16:19:11 RRSAgent has joined #pbg 16:19:11 logging to https://www.w3.org/2019/01/29-pbg-irc 16:19:21 Zakim has joined #pbg 16:48:10 rrsagent, set log public 16:48:10 Meeting: Publishing Business Group Telco 16:48:10 Chair: liisa 16:48:10 Date: 2019-01-29 16:48:10 Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-publishingbg/2019Jan/0020.html 16:48:10 ivan has changed the topic to: Meeting Agenda 2019-01-29: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-publishingbg/2019Jan/0020.html 16:50:13 jeff has joined #pbg 16:53:09 wolfgang has joined #pbg 16:54:00 mateus has joined #pbg 16:54:03 regrets+ Garth 16:54:11 present+ 16:57:16 laudrain has joined #pbg 16:57:20 laudrain has left #pbg 16:57:31 laudrain has joined #pbg 16:58:52 present+ 16:58:53 rkwright has joined #pbg 16:59:07 present+ 16:59:12 present+ wolfgang 16:59:17 present+ 17:00:16 present+ 17:00:43 present+ 17:01:07 present+ Karen 17:01:12 scribenick: Karen 17:01:13 liisamk has joined #pbg 17:01:18 George has joined #pbg 17:01:20 present+ 17:01:21 present+ 17:01:36 present+ George 17:01:47 Luc: we have agenda sent by Liisa 17:01:51 Bill_Kasdorf has joined #pbg 17:01:56 present+ 17:02:06 Luc: we will wait another minute or so 17:02:42 ...Let's start 17:02:51 ...Liisa sent an agenda prepared with Daihei and me 17:02:53 present+ 17:03:04 ...resolution taken to make everyone aware 17:03:08 ...even if not at calls 17:03:14 ...we will have two parts in this call 17:03:14 Avneesh has joined #pbg 17:03:23 ...we are trying to structure calls this way 17:03:31 ...first give updates on what is going on, then give broad discussions 17:03:32 julieblair has joined #pbg 17:03:42 present+ 17:03:44 ...We are happy to welcome Daihei as new co-chair of BG, please say hello 17:03:48 Dahei++ 17:03:55 Daihei: Thank you. I am very honored to be a new co-chair 17:04:04 ...working with everyone and such wonderful co-chairs Liisa and Luc 17:04:04 present+ daihei 17:04:18 ...My priority is to enhance and enrich the discussion among the whole Pub BG 17:04:30 q? 17:04:38 ...Liisa does this is North America, Luc in Europe, and I would like to make clear the interests from Asia and Japan 17:04:42 ...very excited to work with all of you 17:04:45 q+ 17:04:48 Luc: Thank you Daihei 17:04:49 ack Jeff 17:04:57 present+ 17:05:00 ack jeff 17:05:01 Jeff: I also want to add my own personal welcome to Daihei as an official co-chair 17:05:09 ...and as long as Daihei mentioned Asia and Japan 17:05:12 present+ liisamk 17:05:19 ...this is a great opportunity to remind everyone that TPAC 2019 is in Japan 17:05:19 present+ Bill_Kasdorf 17:05:24 ...just 8 months away in September 17:05:30 Luc: TPAC in Japan 17:05:31 ...thank you 17:05:43 Topic: EPUB Check 17:05:50 Luc: We have good news on progress 17:05:53 present+ julieblair 17:05:55 ...DAISY Consortium is on time 17:05:59 ...slightly fixed 17:06:04 ...some new translations have been added 17:06:10 ...from what was published a week ago 17:06:25 ...version of EPUB Check inside validator.idpf.org web site 17:06:35 present+ Jonathan_Thurston 17:06:35 ...there are discussions [future] about what to do with this web site 17:06:46 ...next release about 4.2 is already in alpha 17:06:53 ...verifying some very early items of EPUB3.2 17:06:59 present+ leslie 17:07:01 ...especially using the new nuHTMLchecker 17:07:09 ...people have been using it to check 17:07:13 ...development is on time 17:07:17 ...as figure out 17:07:19 present+ wolfgang 17:07:24 ...there is a milestone for payment end of January 17:07:28 ...as everything is ok 17:07:37 ...the Pub Steering Committee is proceeding with payment 17:07:44 ...On the fundraising side of the aspect 17:07:50 ...we have pledges for half of the total that is expected 17:07:57 ...something like $80K is pledged 17:08:00 ...but we are not yet full 17:08:12 ...there is a very important task force to re-launch the call for fundraising 17:08:16 zakim, who is here? 17:08:16 Present: mateus, dauwhe, tzviya, wolfgang, laudrain, rkwright, Karen, jeff, liisamk, George, Bill_Kasdorf, ivan, Avneesh, daihei, julieblair, Jonathan_Thurston, leslie 17:08:20 On IRC I see julieblair, Avneesh, Bill_Kasdorf, George, liisamk, rkwright, laudrain, mateus, wolfgang, jeff, Zakim, RRSAgent, ivan, dauwhe, wendyreid, Karen, tzviya, dmitry, 17:08:20 ... bigbluehat 17:08:27 regrets+ Rachel_Comerford 17:08:29 present+ tzviya 17:08:30 ...have more direct contact to bring this issue to more companies, publishers, distributors, even suppliers of EPUB 17:08:44 ...we hope all of us will do this in the future weeks to have a new table 17:08:49 ...as of today, just 18 companies 17:09:00 ...a small percentage of companies that use EPUB Checker all over the world 17:09:02 q+ 17:09:04 ...So big hope to get more money 17:09:07 q? 17:09:08 ...that is situation today 17:09:10 q+ 17:09:11 ack Tzviya 17:09:21 Tzviya: I want to make it clear that if we don't get the funding 17:09:21 q+ 17:09:29 ...then we might have to look at abandoning the work 17:09:36 ...I know some on this call are looking into it 17:09:38 Daihei has joined #pbg 17:09:44 ...any amount of contribution is appreciated 17:09:53 ...Rachel Comerford has been leading the fundraising effort 17:10:04 ...you know how important this tool is; EPUB starts and stops with this check 17:10:13 ...we don't want to have to stop and start a contract again with DAISY 17:10:15 ack Avneesh 17:10:15 ack Avnish 17:10:17 ack Avneesh 17:10:24 Avnish: regarding the new HTML validator 17:10:30 LHulse has joined #PBG 17:10:35 ...we are using it as a reference, but we have not integrated it 17:10:39 ...HTML schema 17:10:42 ...is what W3C is using 17:10:44 s/Avnish/Avneesh 17:10:51 ...not in plan for now to build EPUB check on it 17:11:03 ...we are using it as a reference to improve the internal schema which is used by EPUB Check 17:11:05 ack Bill_Kasdorf 17:11:06 q? 17:11:09 ack Bill_Kasdorf 17:11:19 Bill_Kasdorf: regarding messaging for a new appeal 17:11:25 ...it would be useful to have a document or a web site 17:11:32 ...that was perhaps touting our success of the first phase 17:11:35 q+ 17:11:38 ...please use new EPUB check 17:11:43 ...and we are working on EPUB3.2 17:11:49 ...I am not offering to create it as I am slammed 17:11:59 ...but we have been planning to fire up the external coordination TF 17:12:05 ...and reach out to more contacts around the world 17:12:12 ...would be nice to have such a document from W3C 17:12:14 ack Luc 17:12:20 present+ cristina 17:12:21 +1 to Bill's idea 17:12:24 Bill_Kasdorf: yes, a blog is good to promote 17:12:29 jyoshii has joined #pbg 17:12:35 ack lau 17:12:40 Luc: I was thinking to write a new blog on what has been achieved until now 17:12:47 ...I will prepare that with Tzviya and post on the W3C blog 17:12:48 q? 17:12:54 Bill-Kasdorf: thank you 17:12:54 preswent+ 17:12:57 Luc: no more comment? 17:13:00 ...thank you 17:13:13 present+ jyoshii 17:13:15 Topic: Rec Track Resolution 17:13:31 Liisa; We have officially resolved to NOT pick up Rec Track for EPUB3.2 17:13:40 q? 17:13:44 ...we resolved this and work continues in EPUBCG 17:13:51 ...bug reporting takes more time 17:13:55 ...need people to commit resources 17:14:06 q? 17:14:11 ...and Pub BG will pick up discussion in Q4, and at TPAC time frame [Sept] 17:14:21 Luc: Karen, would you take next topics on TPI transition 17:14:25 ...we saw you sent mails 17:14:26 scribenick: dauwhe 17:14:28 scribenick; jeff 17:14:34 ack Karen 17:14:49 Karen: this week, it's been two years since the combination and the TPI offer 17:15:08 ... this thursday, the special membership category comes to the end 17:15:20 ... we've spoken to all 44 organizations over the last few months 17:15:37 ... we have several who became members, and several who joined the BG 17:15:47 ... but quite a few will not be continuing at all 17:16:00 ... and those folks will be dropped from the BG 17:16:10 ... they can subscribe to the emails, but not participate in the calls 17:16:13 ... the same for PWG. 17:16:20 Julian_Calderazi has joined #pbg 17:16:26 ... they can follow the work on the mailing list. 17:16:28 present+ 17:16:32 q+ 17:16:33 q+ 17:17:05 scribenick: karen 17:17:20 Liisa: Karen, when you say people can follow the work 17:17:25 scribenick: dauwhe 17:17:31 Karen: they can read what's happening 17:17:36 Cristina has joined #pbg 17:17:39 ... they should be able to respond to the public mailing list 17:17:51 q? 17:17:59 laudrain: they can raise objection on the ML? 17:18:04 Karen: they don't have votes 17:18:04 ack liisamk 17:18:07 q+ 17:18:14 laudrain: there is nothing in the process on BG and CG 17:18:25 ... in working group any objection should be taken seriously 17:18:41 ack jeff 17:18:54 scribenick: Karen 17:19:09 Jeff: WG have signed up for the IPR and commit to the technology 17:19:20 ...BG people can object, but can also be freely ignored 17:19:27 ...in WG if public objects, there is some resonance 17:19:34 q? 17:19:38 ...but not with BG; they can contribute but objections can be ignored 17:19:43 Luc: Ivan, do you have your mic? 17:19:45 ...let's try 17:19:50 Ivan: one more thing 17:20:06 ...the general public can also follow on the GitHub issue list for the Working Group 17:20:10 ...where most of the work happens 17:20:22 q+ 17:20:27 ...but they cannot be solicited for comments, etc. So following work is also possible on GitHub 17:20:35 Luc: If someone has strong objections or opinions 17:20:43 ...they should pay for a membership; there is a solution to that 17:20:48 ...in any case 17:20:55 ...if a company wants to come back to the BG 17:21:03 ...or have a new subscription, it is possible at any time 17:21:05 q? 17:21:09 Ivan: Absolutely 17:21:09 ack laudrain 17:21:20 Luc: no more comments on TPI updates? 17:21:24 ...thank you 17:21:37 ...Liisa, you wanted to introduce for us the new way we would like to work in the future 17:21:44 ...as we discussed on our call with Daihei 17:21:49 Liisa: What we are proposing 17:21:53 Topic: new ways of working 17:21:57 ...is to keep the update section of our meeting short 17:22:03 ...and we take 2-3 topics per month 17:22:12 ...that we define ahead of time so people have time to prepare 17:22:16 ...we have two calls per month 17:22:17 ...same agenda 17:22:27 ...but allowing us to work in two different time zones 17:22:48 ...first Tuesday call of the month is the 12:00pm EST; 6:00pm Europe; not great Japan; and start on discussion on topic 17:23:05 ...then two weeks later we do 7:00pm EST, morning Japan, not great Europe 17:23:16 ...so people can choose which or both calls to participate 17:23:23 ...update discussions, report back 17:23:26 ...to folks from first call 17:23:32 ...let's say we take up a topic 17:23:41 ...and over the two meetings we discuss worldwide 17:23:58 ...see if we need to develop task forces to continue work on the topics outside of these calls 17:24:06 ...we think this will help with better worldwide participate 17:24:16 ...and that we are clear on what topics are important for different parts of the world 17:24:27 +1 to this plan 17:24:28 ...and simultaneously work on things that are important in different areas 17:24:30 q? 17:24:32 ...questions? 17:24:44 George: I think that sounds really good 17:24:45 present+ george 17:24:45 q+ George 17:24:47 q+ 17:24:52 ...the email list for asynchronous communication 17:24:54 ack George 17:24:54 ack George 17:24:57 ...is something we can always rely on 17:25:02 ...to discuss different items any time 17:25:07 Liisa: absolutely 17:25:10 ack Daihei 17:25:11 ack Daihei 17:25:19 Daihei: in addition to what Liisa explained 17:25:26 ...we want everyone to come into the meeting and to speak out 17:25:30 ...and to give their input 17:25:41 ...whether from company, industry, global perspectives 17:25:43 ...in the past 17:25:52 ...the time friendliness was lacking 17:26:14 Yoshii-san ++ 17:26:20 ...luckily I am based in California, so it's 9:30am, but for Japanese colleagues it's 2:30am 17:26:24 ...this helps to solve that 17:26:27 ...and in between the two meetings 17:26:33 q+ 17:26:35 ...the topics come afterwards 17:26:44 ...and I can communicate with Japan and other Asian countries 17:26:47 q+ 17:26:59 ...to relay information and solicit them to come to the Asia-friendly conference call 17:27:12 ...so with the two meetings, hope the global interest and more consensus can be built 17:27:16 q? 17:27:19 ack Avneesh 17:27:31 Avneesh: Good to have same list of topics 17:27:35 ...that will help to do the job 17:27:48 ...also talk about it's Japan friendly, so it's 5:30am for me 17:27:49 q+ 17:28:00 ...not so good for Eastern Europe and Eastern continenent 17:28:07 q? 17:28:11 ...most calls happen at this time, and I cannot do 5:30am calls 17:28:19 Luc: thank you Avneesh, important to know 17:28:22 ack Tzviya 17:28:36 Tzviya: I have been trying to coordinate one call with WG members from Asia to assess the needs 17:28:48 ...as Avneesh mentioned, there are a number of time zones in Asia 17:29:01 ...I will include Daihei on that email, and Liisa and Luc as well for that initial call 17:29:08 ...I definitely support this 17:29:08 +1 to the WG call and BG participation 17:29:14 ...We do have a number of members who are not in Japan 17:29:18 q+ 17:29:24 ...I will forward the email I sent out to the chairs for coordination 17:29:29 ack liisamk 17:29:30 ...let me know if I left anyone out 17:29:41 Liisamk: Avneesh, thank you for bringing that up 17:29:55 aI always wear pajama. 17:30:03 ...Luc, Daihei, we owe everyone an update on if we can find a more friendly time zone to call all of Asia 17:30:04 q+ 17:30:07 ack Jeff 17:30:12 Jeff: I wanted to mention 17:30:22 ...the time which is currently used as the US/Europe time, noon EST 17:30:31 ...I wonder if we could move that up a couple of hours 17:30:37 ...to be barely ok for West Coast 17:30:52 q? 17:30:52 ...better for Europe, and may still be within the working day for India 17:31:07 Luc: Daihei, what do you think about a couple hours earlier? 17:31:14 Daihei: someone is going to have to suffer 17:31:21 someone always suffers where digital publishing is concerned... 17:31:24 ...it is very hard to find times in global time zones 17:31:33 ...one for US/Europe, the other for Asia friendly 17:31:52 Jeff is suggesting that for the US/EU-friendly call, not the Asia-friendly time, correct? 17:32:00 ...Avneesh, we will go over that again, the India time zone difference 17:32:01 ack Avneesh 17:32:03 ack Avneesh 17:32:18 yes, Bill, but it is tough for San Diego people like Daihei 17:32:19 Avneesh: the Accessibility guidelines are doing US/Europe and Europe/Asia 17:32:30 ...one call is 1500UTC; the other is 900UTC 17:32:37 ...covers everyone from London to Australia 17:32:40 ...this kind of model 17:32:43 ...as an example 17:32:49 Luc: thank you for this information 17:33:03 ...as Daihei and Liisa said, we will discuss among the chairs and bring some proposals 17:33:09 q? 17:33:15 ...Liisa explained the timing and the stuff we want to discuss on these calls 17:33:22 ...if no more comment, we can take next topic 17:33:31 Topic: Conferences in 2019 and 2020 17:33:46 ...we think we have to discuss earlier for how we make people aware of work in W#C 17:33:49 s/w3C 17:34:00 ...either unique events or partnering with existing conferences 17:34:11 q? 17:34:14 q+ 17:34:15 ...the Digital Publishing Summit, being organized 25-26 June in Paris 17:34:16 q+ 17:34:22 ...is a very important conference 17:34:37 ...I will be involved on the program committee, and there is a lot of W3C information to share in this conference 17:34:39 ...that is one point 17:34:41 ack Liisa 17:34:45 Liisamk: I would know 17:34:49 ack liisamk 17:34:58 ...we talked about this with the Publishing Steering Committee on Friday 17:35:06 ...we should figure out what conferences are important to us 17:35:19 ...and from overall W3C perspective, discuss how the work is being represented well enough 17:35:30 ...so people realize that it is important and how it impacts their world 17:35:40 ...we talked about ebookcraft, Toronto, DigPub Summit in Paris 17:35:48 ...we realized that a lot of conferences are about books and trade 17:35:59 q? 17:36:01 ...and we are trying to figure out conferences for education and scholarly publishing 17:36:05 ack dauwhe 17:36:05 ack Dauwhe 17:36:15 Dauwhe: I think we should also figure out what we are trying to accomplish 17:36:21 ...being at conferences is a means to an end 17:36:39 ...we want to communicate to people outside of the people who normally listen to us; spread the word; invite people to join us 17:36:44 ...we also want to have dialogue 17:36:47 q+ 17:36:57 ...to have the kinds of conversations we had last week at the AB-Pub meet-up 17:37:06 ...question is how we facilitate these kinds of conversations 17:37:11 ...conferences are one venue 17:37:19 ...challenges of resources, budgets, travel 17:37:25 Luc: thank you, Dave 17:37:27 ack Luc 17:37:43 Laudrain: I want to emphasize what Dave said 17:37:51 ...the DigPub Summit is not only what we do at W3C 17:38:00 ...but interesting to have different facets discussed 17:38:04 ...and make it aware to people 17:38:11 ...will be to a specific publishing audience 17:38:24 ...but we could also have a workshop or small group discussing technical, business issues 17:38:30 q+ 17:38:35 ...and interesting to have all that kind of stuff tested and prepared in that conference 17:38:36 ack laudrain 17:38:41 ...and try to get some information about adoption 17:38:45 ...perspectives on what is going on 17:38:55 ...and how publishers can imagine engaging to these new standards 17:39:03 ...like web audo books, visual narratives 17:39:14 ...EDRLab is very interested and engaged with Readium 17:39:22 s/audo/audio/ 17:39:30 ...and the visual narrative group at W3C is important to learn about 17:39:35 ...and communicate more broadly 17:39:43 ...as Dave said, it's not the only way to communicate 17:39:54 ...we talked about the small group meet-up with AB 17:40:00 ...and see if this can be reproduced 17:40:18 ...there are also large conferences on education, accessibility, STEM, where we should consider to be present 17:40:19 ack Jeff 17:40:31 Jeff: I think like you said, Dave asked a great question 17:40:37 ...I wanted to provide a perspective 17:40:46 q+ 17:40:50 ...My impression is that IDPF was both a spec factory but also a bit of a trade group 17:40:54 ...the merge into W3C 17:41:03 ...we maintained the spec factory, but did less on the trade group 17:41:09 ...for question on what we are trying to achieve 17:41:16 ...we want to restore that capability that IDPF 17:41:18 ...had 17:41:25 ...when I spoke with TPIs that did not continue 17:41:36 ...many said they were in IDPF for the trade piece, not the spec piece 17:41:40 ...so what does it do? 17:41:44 q+ 17:41:49 ...it popularizes, evangelizes, builds a community 17:41:53 ...those are higher level goals 17:42:04 ...conferences are a piece of it 17:42:08 ...and goal is to build a community 17:42:13 ...especially for the EPUB family specs 17:42:18 ack LHulse 17:42:31 Leslie: I see this is a continuation of conversation about audio books conversation 17:42:46 ...I have concerns whether there is a broad enough community in audio that is aware of work being doe 17:42:55 ...and if they have responded to the perceived business need 17:43:00 s/doe/done/ 17:43:04 ...slightly different topic than conferences 17:43:21 ...but I agree with Jeff there is a gap in having that trade group forum for discussion and sharing of information 17:43:28 ...would make sense to have a meet-up or a webinar 17:43:33 ...to have a broader conversation 17:43:37 q? 17:43:42 ...share explainers, materials put together by WG 17:44:04 ...concerned that you have three strong audio players participating, but four are not, and not so many publishers 17:44:08 +1 17:44:14 +1 17:44:16 +1 to LHulse 17:44:17 ...I think we should pause and solicit specific feedback on this topic [audio books] 17:44:20 q+ 17:44:22 q+ 17:44:31 ...we should intentionally broaden the conversation 17:44:32 ack tzviya 17:44:36 ack Tzviya 17:44:41 Tzviya: I agree with Leslie 17:44:50 ...conferences by IDPF were not so exciting 17:44:57 ...even meet-ups take a lot of work to do 17:45:00 ...I like webinars idea 17:45:02 q+ 17:45:09 ...and Leslie's suggestion to solicit feedback 17:45:16 ...the explainer doc in WG is a great way to do that 17:45:20 ...expect to have that end of week 17:45:27 ...maybe do a formal feedback in the BG 17:45:31 ...and webinars is another way 17:45:34 q+ 17:45:34 q+ 17:45:38 ...rather than a full-fledged conference 17:45:42 ack liisamk 17:45:51 ack liisamk 17:46:01 Liisamk: not about having one, but see which conferences are relevant to tack on conversations 17:46:02 Jonathan_Greenberg has joined #pbg 17:46:17 ...to Leslie's point on audio, we need to take back into the Pub BG 17:46:22 ...help people understand what is happening 17:46:30 ...even more true as the TPI access separates 17:46:40 q? 17:46:40 ...energy to participate; we need to find a better mechanism 17:46:44 ack Dauwhe 17:46:51 Dauwhe: Bit thumbs up to what Leslie said 17:46:57 ...this means there is homework for many of us 17:47:09 s/Bit/Big/ 17:47:14 ...I need to engage with Hachette's audio publishers, Leslie with HC and Liisa with PRH 17:47:19 ...those who work on audio books 17:47:33 ...we need to try to bring them into this conversation and at least get their feedback on what's going on 17:47:52 Luc: with EDRLab we visited the main audiobook publishers and made them aware of what's at stake 17:48:02 ...not sure if there is a list of audio books publishers 17:48:22 ...these people are outside the circles of our conversations; would be interesting to have a global list of audio book publishers 17:48:29 ...do a Q&A, get questions from them 17:48:30 q? 17:48:34 ack laudrain 17:48:40 ack Bill_Kasdorf 17:48:58 Bill_Kasdorf: two comments 17:49:00 ...one is that 17:49:23 ...the value of a conference is not the formal conference itself, it's the fact that a whole lot of people with common interests are in same room at same time 17:49:39 ...main reason NY meet-up worked well last week, is concentration of trade publishers is in NYC 17:49:44 ...but not true for scholarly 17:49:49 ...SSP in May 17:50:05 ...STM major commercial publishers do STM Week in London 17:50:13 ...those orgs capitalize on the fact that folks are there 17:50:21 ...Coko Foundation had a one-day event in London 17:50:31 q? 17:50:34 ...it was not an STM event, but they held it in London because many people were there 17:50:35 q+ 17:50:45 ...also comment on the value of the AB meetup in NYC [last Wed] 17:50:53 ...Leslie mentioned specific invite to audio books 17:51:02 ...makes me think about the EDUPUB Spec 17:51:09 ...we had an invitational meeting 17:51:16 ...we were at stage in development of that spec 17:51:24 ...we know who these people are, get them in a room and talk about this 17:51:31 ...it was very productive and very luminating 17:51:39 ...One of the main lightbulbs 17:51:59 ...was that they were not as interested in EPUB as a distribution spec, but more for infrastructure development 17:52:04 ...that kind of meeting is good to do 17:52:09 ...bringing these up 17:52:29 ...even if only invitation-only, doing it where they are already traveling for something else, you could do an evening event 17:52:36 ...without conflicting with the conference they are there for 17:52:44 ack LHulse 17:53:05 LHulse: a couple points 17:53:20 ...for audio, the org to reach out to is the Audio Publishers Association in the US; not sure if int'l 17:53:26 ...I am happy to host an in-person event 17:53:33 ...they don't have their big conference coming up now 17:53:35 ...figure out what works 17:53:44 ...maybe goes back to what happens to membership transition 17:53:49 ...not clear what is visible 17:53:53 ...what is open to general public 17:53:59 ...not sure what they can access 17:54:03 Luc: good question 17:54:14 ...Dave answered they are public 17:54:15 q? 17:54:18 ack Ivan 17:54:19 https://github.com/w3c/wpub/blob/master/explainers/audio-explainer.md 17:54:28 Ivan: Dave has answered the last question of Leslie 17:54:28 lhulse has joined #pbg 17:54:29 https://github.com/w3c/wpub/blob/master/explainers/wpub-explainer.md 17:54:38 ...any document produced by W3C are publicly available 17:54:49 ...all the drafts and final specs are public 17:54:58 ...I think next steps are to take explicit actions 17:55:08 ...the community should plan to be present at the December STM week 17:55:15 ...I think we should actively start that now 17:55:18 q+ 17:55:28 ...as Tzviya said, organizing any kind of meeting is a lot of work 17:55:33 ...same for Audio Association 17:55:42 ...we should task ourselves 17:55:54 ...combining that with an invitation only event sounds like a great idea 17:56:09 q? 17:56:10 ...but also try to organize a webinar or Q&A via some telco for those who cannot travel 17:56:15 ...get a 1-1.5 hour telco 17:56:18 ...with the audio community 17:56:24 ...and a discussion sounds like a good idea 17:56:32 ...my main message is that we have to organize this 17:56:38 ...we cannot be passive 17:56:43 ack laudrain 17:57:00 Luc: to summarize, we have the Digital Publishing Summit in June 17:57:19 ...Daihei is looking to see if we can do something with APL timed with TPAC in Japan 17:57:28 ...And coordinate with BillK on STM for December 17:57:36 ...and the audio community, and this has to be prepared 17:57:45 q+ 17:57:46 ...do we have some kind of task force for the audio community 17:57:56 Ivan: I think Tzviya said @@ 17:58:00 ack tzviya 17:58:12 Tzviya: Leslie, if I can put Wendy in touch with you, the group has not been responsive 17:58:17 Audio Publisher's Association will be in NY for events on March 4 https://www.audiopub.org/members/events 17:58:18 Luc: good, some kind of action in progress here 17:58:23 ...ok 17:58:28 thank you very much for that 17:58:32 ...we are nearly at end of the hour 17:58:41 ...we explored the discussions we had with Daihei and Liisa 17:58:50 ...next steps are to set up this new way to work every two weeks 17:58:54 ...and figure out a better time for Asia 17:59:00 ...and ask Garth to change the invitations 17:59:05 ...so we have invitations in our agendas 17:59:14 q? 17:59:18 ...More comments, final comments from you, Liisa or Daihei 17:59:32 Liisa: I think I could blog about the AB meet-up since we did not have time to talk about it 17:59:32 +1 to Liisa blog 17:59:33 +1 17:59:39 Luc: ok 17:59:47 Liisa+1 17:59:54 Luc: thank you, very good idea 18:00:00 ...Daihei, ok for you? 18:00:03 Daihei: yes, ok 18:00:12 Luc: thank you to all of you; have a good day or night; talk to you soon 18:00:15 rrsagent, draft minutes 18:00:15 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2019/01/29-pbg-minutes.html ivan 18:00:15 zakim, bye 18:00:15 rrsagent, bye 18:00:15 I see no action items 18:00:15 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been mateus, dauwhe, tzviya, wolfgang, laudrain, rkwright, Karen, jeff, liisamk, George, Bill_Kasdorf, ivan, Avneesh, daihei, 18:00:15 Zakim has left #pbg 18:00:16 adjourned