20:55:57 RRSAgent has joined #dxwgdcat 20:55:57 logging to https://www.w3.org/2020/10/14-dxwgdcat-irc 20:56:07 RRSAgent, make logs public 20:56:14 present+ 20:56:16 zakim, start meeting 20:56:16 RRSAgent, make logs Public 20:56:17 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), AndreaPerego 20:56:34 meeting: DXWG DCAT Subgroup 20:57:04 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:57:04 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/14-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 20:57:32 RRSAgent, make logs world 20:57:34 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:57:34 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/14-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 20:58:13 present+ 20:58:27 present+ PWinstanley 20:58:30 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:58:30 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/14-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 20:59:12 present+ 20:59:27 scribenick: PWinstanley 20:59:51 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:59:51 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/14-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:01:11 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2020.10.14 21:01:12 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:01:12 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/14-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:02:08 proposed: Accept https://www.w3.org/2020/09/30-dxwgdcat-minutes 21:02:52 chair: riccardoAlbertoni_ 21:02:54 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:02:54 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/14-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:02:54 chair: riccardoAlbertoni_ 21:04:04 topic: accept last call minutes 21:04:06 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:04:06 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/14-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:09:04 +1 21:09:04 +1 21:09:08 +1 21:09:19 resolved: Accept https://www.w3.org/2020/09/30-dxwgdcat-minutes 21:09:44 plh has joined #dxwgdcat 21:09:53 present+ 21:09:57 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:09:57 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/14-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:09:58 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2020.10.14 21:10:09 topic: approving agenda 21:10:14 +1 21:10:19 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:10:19 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/14-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:10:19 topic: pending pulls 21:10:32 riccardoAlbertoni_: first pr has been merged 21:10:35 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1244 21:11:08 ... second is pending, reviewed by riccardoAlbertoni_ and simon has accepted, so needs another review 21:11:25 ... any concerns then comment, otherwise let's move to merge 21:11:27 Just approved. 21:11:50 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1244 21:12:12 PR merged. 21:12:12 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1243 21:12:21 ...this is connected to the pending issue which can now be closed (#1243) 21:12:59 +1 21:13:05 +1 21:13:07 +1 21:13:40 topic: DCAT planning and publishing schedule 21:13:56 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:13:56 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/14-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:14:45 riccardoAlbertoni_: we need to look at what has to be done - priorities; and also look at the choice of process 21:15:57 q+ 21:15:57 ... any views? 21:16:03 ack AndreaPerego 21:17:42 scribenick: AndreaPerego 21:18:54 AndreaPerego: We should publish a new WD when we have something substantial added to DCAT2. But if we can address versioning and dataset series, we can proceed. 21:20:42 riccardoAlbertoni_: For versioning we still need some feedback. 21:21:14 ... Maybe we can delay the WD to beginning of next year, so to include most of the open issues. 21:21:20 q+ 21:21:28 ack AndreaPerego 21:21:35 AndreaPerego: I wouldn't wait 21:21:53 ... I think we can proceed having sprints and publishing when we have something new 21:22:03 ... otherwise we will have even more delay 21:22:12 ... A roadmap would be nice 21:22:43 scribenick: PWinstanley 21:23:18 riccardoAlbertoni_: I agree but the concern is to engage with our stakeholders and ensure that we are replying to the comments received 21:23:54 ... perhaps we can summarise the discussion 21:25:31 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:25:31 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/14-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:26:04 https://w3c.github.io/spec-releases/milestones/ 21:26:32 https://w3c.github.io/spec-releases/milestones/#moratoria-list 21:27:09 proposed: cover the bulk of open issue/s and have a deadline for the next publication of before the W3C New year break 21:28:47 q? 21:28:56 [this will be within 6 weeks time, as we have to give the plenary 10 days and the W3C Director 7 days to review] 21:29:34 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A%22DCAT3+FPWD%22+ 21:30:06 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/projects/9 21:30:29 riccardoAlbertoni_: we should try to finish this project 21:31:03 plh: make sure that other issues are removed