15:53:41 RRSAgent has joined #pwg 15:53:41 logging to https://www.w3.org/2020/03/23-pwg-irc 15:53:49 Zakim has joined #pwg 15:53:58 Meeting: Publishing Working Group telecon 15:54:33 Chair: Wendy Reid 15:58:07 Date: 2020-03-23 15:58:33 Kenneth has joined #pwg 15:58:37 Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-publ-wg/2020Mar/0021.html 15:59:14 Regrets+ teenya, laudrain, rkwright, geoffjukes 15:59:22 present+ 15:59:44 present+ 16:00:34 dkaplan3 has joined #pwg 16:00:36 Avneesh has joined #pwg 16:01:21 present+ 16:02:56 present+ tzviya, bigbluehat, lmeurs 16:03:03 present+ george, marisa 16:03:15 scribe+ dauwhe 16:03:23 marisa has joined #pwg 16:03:25 wendyreid: hi everyone 16:03:36 ... welcome to our bimonthly call 16:03:41 George has joined #pwg 16:03:43 https://www.w3.org/publishing/groups/publ-wg/Meetings/Minutes/2020/2020-02-03-pwg 16:03:44 present+ 16:03:46 ... I hope y'all are healthy and are social distancing 16:03:46 present+ 16:03:48 present+ 16:03:57 present+ 16:03:57 present+ david_stroup 16:04:02 franco has joined #pwg 16:04:12 present+ 16:04:14 present+ kenneth 16:04:21 BenSchroeter has joined #pwg 16:04:23 Topic: Testing 16:04:24 https://github.com/w3c/publ-tests 16:04:28 present+ 16:04:38 wendyreid: we are still waiting on test implementations 16:04:48 ... I've spoken to a few people about getting them in 16:04:53 david_stroup has joined #pwg 16:05:00 ... we have some incoming 16:05:17 ... if anyone wants to run the tests but is having trouble reach out to me, ivan, or Matt 16:05:29 ... we are approaching the end of the month and our deadline 16:05:29 Bill_Kasdorf has joined #pwg 16:05:33 ... but we do have some leeway 16:05:35 present+ 16:05:40 ... we should probably extend for a month 16:05:49 q+ 16:05:55 ack marisa 16:06:00 present+ 16:06:07 marisa: I started looking at the tests 16:06:16 ... and ran them on my thing 16:06:21 ... I sent a PR 16:06:27 duga has joined #pwg 16:06:39 https://marisademeglio.github.io/pubmanifest-parse/official-tests/results/audiobooks.html 16:06:39 present+ 16:06:47 https://marisademeglio.github.io/pubmanifest-parse/official-tests/results/pubmanifest.html 16:07:03 ... and can contribute some results 16:07:11 ... I wrote a page to step through the process 16:07:24 ... and runs the library on the tests 16:07:31 ... which made it easy to run 16:07:39 q+ 16:07:42 ... and I opened an issue about inconsistent test naming 16:08:05 garth has joined #pwg 16:08:06 ... which makes it harder to run the toc tests 16:08:07 ack ivan 16:08:11 present+ Garth 16:08:12 ivan: that's great 16:08:25 ... I made a mistake and didn't watch the test repo 16:08:35 ... I will look at the PR tomorrow 16:08:46 wendyreid: and there's another PR 16:09:30 q+ 16:09:42 ack ivan 16:10:01 ivan: there's not a deadline; it's more the dates from which we can decide we can go to PR 16:10:17 ... even if were ready and had 15 implementations, we couldn't move to PR before the end of the month 16:10:21 ... so we don't have to do anything 16:10:34 ... we can just wait until we have enough implementations to move forward 16:10:40 wendyreid: even better :) 16:11:03 ivan: that being said, we have the same calculation in another WG 16:11:28 ... if we want to publish the REC before charter runs out, we should start next step at beginning of May at the latest 16:11:38 wendyreid: that was the mental deadline I was setting for myself 16:11:45 present+ billk 16:11:51 ... pub manifest and audiobooks have been updated based on feedback from testing 16:12:17 https://www.w3.org/blog/2020/03/listen-to-the-people-the-future-of-epub-and-new-directions-for-publishing-w3c/ 16:12:18 Topic: Blog Post 16:12:55 wendyreid: the PBGSC plus W3M met in late February to discuss the future of the pub activity 16:13:00 ... nothing changes for the WG 16:13:14 ... we're still working towards our deadline and publish our specs and our work will be done 16:13:27 ... we're gonna move EPUB to rec track, if all goes well with the charter 16:13:32 -> proposed epub 3 wg charter https://w3c.github.io/epub-3-wg-charter/ 16:13:48 ... you can post issues and questions on the charter 16:14:04 ... and the PCG is going to become our incubation arm 16:14:45 q? 16:14:53 q+ 16:14:53 ... that's the major update 16:14:58 ack garth 16:14:58 present+ garth 16:15:14 garth: I wanted to re-interpret the previous agenda item as testing + implementation 16:15:28 q+ 16:15:29 wendyreid: any questions about blog post? 16:15:34 ack Bill_Kasdorf 16:15:43 Bill_Kasdorf: Ralph sent a message 16:15:57 ... since there's a lot of people in EPUB 3 CG, that group is getting renamed 16:16:21 ... and there are few people in the PCG who aren't in EPUB 3 CG; they will get instructions on how to switch 16:16:32 wendyreid: please join the CGs if you haven't already 16:16:36 q+ 16:16:40 ack ivan 16:16:54 garth: I joined late so perhaps we talked about implementation 16:17:08 ... Google has failed to implement by now, and Kobo is probably not done 16:17:12 ... and Blackstone 16:17:21 ... I haven't given up hope for a Google implementation 16:17:46 ... but I wanted ivan to talk about... the implementation requirements to move the spec 16:18:06 ... can we count matt and ivan's implementation? Or do we need these other implementations? 16:18:43 ivan: I want to keep the fire going to get those implementions done 16:18:53 ... the CR requirements are based on the assumptions 16:19:10 ... that implementations prove that the spec is implementable and correct 16:19:25 ... and so matt and my implementations may fulfil the requirements 16:19:44 ... but they are not part of any reading systems, it does not satisfy the spirit of the rules 16:20:07 ... implementations are on the way 16:20:22 ... but what is relevant for the tests can already be documented 16:20:45 ... the director would look at whether the implementations give confidence that the spec will be used in real products 16:21:33 ... UI stuff doesn't matter, but if these implementations can pass the core tests that would be good 16:21:47 ... there is one area where we are weak 16:21:59 ... the tests on user agent behaviour 16:22:04 ... those are not tested at all 16:22:17 ... that part of the report is empty 16:22:27 ... are those normative or informative features? 16:22:31 wendyreid: informative 16:22:37 ... not required for passing 16:23:02 garth: that's helpfu 16:23:04 ...l 16:23:18 garth: this type of spec is a chicken/egg thing 16:23:30 ... if our ingest pipeline is functional 16:23:38 ... and I could demonstrate things 16:23:51 ... that would be helpful, even if publishers aren't delivering books in that format? 16:23:53 ivan: it's helpful 16:24:01 ... I don't know if the director would be happy 16:24:06 ... but would be way better than now 16:24:16 wendyreid: that's how our implementation will be too 16:24:19 q? 16:24:29 ivan: I can judge the reaction on these things 16:24:56 ... if we feel that by extending the WG by two or three months to have a more mature implementation would make it look better, we could ask for that 16:25:02 ... they would probably say OK 16:25:11 ... to extend the charter into autumn 16:25:24 ... if that would give us a more impressive set of implementation 16:25:31 ... I cannot guarantee such an extension 16:26:01 ... I would wait until May to make such a decision 16:26:10 wendyreid: we can wait 16:26:16 q+ 16:26:19 ... anything else? 16:26:21 ack ivan 16:26:58 https://w3c.github.io/epub-3-wg-charter/ 16:27:05 ivan: as information, the charter proposal for EPUB 3 WG is on github 16:27:13 ... we notified the AC members that this work is happening 16:27:54 ... it's up to W3M etc when we think this charter is ready for a formal AC vote (six weeks); at the end of those six weeks it will be May 16:28:09 ... we can set up group if the AC approves 16:28:16 ... so people in this group should look at the charter 16:28:20 ... give us input 16:28:26 ... PRs, comments, etc 16:28:38 ... if you are AC rep or know your AC rep, get them to vote 16:28:59 ... there is a hope that we would start the group on 1 July 16:29:17 ... but then world events intervened 16:29:22 wendyreid: thanks ivan 16:29:25 q+ 16:29:29 ack George 16:29:52 George: it's a tool, an authoring tool for audiobook publishers was made available where they could order their list of files, 16:30:00 ... and the tool would generate the manifest files 16:30:09 ... would that be an implementation? It's an authoring tool 16:30:13 wendyreid: yes 16:30:16 ivan: absolutely 16:30:52 wendyreid: Lars has convinced a company to implement a tool 16:30:58 q+ 16:31:03 ack Avneesh 16:31:14 Avneesh: George was talking about Obi (???) 16:31:33 ... I may not be able to implement in one month, but let's see how it goes. I'm catching up with a lot of tasks. 16:31:42 George: Obi is so close to what is needed already 16:31:57 ... and it's a great tool and fully accessible 16:32:09 wendyreid: if there's anything we can do to help let me know 16:32:15 ... it doesn't have to be ready to ship 16:32:43 ... any other comments? 16:33:01 ... we will talk again in two weeks. 16:33:09 ... take care and be safe and healthy. 16:33:19 RRSAgent: please draft minutes 16:33:19 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/03/23-pwg-minutes.html dauwhe 16:33:24 RRSAgent: make logs public 16:33:24 zakim, end meeting 16:33:24 As of this point the attendees have been dauwhe, wendyreid, ivan, tzviya, bigbluehat, lmeurs, george, marisa, dkaplan, Avneesh, david_stroup, franco, kenneth, BenSchroeter, 16:33:27 ... Bill_Kasdorf, duga, Garth, billk 16:33:27 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:33:27 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/03/23-pwg-minutes.html Zakim 16:33:30 I am happy to have been of service, ivan; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 16:33:34 Zakim has left #pwg 16:33:54 dkaplan3 has left #pwg 16:34:13 rrsagent, bye 16:34:13 I see no action items