19:53:43 RRSAgent has joined #dxwgdcat 19:53:43 logging to https://www.w3.org/2019/05/01-dxwgdcat-irc 19:53:45 RRSAgent, make logs public 19:53:45 Zakim has joined #dxwgdcat 19:53:47 Meeting: Dataset Exchange Working Group Teleconference 19:53:47 Date: 01 May 2019 19:54:07 meeting: DXWG DCAT subgroup teleconference 01 May 2019 20:00 UTC 19:54:45 regrets: Alasdair Gray, Erik Mannens, Thomas D'Haenens, Lars Svensson, PWinstanley, RiccardoAlbertoni 19:54:53 regrets+ Makx 19:55:03 regrets+ Alejandra 19:55:22 agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:DCAT-Telecon2019.05.01 19:55:30 rrsagent, drfat minutes v2 19:55:30 I'm logging. I don't understand 'drfat minutes v2', DaveBrowning. Try /msg RRSAgent help 19:55:36 rrsagent, draft minutes v2 19:55:36 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/05/01-dxwgdcat-minutes.html DaveBrowning 20:02:44 SimonCox has joined #dxwgdcat 20:08:59 AndreaPerego has joined #dxwgdcat 20:11:31 present+ 20:11:54 present+ 20:11:57 regrets, pwin, riccardo, alejandra 20:12:02 present+ 20:13:11 scribenick: AndreaPerego 20:13:39 DaveBrowning: So, it's just 3 of us. What we want to talk about? 20:13:59 SimonCox: [explaining the PRs created in the last days] 20:14:36 ... some of them are pretty trivial / editorial. 20:15:13 ... The substantial one is https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/909 20:15:23 ... about spatial / temporal encoding. 20:16:11 ... I think addressing it is useful, also because the geo community didn't address it. 20:17:13 ... For the temporal, AndreaPerego added a DCAT-based solution. I added here an option based on existing vocabularies, in particular OWL-Time. 20:17:48 DaveBrowning: Those different approaches, do we need them? Which is the requirement behind it? 20:19:13 SimonCox: So, e.g., for another temporal-related issue - temporal resolution - we eventually opted for a DCAT-specific solution, simpler than using existing vocabularies as RDF DataCube. 20:20:21 ... AndreaPerego took a similar approach to spatial / temporal coverage, using DCMI. The issue is that neither DCMI nor DCAT 2014 explained how to do that in practice. 20:21:45 ... AndreaPerego, are we using the spatial-related properties only for datasets? 20:22:12 AndreaPerego: I think yes, but in theory they can be used on any dcat:Resource with a spatial coverage. 20:23:31 SimonCox: About the temporal coverage, the addition of OWL-Time is actually an alternative way of doing what can be done with dct:PeriodOfTime. 20:25:41 ... and can support non-Gregorian calendar requirements 20:26:50 ... So, the issue about alternatives is to clarify how they fit different requirements. 20:27:56 AndreaPerego: Yes, I think this can simply done with a short explanation saying what you can do with each option (e.g., only WGS84 vs any CRS). 20:28:01 q+ 20:28:12 ack AndreaPerego 20:28:19 q+ 20:29:57 ANd for Spatial, the WKT options allow fir different CRS, while the w3cgeo soluion is fixed to WGS84 20:29:58 ack DaveBrowning 20:30:06 s/fir/for/ 20:30:38 AndreaPerego: Just to mention that the proposed solutions for spatial / temporal coverage are those adopted in DCAT-AP, and addressing gaps identified in that context. 20:31:09 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:31:09 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/05/01-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 20:33:02 DaveBrowning: I would be in favour of having this included, as spatial / temporal is not something domain-specific. 20:34:04 q+ 20:35:42 SimonCox: AndreaPerego, I'm a bit nervous with using LOCN, because of its adoption limited to Europe. 20:36:39 AndreaPerego: Actually, in the originally issue, I was proposing some alternatives, one of them being the definition of a property dcat:geometry, equivalent to locn:geometry. 20:36:50 SimonCox: This can indeed be another option. 20:37:29 q? 20:37:48 need an example with a CRS 20:38:04 ack AndreaPerego 20:42:41 All: [some discussion of geometry encoding, CRS, et similia] 20:43:50 DaveBrowning: Coming to the status of DCAT, I think we are very close to the final version. So, the question is what we want to bring up in the next meeting as critical. 20:44:17 q+ 20:44:47 ack AndreaPerego 20:47:32 AndreaPerego: One of them is whether we want to keep or move out the alignment with LDP. 20:47:47 DaveBrowning: We need to finish that conversation. 20:52:41 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:52:41 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/05/01-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 20:52:43 proposed: Move LDP into a separate document to preserve, but remove from ED 20:53:37 +1 20:54:13 +1 20:54:15 +1 20:54:33 resolved: Move LDP into a separate document to preserve, but remove from ED 20:54:50 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:54:50 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/05/01-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 20:55:28 DaveBrowning: About what is yet to be done, we need to check the links. But are there other editorial issues to be addressed? 20:56:17 ... I'll put an early agenda for next week, to check if we have finished or not. 20:56:48 ... So, if the answer is yes we can go the plenary for approval. 20:57:14 +1 from me 20:57:36 +1 20:58:02 rrsagent, draft minutes v2 20:58:02 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/05/01-dxwgdcat-minutes.html DaveBrowning 20:58:40 NOTE: Minutes of last meeting not discussed/approved 20:58:43 rrsagent, draft minutes v2 20:58:43 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/05/01-dxwgdcat-minutes.html DaveBrowning 20:59:11 chair: DaveBrowning 20:59:11 [meeting adjourned] 20:59:15 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 20:59:15 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/05/01-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:00:27 s/NOTE:/DaveBrowning: NOTE -/ 21:00:28 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:00:28 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/05/01-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:00:59 s/regrets, pwin, riccardo, alejandra// 21:01:00 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:01:00 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/05/01-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego