IRC log of dxwg on 2020-01-28
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 20:46:17 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #dxwg
- 20:46:17 [RRSAgent]
- logging to https://www.w3.org/2020/01/28-dxwg-irc
- 20:46:26 [PWinstanley]
- rrsagent, make logs public
- 20:46:39 [PWinstanley]
- chair: PWinstanley
- 20:47:07 [PWinstanley]
- agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2020.01.28
- 20:47:14 [PWinstanley]
- meeting: DXWG Plenary
- 20:47:33 [PWinstanley]
- regrets+ Makx, Alejandra
- 20:47:49 [PWinstanley]
- rrsagent, create minutes v2
- 20:47:49 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/01/28-dxwg-minutes.html PWinstanley
- 20:47:57 [PWinstanley]
- present+
- 21:00:47 [roba]
- roba has joined #dxwg
- 21:02:37 [riccardoAlbertoni]
- riccardoAlbertoni has joined #dxwg
- 21:02:54 [riccardoAlbertoni]
- present+
- 21:03:14 [roba]
- present+
- 21:03:40 [Ana]
- Ana has joined #DXWG
- 21:04:29 [Ana]
- Present+ Ana
- 21:05:36 [plh]
- plh has joined #dxwg
- 21:05:40 [plh]
- present+
- 21:05:52 [roba]
- scribenick: roba
- 21:07:29 [PWinstanley]
- topic: admin
- 21:07:39 [PWinstanley]
- https://www.w3.org/2020/01/21-dxwg-minutes
- 21:07:52 [roba]
- Proposed: accept minutes of last meeting'
- 21:07:58 [PWinstanley]
- +1
- 21:07:58 [riccardoAlbertoni]
- +1
- 21:08:11 [roba]
- +0
- 21:08:14 [Ana]
- +1
- 21:08:15 [Ana]
- sorry
- 21:08:34 [roba]
- resolved: accept minutes of last meeting
- 21:08:47 [roba]
- topic: DCAT 3 items
- 21:08:49 [riccardoAlbertoni]
- +q
- 21:08:58 [PWinstanley]
- ack riccardoAlbertoni
- 21:09:11 [PWinstanley]
- topic: DCAT2 publication
- 21:09:38 [roba]
- riccardoAlbertoni: two reminders for @plh re content negotiation
- 21:09:42 [riccardoAlbertoni]
- https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/milestone/24.
- 21:10:55 [roba]
- plh: issues assigned to myself to solve - can fix later if need be
- 21:11:44 [roba]
- riccardoAlbertoni: #1182 is due for closing
- 21:13:14 [roba]
- ... discussion open about how to support (couldnt catch...) DCAT is ready
- 21:13:41 [AndreaPerego]
- AndreaPerego has joined #dxwg
- 21:14:20 [AndreaPerego]
- present+
- 21:14:31 [AndreaPerego]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
- 21:14:31 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/01/28-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego
- 21:15:33 [riccardoAlbertoni]
- https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/errata/
- 21:15:36 [roba]
- ...discussion about handling errata documents
- 21:16:14 [riccardoAlbertoni]
- https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/
- 21:16:55 [roba]
- plh: should i change status and publish as is ?
- 21:17:31 [roba]
- riccardoAlbertoni: yes - but open issues like we dont know where the RDF turtle will be
- 21:18:03 [roba]
- plh: suggest move not to status of document
- 21:18:13 [roba]
- s/not/note/
- 21:18:24 [roba]
- ... did you run pubrules?
- 21:18:28 [AndreaPerego]
- q+ to ask about issue posted in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2020Jan/0107.html
- 21:18:42 [PWinstanley]
- ack AndreaPerego
- 21:18:42 [Zakim]
- AndreaPerego, you wanted to ask about issue posted in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2020Jan/0107.html
- 21:19:01 [roba]
- riccardoAlbertoni: discussion was to leave as note, but open to suggestions... have not run pubrules
- 21:19:13 [roba]
- plh: will run rules by end of week
- 21:20:04 [roba]
- AndreaPerego: new version of DCterms has been published: yet to review - should we put in some caveat?
- 21:20:52 [roba]
- PWinstanley: why not push to v3? - DCterms previous version still valid
- 21:21:24 [riccardoAlbertoni]
- +1 to put it in version 3
- 21:21:32 [roba]
- ...otherwise need to do everything in 2 days, including pub rules
- 21:21:46 [roba]
- ... safe enough in your opinion?
- 21:21:54 [alejandra]
- alejandra has joined #dxwg
- 21:22:35 [alejandra]
- present+
- 21:22:41 [roba]
- AndreaPerego: option is to modify references to point to previous version - we are using references to the current version
- 21:23:33 [riccardoAlbertoni]
- ok
- 21:23:42 [roba]
- ...I can do a PR to replace link - we can decide it to merge it
- 21:24:10 [roba]
- ACTION: AndreaPerego to draft a PR with links to specific version of DC terms
- 21:24:11 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-389 - Draft a pr with links to specific version of dc terms [on Andrea Perego - due 2020-02-04].
- 21:24:14 [AndreaPerego]
- +1
- 21:24:18 [AndreaPerego]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
- 21:24:18 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/01/28-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego
- 21:24:41 [roba]
- roba: will there be an issue with the TTL files?
- 21:24:57 [AndreaPerego]
- q+
- 21:25:02 [PWinstanley]
- ack AndreaPerego
- 21:25:15 [roba]
- PWinstanley: should be handled in PR
- 21:26:12 [plh]
- q+
- 21:26:20 [PWinstanley]
- ack plh
- 21:26:20 [roba]
- AndreaPerego: probably dont have time to review, Dcterms defintions are not complex though
- 21:27:06 [roba]
- plh: my recommendation is not to do anything - if there is an issue deal with it in V3 or in errata
- 21:27:09 [AndreaPerego]
- q+
- 21:27:30 [PWinstanley]
- ack AndreaPerego
- 21:27:55 [roba]
- AndreaPerego: happy to move to v3
- 21:28:44 [roba]
- propose: close new action-389 and create issue for this
- 21:28:49 [PWinstanley]
- +1
- 21:28:53 [riccardoAlbertoni]
- +1
- 21:28:53 [roba]
- +1
- 21:28:54 [Ana]
- +1
- 21:28:54 [AndreaPerego]
- +1
- 21:28:58 [plh]
- +1
- 21:29:05 [alejandra]
- +1
- 21:29:13 [roba]
- resolved: close new action-389 and create issue for this
- 21:29:33 [AndreaPerego]
- close action-389
- 21:29:33 [trackbot]
- Closed action-389.
- 21:29:40 [roba]
- plh: what about the blog?
- 21:29:59 [alejandra]
- regrets- alejandra
- 21:30:00 [roba]
- PWinstanley: will have a draft put round by end of the week
- 21:30:07 [alejandra]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
- 21:30:07 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/01/28-dxwg-minutes.html alejandra
- 21:30:32 [roba]
- ACTION: PWinstanley to draft blog post for DCAT2
- 21:30:33 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-390 - Draft blog post for dcat2 [on Peter Winstanley - due 2020-02-04].
- 21:32:11 [roba]
- PWinstanley: we have a spreadsheet with contacts - need to send emails to this contact list and ask for implementations and errata
- 21:32:28 [roba]
- ...please email your contacts
- 21:33:05 [alejandra]
- I think this is the spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_f5CAZv7rgUjJH5YXkmD6w5xS6GX5X2AmEp_LMptAfQ/edit#gid=0
- 21:33:19 [alejandra]
- sure
- 21:33:23 [roba]
- ... to do after blog.
- 21:33:32 [roba]
- topic: Conneg
- 21:34:47 [PWinstanley]
- roba: I talked to nick yesterday - I don't know that there's anything we are waiting for re: publication, but I am actively working on implementation and test suites
- 21:35:25 [annette_g]
- annette_g has joined #dxwg
- 21:35:42 [roba]
- plh: next step is to move to CR
- 21:35:56 [PWinstanley]
- ... I am preparing implementations on both QSA and also headers. There are challenges in making tests on these implementations comparible
- 21:36:16 [roba]
- roba: prefer to get implementations deployed before moving to CR
- 21:36:26 [annette_g]
- present+
- 21:36:29 [alejandra]
- created new worksheet on spreadsheet for DCAT2 REC publicity: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_f5CAZv7rgUjJH5YXkmD6w5xS6GX5X2AmEp_LMptAfQ/edit#gid=560881316
- 21:36:46 [roba]
- PWinstanley: any other comments on conneg?
- 21:36:54 [roba]
- topic: DCAT version 3
- 21:37:08 [roba]
- PWinstanley: how are we going to work out what v3 will cover
- 21:37:54 [roba]
- ...we are probably not representative for this discussion
- 21:37:56 [AndreaPerego]
- GH issue about DCTERMS new version just created: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1213
- 21:38:01 [roba]
- ...should we split repo
- 21:38:04 [roba]
- q+
- 21:38:08 [PWinstanley]
- ack roba
- 21:39:48 [PWinstanley]
- roba: I would definitely like to see the repo split. It is a good opportunity to make more visible the issues relating to the work of the specific deliverable. There is also mention in v2 saying that aspects of DCAT 2 would be handled by the profile. We need to incorporate this thinking more explicitly
- 21:40:29 [PWinstanley]
- ... I would also specifically urge against creating specific aspects of DCAT that would be better handled by profiles
- 21:40:31 [alejandra]
- +q
- 21:40:35 [PWinstanley]
- ack alejandra
- 21:41:09 [AndreaPerego]
- q+ to say not so sure about splitting the report and working on profiles in DCAT 3
- 21:41:34 [plh]
- q+
- 21:41:47 [roba]
- -1 to cloning issues - better to review them and make a case to reopen
- 21:42:22 [roba]
- plh: recommend to clone repository - keep history of commits - then transfer issues to the clone
- 21:42:45 [roba]
- ...there is a concept of transferring issues
- 21:42:46 [PWinstanley]
- q?
- 21:43:10 [plh]
- https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/transferring-an-issue-to-another-repository
- 21:43:57 [alejandra]
- great
- 21:44:13 [roba]
- alejandra: also interested in profiles - we have exampes here
- 21:44:41 [roba]
- ... should we use the Priimer?
- 21:44:52 [annette_g]
- q+
- 21:44:55 [roba]
- PWinstanley: we can publish Notes as well
- 21:44:58 [PWinstanley]
- s/Priimer/Primer/
- 21:45:02 [plh]
- q-
- 21:45:15 [riccardoAlbertoni]
- +1 to keep the issues and maintain the precious discussions we've had..
- 21:45:23 [roba]
- alejandra: we have some work on dataset series to revisit
- 21:45:38 [roba]
- ...create a milestone
- 21:45:39 [PWinstanley]
- q?
- 21:45:43 [PWinstanley]
- ack AndreaPerego
- 21:45:43 [Zakim]
- AndreaPerego, you wanted to say not so sure about splitting the report and working on profiles in DCAT 3
- 21:46:45 [alejandra]
- this is the milestone we already have with priority for future work in DCAT: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/milestone/15
- 21:46:55 [alejandra]
- I think we should revise that selection
- 21:46:57 [roba]
- AndreaPerego: same concerns we may lose issue - so happy to see a possible solution. Re profiles +1 to point by roba - may be domain independent. So far profiles of DCAT made by communities.
- 21:47:05 [annette_g]
- q-
- 21:47:11 [roba]
- ...concerned about potential for conflict.
- 21:47:39 [roba]
- PWinstanley: isnt point to be instructional - to show how things can be addressed by a profile?
- 21:47:42 [plh]
- "The Dataset Exchange Working Group will not create application profiles or metadata standards that only apply to very specific domains (such as particle physics, accountancy, oncology etc.)"
- 21:48:38 [roba]
- AndreaPerego: propose to review issue - if domain-independent can go into V3 otherwise explore options
- 21:48:51 [roba]
- q+
- 21:49:33 [roba]
- ...one issue is that there may be many valid ways of solving a problem, so guidance doesnt always help
- 21:49:39 [PWinstanley]
- ack roba
- 21:50:36 [PWinstanley]
- roba: I think that there is likely to be a middle ground between general cases and application-specific requirements (which should be managed by communities) where we can find good practice patterns
- 21:50:50 [AndreaPerego]
- q+
- 21:50:55 [PWinstanley]
- ack AndreaPerego
- 21:51:17 [roba]
- AndreaPerego: agree - important to review open issues
- 21:51:33 [roba]
- +1 for triage of issues first :-)
- 21:51:54 [alejandra]
- +q
- 21:52:03 [roba]
- PWinstanley: we have UCR document too
- 21:52:09 [AndreaPerego]
- +1 to look at the UCR for not addressed requirements.
- 21:52:25 [PWinstanley]
- ack alejandra
- 21:52:56 [roba]
- alejandra: fine to look at UCR - but we have already generated issues
- 21:53:01 [AndreaPerego]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
- 21:53:01 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/01/28-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego
- 21:54:09 [roba]
- PWinstanley: who is going to do this? joint activity or alejandra doing as part of milestone review?
- 21:54:12 [AndreaPerego]
- s/splitting the report/splitting the repo/
- 21:54:46 [roba]
- alejandra: can have my view then we need to discuss
- 21:56:35 [roba]
- PWinstanley: focus of charter is expanasion of community using FAIR principles - need to get people on board ASAP
- 21:56:55 [AndreaPerego]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
- 21:56:55 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/01/28-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego
- 21:57:40 [roba]
- topic: open action actions https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/open
- 21:57:51 [roba]
- 388 is closed
- 21:59:01 [roba]
- plh: we can not go to cc0 without 6 weeks loop. we have moved to cc-by4 already
- 21:59:30 [roba]
- ...need to recharter - so part of move to evergreen process
- 22:00:04 [roba]
- PWinstanley: can we go back to wikidata and have conversation about cc0 need?
- 22:00:42 [roba]
- ...now we are clear we need to open discussion with wikidata?
- 22:01:01 [roba]
- closing 385
- 22:01:07 [AndreaPerego]
- close action-385
- 22:01:07 [trackbot]
- Closed action-385.
- 22:01:09 [roba]
- closed 386
- 22:01:15 [AndreaPerego]
- close action-386
- 22:01:15 [trackbot]
- Closed action-386.
- 22:01:36 [alejandra]
- thanks all, and bye!
- 22:01:38 [riccardoAlbertoni]
- thank you all, good night
- 22:01:49 [PWinstanley]
- rrsagent, create minutes v2
- 22:01:49 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/01/28-dxwg-minutes.html PWinstanley
- 22:01:51 [AndreaPerego]
- Bye
- 22:01:52 [Ana]
- thanks all, bye
- 22:04:53 [AndreaPerego]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
- 22:04:53 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/01/28-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego
- 22:05:44 [AndreaPerego]
- regrets+ SimonCox
- 22:05:46 [AndreaPerego]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
- 22:05:46 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/01/28-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego
- 22:15:50 [AndreaPerego]
- regrets+ Antoine
- 22:15:51 [AndreaPerego]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
- 22:15:51 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2020/01/28-dxwg-minutes.html AndreaPerego