14:44:36 RRSAgent has joined #pwe 14:44:36 logging to https://www.w3.org/2020/03/03-pwe-irc 14:44:43 Meeting: PWE 14:44:47 Chair: tzviya 14:44:58 Date: 2020:-03-03 14:45:20 Agenda+ Resolve open PRs on CEPC [3] and discuss AB’s pending approval 14:45:20 Agenda+ Circulate CEPC to AC 14:45:20 Agenda+ Training Update (Jory) 14:45:20 Agenda+ Ombuds Update 14:45:20 Agenda+ US changes to DST. How does this affect our schedule? 14:52:16 Ralph has joined #pwe 14:53:02 rrsagent, please make record public 14:54:43 -> https://www.w3.org/2020/02/11-PWE-minutes.html previous 11-Feb 14:54:54 regrets+ Jeff 14:59:13 present+ 14:59:36 present+ 15:00:05 present+ 15:02:29 fantasai has joined #pwe 15:02:35 scribe+ 15:02:55 dkaplan31 has joined #pwe 15:04:52 present+ 15:06:06 present+ Deborah 15:07:07 ack Ralph 15:07:36 tzviya: Offschedule meeting because of the AB meeting, and we're hoping to put the CFC out with the process doc on March 21 15:07:46 Ralph: We could still work through the PRs 15:07:56 ... and another CFC after 15:08:14 zakim, next item 15:08:14 tzviya: Much to my surprise, we did not get to consensus with the AB, or final proposed language 15:08:15 agendum 1. "Resolve open PRs on CEPC [3] and discuss AB’s pending approval" taken up [from tzviya] 15:08:23 ... let's look at the existing pull requests 15:08:28 -> https://github.com/w3c/PWETF/pulls pulls 15:08:40 tzviya: Here are the existing PRs 15:09:54 ... one of the issues that the AB had was that these are all separate 15:10:01 ... let's take a look at PR 117 15:10:08 ... a tweak to the section on reverse-isms 15:10:11 -> https://github.com/w3c/PWETF/pull/117 #117 tweak to reverse -isms 15:10:26 ... the proposed language right now is something the AB agreed on and everyone here can agree on 15:10:45 ... there is a diff document that has the change 15:10:51 -> https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/PWETF/117/67bb88c...37bf364.html diff 15:10:57 https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/PWETF/117/67bb88c...37bf364.html#unacceptablebehavior 15:11:19 ... it's a minor tweak 15:11:32 ... it takes out the concept of enforcement 15:11:41 ... adds in perceived reverse-isms 15:11:54 ... in GH everyone agreed and everyone here has approved 15:11:54 q? 15:11:57 +1 15:12:01 +1 15:12:13 dkaplan31: I like that perceived resolves this, and I trust Ada 15:12:21 tzviya: I think we're all comfortable with this 15:12:21 +1 15:12:26 +1 15:12:27 ... that was relatively easy 15:12:53 fantasai: Procedural question, are we formally resolving in the call? 15:13:10 tzviya: Yes, we do this here and then merge. 15:13:31 ... merging it now 15:14:13 ... next we will look at PR 118 15:14:24 -> https://github.com/w3c/PWETF/pull/118 #118 Tweaks to expected behaviors #118 15:14:33 -> https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/PWETF/118/67bb88c...3093ea2.html diff 15:15:17 tzviya: 118 was about removing some of the repetition and the language was more along the lines of a process 15:15:21 ... limited changes 15:15:35 ... the bullet "respect" was moved to "treat everyone with respect" 15:16:00 ... seemed to be generally accepted 15:16:14 Ralph: I had a hard time following all of dsinger's requests 15:16:26 tzviya: I talked it over with him and I think everything is agreed on 15:17:25 ... merged! 15:17:30 ... time to move on to the complicated ones 15:17:54 ... let's do PR 123 15:17:55 -> https://github.com/w3c/PWETF/pull/123 Fix misuse of semicolon. Issue #120 #123 15:17:57 https://github.com/w3c/PWETF/pull/123/files 15:17:59 ... fixing some semicolons 15:18:02 +1 15:18:04 +1 15:18:43 tzviya: This will close issue 120 right? 15:18:55 fantasai: It'll reference it being closed 15:18:58 https://github.com/w3c/PWETF/issues/119 15:19:05 -> https://github.com/w3c/PWETF/pull/124 Clarify physical contact being unacceptable. Fixes #119 #124 15:19:07 tzviya: The next one is about PR 119 15:19:14 https://github.com/w3c/PWETF/pull/124/files 15:19:44 fantasai: This is for PR 124, fixing issue 119 15:20:00 +1 to #124 15:20:03 tzviya: Proposed language to make the physical contact clause more culturally-sensitive 15:20:43 dkaplan31: I -1 this one, I don't like removing the consent clause