01:25:33 Zakim has left #dxwgdcat 20:57:36 RRSAgent has joined #dxwgdcat 20:57:36 logging to https://www.w3.org/2019/02/06-dxwgdcat-irc 20:57:55 Zakim has joined #dxwgdcat 20:58:13 rrsagent, make logs public 20:58:17 rrsagent, make logs public 21:00:51 Meeeting: DCAT-Telecon2019.02.06 21:00:55 SimonCox has joined #dxwgdcat 21:00:57 chair: alejandra 21:01:06 present+ 21:01:23 regrets+ DaveBrowning 21:01:36 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:DCAT-Telecon2019.02.06 21:01:41 present_ 21:01:49 s/present_/ 21:02:18 present+ 21:02:50 PWinstanley has joined #dxwgdcat 21:02:56 rrsagent, generate minutes v2 21:02:56 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/02/06-dxwgdcat-minutes.html alejandra 21:04:59 s/Meeeting: DCAT-Telecon2019.02.06/ 21:05:02 Meeting: DCAT-Telecon2019.02.06 21:05:12 rrsagent, generate minutes v2 21:05:12 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/02/06-dxwgdcat-minutes.html alejandra 21:06:18 present+ 21:06:46 AndreaPerego has joined #dxwgdcat 21:06:56 present+ AndreaPerego 21:07:03 q? 21:07:39 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:DCAT-Telecon2019.02.06 21:07:51 * Simon let us know when you are back 21:08:15 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:08:15 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/02/06-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:08:19 Topic: Confirm agenda 21:08:48 s/* Simon let us know when you are back/ 21:09:14 scribenick: AndreaPerego 21:09:33 alejandra: Any other topic to discuss? 21:10:06 ... And what about thinking about a new PWD? 21:10:10 q? 21:10:29 Topic: Approve minutes from last meeting 21:10:39 https://www.w3.org/2019/01/30-dxwgdcat-minutes 21:10:54 +1 21:10:58 +1 21:11:00 +1 21:11:17 SimonCox: +1 21:11:22 resolved: Approve minutes from last meeting 21:11:28 Topic: Outstanding actions 21:11:33 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:11:33 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/02/06-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:11:41 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/open 21:12:08 PWinstanley: I made some progress on the very old ones 21:12:12 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/726 21:12:21 riccardoAlbertoni_ has joined #dxwgdcat 21:12:28 present+ 21:12:48 closing #173, #174, #197 21:13:28 close action-173 21:13:28 Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel. 21:13:32 close action-174 21:13:32 Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel. 21:13:38 close action-197 21:13:38 Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel. 21:13:51 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:13:51 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/02/06-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:14:29 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/134 21:16:16 AndreaPerego: I will check the current draft and see what text could be integrated 21:16:25 it could go on Introduction: https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#introduction 21:16:40 or in Motivation for change: https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#motivation 21:18:35 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/282 21:19:16 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/270 can be closed 21:19:26 close action-270 21:19:26 Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel. 21:19:49 close action-278 21:19:49 Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel. 21:19:50 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/278 21:21:07 q? 21:21:21 Topic: Public comments list 21:21:24 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:21:24 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/02/06-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:21:35 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-comments/ 21:21:45 alejandra: The most recent ones have been addressed, right? 21:22:26 ... We still have to reply to Ine (and Luca). 21:22:40 AndreaPerego: About Ine's reply, I'll check if we are addressing the issue 21:23:08 action AndreaPerego reply to Ine's message on comments list 21:23:08 Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel. 21:23:22 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-comments/2019Jan/0005.html 21:23:25 q+ 21:24:21 AndreaPerego: This was fixed in the UCR via a PR, and Jaro replied to the mail. 21:24:26 q- 21:24:27 ack AndreaPerego 21:24:31 q? 21:25:30 alejandra: Stephen raised some issues in GH, but we haven't replied on the mailing list. 21:25:41 q? 21:25:52 ... Should we do that, as per possible W3C requirements? 21:26:31 PWinstanley: I would try to be pragmatic here. What is important is getting feedback. 21:26:40 action alejandra check comments list for missing replies 21:26:40 Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel. 21:26:52 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 21:26:52 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/02/06-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 21:27:04 Topic: Review open DCAT pull requests if required 21:27:34 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/735 21:27:44 alejandra: Please review outstanding PRs - some following up from yesterday's sprint 21:28:12 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/730 21:28:25 q? 21:28:25 alejandra: There's also one related to the "bag of files" issue. Should we wait for Makx's review? 21:28:36 PWinstanley: Let's wait for Makx. 21:29:26 SimonCox: I tried to fold his comments in the current examples, so better wait for him. It has no impact on the rest we are doing. 21:29:46 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22due+for+closing%22+label%3A%22dcat%22 21:30:08 alejandra: So, what is left is next sprint planning. And some open issues ^^ 21:30:12 q? 21:30:20 ... Should we look at them? 21:30:27 SimonCox: +1 from me. 21:30:55 alejandra: About https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/224 21:31:09 q? 21:31:15 ... So, should this be for the UCR to decide if it should go in? 21:31:16 yes I agree 21:31:19 PWinstanley: +1 21:31:30 q+ 21:31:39 ack AndreaPerego 21:31:54 AndreaPerego: this can be linked to another action for me 21:32:03 ... about including examples about licensing and rights 21:32:15 ... and how to use the different properties 21:32:42 ... such as odrl:hasPolicy etc 21:32:56 ... I'll get in touch with Nick 21:33:23 action AndreaPerego to add examples related to licensing and rights (see https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/224) 21:33:23 Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel. 21:33:42 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/81 21:34:04 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/651 21:34:36 final 'due for closing': https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/80 21:34:42 About licences and rights there's already a issue in GH: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/676 21:35:50 SimonCox: About #80, this is in a non-normative part, and I'm unsure how long I should go. 21:36:10 ... I tried to illustrate how this alignment with qualified forms can work. 21:36:41 ... Maybe is just for corner cases. 21:37:04 ... But this issue was not addressed systematically. 21:37:28 ... If anyone has an interest in it, please step in. It might end up in a normative section. 21:37:53 alejandra: Indeed it may be a niche thing - and I see the requirement is yet to be approved. 21:38:08 q? 21:38:21 ... Do we keep the issue for the moment, or we are going to close it as we won't be able to address it? 21:39:06 SimonCox: My understanding is a low concern. We can close it. Maybe with a note saying we were not going on with it. 21:39:25 alejandra: Can you make a proposal then? 21:39:27 SimonCox: Yes. 21:40:00 alejandra: So I'll tag the issue so that we can come back to it if we have time. 21:40:18 proposed: label issue 80 as wontfix and close it adding a comment that we are not going to deal with this issue as too specific/niche 21:40:22 +1 21:40:25 +1 21:40:31 +1 21:40:32 +1 21:40:34 +1 21:40:44 resolved: label issue 80 as wontfix and close it adding a comment that we are not going to deal with this issue as too specific/niche 21:41:38 Milestone: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/milestone/14 21:41:51 alejandra: Should we now look in other issues? 21:42:38 ... Quite a few of them are editorial, and Dave is assigned to it. 21:42:40 q? 21:42:51 q+ to ask about editor/contributor list 21:43:00 s/to it/to them/ 21:43:11 ack SimonCox 21:43:11 SimonCox, you wanted to ask about editor/contributor list 21:43:52 SimonCox: About contributors. I think a couple of people on the call made quite a few contributions, so it might be worth giving them full credit. 21:43:59 q? 21:44:03 +1 21:44:08 +1 21:45:37 q+ 21:45:38 SimonCox: About the issue concerning Annette proposal, it is probably still incomplete and relates to a specific case of API automation. 21:45:56 ack PWinstanley 21:46:12 ... The scope is a bit different from the general one. 21:46:16 re list of DCAT editors ... to add riccardoAlbertoni_ and AndreaPerego to list of editors in recognition of their substantial contributions to the document 21:47:03 PWinstanley: I think we should still give it a chance to make the point. 21:48:09 ... I also think the machine-to-machine perspective is worth being considered. 21:48:36 q? 21:48:43 SimonCox: One of the issues is that I don't completely catch Annette's proposal. 21:49:16 ... So I'm concerned on the impact that it may have on the spec. 21:49:59 PWinstanley: I don't disagree, but I think that trying somehow to think of people writing tools when talking about services. 21:50:07 q+ 21:50:43 I'm looking at Annete's proposal here https://agreiner.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#dcat-scope 21:50:47 q? 21:50:48 ... We need to put a bridge. 21:50:54 s/Annete/Annette/ 21:51:43 ack AndreaPerego 21:51:49 alejandra: I do see the value. What is unclear is why we need, e.g, a class instead of a property for this. 21:52:34 AndreaPerego: I was also trying to catch the point made by Annette - one of the things we should consider whether it is or not in scope of DCAT 21:52:44 ... one of the examples was about the description of the interface 21:52:54 ... she was talking about human targetted description of it 21:53:16 ... maybe this information should not be in DCAT but in the API description linked from DCAT such as Swagger, OpenAPI, etc 21:53:27 ... this is what people are using for doing this job 21:53:54 ... description of search capabilities 21:54:18 +1 to AndreaPerego , but we need to be explicit about this 21:54:18 ... we are not saying how to do these things within DCAT, we point to other language specifications that are designed to do the job 21:54:41 ... from a developer perspective, I'd be happy to reuse what is out there rather than having to adapt my code 21:54:42 we need to explicitly delegate 21:54:51 ... I may not be catching completely the point 21:54:59 ... but we could consider if the requirements are or not in scope 21:55:01 q? 21:55:05 +1 to AndreaPerego consideration about the scope 21:55:41 ? does Hydra have something to offer too? 21:56:10 alejandra: Maybe it would be good to have an example to clarify the points. 21:56:35 SimonCox: Yes, I think we should ask Annette to provide examples to move the discussion forward. 21:56:45 q+ 21:57:01 In order to understand the scope of Annette's proposal, need to see a worked example, then we can tell if AndreaPerego response is suffucient 21:57:14 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/675 21:57:37 q? 21:57:41 ack AndreaPerego 21:58:08 AndreaPerego: wanted to reply about PWinstanley comment about Hydra 21:58:18 ... there is one example by Luca Trani 21:58:27 ... and it is yet another way of doing things 21:58:40 ... we don't need to enumerate the specs 21:58:48 ... we say 'use what is out there to do the job' 21:59:04 yess 21:59:25 alejandra: Thanks. We can then close the meeting. 21:59:40 bye 21:59:42 Thanks a lot, bye 21:59:58 [meeting adjourned] 22:00:07 rrsagent, draft minutes v2 22:00:07 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/02/06-dxwgdcat-minutes.html SimonCox 22:02:01 s/action AndreaPerego reply to Ine's message on comments list/action: AndreaPerego to reply to Ine's message on comments list/ 22:02:08 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 22:02:08 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/02/06-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego 22:02:51 s/action alejandra check comments list for missing replies/action: alejandra to check comments list for missing replies/ 22:02:53 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 22:02:53 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/02/06-dxwgdcat-minutes.html AndreaPerego