from DCAT WD 3 so that it is not misleading 21:32:21 proposed: cover the bulk of open issue/s and have a deadline for the next publication of before the W3C New year break - 27 Nov 2020 21:34:54 proposed: cover the bulk of open issue/s and have a deadline for the next publication of before the W3C New year break - 24 Nov 2020 21:35:37 +1 21:35:41 +1 21:35:41 +1 21:35:45 +1 21:35:50 resolved: cover the bulk of open issue/s and have a deadline for the next publication of before the W3C New year break - 24 Nov 2020 21:35:53 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:35:53 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/14-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:37:21 action: riccardoAlbertoni_ to include feedback as issues in the DCAT spec 21:37:21 Error finding 'riccardoAlbertoni_'. You can review and register nicknames at . 21:37:35 action: riccardoAlbertoni to include feedback as issues in the DCAT spec 21:37:41 Created ACTION-432 - Include feedback as issues in the dcat spec [on Riccardo Albertoni - due 2020-10-21]. 21:37:54 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:37:54 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/14-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:39:19 action: AndreaPerego to drop non-relevant issues from FPWD milestone 21:39:19 Created ACTION-433 - Drop non-relevant issues from fpwd milestone [on Andrea Perego - due 2020-10-21]. 21:39:29 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:39:29 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/14-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:39:40 topic: versioning 21:40:00 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1251 21:40:00 s/action: riccardoAlbertoni_ to include feedback as issues in the DCAT spec// 21:40:03 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:40:03 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/14-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:40:31 riccardoAlbertoni_ going through the thread of this issue is discussion about including new types of version in DCAT 21:40:39 ... incl FRBR 21:41:13 ... we are taking FRBR as inspiration, but we don't need to align with the work, expression, manifestation, etc 21:42:18 ... but Karen wondered if we need a relation between the back bone of DCAT for versioning. 21:42:36 q+ 21:42:54 ... Do we think we have to consider a new type of version in DCAT, or can we await external feedback and see what happens 21:42:57 ack andrea 21:43:29 AndreaPerego: we are identifying 3 types: revision, release & collection 21:44:11 ... Should we try to revise the section and present these relationships as relationships between resources that share a common ancestor 21:44:24 ... because we are not providing any definition of version 21:45:56 ... ... Karen was also pointing out that if we look at the FRBR and other library domain vocabs they don't talk about version but they are explicit about relationships between types 21:46:04 ... so we can do the same 21:46:35 q+ 21:47:04 ... I can try to make a proposal 21:49:10 scribenick: AndreaPerego 21:49:37 AndreaPerego: I also think that this approach would also help us address the dataset series issue. 21:51:09 riccardoAlbertoni_: I am a bit concerned on changing the current approach. There's a bunch of people interesting in this, and if we don't mark a given set of relationships as versioning relationship, this might not be what they expect. 21:51:38 ... Also we may need to align the relationships we have in the document with versioning, especially the qualified ones. 21:52:32 ... So, maybe we can keep the current section more or less as it is, and discuss more in detail in the section with qualified relationships. 21:53:45 AndreaPerego: I don't think there's a problem if we stick to what we have at the moment. We can change it afterwards. 21:53:54 riccardoAlbertoni_: Any other views on this? 21:54:01 q? 21:54:16 ack PWinstanley 21:54:55 PWinstanley: If we don't have an extended framework for qualified relationships, this might not work. I wonder whether RDF* may somehow help here. 21:56:17 ... We should also think to move some work to a primer. 21:57:18 riccardoAlbertoni_: Some of the feedback is about when one should use qualified relationships. I think the problem is that we are not aligning the two solutions. 21:57:32 q+ 21:58:05 PWinstanley: This usually depends on how much provenance metadata you have. 21:58:43 riccardoAlbertoni_: The ideal situation is that un/qualified relationships are mapped to each other. 21:58:48 ack 21:59:03 q? 21:59:10 s/ack// 21:59:16 ack AndreaPerego 22:01:37 AndreaPerego: I think we can address this by doing some work in the guidance and examples section. 22:02:38 action: AndreaPerego to see how the mapping of un/qualified relationships can be addressed in the current spec 22:02:40 Created ACTION-434 - See how the mapping of un/qualified relationships can be addressed in the current spec [on Andrea Perego - due 2020-10-21]. 22:03:17 [meeting adjourned] 22:03:21 rrsagent, create minutes v2 22:03:21 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/14-dxwgdcat-minutes.html PWinstanley 22:03:24 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 22:03:24 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/10/14-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego