni_: no, we are in the FPWD 22:14:14 the HTTPS versions seem to work: check https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/text/csv 22:17:55 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 22:17:55 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/28-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 22:17:57 discussion about the IANA issues 22:18:03 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 22:18:03 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/28-dxwgdcat-minutes.html alejandra 22:19:08 action: riccardoAlbertoni_ to write to DXWG group about the dataset series PR and advance notice for FPWD 22:19:08 Error finding 'riccardoAlbertoni_'. You can review and register nicknames at . 22:19:25 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 22:19:25 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/28-dxwgdcat-minutes.html alejandra 22:20:28 scribenick: AndreaPerego 22:20:35 [meeting adjourned] 22:20:37 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 22:20:37 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/28-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego