15:42:43 RRSAgent has joined #pbg 15:42:43 logging to https://www.w3.org/2020/06/23-pbg-irc 15:42:46 RRSAgent, make logs Public 15:42:47 Meeting: Publishing Business Group 15:43:02 ivan has changed the topic to: Meeting Agenda 2020-06-23: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-publishingbg/2020Jun/0004.html 15:43:03 Chair: liisa 15:43:03 Date: 2020-06-23 15:43:03 Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-publishingbg/2020Jun/0004.html 15:43:03 Meeting: Publishing Business Group Telco 15:47:45 regrets+ cristina 15:55:26 adoll has joined #pbg 15:56:28 wolfgang has joined #pbg 15:58:03 Daihei has joined #pbg 15:58:17 present+ 15:59:37 present+ 16:00:09 present+ 16:01:01 wendyreid has joined #pbg 16:01:12 present+ 16:01:49 present+ wolfgang 16:02:14 present+ 16:02:18 liisamk has joined #pbg 16:02:27 Bill_Kasdorf has joined #pbg 16:02:37 present+ 16:02:38 present+ 16:03:04 Avneesh has joined #pbg 16:03:50 jeff_ has joined #pbg 16:04:07 scribe+ 16:04:22 liisamk: To get started with the agenda 16:04:30 present+ 16:04:31 ... the EPUB3 WG charter is now with the AC 16:04:35 ... the call for votes is open 16:04:46 present+ 16:04:48 ... please vote if you are able or tell your AC rep 16:04:53 EPUB charter review form -> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/epub3wg/ 16:05:01 dauwhe: We definitely need the AC reps of everyone in this group to vote 16:05:12 liisamk: Some people are only PBG members, BG members have no AC reps 16:05:23 dauwhe: If you are a member with an AC rep, please vote, it's important 16:05:43 tzviya: For clarification, please feel free to reach out to me or Ivan for information on this process 16:05:55 ivan: I have put the link to the call in IRC 16:06:01 liisamk: What are the next steps? 16:06:05 ivan: For now, wewait 16:06:09 q+ 16:06:11 ... we try to convince everyone to vote 16:06:17 ... we wait until the end of July 16:06:30 ... if in the mean time there are any objections, then we might have to have discussions 16:06:38 ... at the end of July we have to see the results 16:07:02 ... if there are no significant changes required, or formal objections, there may be editorial changes, but it all goes back to W3M 16:07:12 ... we have to decide when we start 16:07:28 ... the end of the voting period is July 31, we might say we start Sept 1 16:07:39 q+ 16:07:49 ... if there are significant objections, then it is less clear what we need to do 16:07:52 ack dauwhe 16:07:57 dauwhe: This is probably a question for Ivan and Jeff 16:08:16 ... would it make sense to track the members of the PWG/Publishing and record who has voted and who to encourage 16:08:39 ivan: The list of who has voted is confidential 16:08:57 ... but contacting the W3C members who are interested or might be is possible 16:09:08 ... the team has the information about who has voted 16:09:36 ... that being said, an individual member who votes has the right to keep the email in the mailing list 16:09:45 ... up to them though 16:10:10 jeff_: I think that despite what Ivan said about availability, it's not that hard to identify who is interested in EPUB 16:10:19 ... about 30 organizations 16:10:28 ... it would not be difficult to contact them 16:10:36 ack jeff 16:10:37 ... regarding what's next 16:10:55 ... to make people aware, sometime this summer we'll be in the process of organizing the virtual TPAC 16:11:13 ... for the most part each group will be figuring out when and how they'll meet 16:11:28 q+ 16:11:37 ... before the good dates get taken, the proposed chairs might want to discuss when to meet. 16:11:52 ack dauwhe 16:12:09 dauwhe: Wendy and I did get the TPAC questionnaire, and filled it out in hopes we will be a group by them 16:12:09 present+ 16:12:13 [Ralph arrives] 16:12:38 jeff_: There's going to be new schedules based on the change to virtual, group culture and working mode 16:12:52 ... especially if groups want to schedule coordination calls with other groups 16:13:05 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/06/23-pbg-minutes.html Ralph 16:13:08 ... or don't have a group culture yet because they haven't started 16:13:14 liisamk: Anything else? 16:13:33 ... let's talk about the follow-up to the survey 16:13:40 tzviya: I can update on the webinar 16:13:46 ... we're looking at late July 16:13:58 ... it will be open to anyone interested in attending 16:14:04 ... targeted to the publishing community 16:14:19 ... giving a summary of survey, the new structure, and leaving time for Q&A 16:14:54 ... need to talk to the SC about volunteers, the initial volunteers are all based in NA, we will discuss with the SC about diversifying the presenters 16:15:02 ... with representation from all of the groups 16:15:19 ... provide information on the groups, accessibility, new and old laws 16:15:26 ... we'll have an invitation soon 16:15:59 liisamk: Daihei, do you want to talk about the Webinar for Japan? 16:16:10 Daihei: I thought I was asked to do it this firday 16:16:19 ... the day of the APL committee meeting 16:16:24 ... likely now sometime in July 16:16:27 ... I am going to present 16:16:42 ... what Liisa and I presented at the DPUB Summit 16:16:51 Michelle_Kelly has joined #pbg 16:17:03 ... hopefully I will also have other groups present like EBPAJ 16:17:21 ... I am also getting in touch with TDPF 16:17:32 ... we are trying to figure out a schedule to do it 16:17:39 -> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vxI_dvU8EaRfJBVfNvNpwjLPVCa-ZZHZUUCOB-5YomE/edit Publishing @ W3C Summer Webinar planning document 16:17:50 ... and I am trying to get in touch with people in China and Korea 16:18:11 liisamk: Cristina is also working on something in Italian 16:18:19 ... are there any other requests for localized presentations 16:18:20 q+ 16:18:31 ack wendy 16:18:43 q+ 16:19:00 Wendy: if we're doing a presentation end of July on Publishing at Large, why not localize it rather than duplicate effort? 16:19:29 ... instead of having multiple people develop separate presentations 16:19:47 liisamk: People have been asking for this, and there are requests for localized contents 16:19:53 ... we should make it more consistent 16:19:56 q+ 16:20:00 ... if people do want localized content 16:20:06 ... have we heard other requests? 16:20:07 q+ 16:20:14 ack Daihei 16:20:23 Daihei: In terms of communication, especially outside of W3C 16:20:45 ... it is important that they should have the opportunity to be exposed to this content 16:20:57 ... the survey results, and structure 16:21:16 ... the English understanding in Japan isn't always as strong and localization is needed 16:21:30 ... we tried to communicate to people who are interested in EPUB being a spec 16:21:38 ... bringing the survey results to the business people 16:21:52 ... who will use that information for their decisions. 16:22:09 ... I am in the process of localizing the slides 16:22:17 ... where should I put it 16:22:35 ... so we all have access to the localized versions 16:22:44 tzviya: I think we have 2 questiosn here 16:22:50 ack tzviya 16:22:59 q+ 16:22:59 ... by localizing are we talking translations or special content for that region 16:23:15 ... when we create these presentations how do we make them available 16:23:15 [we can certainly store any BG materials in the W3C GitHub repository] 16:23:23 ... we can keep them in github or make a website for them 16:23:33 ... if the answer is simply that we need translations 16:23:58 ... it would be in our interests to localize the slides and then have the presentatiosn in the local language 16:24:01 ack Avneesh 16:24:10 i|Date: 2020-06-23|-> https://www.w3.org/2020/06/09-pbg-minutes.html previous Asia-time BG meeting record 16:24:11 Avneesh: In my experience, this exercise is more than language 16:24:23 ... it's building a community in alignment with the standards community 16:24:44 ... explaining to the local community how this works and then getting their feedback 16:24:50 q? 16:24:53 i|Date: 2020-06-23|-> https://www.w3.org/2020/05/26-pbg-minutes.html previous AM/EU-time BG meeting record 16:24:57 ack ivan 16:25:05 +1 to Avneesh 16:25:10 ivan: For the archival question, we can archive the talks alongside wherever we put the others 16:25:19 ... GitHub, W3C website, etc 16:25:22 ... it's not a problem 16:25:23 Thanks Ivan/Tzviya 16:25:26 q+ 16:25:26 q+ 16:25:52 liisamk: I do think that Daihei and Cristina have been asked for localized versions of the results 16:26:00 ... built off the DPUB Summit presentation 16:26:45 ... it should not be something where any group feels left out, we should make sure there's translations/expertise to give the material local context 16:26:45 ack daihei 16:26:49 ack liisa 16:26:55 Daihei: Liisa covered what I wanted to say 16:27:05 ... in Japan there's all sorts of local issues 16:27:12 ... 85% of the market is manga 16:27:37 ... one of the reasons the text oriented business is not in EPUB3 is because of Japanese typography 16:27:42 ... it's more work than FXL 16:27:57 ... a lot of people are looking for help in minimizing the cost of producing that content 16:28:18 ... localization means that the document can be understood and discussed 16:28:26 ... the straight translation is the foundation 16:29:05 ... the Q&As and such are in the local language 16:29:09 q? 16:29:15 ... I am not as clear on the process of the translation 16:29:17 q+ 16:29:32 ... there's scheduling to consider 16:29:49 tzviya: What I said, we can share slides, we can also share public translations 16:29:58 ... we can make the slides available in any languages 16:30:10 ack wendy 16:30:33 Wendy: what I think would make the most sense is to have one slide deck that gets localized in whatever ways the community needs 16:30:48 ... but slides can be added to it for the local community 16:31:02 ... to cover whatever the community wants to talk about 16:31:15 ... the localization should be done by someone who is familiar with the local community 16:31:16 +1 to wendyreid 16:31:29 q+ 16:31:30 ... so there can be Q&A that is specific to the community 16:31:51 ack Daihei 16:31:58 ... my only concern is to save effort; not do the slides four times 16:32:34 Daihei: Wendy I want you to understand, I'm mindful of the workload, a lot of people have duties, for the sake of digital publishing, we are trying to make it better for the progress of the W3C and digital publishing 16:32:55 ... I'm giving my time for this to make sure it's productive 16:33:25 q+ to note rel of epubcheck 16:33:36 liisamk: Next agenda item, does anyone see any issues in the future that we should be considering? 16:33:42 q+ 16:33:47 ... considering the current pandemic and how it affects business 16:33:53 ack tzviya 16:33:53 tzviya, you wanted to note rel of epubcheck 16:33:59 https://github.com/w3c/epubcheck/releases/tag/v4.2.4 16:34:00 tzviya: I just wanted to make sure that there's a new maintenance release for EPUBCheck 16:34:04 q+ 16:34:09 q- later 16:34:20 ... very minor changes, all of the updates are in the documentation, nothing to affect workflow 16:34:55 ... we deprecated two ARIA roles that weren't working properly, and should stop throwing errors 16:35:03 liisamk: This is a communication opportunity 16:35:26 tzviya: We need to communicate major releases, this is minor, but it has been sent to the usual mailing lists and twitter 16:35:32 -> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-epub3/2020Jun/0001.html "EPUBCheck v4.2.4 (patch maintenance release) is available" [Romain, 23-June] 16:35:34 ... blog posts don't have quite the same reach 16:35:40 ... how else could we communicate this? 16:35:47 liisamk: We should encourage people to use it 16:36:04 ... my organization's reaction was "oh no a new version how do we roll it out" 16:36:11 ... how do we respond to that reaction 16:36:22 tzviya: People don't read release notes 16:36:36 liisamk: Not right away, maybe 2 weeks later when they put it in the sprint 16:36:51 tzviya: I can respond to the email with an explanation on how this doesn't affect workflows 16:36:59 ack liisa 16:37:02 ack jeff 16:37:13 jeff_: I wasn't sure about how broadly to interpret your question about business 16:37:51 ... first of all, I would say that we're starting a new WG, I think all of us would like the BG where people who are not active in the WG are meeting, identifying use cases and requirements, engaged with the WG 16:37:55 ... one item for the BG 16:38:03 ... how does it want to interact with the WG work 16:38:42 ... a companion question, when we merged with the IDPF, we thought that there would be a small number as full members, and more as BG members, fewer than anticipated 16:38:47 ... I spoke to some 16:38:55 ... the reaction was "epub3 is done" 16:39:10 ... w3c work on web publications is not relevant 16:39:24 ... that was 2-3 years ago, they didn't feel the BG was relevant to them 16:39:32 ... Audiobooks is nearly done 16:39:52 ... and EPUB3 is being revised, maybe there are people out there who want to get involved from the business side 16:40:13 ... is there something that can be done to address the BG issue 16:40:23 q+ 16:40:32 ack liisamk 16:40:41 liisamk: I think that one of the things that I'm seeing 16:40:45 ... in the second half of 2020 16:40:54 ... is that there's a doubling down on the backlist 16:41:22 ... a lot of movement where seeing recovery in trade publishing, focusing on the backlist where we're cleaning it up 16:41:28 ... it's being pushed by partners 16:41:37 ... some of these books are poorly formatted, not accessible 16:41:46 q+ 16:41:48 ... it also reminds me of things we wanted to see as features 16:42:12 ... we're segmenting work to anticipate the changes in reading systems and EPUB coming out of the WG 16:42:21 Daihei: To elaborate 16:42:23 ack Daihei 16:42:24 q+ to ask about working on audio books 16:42:30 ... I recently found that from the 4 major publishers 16:42:39 ... in Japan, according to their results 16:42:57 ... certain stores, backlist was outselling new releases 16:43:33 ... when I was speaking to him, he wanted to make clear that there was cooperation between the store and publisher to advertise the backlist alongside new releases 16:43:41 ... normally new releases are the drivers of revenue 16:44:03 q? 16:44:08 ... now because of COVID, people are more inclined to use digital copies, and the backlist titles become important part of revenue 16:44:27 ... if all of the publishers in Japan see that, they'll try to spend more money/time on releasing the backlist 16:44:35 ... which will contribute to their revenue 16:44:43 q+ 16:44:45 ... everyone will benedit 16:44:50 s/benedit/benefit 16:45:02 ack tzviya 16:45:02 tzviya, you wanted to ask about working on audio books 16:45:18 tzviya: Jeff mentioned we're nearly done with audiobooks, we're stilling looking for audiobooks implementations 16:45:24 ... and more support from publishers/retailers 16:45:31 ... I would love to see focus on that from the BG 16:45:43 liisamk: We're happy to put it on the agenda 16:46:00 ... strongarming people into implementing, maybe, but we can't push too hard 16:46:11 ... we should maybe work on something for the APA or BISG 16:46:36 ... a lot of looking at the backlist brings up the question of the committment a publisher has to books that are no longer for sale 16:46:46 ... the partners who are still supporting those books 16:46:51 ... would love to see updates 16:46:58 ... new formatting, improved content 16:47:03 ... whose reponsibility is that? 16:47:27 ... if the publisher takes it out of print, are they still responsible for the digital 16:47:40 ... there's an interesting challenge in the archive for digital products 16:47:45 q? 16:47:49 ack liisa 16:48:11 liisamk: Let's keep this topic open and have a dialogue about it 16:48:17 q+ 16:48:30 ... is there any updates on accessibility 16:48:32 ack tzviya 16:48:40 https://www.w3.org/TR/coga-usable/ 16:48:48 tzviya: I'm not sure if people here are familiar with the Cognitive Accessibility Task Force 16:49:01 ... Steve Lee asked if he might be able to come here to present on it 16:49:12 ... the document focuses on learning disabilities 16:49:17 +1 tzviya Legible would love to hear from him 16:49:17 ... they're seeking feedback on that now 16:49:32 https://www.w3.org/TR/accessibility-conformance-challenges/ 16:49:39 ... Challenges with the Accessibility Guidelines, controversial, but also worth reviewing 16:49:48 ... It's a note but worth reviewing 16:50:07 ... I'm not sure about mentions of EPUB, but I am sure they're open to feedback 16:50:25 liisamk: I think it's an important thing to consider 16:50:32 ... we were talking about accessibility colours 16:50:36 ... if the book is about colour 16:50:57 ... and it talks about shades of yellow, how do we make the content accessible and good for the audience 16:51:12 q? 16:51:44 ... speaking of presentations, our colleagues from Legible have offered to do a presentation for us in July 16:51:46 ... for both meetings 16:51:56 ... rather than doing a recording 16:52:13 ... a lot of why they're participating, they would like feedback, and it's important for us as a community for us to provide that 16:52:28 ... and we're gathering a list of members of the community and W3C we would love to hear from 16:52:50 ... we'd like to line up 1/month for a 15 minute presentation and some q&a 16:53:03 ... not on marketing, but on the future and ways we can work with other groups 16:53:07 ... any thoughts 16:53:30 ... We'll be asking Ralph about the privacy implications of recordings and everything 16:53:40 q+ 16:53:45 Ralph: That's something for legal to review 16:54:01 ... just to remind you I have started a document for us to brainstorm topics 16:54:11 ack Daihei 16:54:32 Daihei: I wanted to put in my ideas, I'll do that 16:54:53 s/for legal to review/that would likely be generally useful for W3C; I can ask our legal counsel for her input 16:54:57 ... I was appointed to be a committee member of the ministry of communications for WOT 16:55:22 ... they would like to understand what is going on in publishing and media 16:55:32 ... publishing and gaming, video, etc 16:56:03 ... I talked to them yesterday, there's a lot of interest in the Japanese government of publishing contributing to other formats 16:56:49 ... it might be interesting to have a presentation from them on what they are looking at 16:57:33 ... there's a number of groyps in the W3C with technologies interesting to them, like DID 16:58:06 ... we can add the ideas to the paper, but that's an interesting thing happening outside of publishing 16:58:19 liisamk: Any other feedback? 16:58:44 ... next meeting will be the Asia/NA timezone 16:58:50 ... be well and be safe! 16:59:16 zakim, end meeting 16:59:17 As of this point the attendees have been Daihei, tzviya, dauwhe, wendyreid, wolfgang, ivan, Bill_Kasdorf, liisamk, jeff_, Avneesh, Ralph 16:59:17 RRSAgent, please draft minutes v2 16:59:17 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/06/23-pbg-minutes.html Zakim 16:59:21 I am happy to have been of service, Ralph; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 16:59:25 Zakim has left #pbg 17:00:11 i/liisamk: To get started/Topic: EPUB 3 WG Charter 17:00:54 i/tzviya: I can update on the webina/topic: Webinar Planning 17:02:13 i/liisamk: Next agenda item, does/topic: Future BG topics 17:02:31 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/06/23-pbg-minutes.html Ralph 17:03:19 hmm, not all the attendees were identified with present+ 17:06:07 present+ Michelle Kelly 17:06:18 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/06/23-pbg-minutes.html Ralph 17:06:40 rrsagent, bye 17:06:40 I see no action items