IRC log of dxwg on 2020-01-21

Timestamps are in UTC.

20:57:42 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #dxwg
20:57:42 [RRSAgent]
logging to
20:57:52 [PWinstanley]
rrsagent, make logs public
20:58:12 [Caroline]
Caroline has joined #DXWG
20:58:25 [PWinstanley]
regrets+ AndreaPerego, Antoine
20:58:33 [PWinstanley]
chair: Caroline
20:58:41 [Ana]
Ana has joined #DXWG
20:58:45 [Caroline]
Present+ Caroline
20:58:48 [PWinstanley]
20:58:59 [PWinstanley]
meeting: DXWG Plenary
20:59:28 [Ana]
* Present+ Ana
20:59:31 [PWinstanley]
rrsagent, create minutes v2
20:59:31 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate PWinstanley
20:59:36 [Makx]
Makx has joined #dxwg
20:59:43 [PWinstanley]
21:00:48 [annette_g]
annette_g has joined #dxwg
21:01:15 [alejandra]
alejandra has joined #dxwg
21:02:04 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
RiccardoAlbertoni has joined #dxwg
21:02:08 [alejandra]
21:02:18 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
21:02:23 [annette_g]
21:05:28 [Makx]
present+ Makx
21:07:28 [PWinstanley]
scribenick: PWinstanley
21:07:37 [PWinstanley]
topic: admin
21:08:20 [AndreaPerego]
AndreaPerego has joined #dxwg
21:08:21 [PWinstanley]
proposed: accept minutes of the last meeting -
21:08:29 [AndreaPerego]
21:08:35 [Caroline]
Scribe: PWinstanley
21:08:50 [PWinstanley]
21:09:04 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
21:09:06 [Caroline]
21:09:08 [PWinstanley]
21:09:09 [Ana]
21:09:14 [AndreaPerego]
21:09:16 [annette_g]
21:09:18 [alejandra]
21:09:47 [PWinstanley]
resolved: accept minutes of the last meeting -
21:10:50 [PWinstanley]
topic: DCAT update on key items
21:10:57 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
21:11:09 [AndreaPerego]
RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
21:11:09 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate AndreaPerego
21:11:31 [AndreaPerego]
ack RiccardoAlbertoni
21:11:53 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
21:12:02 [PWinstanley]
RiccardoAlbertoni: we have closed some issues but some are still open. they are in a milestone 24.
21:12:21 [Caroline]
ack RiccardoAlbertoni
21:12:25 [Caroline]
21:12:34 [AndreaPerego]
21:12:41 [Caroline]
21:12:49 [PWinstanley]
... the most important is the errata page. Andrea has recommended an approach in the link above
21:13:02 [AndreaPerego]
Relevant discussion:
21:13:14 [PWinstanley]
... Are we all happy with this? There has already been discussion
21:13:19 [AndreaPerego]
21:13:20 [alejandra]
21:13:38 [Caroline]
ac AndreaPerego
21:14:23 [PWinstanley]
AndreaPerego: thanks to alejandra we found a standard / recommended approach for errata. We propose to follow the same approach.
21:14:49 [AndreaPerego]
21:15:21 [PWinstanley]
... The link from the W3C Github site I just posted in the minutes gives more detail
21:15:34 [Caroline]
21:15:38 [Caroline]
ack AndreaPerego
21:16:22 [AndreaPerego]
21:16:23 [PWinstanley]
... It is possible to bring into the one doc / framework errata from all of a workgroup's deliverables
21:17:20 [PWinstanley]
... If we go this way then we have 1 doc for all deliverables. There is another option - one doc for each deliverable.
21:17:34 [PWinstanley]
... So there is a decision to be made by the plenary
21:17:52 [PWinstanley]
... so that we are consistent
21:18:07 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
+1 to have a resolution about the approach
21:18:22 [Caroline]
ack alejandra
21:19:25 [alejandra]
21:19:40 [PWinstanley]
alejandra: I have a preference for one errata page per specification. If we split the repo then this makes it easier. It is also clearer for readers to know which deliverable any erratum refers to if they are in deliverable-specific pages
21:19:45 [alejandra]
21:19:58 [PWinstanley]
... this is an example from the SSN W/G
21:20:02 [alejandra]
21:20:21 [PWinstanley]
... and here is another for the time ontology
21:20:40 [PWinstanley]
+1 to alejandra
21:20:41 [Caroline]
21:21:04 [PWinstanley]
proposed: to have one errata page for each deliverable
21:21:41 [alejandra]
21:22:01 [alejandra]
21:22:01 [Caroline]
ack alejandra
21:22:09 [PWinstanley]
proposed: to use the W3C method for the errata page
21:22:31 [alejandra]
+1 (it seems to me that it is the recommended method)
21:22:35 [Makx]
21:22:35 [PWinstanley]
21:22:38 [Caroline]
21:22:39 [Ana]
21:22:41 [AndreaPerego]
21:22:44 [annette_g]
21:22:46 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
21:22:47 [PWinstanley]
resolved: to use the W3C method for the errata page
21:22:55 [PWinstanley]
proposed: to have one errata page for each deliverable
21:23:10 [alejandra]
21:23:14 [PWinstanley]
21:23:14 [Caroline]
21:23:16 [Ana]
21:23:18 [AndreaPerego]
21:23:22 [annette_g]
21:23:25 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
21:23:45 [PWinstanley]
resolved: to have one errata page for each deliverable
21:23:50 [PWinstanley]
21:23:56 [AndreaPerego]
21:24:00 [Caroline]
ack PWinstanley
21:24:09 [Caroline]
scribe: Caroline
21:24:10 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
21:25:10 [Caroline]
PWinstanley: the benefits of having a sing document. There are situations where we might have multiple deliverables
21:25:31 [PWinstanley]
21:25:40 [Caroline]
... if we are going to have separated pages would be nice to indicate because it would be easier on a single document
21:25:44 [alejandra]
has anyone found an example on having a single errata document for several specs?
21:25:46 [Caroline]
Scribe: PWinstanley
21:25:51 [alejandra]
It might be good to see how it looks
21:25:56 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
21:26:03 [Caroline]
ack AndreaPerego
21:27:19 [PWinstanley]
AndreaPerego: we have to consider 1) in the W3C approach there is a section to give the specification, but there is also an option to capture errata that are not associated with a specific publications; 2) we have not yet decided on splitting the repo
21:27:43 [PWinstanley]
... and this might cause changes in e.g. document name
21:27:56 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
+q to say at the moment we have one for dcat and then we might have a second thought about about using one or more errata document when the other rec are out
21:28:06 [Caroline]
ack RiccardoAlbertoni
21:28:06 [Zakim]
RiccardoAlbertoni, you wanted to say at the moment we have one for dcat and then we might have a second thought about about using one or more errata document when the other rec
21:28:09 [Zakim]
... are out
21:28:30 [annette_g]
From the display_errata document: "Note that the workflow describes the case whereby a single repository is used for several documents. In case the Working Group follows the separate repository per document model, an errata file must be installed separately for each document."
21:29:01 [Caroline]
21:29:13 [PWinstanley]
RiccardoAlbertoni: the agreement on the W3C method is important. we have only one document out - perhaps we need to reconsider the decision on having separate docs when we have more deliverables
21:29:45 [Caroline]
21:29:55 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
21:29:58 [AndreaPerego]
regrets+ AndreaPerego
21:30:04 [AndreaPerego]
RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
21:30:04 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate AndreaPerego
21:30:09 [PWinstanley]
21:30:21 [Caroline]
ack RiccardoAlbertoni
21:30:39 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
21:31:12 [PWinstanley]
RiccardoAlbertoni: we need to close the issue #1177 and to help I've created a summary. Can we close in the next few days.
21:31:15 [Caroline]
ack PWinstanley
21:31:31 [Caroline]
Scribe: Caroline
21:31:35 [Makx]
I agree RiccardoAlbertoni
21:32:28 [AndreaPerego]
21:32:48 [Caroline]
PWinstanley: the deadline for all of this is the end of January. RiccardoAlbertoni is liasing it with Philippe. I kindly ask you to contribute quick with everything
21:32:48 [Caroline]
ack AndreaPerego
21:32:54 [Caroline]
Scribe: PWinstanley
21:33:15 [PWinstanley]
PWinstanley: pointing out the deadline of 31 Jan for the completed DCAT doc and that RiccardoAlbertoni is leading on the delivery of the doc to PLH
21:33:51 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
21:34:07 [PWinstanley]
AndreaPerego: I think we can close #1177 . We can point out that it is up to W3C to solve, and it shouldn't delay our progress
21:34:21 [alejandra]
21:34:21 [Caroline]
ack RiccardoAlbertoni
21:35:24 [PWinstanley]
RiccardoAlbertoni: I agree. the point is that there are 2 actions - the summary that I've written could be passed to PLH so that he can attend to the conneg that needs to be put in place at their end
21:35:35 [Caroline]
ack alejandra
21:36:16 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
21:36:22 [Caroline]
ack RiccardoAlbertoni
21:36:24 [PWinstanley]
alejandra: both of these issues, errata, bibliography, and pointers to DCAT v1, probably have easy answers - can we write to him directly?
21:36:58 [PWinstanley]
RiccardoAlbertoni: even after the DCAT2 publication, the errata publication/s are under our control as they are in github
21:37:20 [PWinstanley]
... but I agree that we involve PLH and ask him to take forward the implementation
21:37:24 [AndreaPerego]
21:37:29 [alejandra]
About the errata, I agree RiccardoAlbertoni - the question is the implications on splitting the repository
21:37:29 [Caroline]
ack AndreaPerego
21:38:25 [PWinstanley]
AndreaPerego: we need to get this message to W3C and then to see if there is anything that we need to do
21:39:21 [PWinstanley]
action: PWinstanley to write to PLH to ask about #1177 and the W3C actions/intentions
21:39:22 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-386 - Write to plh to ask about #1177 and the w3c actions/intentions [on Peter Winstanley - due 2020-01-28].
21:39:36 [PWinstanley]
Topic: conneg
21:39:39 [AndreaPerego]
RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
21:39:39 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate AndreaPerego
21:39:56 [PWinstanley]
21:40:08 [Caroline]
ack PWinstanley
21:40:17 [Caroline]
Scribe: Caroline
21:40:40 [Caroline]
PWinstanley: we have to wait for roba or nick and this is the same for profile vocab
21:41:15 [PWinstanley]
Topic: DCAT v3
21:41:39 [PWinstanley]
Caroline: The agenda has some questions - e.g. repo splitting
21:41:39 [Caroline]
21:41:45 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
21:42:16 [AndreaPerego]
RRSAgent, draft minutes v2
21:42:16 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate AndreaPerego
21:42:19 [Caroline]
ack RiccardoAlbertoni
21:43:11 [PWinstanley]
RiccardoAlbertoni: I'm concerned about the splitting the repo - we need to ensure that the issues and discussion area retained
21:43:21 [AndreaPerego]
Some concern from my side.
21:43:44 [PWinstanley]
s/discussion area/discussion are/
21:43:49 [Makx]
Me too, keep the same repo
21:44:05 [Caroline]
21:44:17 [PWinstanley]
I think the repo split is too late in the day and would take too long for little benefit and high risk
21:44:51 [Makx]
maybe split off non-DCAT work and keep DCAT here
21:45:01 [PWinstanley]
21:45:02 [alejandra]
21:45:08 [annette_g]
21:45:15 [Caroline]
ack PWinstanley
21:45:28 [Caroline]
Scribe: Caroline
21:45:49 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
+1 to PWinstanley let's wait for other opinion
21:45:51 [AndreaPerego]
I agree, this is an issue that requires further discussion - and it is not so urgent, IMO. Let's have first DCAT2 out.
21:45:53 [Makx]
Move this to next week?
21:45:55 [Caroline]
PWinstanley: I don't think we should make decisions until other members of the group say what they think
21:46:01 [Caroline]
Scribe: alejandra
21:46:06 [Caroline]
Scribe: PWinstanley
21:46:12 [Caroline]
ack alejandra
21:46:38 [PWinstanley]
alejandra: the idea to split was mentioned by PLH, but this risks giving us problems with the issues (the core text would be OK)
21:46:50 [Caroline]
ack annette_g
21:47:04 [PWinstanley]
annette_g: would it still be possible to split the errata if we don't split the repos?
21:47:51 [PWinstanley]
Caroline: perhaps we can discuss this by email in preparation for some decision at the next call
21:48:51 [PWinstanley]
action: annette_g to write to the group to get discussion about repo splitting in preparation for a decision on 28 Jan meeting
21:48:51 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-387 - Write to the group to get discussion about repo splitting in preparation for a decision on 28 jan meeting [on Annette Greiner - due 2020-01-28].
21:48:57 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
21:48:57 [Caroline]
21:49:02 [Caroline]
ack RiccardoAlbertoni
21:50:45 [PWinstanley]
RiccardoAlbertoni: I was just thinking about how to close the DCAT 2 document - before we discuss #1177 with PLH perhaps we should change the draft that Andrea has prepared so that we are giving PLH a well-reasoned proposal..
21:51:09 [AndreaPerego]
21:51:16 [AndreaPerego]
21:51:18 [PWinstanley]
... I don't know how long W3C will take to publish after our delivery of the DCAT to them
21:52:18 [Caroline]
21:52:22 [AndreaPerego]
21:53:13 [Caroline]
ack AndreaPerego
21:54:53 [Caroline]
21:57:15 [Caroline]
Action: PWinstanley to send an email to the group about the publications deadline and W3C processes
21:57:15 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-388 - Send an email to the group about the publications deadline and w3c processes [on Peter Winstanley - due 2020-01-28].
21:57:49 [Caroline]
21:57:54 [PWinstanley]
rrsagent, create minutes v2
21:57:54 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate PWinstanley
21:58:17 [alejandra]
thank you, bye!
21:58:25 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
Thanks you, bye !
21:58:25 [PWinstanley]
rrsagent, create minutes v2
21:58:25 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate PWinstanley
21:58:27 [annette_g]
welcome back, Caroline!!!
21:58:32 [annette_g]
21:58:34 [Ana]
thank you, bye!
21:58:49 [RiccardoAlbertoni]
21:58:49 [Caroline]
Thank you!! :)
21:58:50 [Caroline]
Have a great week!
22:22:01 [rhiaro]
rhiaro has joined #dxwg