15:43:34 RRSAgent has joined #pwg 15:43:34 logging to https://www.w3.org/2019/08/05-pwg-irc 15:43:35 rrsagent, set log public 15:43:35 Meeting: Publishing Working Group Telco 15:43:35 Chair: garth 15:43:35 Date: 2019-08-05 15:43:35 Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-publ-wg/2019Aug/0001.html 15:43:36 ivan has changed the topic to: Meeting Agenda 2019-08-05: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-publ-wg/2019Aug/0001.html 15:43:37 Regrets+ tzviya, wendy, gregorio, avneesh, rkwright 15:53:30 dauwhe has joined #pwg 15:53:41 mgarrish has joined #pwg 15:55:59 garth has joined #pwg 15:58:53 present+ 15:59:24 Kenneth has joined #pwg 15:59:51 present+ Kenneth_Dougherty 15:59:53 present+ 15:59:55 laudrain has joined #pwg 16:00:05 present+ 16:00:33 JunGamo has joined #pwg 16:01:03 Zakim, why are we here? 16:01:03 I don't understand your question, dauwhe. 16:01:11 BenSchroeter has joined #pwg 16:01:21 jasminemulliken has joined #pwg 16:01:23 franco has joined #pwg 16:01:29 present+ 16:01:31 present+ Garth 16:01:43 present+ 16:01:48 josh has joined #pwg 16:01:57 present+ 16:01:57 present+ 16:02:12 present+ 16:02:16 present+ franco 16:02:21 present+ 16:02:23 George has joined #pwg 16:02:33 present+ 16:02:59 scribenick: dauwhe 16:03:01 timCole has joined #pwg 16:03:13 present+ mgarrish 16:03:22 https://www.w3.org/publishing/groups/publ-wg/Meetings/Minutes/2019/2019-07-29-pwg 16:03:23 present+ 16:03:24 present+ timCole 16:03:35 garth: shall we approve the minutes? 16:03:37 romain has joined #pwg 16:03:38 all: silence 16:03:53 resolved: last week's minutes approved 16:03:54 david_stroup has joined #pwg 16:03:56 garth: minutes approved 16:04:00 present+ 16:04:45 topic: publication schedules 16:04:47 Topic: publication schedules 16:04:54 ... UCR, Web Pub as notes 16:04:57 Nellie has joined #pwg 16:05:00 ... the packaging doc as a note 16:05:02 Bill_Kasdorf has joined #pwg 16:05:09 ... web pub manifest and audio as rec track 16:05:22 present+ 16:05:23 marisa has joined #pwg 16:05:29 ... ivan, do you want to talk about where we are on the first two? 16:05:33 present+ 16:05:36 ivan: the UCR is ready to go 16:05:37 present+ 16:05:43 ... I have cross-checked it with the checkers 16:05:58 ... it has to be published by the webmaster... thursday is possible 16:06:07 ... but we should sync with web publication note 16:06:41 ... matt would know where we are with WPUB note 16:06:47 https://github.com/w3c/wpub/pull/461 16:06:48 mgarrish: we have an open PR 16:07:00 ... that's to add in the status of this doc, the final proposed text 16:07:08 ... otherwise it's publishing it verbatim 16:07:21 ... what we probably need is consensus to publish as a note 16:07:38 ... if we can get that, it's not a big issue 16:07:42 ivan: that's correct 16:07:49 ... the clean thing is to have a formal resolution 16:07:54 ... we have this already for UCR 16:08:00 present+ josh 16:08:06 garth: is that a matter of wanting a consensus on this call? 16:08:10 q+ 16:08:15 ivan: yes 16:08:18 q? 16:08:20 q? 16:08:32 ack laudrain 16:08:34 laudrain: there are five documents 16:08:44 duga has joined #pwg 16:08:48 present+ 16:08:51 ... the three last ones are related 16:08:58 ... and the two first ones are 16:09:04 ... ivan, you said... 16:09:16 garth: UCR has references to web publications, so they should go concurrently 16:09:29 ... we have consensus to publish UCR, but not yet to do WPUB 16:09:38 laudrain: you answered :) 16:09:48 garth: do we have consensus to publish WPUB as a note? 16:09:53 proposed: Publish the WPUB as a Note based on PR #461 16:10:07 +1 16:10:08 garth: is consensus is on the call sufficient? 16:10:09 laurent has joined #pwg 16:10:11 +1 16:10:12 +1 16:10:12 +1 16:10:13 +1 16:10:15 +1 16:10:16 +1 16:10:17 +1 16:10:21 +1 16:10:23 +1 16:10:28 +1 16:10:48 +1 16:10:48 resolved: Publish the WPUB as a Note based on PR #461 16:10:52 garth: we have consensus 16:11:11 ivan: on the practicalities, matt you can ping me when it's ready to go? Then I'll take it to webmaster 16:11:14 q? 16:11:20 ... I'll try for Thursday, if not it will be next week 16:11:27 present+ 16:11:43 garth: the bottom 3 is packaging, audio, and manifest 16:12:04 ... we might be better off with dropping the "web" in front of publication manifest to avoid confusion 16:12:10 q? 16:12:12 ... and discussion on that? 16:12:22 q+ 16:12:27 q? 16:12:29 ivan: I am ok with it 16:12:29 subtopic: rec-track publications 16:12:35 +1 16:12:39 q+ 16:12:44 present+ bigbluehat 16:12:50 ? 16:12:52 q? 16:12:55 dauwhe: I think we should remove the word "web" 16:12:57 ack dauwhe 16:12:58 +1 to dau 16:13:02 ack mgarrish 16:13:05 +1 to dauwhe 16:13:18 mgarrish: we've not called this the WPUB manifest, if we're pulling out publication manifest, we should continue not to call it the web publication manifest 16:13:26 ... and it avoids some legacy baggage 16:13:35 Proposal: s/Web Publication Manifest/Publication Manifest/ 16:13:36 ...we're making a break from web publications and working on other things 16:13:42 ... we're working on a more general manifest 16:13:45 +1 16:13:47 +1 16:13:47 garth: I put a proposal in IRC 16:13:49 +1 16:13:50 +1 16:13:51 +1 16:13:54 +1 16:13:57 +1 16:13:57 +1 16:13:59 +1 16:14:04 +1 16:14:04 +1 16:14:08 +1 16:14:08 +1 16:14:11 +1 16:14:13 resolved: s/Web Publication Manifest/Publication Manifest/ 16:14:16 garth: so we have three publications 16:14:17 q? 16:14:37 ... we have packaging, which would be a note 16:14:43 ... and audio and manifest would be rec 16:14:44 ivan: yes 16:14:55 ... we did agree packaging is a note 16:15:15 garth: the agenda had us making a plan for a schedule to publish these 16:15:20 ... I am open to suggestions 16:15:43 ... given that REC is harder than note we should discuss packaging separately 16:15:52 ... laurent, what about open issues? 16:16:04 ... we have a working draft 16:16:04 q? 16:16:22 q+ 16:16:30 laurent: at the moment it's separate text, I have to know if I have to include inside audiobook doc, or if it should be separate 16:16:36 ack ivan 16:17:02 ivan: the questions could arise whether the publication manifest should be put together with audio as one big document 16:17:17 ... last week we said it would be better separate, so other things could use it 16:17:24 ... the same argument would apply to packaging 16:17:29 q? 16:17:31 ... it's better for it to stay as a separate note 16:17:50 garth: the different statuses imply that 16:18:06 laurent: I have to add one para about not deflating binary resources 16:18:13 ... which is already in EPUB 3 16:18:16 q? 16:18:27 mateus has joined #pwg 16:18:30 ... and packaging is the proper place for that. I can add by end of the week. 16:18:40 ... I also need to change the structure of the files 16:18:49 Do you mean compression within the package? 16:18:56 ... and I must do some kitchen work :) 16:19:14 laurent: maybe I'll need your help, Ivan 16:19:22 action: ivan to create a separate lpf repository 16:19:22 q? 16:19:30 q+ 16:19:37 present+ George 16:19:41 ivan: I will create a separate repo 16:19:45 ack George 16:19:55 George: just want to make clear 16:20:18 ... you're not going to compress the audio files, which are already compressed with a codex? You're not going to re-compress? 16:20:21 laurent: exactly 16:20:34 s/codex/codec 16:20:36 garth: with a para to be added and some kitchen cleanup, what timeframe? 16:20:42 q+ 16:20:57 ack ivan 16:21:01 garth: maybe on the 19th? 16:21:04 laurent: that' 16:21:09 ... s ok for me 16:21:34 ivan: from a public relations point of view, it would be a good idea if the audio, manifest, and packaging were published at the same time 16:21:50 ... I don't know if we have an agreed date for the other two 16:22:19 garth: we can probably do a date for manifest, but I can't speak for Wendy on a date for audio 16:22:35 ivan: we can propose something than we can revisit 16:22:41 s/than/then/ 16:22:56 garth: then can we get consensus for all three two weeks from today? 16:23:17 ivan: two weeks from today, you mean that on the 19th these documents are ready to be reviewed by this group? 16:23:25 garth: and we would use that call to make a pub decision 16:23:54 mgarrish: I started working at pulling manifest out of WPUB 16:24:15 ... we need new infrastructure, new repos, new shortnames 16:24:20 ... I think we could do in two weeks? 16:24:29 ... we also have to update audiobooks because of xrefs 16:24:38 q+ 16:24:46 q? 16:24:49 ... we can target two weeks and check in next week 16:24:50 ack ivan 16:25:03 ivan: for what you ask, setting up a repo is not a big deal. I can do it tomorrow. 16:25:13 ... it is good if the repo name reflects the shortname 16:25:20 ... so we should agree on that now. 16:25:35 q+ 16:26:07 q+ 16:26:07 George: once the WG publishing these three documents as notes 16:26:17 garth: one as note and two as working drafts 16:26:31 George: what happens to notes after the WG is closed? who maintains those notes? 16:26:40 ivan: for notes, any other group can keep them up 16:26:44 q? 16:26:47 ack George 16:26:50 ... REC is different 16:27:17 ... the publishing CG could experiment with the WPUB note, for example 16:27:23 ack mgarrish 16:27:33 mgarrish: the obvious short name would be pubmanifest or pub-manifest 16:27:35 garth: pubman 16:27:44 mgarrish: how short do we want to make it? :) 16:27:50 +1 to pub-manifest 16:28:04 q? 16:28:05 garth: I tend to think what makes mgarrish and ivan happy works 16:28:07 +1 16:28:09 +1 16:28:16 +1 16:28:22 +1 16:28:30 proposed: the short name for Publication Manifest will be pub-manifest 16:28:33 +1 16:28:33 +1 16:28:36 +1 16:28:37 +1 16:28:44 +1 16:28:48 ivan: it has to be formalized for the rest of the administration 16:28:49 +1 16:28:50 resolved: the short name for Publication Manifest will be pub-manifest 16:28:51 garth: that's on you? 16:28:52 +1 16:28:55 ivan: that's on me 16:28:59 garth: I have a proposal 16:29:10 Proposal: Have all three (LPF, Publication Manifest, Audiobooks) ready for Publicaiton and concensus by the group to go ahead with Publication on 8/19 16:29:15 action: ivan to set up a repository for pub-manifest 16:29:36 +1 16:29:40 +1 16:29:43 +1 16:29:45 +1 16:29:47 +1 16:29:48 +1 16:29:55 +1 16:30:03 +1 16:30:09 present+ david_stroup 16:30:13 +1 16:30:17 q? 16:30:17 garth: that seems to be accepted 16:30:17 +1 16:30:25 q+ 16:30:26 ... any other business for this call? 16:30:41 q? 16:30:43 ack ivan 16:30:43 ... thanks to Dave for scribing and Matt for joining us on a holiday 16:30:47 q+ 16:30:52 ivan: let's prepare ourselves 16:31:10 ... the 19th should be when we agree on everything, the docs would go out that week or the week after 16:31:23 q+ 16:31:27 q? 16:31:33 ... we should plan for ourselves, we should read those docs so that at TPAC we can work on those docs to get them ready for CR 16:31:44 ack david_stroup 16:31:51 david_stroup: I don't know if anything's been done yet 16:31:58 ... kenneth from my team is joining 16:32:02 topic: new member 16:32:03 ... he's on the call today 16:32:09 Q? 16:32:11 Kenneth: hello everyone 16:32:16 ack josh 16:32:33 q? 16:32:35 josh: if there's an award for the most proposals in a meeting we should nominate garth 16:32:46 garth: any other business? going twice? 16:32:54 ... we'll have Wendy back next week. 16:32:58 ... thanks all! 16:33:01 JunGamo has left #pwg 16:33:02 laudrain has left #pwg 16:33:14 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:33:14 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/08/05-pwg-minutes.html ivan 16:33:14 zakim, bye 16:33:14 rrsagent, bye 16:33:14 I see 2 open action items saved in https://www.w3.org/2019/08/05-pwg-actions.rdf : 16:33:14 ACTION: ivan to create a separate lpf repository [1] 16:33:14 recorded in https://www.w3.org/2019/08/05-pwg-irc#T16-19-22 16:33:14 ACTION: ivan to set up a repository for pub-manifest [2] 16:33:14 recorded in https://www.w3.org/2019/08/05-pwg-irc#T16-29-15 16:33:14 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been ivan, Kenneth_Dougherty, dauwhe, laudrain, BenSchroeter, Garth, JunGamo, Rachel, josh, franco, jasminemulliken, mgarrish, George, 16:33:14 Zakim has left #pwg