<CharlesL> chair: clapierre

pressent+

<CharlesL> regrests+ John

<scribe> scribe: becka11y

Charles: We sent out the vocabulary list to web platforms on January 18. We haven’t heard anything back yet.

Janina: Probably time to ping them and ask for a timeline for feedback and direction. Should we include personalization work as part of diagram center strategic upcoming planning meeting?

charles: good idea - I can probably include Janina - will look into that.

<scribe> ACTION: charles to draft a message to web platforms

<trackbot> Created ACTION-6 - Draft a message to web platforms [on Charles LaPierre - due 2019-02-11].

How we track actions

<CharlesL> https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/task-forces/personalization/track/

charles: 3 actions: create a note for symbol; add to abstract that it is derived from other documents; gentle reminder to Web platforms group for feedback on vocabulary
... we will continue to use internal actions system

time line review

<CharlesL> • Oct 2018 (WD Module 1 & Explainer) - note can make a second WD Module 1 & Explainer if needed 2 month later (dec 2018 - so if we have not worked out implementations we have more time

<CharlesL> • Oct 2018 (FPWD Module 2&3) - note These need to be published with the explainer next draft (These are still early drafts so we do not think we need to worry too much.

<CharlesL> • Feb 2019 (CR Module 1 & Explainer)

<CharlesL> • June 2019 (PR Module 1 & Explainer)

<CharlesL> • Nov 2019 (CR Module 2)

<CharlesL> • April 2020 (PR Module 2)

<CharlesL> • Nov 2020 (CR Module 3)

<CharlesL> • April 2021 (PR Module 3)

charles: we did release documents in October 2018 so we were on track; but have now fallen behind
... we are not on track for Feb 2019 for CR module 1 and explainer; we will need to push everything because we haven’t deciced upon an implementation - we need input from Web platforms for that

Janina: feels that group has a good explaination for delays; just need to keep the work moving and continue to make progress

<CharlesL> Possible Time line: * April 2019  Module 1 & Explainer wide review wd

<CharlesL> * May 2019 second wd module two

<CharlesL> * june  2019 (CR Module 1 & Explainer)

<CharlesL> * dec 2019 (PR Module 1 & Explainer)

charles: above is what Lisa and Charles were thinking - feedback?

becka11y: April seems a bit aggressive since we need feedback from web platforms

Charles: does this seem too aggressive? We do need feedback and Web4All hackathon is happening in May - we want to make the best use of time there so it would be beneficial to have an implementation direction

Janina: good to remind web platforms about Web 4 all when we ask for feedback

Charles: Michael submitted the personalization paper (contributed to by Charles and Lisa) to the Web4All conf.
... will be at the conf; Michael is hoping to be there

Becka11y: can’t attend web4all as it conflict’s with Knowbility’s accessU conf

s/confilct’s/conflicts

Michael: when working Web4all paper found some editorial issues - we need a heavy editorial pass on our documents; properties used in examples that are not defined within the spec; there seem to be some redundance and repeated properties;
... not sure if lack of decision on implementation will hold us back from publishing for at least first review

Charles: I have an action to remind Web platform group that we need and are relying on their guidance;

Michael: FYI - they are re-chartering
... there hasn’t been much activity on their mailing list; helpful to at least get a timeline for the vocabulary review from them
... we want them to take up some properties into HTML and we need them to define a process for requesting attribute addition to HTML

Janina: good to be working in cooperation with them

Michael: any official changes to HTML will need to go through WHAT WG - hopefully we can help with that

charles: sent original request for vocabulary review ot public mailing list and directly to chairs;
... due to low attendance will adjourn now since need more input for remaining adgenda items

rrsagend, make minutes

<CharlesL> trackbot, end meeting

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.154  of Date: 2018/09/25 16:35:56  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00)

FAILED: s/confilct’s/conflicts/

WARNING: Replacing list of attendees.
Old list: Becka11y MichaelC CharlesL stevelee Roy Janina Sharon JF LisaSeemanKestenbaum
New list: janina CharlesL stevelee MichaelC

Default Present: janina, CharlesL, stevelee, MichaelC
Present: CharlesL MichaelC janina stevelee
Regrets: Thaddeous John Lisa
Found Scribe: becka11y
Inferring ScribeNick: Becka11y
Found Date: 04 Feb 2019
People with action items: charles

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


WARNING: IRC log location not specified!  (You can ignore this 
warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain 
a link to the original IRC log.)